If Democrats Gain Control of Congress

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > If Democrats Gain Control of Congress

If Democrats Gain Control of Congress02-08-2020 05:36
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14389)	I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
02-08-2020 19:43
HarveyH55★★★★★ (5196)	I don't know about jail, most of the people they did, were to get at Trump. If they win congress, impeachment 2.0 will be silly, but push right through quickly. Like most VPs, Pence is more of a follower, than a leader. Depends on how willing he is to let the democrats walk all over him, and the constitution. The universal mail-in ballots are to much in the spotlight. Don't think they are going to mess with the presidential race. They knew in 2016, Trump would win two terms, and they would have to get down and dirty to beat him, even with a decent candidate. Likely get caught doing it this time. They narrowly pulled off the Hilary scam, which failed, but they didn't get caught. I have every confidence, that they are really after both the House and Senate, since they can do pretty much everything they want, without Trump's approval. The can stop everything Trump wants, unless he gives in on some of that socialism crap. Pence is likely to cave on most everything, just to get something done. Biden winning would be a bonus to them, but throwing Trump out of office, is so much better. First impeached president to be removed, ever. Huge embarrassment for the republican party, they can use for decades. We will know better, since Biden is suppose to name his running mate this week. I'm doubtful he's going to find a qualified woman for the job, who enjoys being groped, and hair sniffed. Any woman, who could possibly step in for Joe, had to work hard to get were she is, and would do better running in 2024. Being Joe's VP, would be a career killer, and pretty embarrassing.
02-08-2020 21:20
gfm7175★★★★★ (3314)	IBdaMann wrote: Pretty much...
02-08-2020 22:42
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14389)	HarveyH55 wrote: I don't know about jail, Unfortunately, all people breaking the law by operating a business in order to feed their families will be jailed. People caught not wearing the ever-increasing required medical protection gear will be jailed. Those who step outside their homes without a permit during the ever-restrictive lockdown will be jailed. Those trying to school children in-person will be jailed. Democrats will never allow the lockdown to end. Only the police and government workers will be free. I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist Edited on 02-08-2020 23:32
02-08-2020 23:01
keepit ★★★★★ (3058)	The paranoid talk seems to be increasing.

02-08-2020 23:17
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14389)	keepit wrote: The paranoid talk seems to be increasing. Let me get this straight, my noting of how the Democrats have perpetrated five hoaxes onto the American people just to grab power and convert the US to another Venezuela is "paranoia" whereas your eternal panic over a mild flu virus is somehow rational? Did I get that right? . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
02-08-2020 23:29
keepit ★★★★★ (3058)	That's right. By the way, Dr. Gottlieb thinks most of the pandemic will subside by early next year.
03-08-2020 02:18
HarveyH55★★★★★ (5196)	keepit wrote: That's right. By the way, Dr. Gottlieb thinks most of the pandemic will subside by early next year. Isn't he the one who claimed that a 30 day lockdown would be enough to get control over this 'deadly' virus? 4 months later, the lockdowns started lifting. It was to risky to open up beaches, but rioting, looting, and burning business should be okay. How are the democrats going to arrest anyone, if they defund the police? The pandemic won't subside early next year, since it'll take that long to produce the second batch of vaccine. We might get enough doses, for about 1/3 the population. They keep mentioning 2 doses, so it won't even cover that. They haven't been pushing the antibodies test, which would save a lot of doses, for those who might benefit. You test positive for antibodies, you don't need the vaccine. That's about a half million doses saved, just from the confirmed cases numbers. Likely a couple million people din't know they had it, or didn't care enough to get tested, just a cold.
03-08-2020 03:08
keepit ★★★★★ (3058)	Dr. Gottlieb doesn't need your opinion. Both immunity after infection and vaccine are going to take a bite out out of covid accodrding to the doctor. BTW. It's been reported that some of those seeds produce a plant that will reduce the crop size of soy beans in indiana. Who knows what else? Edited on 03-08-2020 03:14
03-08-2020 04:18
HarveyH55★★★★★ (5196)	keepit wrote: Dr. Gottlieb doesn't need your opinion. Both immunity after infection and vaccine are going to take a bite out out of covid accodrding to the doctor. BTW. It's been reported that some of those seeds produce a plant that will reduce the crop size of soy beans in indiana. Who knows what else? A pandemic still usually last 2-3 years. We were asked to wear masks, and hide in the basement. Wasted about 7 months of natural immunity. We are only getting about 100 million doses, of the first batch. Unknown how many doses we get out of the second or third batches, or when they would be available. There are about 7.7 billion people on the planet. Likely, some of the other countries will have a need for vaccine as well. Fortunately, there is a short supply, and a high demand, so there shouldn't be any mandates. The basement dwellers can't fight over who gets to be a lab-rat. The vaccine, unless perfect in every way, 100% effective, isn't going to have a huge impact. It's going to be a light dose, and ineffective for many. Should be interesting to see how they deal with the fail, second dose, means few people immune. An excessively high dose, will kill some people, at high risk, since it'll trigger an excessively strong immune response, which is what really does all the damage, and death. Hard to get people vaccinated, if there are people dying from it. This is why clinical trials take so long. They need to find the dosage, that provokes a sufficient immune response, to create the antibodies, but they don't want to produce the symptoms, from an excessively strong dose.
03-08-2020 22:39
Into the Night★★★★★ (21582)	keepit wrote: The paranoid talk seems to be increasing. Yes. YOU are increasing it. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
03-08-2020 22:40
Into the Night★★★★★ (21582)	keepit wrote: That's right. By the way, Dr. Gottlieb thinks most of the pandemic will subside by early next year. Of course it will. The Democrats will no longer need it. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
03-08-2020 23:04
keepit ★★★★★ (3058)	ITN, You say that i'm causing the paranoid talk to increase. Wow. That would be an influence that i didn't know i had. Matter of fact i don't think it's legitimate to blame one person for another person's paranoid thought and speech. Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. How about you?
04-08-2020 00:00
gfm7175★★★★★ (3314)	keepit wrote: ITN, You say that i'm causing the paranoid talk to increase. Wow. That would be an influence that i didn't know i had. Yup, that's what he said. He is exactly right about that too. keepit wrote: Matter of fact i don't think it's legitimate to blame one person for another person's paranoid thought and speech. The paranoia is yours. keepit wrote: Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. How about you? Google promotes paranoid talk (such as yours). Evaluated and certified for what? By whom? Oh wait, I don't care...
04-08-2020 00:02
keepit ★★★★★ (3058)	gfm, "Google promotes paranoid talk", you say. That's good one. Edited on 04-08-2020 00:36

04-08-2020 05:19
Into the Night★★★★★ (21582)	keepit wrote: ITN, You say that i'm causing the paranoid talk to increase. That's exactly what I said. Good for you. keepit wrote: Wow. That would be an influence that i didn't know i had. You have no control over what you say? BTW, 'I' is always capitalized in English. keepit wrote: Matter of fact i don't think it's legitimate to blame one person for another person's paranoid thought and speech. I'm not. I'm blaming you for your speech and paranoid thought. keepit wrote: Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. So? Looks like I've got something to add to my sig! keepit wrote: I've been evaluated and certified. By who? Google??? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! keepit wrote: How about you? What about me? I'm not making paranoid speech and comments. You are. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 04-08-2020 05:20
04-08-2020 05:24
Into the Night★★★★★ (21582)	keepit wrote: gfm, "Google promotes paranoid talk", you say. That's good one. They do. That's why I don't use them as a search engine anymore, among other reasons. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
04-08-2020 06:32
James___ ★★★★★ (5513)	Into the Night wrote: keepit wrote: gfm, "Google promotes paranoid talk", you say. That's good one. They do. That's why I don't use them as a search engine anymore, among other reasons. The issue with search engines is that they search for the most common results. Want something specific? Good luck with that. An actual search for specific "key" words could take days. And as some search engines show, 1 million results in less than 1 second. That's kind of like going to McDonald's and ordering a hamburger. You'll get something but I don't know if I'd call it a hamburger. But it is something, right?
04-08-2020 10:20
HarveyH55★★★★★ (5196)	James___ wrote: Into the Night wrote: keepit wrote: gfm, "Google promotes paranoid talk", you say. That's good one. They do. That's why I don't use them as a search engine anymore, among other reasons. The issue with search engines is that they search for the most common results. Want something specific? Good luck with that. An actual search for specific "key" words could take days. And as some search engines show, 1 million results in less than 1 second. That's kind of like going to McDonald's and ordering a hamburger. You'll get something but I don't know if I'd call it a hamburger. But it is something, right? Search engines are free to use, but certainly not free to host, or provide. Kind oh expensive, actually, considering the traffic. Sponsors and advertisers pay some of the bills, but wouldn't account for huge profits they are showing. There is, of course, data mining, which pays pretty well for a lot of 'free' online services. Of course, sponsors and advertiser would want some sort of priority in the results, even if their products and services are crap, or not really related to the search. There are search items that are either banned, or frowned upon, being illegal, or potentially harmful. Biasing the results, for a price isn't such a stretch. I'm doubtful that popularity enters into the result too much, sort of lower down the list. New items appear on the search engine constantly, some of which, would have had time to gain an popularity, and still they show up. I heard about another drunk Nancy Pelosi video the other day, so I set to searching. Not sure if I missed it, but even the actual video from the last time, wasn't easy to dig up. Wasn't hard to find before. I didn't buy the doctored video the first time, and wanted to see if this was similar.
04-08-2020 10:36
Into the Night★★★★★ (21582)	James___ wrote: Into the Night wrote: keepit wrote: gfm, "Google promotes paranoid talk", you say. That's good one. They do. That's why I don't use them as a search engine anymore, among other reasons. The issue with search engines is that they search for the most common results. How do you know? James___ wrote: Want something specific? Good luck with that. An actual search for specific "key" words could take days. And could still be biased. James___ wrote: And as some search engines show, 1 million results in less than 1 second. That's kind of like going to McDonald's and ordering a hamburger. You'll get something but I don't know if I'd call it a hamburger. But it is something, right? More like going to McDonalds, ordering a hamburger, and getting everything on the menu. Your hamburger might be in there somewhere, but since beef is politically incorrect, it's buried under fries and salads, if it's there at all. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 04-08-2020 10:38

Join the debate If Democrats Gain Control of Congress:

Threads	Replies	Last post
QAnon Group Was Are Deceiving The Rest Of The World For Individual Gain	0	21-07-2023 06:09
The Root Problem Of Life Chaos, Suffering Is Because People Do Not Fully Understand, Control Environment	2	01-04-2021 06:03
Democrats Don't Even Conceal It	49	14-02-2021 18:14
How are the Borg not Democrats	13	18-12-2020 21:51
Humanity Must Take Control Of Their Own Destiny, Stop Relying On Others	1	18-08-2020 19:58