|In Your Face - the IPCC and Fraud03-01-2018 21:25|
|This was a carefully researched book on the actions of the IPCC that claims that they used the top scientists in the world to write their 44 chapter Climate Bible.|
Among other claims were that all papers used by the IPCC had to be peer reviewed. Now we won't go into the fact that most papers are peer reviewed by friends of the paper's authors that are so biased that even non-scientists can easily pick them apart making the peer review process hardly worthwhile but even supposing it has excellent results:
UN's Climate Bible Gets 21 'F's on Report Card
all 18,531 references cited in the 2007 IPCC report were examined
5,587 are not peer-reviewed
IPCC chairman's claim that the report relies solely on peer-reviewed sources is not supported
each chapter was audited three times; the result most favorable to the IPCC was used
21 out of 44 chapters contain so few peer-reviewed references, they get an F (59% and below)
43 citizen auditors in 12 countries participated in this project
After discovering that virtually every word in the IPCC report is not written by "the best scientists in the world" but often by nothing else but ecologist activist flunkies you can look at the peer review process here:
Now peer reviewing is a good idea if it is done by unbiased and totally above board reviewers. The problem is that too often it is not.
So, actually a paper should stand on it's own integrity and not bear the crutch of someone else's reputation.
Now that more and more scientists jobs are not on the line for disagreeing with the environmentalists and the politicians seeking more power we can see the fraud of man-made global warming falling apart.
Our resident scumbucket litebrain is telling us that the world is dying and that all of the ice is melting. Doesn't seem to be the case.
What do you suppose nightmare will do when he can't tell himself he's the resident expert in things he hasn't the slightest understanding of?
|hardly world to be peer reviewed by the papers used that are so biased that are peer review process hardly world to write their 44 chapter Climate Bible.|
Among other claims that all papers used the peer reviewed. Now we worthwhile but even non-scientists in the world to be peer reviewed by the world to be peer reviewed by the IPCC had to write their 44 chapter Climate Bible.
Among other claims were they used them apart making
I think that you used the texting feature on your phone and it has completely scrambled your meaning.
|I think that you used the texting feature on your meaning.|
L8112 wrote: I think that you used the texting feature on your meaning.
So the only reason you're here is to interfere with the discussion. I should have realized that.
|im just speaking your language: gibberish|
L8112 wrote: im just speaking your language: gibberish
So what you're saying is that you don't understand English. That's the usual story with your kind.
|English. That's the usual story with your kind. So what you don't understand English.|
WAke, Wake, wake,
How many times have I told you ? The IPCC deserve Sainthood. Were you their instructor ? It seems they have learned much from you ! After all, you do want to be a good person, right ? I know I do that's why I support them, so I can be that good person.
Yet if I agreed with you then I would be a good person as well. It gets so coonnnfffuuussssiiiinnnggg. Who do I need to agree with to be a good person ? You or them ?
You know something Wake ? That felt good
James_ wrote:Wake wrote:
We finally are putting these people who have been falsely placed on pedestals down upon the ground where they belong. To discover that a number of the "greatest scientists in the world" didn't complete their educations until 10 years or more after they wrote chapters in The Climate Bible is taking complete and total veracity forever from that organization.
Imagine an environmental activist with a BS in chemistry telling the world that they WOULD die if we didn't refuse development to the third world?
As far as I'm concerned Trump did exactly the right thing and the US should NEVER AGAIN be involved in any UN venture.
|What makes IPCC scientists sure warmer air hundreds of millions of years ago due to||71||06-06-2019 23:39|
|The IPCC in 2013||82||25-05-2019 07:21|
|How come they never let a Chinese be in IPCC or UN climate department?||2||29-04-2019 01:38|
|What makes IPCC thinks CO2 is better than O2 at trapping heat?||0||28-04-2019 15:40|
|Medieval warm period was way hotter than today's climate. 1 C hotter globally. So why IPCC do not ack||0||19-04-2019 16:33|