|interesting article in forbes26-06-2019 08:38|
1. Carbon is not pollution, it is an element.
2. CO2 is not pollution, it is a life-essential compound.
3.. Nobody cares about the opinion of a scientifically illiterate moron who thinks he is a scientific genius.
4. Harvard does not somehow own science.
5. Nobody is fooled by WACKY, near-future prophecies of planetary destruction and of humanity's demise.
6. It is not an interesting article.
Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.
Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn
You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.
The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank
:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude
IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
|This is interesting, pertinent - "The Eerie Silence Surrounding the Assange Case"||1||24-06-2018 04:53|
|This is interesting - 'The Philip Cross Affair'||5||30-05-2018 17:10|
|The link is to an article in the Daily Mail about asteroids and the last ice age||45||16-03-2018 23:15|
|Interesting piece about Greenpeace||6||10-12-2015 20:47|