| 26-07-2025 06:34 |
GasGuzzler★★★★★
(3124) |
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Climate is a fat lesbian. A Climate forcing is her sitting on you. Just hope she doesn't sit on your face and wiggle.
OMG! OMG! I'm so excited!
At 14,998 posts, IBdaMann is just two post away from a full 15,000!
We will soon mark the milestone of 15,000 insightful gems, such as this one about climate, the fat lesbian.
Do you even have a clue that threads like this are inspired by gullible morons like yourself?
Four and a half years you have waved around climate change
like some kind of super power penis pistol, yet you still haven't given a definition of what it is. Then you proceed to piss and moan because there is no meaningful discussion. So, until you can define climate change, climate is at minimum, your fat lesbian. If it's not your fat lesbian, then PLEASE, just tell us what it actually is.
Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan
Edited on 26-07-2025 06:35 |
| 26-07-2025 16:12 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3892) |
GasGuzzler wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Climate is a fat lesbian. A Climate forcing is her sitting on you. Just hope she doesn't sit on your face and wiggle.
OMG! OMG! I'm so excited!
At 14,998 posts, IBdaMann is just two post away from a full 15,000!
We will soon mark the milestone of 15,000 insightful gems, such as this one about climate, the fat lesbian.
Do you even have a clue that threads like this are inspired by gullible morons like yourself?
Four and a half years you have waved around climate change
like some kind of super power penis pistol, yet you still haven't given a definition of what it is. Then you proceed to piss and moan because there is no meaningful discussion. So, until you can define climate change, climate is at minimum, your fat lesbian. If it's not your fat lesbian, then PLEASE, just tell us what it actually is.
Threads like this are "inspired" by gullible morons, such as myself.
Obviously, this is a good thing.
Threads like this are what make climate-debate.com "one of the Internet's best discussion sites", as IBdaMann likes to call it.
Is it not a good thing to have a muse around for inspiration?
Edited on 26-07-2025 16:17 |
| 26-07-2025 16:17 |
GasGuzzler★★★★★
(3124) |
Im a BM wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Climate is a fat lesbian. A Climate forcing is her sitting on you. Just hope she doesn't sit on your face and wiggle.
OMG! OMG! I'm so excited!
At 14,998 posts, IBdaMann is just two post away from a full 15,000!
We will soon mark the milestone of 15,000 insightful gems, such as this one about climate, the fat lesbian.
Threads like this are inspired by gullible morons, such as myself.
Are you saying that this is not a good thing?
Threads like this are what make climate-debate.com "One of the Internet's best discussion sites" (quoting IBdaMann)
Do you even have a clue that threads like this are inspired by gullible morons like yourself?
Four and a half years you have waved around climate change
like some kind of super power penis pistol, yet you still haven't given a definition of what it is. Then you proceed to piss and moan because there is no meaningful discussion. So, until you can define climate change, climate is at minimum, your fat lesbian. If it's not your fat lesbian, then PLEASE, just tell us what it actually is.
So you can't tell us what climate change is. Got it.
Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan |
| 26-07-2025 16:32 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3892) |
GasGuzzler wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Climate is a fat lesbian. A Climate forcing is her sitting on you. Just hope she doesn't sit on your face and wiggle.
OMG! OMG! I'm so excited!
At 14,998 posts, IBdaMann is just two post away from a full 15,000!
We will soon mark the milestone of 15,000 insightful gems, such as this one about climate, the fat lesbian.
Threads like this are inspired by gullible morons, such as myself.
Are you saying that this is not a good thing?
Threads like this are what make climate-debate.com "One of the Internet's best discussion sites" (quoting IBdaMann)
Do you even have a clue that threads like this are inspired by gullible morons like yourself?
Four and a half years you have waved around climate change
like some kind of super power penis pistol, yet you still haven't given a definition of what it is. Then you proceed to piss and moan because there is no meaningful discussion. So, until you can define climate change, climate is at minimum, your fat lesbian. If it's not your fat lesbian, then PLEASE, just tell us what it actually is.
So you can't tell us what climate change is. Got it.
I'm going to keep my own personal definition for "climate change" a SECRET.
Kind of like ITN with his secret definition for pH. He says it is NOT = -log[H+], but rather is some kind of mystery "ratio".
But Google is willing to snitch us BOTH out.
I'll ask Google to tell us what climate change is, and what pH is.
Google says that "Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperature and weather patterns, primarily caused by human activities like burning fossil fuels."
Google says that "Yes, the pH of a solution is indeed calculated using the formula pH = -log[H+]" Not the negative NATURAL LOG, and not a "ratio".
The kind of basic, rudimentary chemistry someone would have learned if they were actually a chemist, and not a scientifically illiterate moron troll. |
| 24-11-2025 20:47 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3892) |
IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.
So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?
Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.
Why can't we all just get along?
During the Golden Age of climate-debate.com, IBdaMann was the senior troll.
"Is Climate a Lesbian?"
Thorough "debunking" of the anthropogenic climate change "hoax" by getting to the scientific basics of natural sexuality.
IBdaMann would always let the new members know "You won't be here long" and remind them that they are all scientifically illiterate morons.
I was almost immediately informed that I don't even know what science is.
I certainly don't understand the science well enough to determine the sexuality of climate. |
|
| 24-11-2025 22:24 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★
(3545) |
Im a BM wrote:
I certainly don't understand the science well enough to determine the sexuality of climate.
Sure you do.
It's Mother Nature v. Father Time.
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
| 25-11-2025 00:47 |
Into the Night ★★★★★
(24419) |
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.
So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?
Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.
Why can't we all just get along?
During the Golden Age of climate-debate.com, IBdaMann was the senior troll.
"Is Climate a Lesbian?"
Thorough "debunking" of the anthropogenic climate change "hoax" by getting to the scientific basics of natural sexuality.
IBdaMann would always let the new members know "You won't be here long" and remind them that they are all scientifically illiterate morons.
I was almost immediately informed that I don't even know what science is.
Because you don't.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 12-06-2026 17:07 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3892) |
IBdaMann wrote:
I have asked every Climate worshiper to unambiguously define the global "Climate" and none ever have, probably out of embarrassment that their goddess is a lesbian. All Climate worshipers are leftists, and all leftists HATE all LGBTQIAMIPPREPGLOPVI+, to the point that leftists lump them all together as sexual freaks.
So what can a leftist do upon finding out that Climate is a lesbian who appropriately HATES white conservative males, but who unfortunately is one of the left's HATED sexual freaks? It's a great question, right?
Why don't we have any more Climate Pride parades? Below is the last time Climate was allowed to march in a parade. Since then, the DNC has shunned such events.
Why can't we all just get along?
I was looking for the "Definition of a Troll" thread, but this one..
It kind of defines IBdaMann as a troll without providing a precise definition. |
| 13-06-2026 23:37 |
IBdaMann ★★★★★
(15374) |
Im a BM wrote:It kind of defines IBdaMann as a troll without providing a precise definition.
To define something, you must have a definition.
You are a troll and I am not. You spam boards and I do not. You post shock threads just for attention and I do not. You define "troll" as someone who disagrees with the people who do your thinking for you (i.e. a standard troll's definition of "troll") and I do not. You deny science and I do not. |
| 13-06-2026 23:56 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3892) |
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:It kind of defines IBdaMann as a troll without providing a precise definition.
To define something, you must have a definition.
You are a troll and I am not. You spam boards and I do not. You post shock threads just for attention and I do not. You define "troll" as someone who disagrees with the people who do your thinking for you (i.e. a standard troll's definition of "troll") and I do not. You deny science and I do not.
Clearly, this is NOT one of those "..shock threads just for attention.."
"You are a troll and I am not." - IBdaMann
"You are describing yourself." - Into the Night |
| 14-06-2026 02:49 |
IBdaMann★★★★★
(15374) |
Im a BM wrote: Clearly, this is NOT one of those "..shock threads just for attention.."[b]
Obviously. There's nothing shock about it, as you noticed. |
| 14-06-2026 04:43 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3892) |
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote: Clearly, this is NOT one of those "..shock threads just for attention.."[b]
Obviously. There's nothing shock about it, as you noticed.
Let me get this straight.
A "troll" is someone who complains about there being too little moderation.
A "troll" is someone making a veiled attack on anyone who thinks independently.
A "troll" seeks some kind of CENSORSHIP, blinded by the light of intolerable scientific truth.
A "troll" observes that a website where active members can be counted on one hand might be characterized as "dead".
A "troll" whines that conflict-adverse individuals who do not appreciate being told the truth that they are "scientifically illiterate" and "morons" are being "driven away" somehow.
Who is NOT a troll then?
An arrogant, obnoxious, malignant narcissist who DOES qualify as "scientifically illiterate" is NOT a troll. If he wears the quotes of vanquished (a.k.a. "driven away") opponents as war medals because he has done this for so long to so many, that hardly makes him a troll.
That just makes him the guy who made climate-debate "one of the internet's best discussion sites"!
Got it. |
| 14-06-2026 09:12 |
IBdaMann★★★★★
(15374) |
Im a BM wrote:Let me get this straight.
You rarely do.
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone who complains about there being too little moderation.
You're being a troll again. You are lying, as usual. You are specifically talking about censorship. You want dissenting voices silenced. Your stupid religion can't stand up to scrutiny so you need the scrutiny banned.
Yes, a troll is someone who demands that censors silence those who disagree with the people who do the troll's thinking for him
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone making a veiled attack on anyone who thinks independently.
Nope. All "attacks" are allowed because they are rhetorical. Sticks and stones, etc.
Im a BM wrote: A "troll" seeks some kind of CENSORSHIP, blinded by the light of intolerable scientific truth.
You really should learn what science is, but I get it, you are too stupid to learn. Yours is a personal problem.
There is no such thing as "scientific truth."
Im a BM wrote: An arrogant, obnoxious, malignant narcissist
Did you just pretend to make a clinical psychiatric diagnosis? Too funny.
Too stupid to learn. |
| 18-06-2026 01:05 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3892) |
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Let me get this straight.
You rarely do.
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone who complains about there being too little moderation.
You're being a troll again. You are lying, as usual. You are specifically talking about censorship. You want dissenting voices silenced. Your stupid religion can't stand up to scrutiny so you need the scrutiny banned.
Yes, a troll is someone who demands that censors silence those who disagree with the people who do the troll's thinking for him
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone making a veiled attack on anyone who thinks independently.
Nope. All "attacks" are allowed because they are rhetorical. Sticks and stones, etc.
Im a BM wrote: A "troll" seeks some kind of CENSORSHIP, blinded by the light of intolerable scientific truth.
You really should learn what science is, but I get it, you are too stupid to learn. Yours is a personal problem.
There is no such thing as "scientific truth."
Im a BM wrote: An arrogant, obnoxious, malignant narcissist
Did you just pretend to make a clinical psychiatric diagnosis? Too funny.
Too stupid to learn.
How about a simple OPERATIONAL definition for what a troll is, according to how it reacts to website conditions?
A "troll" is the thing that always gets BANNED if there is a conscious moderator.
A "troll" is the thing that finds few places where it can show its true colors, if there are any standards for common decency being upheld.
A "troll" gets systematically banned or shunned until its dominion is limited to one or two "dead" websites where they have driven all others away. |
| 18-06-2026 01:37 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(24419) |
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Let me get this straight.
You rarely do.
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone who complains about there being too little moderation.
You're being a troll again. You are lying, as usual. You are specifically talking about censorship. You want dissenting voices silenced. Your stupid religion can't stand up to scrutiny so you need the scrutiny banned.
Yes, a troll is someone who demands that censors silence those who disagree with the people who do the troll's thinking for him
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone making a veiled attack on anyone who thinks independently.
Nope. All "attacks" are allowed because they are rhetorical. Sticks and stones, etc.
Im a BM wrote: A "troll" seeks some kind of CENSORSHIP, blinded by the light of intolerable scientific truth.
You really should learn what science is, but I get it, you are too stupid to learn. Yours is a personal problem.
There is no such thing as "scientific truth."
Im a BM wrote: An arrogant, obnoxious, malignant narcissist
Did you just pretend to make a clinical psychiatric diagnosis? Too funny.
Too stupid to learn.
How about a simple OPERATIONAL definition for what a troll is, according to how it reacts to website conditions?
RQAA
Im a BM wrote:
A "troll" is the thing that always gets BANNED if there is a conscious moderator.
Nope. Trolls can and do exist for long times on forums.
Im a BM wrote:
A "troll" is the thing that finds few places where it can show its true colors, if there are any standards for common decency being upheld.
[/quote]
You are describing yourself.
Im a BM wrote:
A "troll" gets systematically banned or shunned until its dominion is limited to one or two "dead" websites where they have driven all others away.
No forum I know bans trolls. They usually want to ban others, though.
Your endless spamming has done a lot to drive users away. The only one worse is the Messiah moron.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
|
| 18-06-2026 01:59 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3892) |
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Let me get this straight.
You rarely do.
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone who complains about there being too little moderation.
You're being a troll again. You are lying, as usual. You are specifically talking about censorship. You want dissenting voices silenced. Your stupid religion can't stand up to scrutiny so you need the scrutiny banned.
Yes, a troll is someone who demands that censors silence those who disagree with the people who do the troll's thinking for him
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone making a veiled attack on anyone who thinks independently.
Nope. All "attacks" are allowed because they are rhetorical. Sticks and stones, etc.
Im a BM wrote: A "troll" seeks some kind of CENSORSHIP, blinded by the light of intolerable scientific truth.
You really should learn what science is, but I get it, you are too stupid to learn. Yours is a personal problem.
There is no such thing as "scientific truth."
Im a BM wrote: An arrogant, obnoxious, malignant narcissist
Did you just pretend to make a clinical psychiatric diagnosis? Too funny.
Too stupid to learn.
How about a simple OPERATIONAL definition for what a troll is, according to how it reacts to website conditions?
RQAA
Im a BM wrote:
A "troll" is the thing that always gets BANNED if there is a conscious moderator.
Nope. Trolls can and do exist for long times on forums.
Im a BM wrote:
A "troll" is the thing that finds few places where it can show its true colors, if there are any standards for common decency being upheld.
You are describing yourself.
Im a BM wrote:
A "troll" gets systematically banned or shunned until its dominion is limited to one or two "dead" websites where they have driven all others away.
No forum I know bans trolls. They usually want to ban others, though.
Your endless spamming has done a lot to drive users away. The only one worse is the Messiah moron.[/quote]
I drove my opponents all away, but I remember them in my signature line at the end of my every post. I wear their names and quotes like war medals, because I most heroically made them "flee". They denied science! |
| 20-06-2026 18:39 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3892) |
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Let me get this straight.
You rarely do.
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone who complains about there being too little moderation.
You're being a troll again. You are lying, as usual. You are specifically talking about censorship. You want dissenting voices silenced. Your stupid religion can't stand up to scrutiny so you need the scrutiny banned.
Yes, a troll is someone who demands that censors silence those who disagree with the people who do the troll's thinking for him
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone making a veiled attack on anyone who thinks independently.
Nope. All "attacks" are allowed because they are rhetorical. Sticks and stones, etc.
Im a BM wrote: A "troll" seeks some kind of CENSORSHIP, blinded by the light of intolerable scientific truth.
You really should learn what science is, but I get it, you are too stupid to learn. Yours is a personal problem.
There is no such thing as "scientific truth."
Im a BM wrote: An arrogant, obnoxious, malignant narcissist
Did you just pretend to make a clinical psychiatric diagnosis? Too funny.
Too stupid to learn.
Hey, if Into the Night gets to call himself a "chemist", then I am at LEAST as qualified to self identify as a "psychiatrist".
IBdaMann, your posts REEK of malignant narcissism.
It don't take a PSYCHIATRIST to smell THAT stench. |
| 20-06-2026 22:34 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(24419) |
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Let me get this straight.
You rarely do.
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone who complains about there being too little moderation.
You're being a troll again. You are lying, as usual. You are specifically talking about censorship. You want dissenting voices silenced. Your stupid religion can't stand up to scrutiny so you need the scrutiny banned.
Yes, a troll is someone who demands that censors silence those who disagree with the people who do the troll's thinking for him
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone making a veiled attack on anyone who thinks independently.
Nope. All "attacks" are allowed because they are rhetorical. Sticks and stones, etc.
Im a BM wrote: A "troll" seeks some kind of CENSORSHIP, blinded by the light of intolerable scientific truth.
You really should learn what science is, but I get it, you are too stupid to learn. Yours is a personal problem.
There is no such thing as "scientific truth."
Im a BM wrote: An arrogant, obnoxious, malignant narcissist
Did you just pretend to make a clinical psychiatric diagnosis? Too funny.
Too stupid to learn.
Hey, if Into the Night gets to call himself a "chemist", then I am at LEAST as qualified to self identify as a "psychiatrist".
IBdaMann, your posts REEK of malignant narcissism.
It don't take a PSYCHIATRIST to smell THAT stench.
You are not a psychiatrist either. Robert.
Inversion fallacy. You can't blame your vanity and narcissism on anybody else, Robert.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 21-06-2026 21:46 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3892) |
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Let me get this straight.
You rarely do.
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone who complains about there being too little moderation.
You're being a troll again. You are lying, as usual. You are specifically talking about censorship. You want dissenting voices silenced. Your stupid religion can't stand up to scrutiny so you need the scrutiny banned.
Yes, a troll is someone who demands that censors silence those who disagree with the people who do the troll's thinking for him
Im a BM wrote:A "troll" is someone making a veiled attack on anyone who thinks independently.
Nope. All "attacks" are allowed because they are rhetorical. Sticks and stones, etc.
Im a BM wrote: A "troll" seeks some kind of CENSORSHIP, blinded by the light of intolerable scientific truth.
You really should learn what science is, but I get it, you are too stupid to learn. Yours is a personal problem.
There is no such thing as "scientific truth."
Im a BM wrote: An arrogant, obnoxious, malignant narcissist
Did you just pretend to make a clinical psychiatric diagnosis? Too funny.
Too stupid to learn.
Hey, if Into the Night gets to call himself a "chemist", then I am at LEAST as qualified to self identify as a "psychiatrist".
IBdaMann, your posts REEK of malignant narcissism.
It don't take a PSYCHIATRIST to smell THAT stench.
You are not a psychiatrist either. Robert.
Inversion fallacy. You can't blame your vanity and narcissism on anybody else, Robert.
Still can't figure out which CHEMICALS are in the "caustic brew" in the "white liquor" that you pretend to know something about in wood pulp processing for the Kraft lignin extraction?
If you were really a chemist employed in this industry, you would already know that "white liquor" is a solution of sodium hydroxide, NaOH, and sodium sulfide, Na2S. Unless you work at a distillery - a different kind of "white liquor".
Your "chemist" bluff is tiresome. You don't even know what chemistry IS.
On the other hand, I DO know what malignant narcissism is.
I would encourage you to look up the definition to help you understand, but I know you are incapable of learning any new terms that you didn't learn in high school.
Go ahead and just unilaterally declare it to be a meaningless "buzzword".
That's how a real scientist "wins" a "debate". |
| 21-06-2026 23:59 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(24419) |
Im a BM wrote:
Still can't figure out which CHEMICALS are in the "caustic brew" in the "white liquor" that you pretend to know something about in wood pulp processing for the Kraft lignin extraction?
You are describing yourself again, Robert. Inversion fallacy.
Im a BM wrote:
If you were really a chemist employed in this industry, you would already know that "white liquor" is a solution of sodium hydroxide, NaOH, and sodium sulfide, Na2S. Unless you work at a distillery - a different kind of "white liquor".
Nope. You still can't figure it out.
Im a BM wrote:
Your "chemist" bluff is tiresome. You don't even know what chemistry IS.
Inversion fallacy.
Im a BM wrote:
On the other hand, I DO know what malignant narcissism is.
Inversion fallacy.
Im a BM wrote:
I would encourage you to look up the definition to help you understand, but I know you are incapable of learning any new terms that you didn't learn in high school.
Mantra 1a.
Im a BM wrote:
Go ahead and just unilaterally declare it to be a meaningless "buzzword".
That's how a real scientist "wins" a "debate".
Void argument fallacy.
You cannot blame your problems on anybody else, Robert.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
