Is Climate Change More of a Local Problem Than a Global Problem?

Spongy Iris wrote:
I don't mean to suggest that climate change doesn't effect everybody in the world.

I do want to ask, if the people of this world were able to migrate, and adapt our infrastructure, so that our growing population became spread out across more towns and cities, but those towns and cities were less densely populated and congested, would this alleviate the pressure build up of human related emissions enough to mitigate the risk of climate change?

Is this something like the UN's Agenda 21 is trying to propose?

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
I don't mean to suggest that climate change doesn't effect everybody in the world.

I do want to ask, if the people of this world were able to migrate, and adapt our infrastructure, so that our growing population became spread out across more towns and cities, but those towns and cities were less densely populated and congested, would this alleviate the pressure build up of human related emissions enough to mitigate the risk of climate change?

Is this something like the UN's Agenda 21 is trying to propose?

February 24, 2019 - SIX YEARS AGO, TODAY!

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, SPONGY!

Your very first post, from six years ago, actually relates to CLIMATE CHANGE.

More than 2000 posts since then, and only the rarest mention of climate.

More concerned about "seminal" issues and that airtight, glass ceiling that contains the atmosphere under pressure.

Humans have migrated in response to climate change plenty of times in the past.

Those that couldn't migrate left us no descendants to tell the tale.

A whole bunch of Central American coffee farmers and their families migrated in response to climate change in the last five or six years.

Those migrating coffee farmers and their families were more than half of some of those "caravans" that kept "invading" the United States.

So, if you don't want to think of climate change as a "local" problem for the Central American coffee farmers, think of it as a "global" problem for the other nations they go to as they take the desperate measure of migrating.

Happy Anniversary, Spongy Iris!

SIX YEARS of doing whatever it is that you do at this website.

We should have some kind of website anniversary party.

At least that glass ceiling will stop any ejaculate from escaping into outer space.

And now, I can say with CERTAINTY that I have seen the "Guests online" number exceed 300. 302 "Guests online" right now, it says. I had seen it go into the high 200s many times, but now I know for sure it CAN exceed 300.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
I don't mean to suggest that climate change doesn't effect everybody in the world.

I do want to ask, if the people of this world were able to migrate, and adapt our infrastructure, so that our growing population became spread out across more towns and cities, but those towns and cities were less densely populated and congested, would this alleviate the pressure build up of human related emissions enough to mitigate the risk of climate change?

Is this something like the UN's Agenda 21 is trying to propose?

February 24, 2019 - SIX YEARS AGO, TODAY!

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, SPONGY!

Your very first post, from six years ago, actually relates to CLIMATE CHANGE.

More than 2000 posts since then, and only the rarest mention of climate.

More concerned about "seminal" issues and that airtight, glass ceiling that contains the atmosphere under pressure.

Humans have migrated in response to climate change plenty of times in the past.

Those that couldn't migrate left us no descendants to tell the tale.

A whole bunch of Central American coffee farmers and their families migrated in response to climate change in the last five or six years.

Those migrating coffee farmers and their families were more than half of some of those "caravans" that kept "invading" the United States.

So, if you don't want to think of climate change as a "local" problem for the Central American coffee farmers, think of it as a "global" problem for the other nations they go to as they take the desperate measure of migrating.

Happy Anniversary, Spongy Iris!

SIX YEARS of doing whatever it is that you do at this website.

We should have some kind of website anniversary party.

At least that glass ceiling will stop any ejaculate from escaping into outer space.

And now, I can say with CERTAINTY that I have seen the "Guests online" number exceed 300. 302 "Guests online" right now, it says. I had seen it go into the high 200s many times, but now I know for sure it CAN exceed 300.

Oh how I have grown 6 years after joining Climate Debate.

Clearly you have received my top 2 messages expressed at Climate Debate.

Yet somehow it does not seem they have fully registered with you that these are the 2 the primary points relevant to any Climate Change debate.

I decided to summarize my top positions into a Reddit channel which can be easily linked, to help avoid repetitious posting, last linked in The Devil in Ohio post I started.

Seems my agenda here at Climate Debate has manifested itself into the Ohio legislative debate. Woo woo. Yet everybody thinks it's some kind of joke.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
I don't mean to suggest that climate change doesn't effect everybody in the world.

I do want to ask, if the people of this world were able to migrate, and adapt our infrastructure, so that our growing population became spread out across more towns and cities, but those towns and cities were less densely populated and congested, would this alleviate the pressure build up of human related emissions enough to mitigate the risk of climate change?

Is this something like the UN's Agenda 21 is trying to propose?

February 24, 2019 - SIX YEARS AGO, TODAY!

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, SPONGY!

Your very first post, from six years ago, actually relates to CLIMATE CHANGE.

More than 2000 posts since then, and only the rarest mention of climate.

More concerned about "seminal" issues and that airtight, glass ceiling that contains the atmosphere under pressure.

Humans have migrated in response to climate change plenty of times in the past.

Those that couldn't migrate left us no descendants to tell the tale.

A whole bunch of Central American coffee farmers and their families migrated in response to climate change in the last five or six years.

Those migrating coffee farmers and their families were more than half of some of those "caravans" that kept "invading" the United States.

So, if you don't want to think of climate change as a "local" problem for the Central American coffee farmers, think of it as a "global" problem for the other nations they go to as they take the desperate measure of migrating.

Happy Anniversary, Spongy Iris!

SIX YEARS of doing whatever it is that you do at this website.

We should have some kind of website anniversary party.

At least that glass ceiling will stop any ejaculate from escaping into outer space.

And now, I can say with CERTAINTY that I have seen the "Guests online" number exceed 300. 302 "Guests online" right now, it says. I had seen it go into the high 200s many times, but now I know for sure it CAN exceed 300.

Oh how I have grown 6 years after joining Climate Debate.

Clearly you have received my top 2 messages expressed at Climate Debate.

Yet somehow it does not seem they have fully registered with you that these are the 2 the primary points relevant to any Climate Change debate.

I decided to summarize my top positions into a Reddit channel which can be easily linked, to help avoid repetitious posting, last linked in The Devil in Ohio post I started.

Seems my agenda here at Climate Debate has manifested itself into the Ohio legislative debate. Woo woo. Yet everybody thinks it's some kind of joke.

There is no debate as the Earth's climate has been changing for 5 billion years or so and the current warming trend begal 22,000 or so years ago. All backed by science

Spongy Iris wrote:
I don't mean to suggest that climate change doesn't effect everybody in the world.

I do want to ask, if the people of this world were able to migrate, and adapt our infrastructure, so that our growing population became spread out across more towns and cities, but those towns and cities were less densely populated and congested, would this alleviate the pressure build up of human related emissions enough to mitigate the risk of climate change?

Is this something like the UN's Agenda 21 is trying to propose?

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
I don't mean to suggest that climate change doesn't effect everybody in the world.

I do want to ask, if the people of this world were able to migrate, and adapt our infrastructure, so that our growing population became spread out across more towns and cities, but those towns and cities were less densely populated and congested, would this alleviate the pressure build up of human related emissions enough to mitigate the risk of climate change?

Is this something like the UN's Agenda 21 is trying to propose?

1590 "views" of this thread in five and a half years.

The thread title is intriguing enough.

During most of the years that this thread has existed, Google was still directing people to this website when they searched for climate change discussion sites.

Although the thread got very little actual response, a lot of people took a peek at it at some point in the past five and a half years.

This thread got as many views over its lifetime as "Carbon Sequestration.." got in the last month.

Spongy Iris long since moved on to more compelling topics of discussion.

Is climate change more of a local problem or a global problem?

Who cares?

As long as it doesn't break the glass cieling that protects our atmosphere!