Remember me
▼ Content

IBdaMann, GasGuzzler, gfm7174, "interstitium" definition



Page 2 of 2<12
14-05-2026 00:57
Im a BM
★★★★★
(3489)
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
And THAT'S how you "win" a "debate" about "science".

You deny science.

You still haven't described what is 'changing' in climate.
You are still ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

You think 'science' is a magick paper.
You think 'science' is a magazine.
You think 'science' is a journal.
You think 'science' is a consensus or voting bloc.
You think 'science' is buzzword junk.
You think 'science' is a prize.
You think 'science' is spam.
You think 'science' is a title.
You think 'science' is a sanctification.
You think 'science' is a class or course.
You think 'science' is bacteria.
You think 'science' is climate.

Science is none of these things.
Science is a set of falsifiable theories.

You ignore several of them, including the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

You have also not yet described what is 'changing' in climate.


"You think 'science' is... You think 'science' is... You think 'science' is... You think 'science' is...You think 'science' is..
" and I'm not going to copy all ELEVEN times this meaningless phrase gets repeated.

It reinforces my conviction that Into the Night does not even know what 'science' IS. Literally!

Inversion fallacy.


I'm need to be "woke" enough to accept your self identification as a "chemist", in defiance of what the scientists declared on your Education Certificate.

Science is not what science is not.

Spam is as spam does.

Troll is in the eye of the beholder.
14-05-2026 09:24
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(24080)
Im a BM wrote:
...deleted spam and whining...

Whining gets you nowhere, Robert.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
18-05-2026 07:14
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15223)
Im a BM wrote:The mental gymnastics required for this level of cognitive dissonance are amazing!

Too funny! You are about to describe exactly how things are in science.

Im a BM wrote: everyone gets to have their own personal definition.

Exactly, but...
Im a BM wrote:Everyone must define their terms,

Exactly! It's the cost of having your own definitions.

Do you recall how Sir Isaac Newton developed his own notation? Do you recall that Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz did as well? Did you catch that they were allowed to do that? Did you extrapolate that all people are free to create all their own terms ... but that they have to define and explain them?

What? No? You never did? Color me surprised.
18-05-2026 17:20
Im a BM
★★★★★
(3489)
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:The mental gymnastics required for this level of cognitive dissonance are amazing!

Too funny! You are about to describe exactly how things are in science.

Im a BM wrote: everyone gets to have their own personal definition.

Exactly, but...
Im a BM wrote:Everyone must define their terms,

Exactly! It's the cost of having your own definitions.

Do you recall how Sir Isaac Newton developed his own notation? Do you recall that Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz did as well? Did you catch that they were allowed to do that? Did you extrapolate that all people are free to create all their own terms ... but that they have to define and explain them?

What? No? You never did? Color me surprised.


I invited GasGuzzler to come back and join this discussion. Sent a PM.

I invited gfm7175 to come back and join this discussion. Sent a PM.

I even let Harvey know he's always welcome here, with no censorship to fear.

But without fresh prey stumbling into the ambush, the trolls had nothing left to do but circle jerks. Google cut off the food supply when it stopped directing new members to this website.

Still, wouldn't it be nice to get the the "DEFINE YOUR TERMS" gang back together for one more party?

In the past, all a member needed to do was say, "I DO believe in climate change", and no less than three trolls would descend upon them in attack, nearly simultaneously.

You would think they would want to be here to continue the enlightening discussions with IBdaMann and YARP (Yellow And Red Parrot).. Get one of the good old circle jerks going again.

"Your religion is stupid." - IBdaMann
18-05-2026 20:44
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(24080)
Im a BM wrote:
...deleted whining...

Whining gets you nowhere, Robert.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
Page 2 of 2<12





Join the debate IBdaMann, GasGuzzler, gfm7174, "interstitium" definition:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Definition of a Troll6513-06-2026 22:46
Subscribtion challange, ITN, Swanny boy , James, IbdaMann and others, help me.2422-11-2025 22:26
IbdaMann physics mistake13706-01-2025 23:47
Wonder What GasGuzzler Is Doing Now?025-08-2020 06:38
The Definition of an Average Climate6403-08-2020 22:53
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact