Is the sun toxic?

Swan wrote:

That said being mentally ill as you are is not a crime unless you are deemed a threat to society or yourself. However a judge would still order you to be evaluated at a mental facility for everyones safety.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

It is a crime to lie and say that you took that picture, because you did not. .

I did take the picture in my signature during the 2017 California wildfires.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

It is a crime to lie and say that you took that picture, because you did not. .

I did take the picture in my signature during the 2017 California wildfires.

What kind of camera and lens? Bye the way that kind of lens refraction happens all the time with light sources, as I have taken thousands of photos with either lens refraction or atmospheric refraction or bokeh, there are even filters to achieve such an effect. Could even be a shutter misfire inside the camera, at any rate you are mentally incapable of understanding that camera's only photograph what is there, so you would have seen two suns so it was not there. You on the other hand are clearly too dumb or overeducated to the point that you forgot that camera's have a moving mirror. A real photographer takes thousands of photos just to get one because cameras misfire in hundreds of ways all the time. Only a psycho calls a lens refraction proof of glass around the Earth.

So in order to be as dumb as you seem you would actually need a Masters or better degree in abnormal psych. So there is no longer anything for you to achieve here Vlad

CIAO

Spongy Iris wrote:

[img][/img]

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

It is a crime to lie and say that you took that picture, because you did not. .

I did take the picture in my signature during the 2017 California wildfires.

What kind of camera and lens? Bye the way that kind of lens refraction happens all the time with light sources, as I have taken thousands of photos with either lens refraction or atmospheric refraction or bokeh, there are even filters to achieve such an effect. Could even be a shutter misfire inside the camera, at any rate you are mentally incapable of understanding that camera's only photograph what is there, so you would have seen two suns so it was not there. You on the other hand are clearly too dumb or overeducated to the point that you forgot that camera's have a moving mirror. A real photographer takes thousands of photos just to get one because cameras misfire in hundreds of ways all the time. Only a psycho calls a lens refraction proof of glass around the Earth.

So in order to be as dumb as you seem you would actually need a Masters or better degree in abnormal psych. So there is no longer anything for you to achieve here Vlad

CIAO

It was my old LG cell phone, I think a 2015 model.

I know what I'm looking at. A reflection of the Sun in glass, and the actual Sun behind the glass. I can also see this effect with my own two eyes if I look at the Sun out of the corner of my eye. So there is no doubt.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

[img][/img]

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

It is a crime to lie and say that you took that picture, because you did not. .

I did take the picture in my signature during the 2017 California wildfires.

What kind of camera and lens? Bye the way that kind of lens refraction happens all the time with light sources, as I have taken thousands of photos with either lens refraction or atmospheric refraction or bokeh, there are even filters to achieve such an effect. Could even be a shutter misfire inside the camera, at any rate you are mentally incapable of understanding that camera's only photograph what is there, so you would have seen two suns so it was not there. You on the other hand are clearly too dumb or overeducated to the point that you forgot that camera's have a moving mirror. A real photographer takes thousands of photos just to get one because cameras misfire in hundreds of ways all the time. Only a psycho calls a lens refraction proof of glass around the Earth.

So in order to be as dumb as you seem you would actually need a Masters or better degree in abnormal psych. So there is no longer anything for you to achieve here Vlad

CIAO

It was my old LG cell phone, I think a 2015 model.

I know what I'm looking at. A reflection of the Sun in glass, and the actual Sun behind the glass. I can also see this effect with my own two eyes if I look at the Sun out of the corner of my eye. So there is no doubt.

Actually it is a reflection caused by glass. The glass in your phone's camera lens. If not your eyes would see two sun's, so are you done Vlad?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

[img][/img]

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

It is a crime to lie and say that you took that picture, because you did not. .

I did take the picture in my signature during the 2017 California wildfires.

What kind of camera and lens? Bye the way that kind of lens refraction happens all the time with light sources, as I have taken thousands of photos with either lens refraction or atmospheric refraction or bokeh, there are even filters to achieve such an effect. Could even be a shutter misfire inside the camera, at any rate you are mentally incapable of understanding that camera's only photograph what is there, so you would have seen two suns so it was not there. You on the other hand are clearly too dumb or overeducated to the point that you forgot that camera's have a moving mirror. A real photographer takes thousands of photos just to get one because cameras misfire in hundreds of ways all the time. Only a psycho calls a lens refraction proof of glass around the Earth.

So in order to be as dumb as you seem you would actually need a Masters or better degree in abnormal psych. So there is no longer anything for you to achieve here Vlad

CIAO

It was my old LG cell phone, I think a 2015 model.

I know what I'm looking at. A reflection of the Sun in glass, and the actual Sun behind the glass. I can also see this effect with my own two eyes if I look at the Sun out of the corner of my eye. So there is no doubt.

Actually it is a reflection caused by glass. The glass in your phone's camera lens. If not your eyes would see two sun's, so are you done Vlad?

Are you listening? I can also see this effect with my own two eyes if I look at the Sun out of the corners of my eyes.

Spongy Iris wrote:Meteorites must be shot by UFOs flying a bit under 30 miles high.

IBdaMann wrote:

Do you accept satellite imagery, i.e. Google maps, etc...

Do you accept that US special forces plan and conduct operations based on the imagery they receive from some source that is overhead the target they wish to examine/study and even reconstruct (as a replica/mockup) for training and rehearsal purposes?

.

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
Do you accept satellite imagery, i.e. Google maps, etc...

Do you accept that US special forces plan and conduct operations based on the imagery they receive from some source that is overhead the target they wish to examine/study and even reconstruct (as a replica/mockup) for training and rehearsal purposes?

Ya sure, some source.

On 05/14/2022 Spongy Iris wrote:
Just look at my signature.(double sun image) There's your proof.

On 05/16/2022 Spongy Iris wrote:
Just so you know, this picture was taken outdoors. But the double sun image would not occur unless it is shining through glass.

Spongy Iris wrote:
I am of a sound mind.

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
Do you accept satellite imagery, i.e. Google maps, etc...

Do you accept that US special forces plan and conduct operations based on the imagery they receive from some source that is overhead the target they wish to examine/study and even reconstruct (as a replica/mockup) for training and rehearsal purposes?

Ya sure, some source.

Thank you. So what this means is that you have to preface your belief with your admission that you simply do not accept the scientific method, preferring instead to believe what you believe.

You claim that there is glass surrounding the earth, impenetrable to NASA and other human forces, ... as well as invulnerable to even mountainous meteors with enough kinetic energy to otherwise leave a huge crater in a planet.

Along comes the NRO (National Reconaissance Office) and they are unaware of any such planetary glass enclosure. The NRO contracts with an engineering firm to design and build an imagery satellite that is to orbit the planet well above this glass enclosure of which they are unaware. THe NRO coordinates with NASA to launch the satellite into this orbit well above the glass enclosure of which they are unaware.

The NRO has a plan. They have a list of Top Secret targets of which they greatly want hi-res imagery. National interests and many political agendas will be bolstered by such imagery once it is obtained. The NRO simply does not divulge this list of targets.

The engineering firm is happy to take the NRO's money. They too are unaware of any glass enclosure surrounding the planet.

The day comes that the satellite is launched and ... lo' and behold, there is no crashing into any glass ceiling. Lo' and behold, when the NRO tasks the satellite to capture imagery of the desired targets, the NRO receives the desired imagery which is quickly exploited by thousands of analysts in preparing intelligence products for senior leaders.

In scientific terms, your theory has been successfully falsified.

There is no reason any rational adult should believe your claims.

While you are certainly welcome to remain a glass-earther, I would ask you what you get out of holding onto this belief.

Otherwise, I have said all I need to say.

.

GasGuzzler wrote:
I'm just so confused...

The double sun image was first posted by Spongy on May 14th this year with a new thread Titled Proof That Too Much CO2 Is An Existential Threat followed by the claim...

On 05/14/2022 Spongy Iris wrote:
Just look at my signature.(double sun image) There's your proof.

One would naturally think that Spongy is claiming the double image was caused by CO2 overstock in the atmosphere.

But wait!

On 05/16/2022 Spongy Iris wrote:
Just so you know, this picture was taken outdoors. But the double sun image would not occur unless it is shining through glass.

Which is it? CO2 or glass?

But that not all folks!!!
On 08/03/22 Spongy made this wild claim!....

Spongy Iris wrote:
I am of a sound mind.

As much as it pains me to a agree with Swank, I think you need to seek out professional help.

Spongy Iris wrote:
There have been no reasonable explanations for my double sun image, nor the one in the following link, other than, the Earth is in a glass enclosure "Heaven."

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna41927089

All your stupid comments amount to is chants of You're Crazy and In NASA We Trust.

Spongy Iris wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
I'm just so confused...

The double sun image was first posted by Spongy on May 14th this year with a new thread Titled Proof That Too Much CO2 Is An Existential Threat followed by the claim...

On 05/14/2022 Spongy Iris wrote:
Just look at my signature.(double sun image) There's your proof.

One would naturally think that Spongy is claiming the double image was caused by CO2 overstock in the atmosphere.

But wait!

On 05/16/2022 Spongy Iris wrote:
Just so you know, this picture was taken outdoors. But the double sun image would not occur unless it is shining through glass.

Which is it? CO2 or glass?

But that not all folks!!!
On 08/03/22 Spongy made this wild claim!....

Spongy Iris wrote:
I am of a sound mind.

As much as it pains me to a agree with Swank, I think you need to seek out professional help.

Do you know how a dry ice bomb works?

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
There have been no reasonable explanations for my double sun image, nor the one in the following link, other than, the Earth is in a glass enclosure "Heaven."

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna41927089

All your stupid comments amount to is chants of You're Crazy and In NASA We Trust.

There is no double sun in the image, the one sun was refracted by the atmosphere which resulted in a cheap LG smartphone camera experiencing further lens reflection. This happens all the time kid, but in your mind it is because the Earth is in glass.

This is all common knowledge to educated folks such as me, not that you can or could grasp my real IQ





LOL this must be a test of the American emergency broad cast system, for turkeys.

GasGuzzler wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
I'm just so confused...

The double sun image was first posted by Spongy on May 14th this year with a new thread Titled Proof That Too Much CO2 Is An Existential Threat followed by the claim...

On 05/14/2022 Spongy Iris wrote:
Just look at my signature.(double sun image) There's your proof.

One would naturally think that Spongy is claiming the double image was caused by CO2 overstock in the atmosphere.

But wait!

On 05/16/2022 Spongy Iris wrote:
Just so you know, this picture was taken outdoors. But the double sun image would not occur unless it is shining through glass.

Which is it? CO2 or glass?

But that not all folks!!!
On 08/03/22 Spongy made this wild claim!....

Spongy Iris wrote:
I am of a sound mind.

As much as it pains me to a agree with Swank, I think you need to seek out professional help.

Do you know how a dry ice bomb works?

Do you know how a camera works?

If there were a glass ceiling on the atmosphere, should there not be 3 suns in the pic?

1. The sun
2. The reflective image on the glass ceiling
3. The reflective image from the camera lens

I just took this pic through my truck windshield. 3 images.

Spongy Iris wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
I'm just so confused...

The double sun image was first posted by Spongy on May 14th this year with a new thread Titled Proof That Too Much CO2 Is An Existential Threat followed by the claim...

On 05/14/2022 Spongy Iris wrote:
Just look at my signature.(double sun image) There's your proof.

One would naturally think that Spongy is claiming the double image was caused by CO2 overstock in the atmosphere.

But wait!

On 05/16/2022 Spongy Iris wrote:
Just so you know, this picture was taken outdoors. But the double sun image would not occur unless it is shining through glass.

Which is it? CO2 or glass?

But that not all folks!!!
On 08/03/22 Spongy made this wild claim!....

Spongy Iris wrote:
I am of a sound mind.

As much as it pains me to a agree with Swank, I think you need to seek out professional help.

Do you know how a dry ice bomb works?

Do you know how a camera works?

If there were a glass ceiling on the atmosphere, should there not be 3 suns in the pic?

1. The sun
2. The reflective image on the glass ceiling
3. The reflective image from the camera lens

I just took this pic through my truck windshield. 3 images.

That's a nice image.

But not all pictures of the Sun result in lens reflection. If wildfire smoke has dimmed the sun's brightness, you won't get lens reflection. See below.



Also notice that your reflections, in both the lens, and windshield, are much smaller than the sun, and they are a far distance from the sun.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
There have been no reasonable explanations for my double sun image, nor the one in the following link, other than, the Earth is in a glass enclosure "Heaven."

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna41927089

All your stupid comments amount to is chants of You're Crazy and In NASA We Trust.

There is no double sun in the image, the one sun was refracted by the atmosphere which resulted in a cheap LG smartphone camera experiencing further lens reflection. This happens all the time kid, but in your mind it is because the Earth is in glass.

This is all common knowledge to educated folks such as me, not that you can or could grasp my real IQ





LOL this must be a test of the American emergency broad cast system, for turkeys.

I don't care about your IQ. But you don't seem to me as very intelligent because you can't even grasp my simple explanations. Maybe you are suffering from a mental block.

It was not lens reflection. Below is an example of lens reflection. See lower left. Notice how much smaller the sun reflected in the lens is. Also notice the greater distance it is from the sun photographed, unlike my signature image where they are very close together and almost the same size.



It is indeed a reflection. Nitrogen and oxygen can't reflect the circle of the sun. However Heaven's glass does.

GasGuzzler wrote:

Also notice that your reflections, in both the lens, and windshield, are much smaller than the sun, and they are a far distance from the sun.

Swan wrote:

Give your simple explanations to a medical doctor, seriously I challenge you to do this. Seriously you are the only lunatic on Earth who believes that the Earth is encased in glass.

Who made the glass, and why, and where did the raw material for the glass come from, how was the glass smelted? The fact is that you have not one friend in the World to talk too and that you pose these ruses just to gather the attention that you need to function.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Give your simple explanations to a medical doctor, seriously I challenge you to do this. Seriously you are the only lunatic on Earth who believes that the Earth is encased in glass.

Who made the glass, and why, and where did the raw material for the glass come from, how was the glass smelted? The fact is that you have not one friend in the World to talk too and that you pose these ruses just to gather the attention that you need to function.

Gas lighting. Psycho babble.

Who made the Earth and Universe?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Give your simple explanations to a medical doctor, seriously I challenge you to do this. Seriously you are the only lunatic on Earth who believes that the Earth is encased in glass.

Who made the glass, and why, and where did the raw material for the glass come from, how was the glass smelted? The fact is that you have not one friend in the World to talk too and that you pose these ruses just to gather the attention that you need to function.

Gas lighting. Psycho babble.

Who made the Earth and Universe?

Into the Night wrote:How do you know the Universe was 'made'?

Into the Night wrote:What was it 'made' from?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Give your simple explanations to a medical doctor, seriously I challenge you to do this. Seriously you are the only lunatic on Earth who believes that the Earth is encased in glass.

Who made the glass, and why, and where did the raw material for the glass come from, how was the glass smelted? The fact is that you have not one friend in the World to talk too and that you pose these ruses just to gather the attention that you need to function.

Gas lighting. Psycho babble.

Who made the Earth and Universe?

Swan wrote:

Give your simple explanations to a medical doctor, seriously I challenge you to do this. Seriously you are the only lunatic on Earth who believes that the Earth is encased in glass.

Who made the glass, and why, and where did the raw material for the glass come from, how was the glass smelted? The fact is that you have not one friend in the World to talk too and that you pose these ruses just to gather the attention that you need to function.

But you are the only human alive that believes that the Earth is encased in glass, so where did you learn what you claim to know as it could not have come from any other human. So did the Mars Attacks aliens tell you? because they are encased in glass too?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Give your simple explanations to a medical doctor, seriously I challenge you to do this. Seriously you are the only lunatic on Earth who believes that the Earth is encased in glass.

Who made the glass, and why, and where did the raw material for the glass come from, how was the glass smelted? The fact is that you have not one friend in the World to talk too and that you pose these ruses just to gather the attention that you need to function.

But you are the only human alive that believes that the Earth is encased in glass, so where did you learn what you claim to know as it could not have come from any other human. So did the Mars Attacks aliens tell you? because they are encased in glass too?

Swan I have told you before where I first found the evidence of the glass sky. Here is the link again.

https://www.wildheretic.com/there-is-glass-in-the-sky/

You're quite forgetful aren't you?

This is not something I believe. I have come to know it. All reasonable doubt is gone.

Please reply to me again Swan because I love your attention.

Ack ack ack ack.

Spongy Iris wrote:Gas lighting. Psycho babble.

Who made the Earth and Universe?

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Gas lighting. Psycho babble.

Who made the Earth and Universe?

http://bear.sbszoo.com/sable/sable3.htm

Spongy Iris, please visit the above link.

The image was taken at 117,597 feet (22.24 Miles, 35.8Km) over Alberta. There is clear visibility in all directions, especially out over the horizon.

Please point out the copper and the glass.

.

Swan wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GDJWuCSPEo

Swan wrote:

Also is the moon inside or outside the glass? I love a coconut rum blue Hawaiian as opposed to your love of meth.

Spongy Iris wrote:So you must know that balloon didn't get high enough to see the glass (~60 miles) and copper (~30 miles).

Spongy Iris wrote:But there is an indication I can tell you. It's the color of blue.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Also is the moon inside or outside the glass? I love a coconut rum blue Hawaiian as opposed to your love of meth.

The Moon obviously appears to be outside the glass. The glass I think is only 2 layers at 60 and 90 miles.

Unless you're referring to the moon in some other symbolic means...

You do keep referencing symbolism from the TV show, Breaking Bad...

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:So you must know that balloon didn't get high enough to see the glass (~60 miles) and copper (~30 miles).

The balloon specifically got high enough to see the curvature of the earth and off into space. It was totally clear in all directions and in it, I can see out thousands of miles above the earth.

One more time, I can see out to points thousands of miles above the earth. I can easily see a mere 7.7 miles out above the camera level. I can easily see out 70 miles above the camera level.

Do you remember anything at all from your high school geometry?

If there is glass surrounding the earth then it should be readily apparent in this photograph. However, all that is visible off into space is empty space.

Spongy Iris wrote:But there is an indication I can tell you. It's the color of blue.

... and that is specifically below the camera level. You know what that means, don't you?

.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Also is the moon inside or outside the glass? I love a coconut rum blue Hawaiian as opposed to your love of meth.

The Moon obviously appears to be outside the glass. The glass I think is only 2 layers at 60 and 90 miles.

Unless you're referring to the moon in some other symbolic means...

You do keep referencing symbolism from the TV show, Breaking Bad...

Never even seen a TV show called breaking bad.

What we need to get to is why is it that you think that your Mother kept you in the dark damp closet with the moth's and spiders? Why don't you lie back on the couch and tell us about it.

So is the Earth inside the glass bubble?

Spongy Iris wrote:What makes you think the human eye can discern the definition of a glass barrier 60 miles away?

Spongy Iris wrote:And what makes you think the human eye can see micrometer thin needles and wires 30 miles away?

Spongy Iris wrote:And what makes you think floating a camera up 20 miles, and taking a picture of the horizon, is going to make the definition of these phenomenon discernible by the human eye?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Also is the moon inside or outside the glass? I love a coconut rum blue Hawaiian as opposed to your love of meth.

The Moon obviously appears to be outside the glass. The glass I think is only 2 layers at 60 and 90 miles.

Unless you're referring to the moon in some other symbolic means...

You do keep referencing symbolism from the TV show, Breaking Bad...

Never even seen a TV show called breaking bad.

What we need to get to is why is it that you think that your Mother kept you in the dark damp closet with the moth's and spiders? Why don't you lie back on the couch and tell us about it.

So is the Earth inside the glass bubble?

Lol. I doubt your eyes or lack thereof are capable of sight.

Swan wrote: Delusion of grandeur, also known as grandiose delusion, is seen in patients with other mental health conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Patients with delusions of grandeur believe that they are miraculous and that they can teleport wherever they wish and even know with certainty what transpired during unovserved events of the distant past. They make assumptions that their wild speculations are actually knowledge stemming from their omniscience.

* Types of delusions of grandeur:

Importance: A patient with this type of delusion will presume that the FBI is somehow obligated to interview him, and until the FBI pays him the attention he feels he deserves, the FBI is perceived as shirking their duties.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote: Delusion of grandeur, also known as grandiose delusion, is seen in patients with other mental health conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Patients with delusions of grandeur believe that they are miraculous and that they can teleport wherever they wish and even know with certainty what transpired during unovserved events of the distant past. They make assumptions that their wild speculations are actually knowledge stemming from their omniscience.

* Types of delusions of grandeur:

Importance: A patient with this type of delusion will presume that the FBI is somehow obligated to interview him, and until the FBI pays him the attention he feels he deserves, the FBI is perceived as shirking their duties.

.

Swan wrote:Now what were you babbling?