Remember me
▼ Content

Is Climate a Lesbian?



Page 1 of 212>
Is Climate a Lesbian?22-06-2024 10:10
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14986)
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?
22-06-2024 17:21
sealover
★★★★☆
(1818)
IBdaMann, to respond to your offer posted yesterday regarding the website administrator (Jeppe Branner):

"I can send him a PM if you'd like."

I'd like you to send him a PM inviting him to comment on THIS THREAD.

It will fill him with pride when he sees what his website has matured into.



IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?
22-06-2024 19:18
GasGuzzler
★★★★★
(3072)
IBdaMann wrote:
Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.




Wait.... I'm totally confused. Is that a climate activist or is that just an active climate?

Whatever the case, Sven is looking into climate control.


Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan
Edited on 22-06-2024 19:57
23-06-2024 00:49
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14986)
GasGuzzler wrote: Wait.... I'm totally confused. Is that a climate activist or is that just an active climate?

Have you ever seen Her after that parade?

GasGuzzler wrote:Whatever the case, Sven is looking into climate control.

... via a methane reservoire or no?
26-06-2024 14:35
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(6715)
IBdaMann wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote: Wait.... I'm totally confused. Is that a climate activist or is that just an active climate?

Have you ever seen Her after that parade?

GasGuzzler wrote:Whatever the case, Sven is looking into climate control.

... via a methane reservoir or no?


Don't give up your day job


IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA

So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?


Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy


Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
26-06-2024 20:04
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14986)
Swan wrote: Don't give up your day job

Aaaawww, did someone get knocked off his bicycle again? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of his Abilify today?

Oooooh, you don't even have a day job to keep! You only have your share of Apple stock. Can it really suck that much to be you?
02-07-2024 18:38
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?



Another serious scientific discussion for climate-debate.com

However, if "climate" IS a "lesbian", then "climate change" is unlikely to be related to the increased concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

One look at "climate" and I can only imagine what "climate change" would be.

I'm also thinking that "unambiguous definition" for the term "lesbian" would be needed, because "climate" may have ambiguous gender identity.

And IBdaMann is still a scientifically illiterate moron looking to insult someone in the name of "debating" something loosely referred to as "science".
03-07-2024 09:31
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14986)
Im a BM wrote: However, if "climate" IS a "lesbian", then "climate change" is unlikely to be related to the increased concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

Exactly, especially since there is no such thing as "greenhouse gas" that is somehow different from "non-greenhouse gas." Decades ago, someone decided to play a prank on all the uneducated, scientifically illiterate leftists and began spreading a silly hoax about "greenhouse effect," knowing that none of them knew anywhere near enough to call boooooolsch't on any of the egregious physics violations.

... and look, leftists are still repeating that hoax to this day. Many of them are in the process of role-playing thuper thmart perthonth with PhDs in nonexithtent dithiplinth.

Im a BM wrote: One look at "climate" and I can only imagine what "climate change" would be.

It would probably entail a few different hair colors, a few additional tattoos, perhaps a couple of body piercings, and a new "pussy" hat.

Im a BM wrote: I'm also thinking that "unambiguous definition" for the term "lesbian" would be needed, because "climate" may have ambiguous gender identity.

Good point. You probably mean that she nonetheless has a penis that goes up when she goes down on Stefan-Boltzmann, which cannot happen if she only self-identifies as "black" body science without "white body privilege".

Your religion is stupid ... and you know it.
RE: Come for the climate. Stay for the homophobia.19-10-2024 03:09
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?



COME FOR THE CLIMATE!

STAY FOR THE HOMOPHOBIA!

The first-time visitor to climate-debate.com might find everything they need in this thread.

It's sort of about climate.

It gets in a hilarious dig at homosexuals while dismissing the possibility that there is any valid issue regarding climate to be discussing.

No wonder this website is so POPULAR, ten years after IBdaMann joined.

Threads such as this are of incalculable value.

As far as rational discussion about climate change, this is as good as it gets!
19-10-2024 05:31
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(23078)
Im a BM wrote:
It gets in a hilarious dig at homosexuals while dismissing the possibility that there is any valid issue regarding climate to be discussing.

No wonder this website is so POPULAR, ten years after IBdaMann joined.

Threads such as this are of incalculable value.

As far as rational discussion about climate change, this is as good as it gets!

Climate cannot change. Stop whining.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
19-10-2024 21:04
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?



COME FOR THE CLIMATE!

STAY FOR THE HOMOPHOBIA!

The first-time visitor to climate-debate.com might find everything they need in this thread.

It's sort of about climate.

It gets in a hilarious dig at homosexuals while dismissing the possibility that there is any valid issue regarding climate to be discussing.

No wonder this website is so POPULAR, ten years after IBdaMann joined.

Threads such as this are of incalculable value.

As far as rational discussion about climate change, this is as good as it gets!

This wasn't always a "dead" website.

It took some time to become a troll-infested, rabbit hole echo chamber.

Why would any rational adult want to engage in ANY kind of discussion with the author of a thread as ugly as this one?

Why would any rational adult believe it is even theoretically possible to have a rational discussion about climate change with someone who displays such a lack of common decency, and doesn't take climate change seriously in the least?
20-10-2024 03:44
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(23078)
Im a BM wrote:
COME FOR THE CLIMATE!
...


Stop spamming.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
11-11-2024 18:53
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
"Only a scientifically illiterate moron" would fail to understand that "climate science" is just a WACKY religion.

The "truly scientific" question to be asked about climate is:

Is climate a lesbian?

That is none of our damn business.


IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?



COME FOR THE CLIMATE!

STAY FOR THE HOMOPHOBIA!

The first-time visitor to climate-debate.com might find everything they need in this thread.

It's sort of about climate.

It gets in a hilarious dig at homosexuals while dismissing the possibility that there is any valid issue regarding climate to be discussing.

No wonder this website is so POPULAR, ten years after IBdaMann joined.

Threads such as this are of incalculable value.

As far as rational discussion about climate change, this is as good as it gets!

This wasn't always a "dead" website.

It took some time to become a troll-infested, rabbit hole echo chamber.

Why would any rational adult want to engage in ANY kind of discussion with the author of a thread as ugly as this one?

Why would any rational adult believe it is even theoretically possible to have a rational discussion about climate change with someone who displays such a lack of common decency, and doesn't take climate change seriously in the least?[/quote]
11-11-2024 20:47
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(6715)
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote: Don't give up your day job

Aaaawww, did someone get knocked off his bicycle again? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of his Abilify today?

Oooooh, you don't even have a day job to keep! You only have your share of Apple stock. Can it really suck that much to be you?


Yawn

Market Summary
>
Alphabet Inc Class C
181.50 USD
+153.58 (550.05%)all time

LOL I am quite sure that the operative who was walking for exercise as I flew by him on my bike has had either a coronary or stroke by now, or overdosed on his pain meds not that hanging himself like Robin Williams is out of the question


IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA

So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?


Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy


Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
Edited on 11-11-2024 20:50
18-11-2024 21:59
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
Is it some kind of trick question?

"Is Climate a lesbian?"

NO, Climate is NOT a lesbian.

Is this the best discussion that the trolls are capable of having?

The sexuality of climate science doesn't even account for the Marxist motive.

Genius trolls know all about quantum cubits and the true nature of science.

And they will always have each other for comfort when all others have gone.



Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote: Don't give up your day job

Aaaawww, did someone get knocked off his bicycle again? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of his Abilify today?

Oooooh, you don't even have a day job to keep! You only have your share of Apple stock. Can it really suck that much to be you?


Yawn

Market Summary
>
Alphabet Inc Class C
181.50 USD
+153.58 (550.05%)all time

LOL I am quite sure that the operative who was walking for exercise as I flew by him on my bike has had either a coronary or stroke by now, or overdosed on his pain meds not that hanging himself like Robin Williams is out of the question
18-11-2024 22:46
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(6715)
Im a BM wrote:
Is it some kind of trick question?

"Is Climate a lesbian?"

NO, Climate is NOT a lesbian.

Is this the best discussion that the trolls are capable of having?

The sexuality of climate science doesn't even account for the Marxist motive.

Genius trolls know all about quantum cubits and the true nature of science.

And they will always have each other for comfort when all others have gone.



Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote: Don't give up your day job

Aaaawww, did someone get knocked off his bicycle again? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of his Abilify today?

Oooooh, you don't even have a day job to keep! You only have your share of Apple stock. Can it really suck that much to be you?


Yawn

Market Summary
>
Alphabet Inc Class C
181.50 USD
+153.58 (550.05%)all time

LOL I am quite sure that the operative who was walking for exercise as I flew by him on my bike has had either a coronary or stroke by now, or overdosed on his pain meds not that hanging himself like Robin Williams is out of the question


No climate is not a lesbian, as it is currently identifying as a dyke


IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA

So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?


Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy


Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
25-11-2024 21:51
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?



No, Climate is NOT a lesbian.

Climate is not a Communist either.

Climate isn't even a Marxist sympathizer.

Climate change is not about puberty or menopause.

Got homophobia?
27-11-2024 10:11
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14986)
Im a BM wrote: No, Climate is NOT a lesbian.

Yes, She obviously is. That's why She has never fuqked a guy, only fuqked-OVER many men.

Im a BM wrote: Climate is not a Communist either.

Correct. She is a hard core socialist who insists that everything about the earth be centrally planned, and without capital.

Im a BM wrote: Climate change is not about puberty or menopause.

... well not when puberty-blockers are used to realign one's pronouns.
27-11-2024 22:18
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(6715)
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote: No, Climate is NOT a lesbian.

Yes, She obviously is. That's why She has never fuqked a guy, only fuqked-OVER many men.

Im a BM wrote: Climate is not a Communist either.

Correct. She is a hard core socialist who insists that everything about the earth be centrally planned, and without capital.

Im a BM wrote: Climate change is not about puberty or menopause.

... well not when puberty-blockers are used to realign one's pronouns.


OK I give up, is climate a lezzy


IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA

So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?


Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy


Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
28-11-2024 07:55
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14986)
Swan wrote:OK I give up, is climate a lezzy


Yep, it's been confirmed by science, and by biogeochemistry.

28-11-2024 22:25
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(23078)
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:OK I give up, is climate a lezzy


Yep, it's been confirmed by science, and by biogeochemistry.





The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
03-12-2024 00:08
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
Swan, this is a genuinely sincere request for you to offer your opinion about something.

Obviously, there is no obligation to reply if there is any reason that you prefer not to share your opinion.

You are quite familiar with posts by both Into the Night and myselves discussing questions of chemistry.

QUESTION:

If a chemistry argument made by Into the Night directly contradicts a chemistry argument made by myselves, do you believe that Into the Night is more likely to be correct about the chemistry?



Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote: Don't give up your day job

Aaaawww, did someone get knocked off his bicycle again? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of his Abilify today?

Oooooh, you don't even have a day job to keep! You only have your share of Apple stock. Can it really suck that much to be you?


Yawn

Market Summary
>
Alphabet Inc Class C
181.50 USD
+153.58 (550.05%)all time

LOL I am quite sure that the operative who was walking for exercise as I flew by him on my bike has had either a coronary or stroke by now, or overdosed on his pain meds not that hanging himself like Robin Williams is out of the question

Edited on 03-12-2024 00:15
03-12-2024 01:00
GasGuzzler
★★★★★
(3072)
Im a BM wrote:

No, Climate is NOT a lesbian.

Climate is not a Communist either.

Climate is not even a Marxist sympathizer.

Climate change is not about puberty or menopause.

Got homophobia?


Wait!!!
Isn't this EXACTLY what you bitch about Into the Night doing, telling you what science is NOT?

If your climate vision is so damn clear, then maybe you can tell us what climate change IS?! Will you finally define this term? I suspect you won't. You will bitch and piss and moan about the lack of discussion and blame your problem on someone else.

I beg you! Please prove me wrong.


Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan
Edited on 03-12-2024 01:03
03-12-2024 01:08
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
Swan, this is a genuinely sincere request for you to offer your opinion about something.

Obviously, there is no obligation to reply if there is any reason that you prefer not to share your opinion.

You are quite familiar with posts by both Into the Night and myselves discussing questions of chemistry.

QUESTION:

If a chemistry argument made by Into the Night directly contradicts a chemistry argument made by myselves, do you believe that Into the Night is more likely to be correct about the chemistry?



Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote: Don't give up your day job

Aaaawww, did someone get knocked off his bicycle again? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of his Abilify today?

Oooooh, you don't even have a day job to keep! You only have your share of Apple stock. Can it really suck that much to be you?


Yawn

Market Summary
>
Alphabet Inc Class C
181.50 USD
+153.58 (550.05%)all time

LOL I am quite sure that the operative who was walking for exercise as I flew by him on my bike has had either a coronary or stroke by now, or overdosed on his pain meds not that hanging himself like Robin Williams is out of the question
03-12-2024 01:38
GasGuzzler
★★★★★
(3072)
Im a BM wrote:

No, Climate is NOT a lesbian.

Climate is not a Communist either.

Climate is not even a Marxist sympathizer.

Climate change is not about puberty or menopause.

Got homophobia?


Wait!!!
Isn't this EXACTLY what you bitch about Into the Night doing, telling you what science is NOT?

If your climate vision is so damn clear, then maybe you can tell us what climate change IS?! Will you finally define this term? I suspect you won't. You will bitch and piss and moan about the lack of discussion and blame your problem on someone else.

I beg you! Please prove me wrong.


Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan
Edited on 03-12-2024 01:39
03-12-2024 02:30
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
Swan, this is a genuinely sincere request for you to offer your opinion about something.

Obviously, there is no obligation to reply if there is any reason that you prefer not to share your opinion.

You are quite familiar with posts by both Into the Night and myselves discussing questions of chemistry.

QUESTION:

If a chemistry argument made by Into the Night directly contradicts a chemistry argument made by myselves, do you believe that Into the Night is more likely to be correct about the chemistry?



Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote: Don't give up your day job

Aaaawww, did someone get knocked off his bicycle again? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of his Abilify today?

Oooooh, you don't even have a day job to keep! You only have your share of Apple stock. Can it really suck that much to be you?


Yawn

Market Summary
>
Alphabet Inc Class C
181.50 USD
+153.58 (550.05%)all time

LOL I am quite sure that the operative who was walking for exercise as I flew by him on my bike has had either a coronary or stroke by now, or overdosed on his pain meds not that hanging himself like Robin Williams is out of the question
03-12-2024 05:00
GasGuzzler
★★★★★
(3072)
GasGuzzler wrote:
Im a BM wrote:

No, Climate is NOT a lesbian.

Climate is not a Communist either.

Climate is not even a Marxist sympathizer.

Climate change is not about puberty or menopause.

Got homophobia?


Wait!!!
Isn't this EXACTLY what you bitch about Into the Night doing, telling you what science is NOT?

If your climate vision is so damn clear, then maybe you can tell us what climate change IS?! Will you finally define this term? I suspect you won't. You will bitch and piss and moan about the lack of discussion and blame your problem on someone else.

I beg you! Please prove me wrong.


I see you continue to EVADE. I'll try again later.


Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan
03-12-2024 08:21
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14986)
GasGuzzler wrote:
Im a BM wrote:

No, Climate is NOT a lesbian.

Climate is not a Communist either.

Climate is not even a Marxist sympathizer.

Climate change is not about puberty or menopause.

Got homophobia?

Genius. Now if we can ensure that your superpower is harnessed for good, and not for evil.
04-12-2024 01:51
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
IBdaMann claims that gold is a molecule... - from Swan "signature"

This is one of the important points made in EVERY POST by Swan as part of his "signature".

IBdaMann and Into the Night seem to be in agreement on this claim.

However, the claim is specific for solid, metallic gold, and not gold in any other chemical form (gold nitrate, etc.). That's the only kind of gold that they are calling a "molecule".

Another claim that is specific for solid metallic gold, and not gold in any other chemical form (gold nitrate, etc.), is that such gold is ZERO VALENT.

Into the Night is entrenched in the position that there is no such thing as zero valent gold.

This is a genuine question for you, Swan. Do you believe that there is such a thing as zero valent gold?

This may be an easier ask than trying to get you to do jury duty on the broader question of who is more likely to be correct about chemistry in general.





Swan, this is a genuinely sincere request for you to offer your opinion about something.

Obviously, there is no obligation to reply if there is any reason that you prefer not to share your opinion.

You are quite familiar with posts by both Into the Night and myselves discussing questions of chemistry.

QUESTION:

If a chemistry argument made by Into the Night directly contradicts a chemistry argument made by myselves, do you believe that Into the Night is more likely to be correct about the chemistry?



Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote: Don't give up your day job

Aaaawww, did someone get knocked off his bicycle again? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of his Abilify today?

Oooooh, you don't even have a day job to keep! You only have your share of Apple stock. Can it really suck that much to be you?


Yawn

Market Summary
>
Alphabet Inc Class C
181.50 USD
+153.58 (550.05%)all time

LOL I am quite sure that the operative who was walking for exercise as I flew by him on my bike has had either a coronary or stroke by now, or overdosed on his pain meds not that hanging himself like Robin Williams is out of the question
[/quote]
04-12-2024 21:56
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
I keep hoping that Branner, the climate-debate.com administrator, will drop in for a visit someday and see this thread title.

I'd love to see Branner's reaction to IBdaMann "Is Climate a Lesbian" thread.

He hasn't logged in since July.

When he comes back, if he ever does, I fear he may still never see this thread

It would make him so proud.


Hey, how about that SWAN signature?

You've got a FOOT LONG signature there. Twelve inches of signature.

"IBdaMann claims that gold is a molecule..." - from Swan "signature"

This is one of the first important points made in EVERY POST by Swan as part of his "signature".

IBdaMann's claim that gold is a molecule really matters a lot to Swan.

IBdaMann and Into the Night seem to be in agreement on this gold being a molecule claim.

However, the claim is specific for solid, metallic gold, and not gold in any other chemical form (gold nitrate, etc.). That's the only kind of gold that they are calling a "molecule".

Another claim that is specific for solid metallic gold, and not gold in any other chemical form (gold nitrate, etc.), is that such gold is ZERO VALENT.

Into the Night is entrenched in the position that there is no such thing as zero valent gold.

This is a genuine question for you, Swan. Do you believe that there is such a thing as zero valent gold?

This may be an easier ask than trying to get you to do jury duty on the broader question of who is more likely to be correct about chemistry in general.





Swan, this is a genuinely sincere request for you to offer your opinion about something.

Obviously, there is no obligation to reply if there is any reason that you prefer not to share your opinion.

You are quite familiar with posts by both Into the Night and myselves discussing questions of chemistry.

QUESTION:

If a chemistry argument made by Into the Night directly contradicts a chemistry argument made by myselves, do you believe that Into the Night is more likely to be correct about the chemistry?



Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote: Don't give up your day job

Aaaawww, did someone get knocked off his bicycle again? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of his Abilify today?

Oooooh, you don't even have a day job to keep! You only have your share of Apple stock. Can it really suck that much to be you?


Yawn

Market Summary
>
Alphabet Inc Class C
181.50 USD
+153.58 (550.05%)all time

LOL I am quite sure that the operative who was walking for exercise as I flew by him on my bike has had either a coronary or stroke by now, or overdosed on his pain meds not that hanging himself like Robin Williams is out of the question
05-12-2024 23:59
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(23078)
Im a BM wrote:
I keep hoping that Branner,

Stop whining. Stop spamming.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
16-12-2024 18:36
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
The Sexuality of Climate Science

from home page:
"What is Climate-Debate.com.... place where everyone is invited to have their say on one of the most important discussions of our time."

"Is Climate a Lesbian?"

Not just ONE of the most important discussions of our time.

Serious minded people who care know it doesn't get more important than that.

What other climate discussion website allows someone to courageously come out and ask the obvious question about the elephant in the room, uncensored?

They will duck, dodge, squirm and evade, but they will not answer the question.

IS Climate a Lesbian?

IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?
14-03-2025 19:15
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
Is climate sexuality a hoax or an existential threat to the Earth and humanity?

Google "climate sexuality" to see what's up with that.

Google says...

"The term 'climate sexuality' refers to the intersection of climate change and sexual health, sexual and reproductive rights, and gender equality..."

This could be serious.

Google a more specific inquiry.

Google "Is climate a lesbian?"

Google says...

"No, 'climate' is not a lesbian as 'climate' refers to the long-term weather patterns and conditions of a place, not a person or their sexual orientation."

I hope to God that Google is telling the truth here.

What proof do we really have to confirm that climate is not a lesbian?


IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?
14-03-2025 19:29
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(2395)
Im a BM wrote:
Is climate sexuality a hoax or an existential threat to the Earth and humanity?

Google "climate sexuality" to see what's up with that.

Google says...

"The term 'climate sexuality' refers to the intersection of climate change and sexual health, sexual and reproductive rights, and gender equality..."

This could be serious.

Google a more specific inquiry.

Google "Is climate a lesbian?"

Google says...

"No, 'climate' is not a lesbian as 'climate' refers to the long-term weather patterns and conditions of a place, not a person or their sexual orientation."

I hope to God that Google is telling the truth here.

What proof do we really have to confirm that climate is not a lesbian?


IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?


Obviously Google doesn't know how sex and climate change are joined at the hip.

It isn't in their programming yet.

But I have a Reddit friend who asked AI if monks could go 5 years without ejaculating.

AI said something like, no, such an adult male is likely so rare that they probably don't exist.




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
Edited on 14-03-2025 19:55
15-03-2025 02:47
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Is climate sexuality a hoax or an existential threat to the Earth and humanity?

Google "climate sexuality" to see what's up with that.

Google says...

"The term 'climate sexuality' refers to the intersection of climate change and sexual health, sexual and reproductive rights, and gender equality..."

This could be serious.

Google a more specific inquiry.

Google "Is climate a lesbian?"

Google says...

"No, 'climate' is not a lesbian as 'climate' refers to the long-term weather patterns and conditions of a place, not a person or their sexual orientation."

I hope to God that Google is telling the truth here.

What proof do we really have to confirm that climate is not a lesbian?


IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?


Obviously Google doesn't know how sex and climate change are joined at the hip.

It isn't in their programming yet.

But I have a Reddit friend who asked AI if monks could go 5 years without ejaculating.

AI said something like, no, such an adult male is likely so rare that they probably don't exist.



Apparently, sex and climate change are joined at the hip.

Shifting from climate sexuality to climate change, in that case.

I had the honor of being friends with Hans Jenny, a genius who was as important to soil science as Newton was to physics or Darwin was to biology.

"Climate" refers to the long-term weather patterns and conditions of a place, as affirmed by Google and a million other sources.

"Climate" is also a quantifiable factor of soil formation.

Climate can be calculated from information in the soil.

Hans Jenny revolutionized soil science in the 1940s by construing soils as dynamic natural bodies having properties derived from the interaction of climate and organisms acting on geologic parent materials, as modified by topography, over finite periods of time.

Show me a soil profile, and give me background on its age, mineralogy, and topography, and I can tell you precisely what kind of climate regime the soil formed under.

soil = f(climate, organisms, parent material, topography, time)

Each of the factors of soil formation can be unambiguously characterized to accurately "calculate" exactly what the soil is like.

Jack Major was a graduate student of Hans Jenny at UC Berkeley in the 1950s. He took the factors of soil formation in a different direction. ECOSYSTEMS are dynamic natural bodies having properties derived from the interaction of of climate and soil, as modified by topography, over finite periods of time.

Ecosystem (organisms) = f(climate, soil, topography, time)

Show me an ecosystem list of inhabitants, and give me some background about the soil, topography, and age (primary versus secondary succession, etc), and I can tell you a LOT about the climate of that ecosystem.

For soil science and ecology, "climate" refers to the same thing Google mentions - the long-term weather patterns and conditions of a place.

Applying basic logic, "climate change" presumably refers to a CHANGE in the long-term weather and conditions of a place.

Long-term weather patterns include average annual precipitation and the frequency of intense storms, droughts, flooding, etc.

Conditions of a place include average temperature, humidity, potential evapotranspiration, wind velocities during fire season, etc.

Setting aside potential controversy regarding climate sexuality, there is more than sufficient evidence that climate change has been occurring, and is occurring at an accelerating rate, for at least the last fifty years.
15-03-2025 18:44
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(2395)
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Is climate sexuality a hoax or an existential threat to the Earth and humanity?

Google "climate sexuality" to see what's up with that.

Google says...

"The term 'climate sexuality' refers to the intersection of climate change and sexual health, sexual and reproductive rights, and gender equality..."

This could be serious.

Google a more specific inquiry.

Google "Is climate a lesbian?"

Google says...

"No, 'climate' is not a lesbian as 'climate' refers to the long-term weather patterns and conditions of a place, not a person or their sexual orientation."

I hope to God that Google is telling the truth here.

What proof do we really have to confirm that climate is not a lesbian?


IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?


Obviously Google doesn't know how sex and climate change are joined at the hip.

It isn't in their programming yet.

But I have a Reddit friend who asked AI if monks could go 5 years without ejaculating.

AI said something like, no, such an adult male is likely so rare that they probably don't exist.



Apparently, sex and climate change are joined at the hip.

Shifting from climate sexuality to climate change, in that case.

I had the honor of being friends with Hans Jenny, a genius who was as important to soil science as Newton was to physics or Darwin was to biology.

"Climate" refers to the long-term weather patterns and conditions of a place, as affirmed by Google and a million other sources.

"Climate" is also a quantifiable factor of soil formation.

Climate can be calculated from information in the soil.

Hans Jenny revolutionized soil science in the 1940s by construing soils as dynamic natural bodies having properties derived from the interaction of climate and organisms acting on geologic parent materials, as modified by topography, over finite periods of time.

Show me a soil profile, and give me background on its age, mineralogy, and topography, and I can tell you precisely what kind of climate regime the soil formed under.

soil = f(climate, organisms, parent material, topography, time)

Each of the factors of soil formation can be unambiguously characterized to accurately "calculate" exactly what the soil is like.

Jack Major was a graduate student of Hans Jenny at UC Berkeley in the 1950s. He took the factors of soil formation in a different direction. ECOSYSTEMS are dynamic natural bodies having properties derived from the interaction of of climate and soil, as modified by topography, over finite periods of time.

Ecosystem (organisms) = f(climate, soil, topography, time)

Show me an ecosystem list of inhabitants, and give me some background about the soil, topography, and age (primary versus secondary succession, etc), and I can tell you a LOT about the climate of that ecosystem.

For soil science and ecology, "climate" refers to the same thing Google mentions - the long-term weather patterns and conditions of a place.

Applying basic logic, "climate change" presumably refers to a CHANGE in the long-term weather and conditions of a place.

Long-term weather patterns include average annual precipitation and the frequency of intense storms, droughts, flooding, etc.

Conditions of a place include average temperature, humidity, potential evapotranspiration, wind velocities during fire season, etc.

Setting aside potential controversy regarding climate sexuality, there is more than sufficient evidence that climate change has been occurring, and is occurring at an accelerating rate, for at least the last fifty years.


Brother I was brought into this world to til the land


I like some perennial plants, but mostly I try to keep the annuals coming and going in my plot, to improve the soil over time.

In the past 2.5 years, I have turned a neglected but beautiful back yard into veritable green land.

Right now with the rainy off season, I didn't deliberately spread any seeds for winter crops, but some pea seeds that I didn't collect yielded a few shoots. And the wheat seeds I spread about 2 years ago, in spite of me collecting multiple boxes, are still multiplying like mad. The grass here is the greenest on the block right now.

I got loads of wheat and beet seeds if you want.

I got quite a few string beans, zucchini, and tomato seeds I have been keeping pretty steady.

My spinach seeds I failed to keep the generation going, but they attracted too many of the neighbors bee colony, so probably a good thing those didn't flourish beyond 1 season. I got 3 lavender bushes that have made it through a couple winters now, and shown decent growth. Those will still feed some of the neighbor's bee colony. They seem to love those purple flowers.

https://inbloompics.blogspot.com/2021/05/in-bloom.html




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
15-03-2025 20:19
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Is climate sexuality a hoax or an existential threat to the Earth and humanity?

Google "climate sexuality" to see what's up with that.

Google says...

"The term 'climate sexuality' refers to the intersection of climate change and sexual health, sexual and reproductive rights, and gender equality..."

This could be serious.

Google a more specific inquiry.

Google "Is climate a lesbian?"

Google says...

"No, 'climate' is not a lesbian as 'climate' refers to the long-term weather patterns and conditions of a place, not a person or their sexual orientation."

I hope to God that Google is telling the truth here.

What proof do we really have to confirm that climate is not a lesbian?


IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.

So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?

Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.



Why can't we all just get along?


Obviously Google doesn't know how sex and climate change are joined at the hip.

It isn't in their programming yet.

But I have a Reddit friend who asked AI if monks could go 5 years without ejaculating.

AI said something like, no, such an adult male is likely so rare that they probably don't exist.



Apparently, sex and climate change are joined at the hip.

Shifting from climate sexuality to climate change, in that case.

I had the honor of being friends with Hans Jenny, a genius who was as important to soil science as Newton was to physics or Darwin was to biology.

"Climate" refers to the long-term weather patterns and conditions of a place, as affirmed by Google and a million other sources.

"Climate" is also a quantifiable factor of soil formation.

Climate can be calculated from information in the soil.

Hans Jenny revolutionized soil science in the 1940s by construing soils as dynamic natural bodies having properties derived from the interaction of climate and organisms acting on geologic parent materials, as modified by topography, over finite periods of time.

Show me a soil profile, and give me background on its age, mineralogy, and topography, and I can tell you precisely what kind of climate regime the soil formed under.

soil = f(climate, organisms, parent material, topography, time)

Each of the factors of soil formation can be unambiguously characterized to accurately "calculate" exactly what the soil is like.

Jack Major was a graduate student of Hans Jenny at UC Berkeley in the 1950s. He took the factors of soil formation in a different direction. ECOSYSTEMS are dynamic natural bodies having properties derived from the interaction of of climate and soil, as modified by topography, over finite periods of time.

Ecosystem (organisms) = f(climate, soil, topography, time)

Show me an ecosystem list of inhabitants, and give me some background about the soil, topography, and age (primary versus secondary succession, etc), and I can tell you a LOT about the climate of that ecosystem.

For soil science and ecology, "climate" refers to the same thing Google mentions - the long-term weather patterns and conditions of a place.

Applying basic logic, "climate change" presumably refers to a CHANGE in the long-term weather and conditions of a place.

Long-term weather patterns include average annual precipitation and the frequency of intense storms, droughts, flooding, etc.

Conditions of a place include average temperature, humidity, potential evapotranspiration, wind velocities during fire season, etc.

Setting aside potential controversy regarding climate sexuality, there is more than sufficient evidence that climate change has been occurring, and is occurring at an accelerating rate, for at least the last fifty years.


Brother I was brought into this world to til the land


I like some perennial plants, but mostly I try to keep the annuals coming and going in my plot, to improve the soil over time.

In the past 2.5 years, I have turned a neglected but beautiful back yard into veritable green land.

Right now with the rainy off season, I didn't deliberately spread any seeds for winter crops, but some pea seeds that I didn't collect yielded a few shoots. And the wheat seeds I spread about 2 years ago, in spite of me collecting multiple boxes, are still multiplying like mad. The grass here is the greenest on the block right now.

I got loads of wheat and beet seeds if you want.

I got quite a few string beans, zucchini, and tomato seeds I have been keeping pretty steady.

My spinach seeds I failed to keep the generation going, but they attracted too many of the neighbors bee colony, so probably a good thing those didn't flourish beyond 1 season. I got 3 lavender bushes that have made it through a couple winters now, and shown decent growth. Those will still feed some of the neighbor's bee colony. They seem to love those purple flowers.



Take a day trip to see the Ione Formation, at the bottom of the Mother Lode, near Sutter's Mill, where white men first found gold in California.

You can see with your own eyes climate change history, recorded in the soil.

The Ione Formation is a geologic marvel.

About forty million years ago, a tropical rainforest grew there.

Under very warm, wet conditions for a very long time, it created the kind of soil profile that can ONLY be found under tropical rainforests. Near the surface, a meters thick layer of blood-red hematite clay overlies a much thicker layer of chalk-white kaolinite clay. A very old soil under a very old tropical rainforest.

Then a local volcano blew its top and poured lava over the forest. A new layer of hard, volcanic basalt rock capped the whole thing and preserved it from erosion for forty million years.

They still mine kaolinite from the place. It makes excellent ceramics. But kaolinite cannot possibly form in any soil under California's existing climate regime. The ancient soil profile is proof that a tropical rainforest once grew.

At least on a forty-million-year time scale, climate has been known to change.
16-03-2025 09:01
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14986)
Im a BM wrote:At least on a forty-million-year time scale, climate has been known to change.

That would necessarily require a forty-million-year-old person.

.


I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit

A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
16-03-2025 14:39
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(2395)
Im a BM wrote:
The Ione Formation is a geologic marvel.

About forty million years ago, a tropical rainforest grew there.

Under very warm, wet conditions for a very long time, it created the kind of soil profile that can ONLY be found under tropical rainforests. Near the surface, a meters thick layer of blood-red hematite clay overlies a much thicker layer of chalk-white kaolinite clay. A very old soil under a very old tropical rainforest.

Then a local volcano blew its top and poured lava over the forest. A new layer of hard, volcanic basalt rock capped the whole thing and preserved it from erosion for forty million years.

They still mine kaolinite from the place. It makes excellent ceramics. But kaolinite cannot possibly form in any soil under California's existing climate regime. The ancient soil profile is proof that a tropical rainforest once grew.

At least on a forty-million-year time scale, climate has been known to change.


Interesting.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hematitic_kaolinite_(Ione_Formation,_Middle_Eocene;_clay_pit_in_the_western_foothills_of_the_Sierra_Nevada_Mountains,_central_California,_USA).jpg

https://www.clayimco.com/product/709-ione-kaolin/41

Do both the red hematite and white kaolinite clays only form in tropical climate, or just the white clay?

I'm not sure it was 40,000,000 years.

Do you know if sea levels were ever much higher in California?




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
16-03-2025 17:55
Im a BM
★★★★★
(2291)
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
The Ione Formation is a geologic marvel.

About forty million years ago, a tropical rainforest grew there.

Under very warm, wet conditions for a very long time, it created the kind of soil profile that can ONLY be found under tropical rainforests. Near the surface, a meters thick layer of blood-red hematite clay overlies a much thicker layer of chalk-white kaolinite clay. A very old soil under a very old tropical rainforest.

Then a local volcano blew its top and poured lava over the forest. A new layer of hard, volcanic basalt rock capped the whole thing and preserved it from erosion for forty million years.

They still mine kaolinite from the place. It makes excellent ceramics. But kaolinite cannot possibly form in any soil under California's existing climate regime. The ancient soil profile is proof that a tropical rainforest once grew.

At least on a forty-million-year time scale, climate has been known to change.


Interesting.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hematitic_kaolinite_(Ione_Formation,_Middle_Eocene;_clay_pit_in_the_western_foothills_of_the_Sierra_Nevada_Mountains,_central_California,_USA).jpg

https://www.clayimco.com/product/709-ione-kaolin/41

Do both the red hematite and white kaolinite clays only form in tropical climate, or just the white clay?

I'm not sure it was 40,000,000 years.

Do you know if sea levels were ever much higher in California?



Hello!

Thank you for sharing the link about the "Middle Eocene Clay pit".

The "Eocene" was a geological "epoch", covering the period of time between 34 and 56 million years ago. "Middle Eocene" was about forty million years ago.

I'll start with the sea level question:

At the time the kaolinite of the Ione Formation was underneath a live tropical rainforest, it was not in the foothills of a secondary inland mountain range (the Sierra Nevada).

That rainforest was much closer to the coastline, and at an elevation much closer to sea level.

Indeed, the link you posted says the kaolinite originally deposited in "ancient deltaic and intertidal estuarine environments". Pretty dang close to sea level.

There is now a big Central Valley, and a Coast Range of new mountains being pushed up all along the coast, between the Ione Formation and the sea.

Do I know if sea levels were ever higher in California?

First, note that on the forty-million-year time scale (the Eocene was from 34-56 million years ago), it is the LAND SURFACE ELEVATION that has made the most impressive movement. The Mother Lode is full of marine sediment fossils, originally deposited as sea floor sediments on the continental shelf. Tectonic movement keeps pushing more sea floor up under it. Those ancient submarine sediments, originally formed hundreds of feet below sea level, are now half a mile above sea level.

As for sea level ever being higher in California, it is the last three million years that are of greatest interest. Sea level has been fluctuating cyclically as glaciers grow and shrink during those last few million years. As part of THAT cycle, this should be about as high as sea level ever gets.

Without the intervention of anthropogenic greenhouse gases, sea level rise should have come to a stall about now, to then begin going back down again as glaciers start to grow again.

The big scare in the 1970s about the new ice age was based on scientists figuring out that we are coming to the end of the warming and going back to the cooling. On a centuries long time scale. Nobody said the new ice age would arrive before the next election.

Hematite and kaolinite are "secondary" clay minerals. They form from the weathering of "primary" clay minerals found in rocks. Their formation requires warm temperature and frequent leaching with rain. Without such conditions, the primary minerals in the rock will weather into a DIFFERENT kind of secondary mineral. Not hematite or kaolinite.

The article linked refers to them as "paleo-oxisols". The "paleo" part means they are very ancient. The "oxisol" part means it was the kind of soil classified as an "oxisol". "Oxisols" are highly weathered, iron-oxide-rich clay soils found under tropical and subtropical forests where is rains a LOT.
Edited on 16-03-2025 18:22
Page 1 of 212>





Join the debate Is Climate a Lesbian?:

Remember me

▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact