I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner

Page 1 of 3

I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner13-04-2026 06:43
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15126)	I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
13-04-2026 13:36
Swan★★★★★ (7864)	IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . Anything to take the spotlight off of Kristy Noem's pantie wearing butt bopping husband IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
13-04-2026 23:22
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	Swan wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . Anything to take the spotlight off of Kristy Noem's pantie wearing butt bopping husband Shhhhhhh
14-04-2026 03:34
Spongy Iris★★★★★ (3432)	Im a BM wrote: Swan wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . Anything to take the spotlight off of Kristy Noem's pantie wearing butt bopping husband Shhhhhhh I nominate myself. Every post with a picture of the double sun, and a link to the Jesus Freak Killer files is a victory. https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
14-04-2026 12:49
Swan★★★★★ (7864)	Spongy Iris wrote: Im a BM wrote: Swan wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . Anything to take the spotlight off of Kristy Noem's pantie wearing butt bopping husband Shhhhhhh I nominate myself. Every post with a picture of the double sun, and a link to the Jesus Freak Killer files is a victory. If you say so special agent K IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
14-04-2026 23:02
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Im a BM wrote: Swan wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . Anything to take the spotlight off of Kristy Noem's pantie wearing butt bopping husband Shhhhhhh I nominate myself. Every post with a picture of the double sun, and a link to the Jesus Freak Killer files is a victory. If you say so special agent K "Fluoride is not a chemical." - Into the Night "Fluoride is a waste product..." - RFK Jr, a.k.a. "Marco Polio" Fluoride is the anion of fluorine, F-. Most chemists would say it IS a "chemical". Most dentists would say that it is beneficial to have some fluoride in the water supply. Another exhaustive study confirms that the mythical health hazards and risk to IQ development allegedly associated with fluoride are RKF Jr having flashbacks. But this is the reign of ANTI SCIENCE! What did I win?
14-04-2026 23:07
Swan★★★★★ (7864)	Im a BM wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Im a BM wrote: Swan wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . Anything to take the spotlight off of Kristy Noem's pantie wearing butt bopping husband Shhhhhhh I nominate myself. Every post with a picture of the double sun, and a link to the Jesus Freak Killer files is a victory. If you say so special agent K "Fluoride is not a chemical." - Into the Night "Fluoride is a waste product..." - RFK Jr, a.k.a. "Marco Polio" Fluoride is the anion of fluorine, F-. Most chemists would say it IS a "chemical". Most dentists would say that it is beneficial to have some fluoride in the water supply. Another exhaustive study confirms that the mythical health hazards and risk to IQ development allegedly associated with fluoride are RKF Jr having flashbacks. But this is the reign of ANTI SCIENCE! What did I win? I use fluoride free toothpaste whether you like it or not and you cannot stop me. RFK jr also wants people to eat less beef and eat more beef fat. So he is just another dumocrat on the loose IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
15-04-2026 12:01
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15126)	Im a BM wrote:Fluoride is the anion of fluorine, F-. Most chemists would say it IS a "chemical". All actual chemists acknowledge that fluoride is not a chemical, but is a class/category of chemicals, specifically of the F- class. If you were an actual chemist, you would know this. If you weren't scientifically illiterate, you'd know about "classification". But this is the reign of ANTI SCIENCE! Im a BM wrote: Most dentists would say that it is beneficial to have some fluoride in the water supply. Did you interview them personally? All of them? . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
15-04-2026 12:04
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15126)	Spongy Iris wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? I nominate myself. Every post with a picture of the double sun, and a link to the Jesus Freak Killer files is a victory. The nominations are locked in. Swan and Spongy Iris are the competitors. The voting will commence. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
15-04-2026 14:51
Swan★★★★★ (7864)	IBdaMann wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? I nominate myself. Every post with a picture of the double sun, and a link to the Jesus Freak Killer files is a victory. The nominations are locked in. Swan and Spongy Iris are the competitors. The voting will commence. . Indeed, let the delusions commence. See we always know when you go off your Abilify IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
15-04-2026 17:18
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	IBdaMann wrote: Im a BM wrote:Fluoride is the anion of fluorine, F-. Most chemists would say it IS a "chemical". All actual chemists acknowledge that fluoride is not a chemical, but is a class/category of chemicals, specifically of the F- class. If you were an actual chemist, you would know this. If you weren't scientifically illiterate, you'd know about "classification". But this is the reign of ANTI SCIENCE! Im a BM wrote: Most dentists would say that it is beneficial to have some fluoride in the water supply. Did you interview them personally? All of them? . The fluoride anion, F-, is not a "class" of anything. It is a specific chemical with a specific formula. There is only one fluoride anion. "Fluorides" (sodium fluoride, potassium fluoride, etc.) are a "class", but not fluoride itself. But you don't trust dictionaries or textbooks, so it won't do any good to give you a reference. If you had ever taken a course in chemistry, which you obviously never have, you would potentially have something of value to contribute. Or you could, once again, write out "Carbonate is not a chemical" TWO HUNDRED TIMES. To make some kind of point, I guess. Meanwhile, that carbonate ion, the oxyanion CO3(2-), is the important player in ocean "acidification". Learning what it is, rather than simply denying its characterization as a "chemical", would give you something more than "Water itself is a buffer for acid" to say about sea water chemistry. Infinite dilution is not the solution to pollution, even if it DID exist. Edited on 15-04-2026 17:55
15-04-2026 17:55
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15126)	Im a BM wrote:The fluoride anion, F-, is not a "class" of anything. Yes, a "class" or "category" is exactly what it is, you just happen to be too uneducated to know this. If you were to learn science, however, especially chemistry, it will help you tremendously. Im a BM wrote: It is a specific chemical compound with a specific formula. Nope. The class of fluoride is defined as having fluorine in the −1 oxidation state. It is any chemical species that contains the fluoride ion, F⁻, e.g. Sodium fluoride (NaF), Calcium fluoride (CaF₂), Stannous fluoride (SnF₂), Hydrogen fluoride (HF) (becomes fluoride in water), etc., and also includes ionic fluorides (salts), covalent fluorides (molecules), and complex fluorides (e.g., BF₄⁻). I highly recommend you ask a chemist to verify this for you, and while you are at it, ask about "classification" and "categories" if you can. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
15-04-2026 17:57
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15126)	Swan wrote:Indeed, let the delusions commence. Ooooh, Swan tries to implicitly vote for himself. Sorry, no can do. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
15-04-2026 18:42
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	IBdaMann wrote: Im a BM wrote:The fluoride anion, F-, is not a "class" of anything. Yes, a "class" or "category" is exactly what it is, you just happen to be too uneducated to know this. If you were to learn science, however, especially chemistry, it will help you tremendously. Im a BM wrote: It is a specific chemical compound with a specific formula. Nope. The class of fluoride is defined as having fluorine in the −1 oxidation state. It is any chemical species that contains the fluoride ion, F⁻, e.g. Sodium fluoride (NaF), Calcium fluoride (CaF₂), Stannous fluoride (SnF₂), Hydrogen fluoride (HF) (becomes fluoride in water), etc., and also includes ionic fluorides (salts), covalent fluorides (molecules), and complex fluorides (e.g., BF₄⁻). I highly recommend you ask a chemist to verify this for you, and while you are at it, ask about "classification" and "categories" if you can. . If there were a PhD program for word game science, you would be qualified. There is a good reason you were unable to pass a course in chemistry.
15-04-2026 18:57
Swan★★★★★ (7864)	IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote:Indeed, let the delusions commence. Ooooh, Swan tries to implicitly vote for himself. Sorry, no can do. . Look dude, you really need to take your Chlorpromazine, before you post your delusions here IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
15-04-2026 19:07
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	Swan wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote:Indeed, let the delusions commence. Ooooh, Swan tries to implicitly vote for himself. Sorry, no can do. . Look dude, you really need to take your Chlorpromazine, before you post your delusions here What time is it? It's time to get SNARKY!
15-04-2026 22:04
Into the Night★★★★★ (23897)	Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Im a BM wrote:The fluoride anion, F-, is not a "class" of anything. Yes, a "class" or "category" is exactly what it is, you just happen to be too uneducated to know this. If you were to learn science, however, especially chemistry, it will help you tremendously. Im a BM wrote: It is a specific chemical compound with a specific formula. Nope. The class of fluoride is defined as having fluorine in the −1 oxidation state. It is any chemical species that contains the fluoride ion, F⁻, e.g. Sodium fluoride (NaF), Calcium fluoride (CaF₂), Stannous fluoride (SnF₂), Hydrogen fluoride (HF) (becomes fluoride in water), etc., and also includes ionic fluorides (salts), covalent fluorides (molecules), and complex fluorides (e.g., BF₄⁻). I highly recommend you ask a chemist to verify this for you, and while you are at it, ask about "classification" and "categories" if you can. . If there were a PhD program for word game science, you would be qualified. There is a good reason you were unable to pass a course in chemistry. Inversion fallacy . The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
15-04-2026 22:07
Into the Night★★★★★ (23897)	IBdaMann wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? I nominate myself. Every post with a picture of the double sun, and a link to the Jesus Freak Killer files is a victory. The nominations are locked in. Swan and Spongy Iris are the competitors. The voting will commence. . I nominate IBdaMann. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
16-04-2026 00:06
gfm7175★★★★★ (3343)	I vote for IBDaMann
16-04-2026 00:17
Spongy Iris★★★★★ (3432)	gfm7175 wrote: I vote for IBDaMann Blast from the past shows up. Lets hear from James, Harvey, keepit, and tmiddles. https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html Edited on 16-04-2026 00:19
16-04-2026 00:21
Spongy Iris★★★★★ (3432)	Into the Night wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? I nominate myself. Every post with a picture of the double sun, and a link to the Jesus Freak Killer files is a victory. The nominations are locked in. Swan and Spongy Iris are the competitors. The voting will commence. . I nominate IBdaMann. Science is not consensus. Nyuk nyuk nyuk. https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
16-04-2026 06:25
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15126)	Into the Night wrote: I nominate IBdaMann. gfm7175 wrote: I vote for IBDaMann We're going to have to talk to the judges to see if we can get in any additional nominees or if the window on that has closed. I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
16-04-2026 06:37
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15126)	Im a BM wrote:What time is it? It's time to get SNARKY! I want to congratulate you. I hear you are the top runner in the category of "most likely to save the planet from catastrophic inorganic hexavalent chromium change through organic sea-water-infused, inorganic polyphenol-driven mangroves. They tell me you have it sinched.
16-04-2026 17:17
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	Spongy Iris wrote: gfm7175 wrote: I vote for IBDaMann Blast from the past shows up. Lets hear from James, Harvey, keepit, and tmiddles. Clearly, there are a whole lot more people reading than posting. I suspect that James is no longer alive. Harvey got too disgusted with being insulted for not believing in magic petroleum. Keepit may have met his maker by now, or maybe he just found greener pastures for Internet discussion. I wouldn't be surprised if tmiddles continues to occasionally follow the discussion and make semi annual visits. GassyGuz is MIA. And this little tidbit is all we get from Gfm7777. But maybe climate-debate.com will rise again. Google will once again display this website high on the results list for those seeking a climate change discussion website. Other websites offer "skeptic" science. Sure, climate changes. But there is no definitive proof that humans are responsible, right? WRONG! Here is where they insist that CLIMATE CANNOT CHANGE. Ever. By any plausible mechanism of any kind. Here is where they insist that it is simply not possible to know what happened in the past, because we were not there to personally witness it. Here is where they insist that it is simply not possible to measure climate-related parameters. Here is where they insist that there is "no such thing" as climate change, or biogeochemistry, terminal electron acceptors, organic carbon... the list goes on and on for the HARD CORE SCIENCE DENIAL that you can find at climate-debate.com None of this half ass pussy "skeptic" shit here. They go ALL THE WAY with the science denial here. There is simply "no such thing" as "climate change". According to the scientifically illiterate trolls who took over climate-debate.com
16-04-2026 19:03
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	gfm7175 wrote: I vote for IBDaMann Long time no see! Hey, I still remember you fondly. You were so awesome in the "alligators are amphibians" debate! You backed up IBdaMann's demands with righteous indignation. You told me that I had been "politely asked" to make a statement about whether alligators are AMPHIBIOUS, because that means science calls them "amphibians". There are salamanders that are amphibians, but they are not amphibious. They will die if taken out of the water, as some species of salamanders have adults with no lungs and only gills. They are amphibians because they are vertebrates in the amphibian family. The "amphi bios" (two lives) refers to the two stage life cycle, not the aquatic versus land environment. There are frogs that are amphibians, and they live their entire lives in trees. Never once go down to the ground to lay eggs in water. They complete the entire larval stage of their life cycle while still in the egg, which doesn't hatch until they emerge as air breathing adults. Soooo.... I guess I'm the bad guy because I was "politely" asked to repeat a sentence about whether or not alligators are "amphibious". There are MANY species of animals with two stage life cycles. Among them, many have a gilled juvenile stage in water and an air breathing adult stage. But most amphibious animals are NOT amphibians. And not all amphibians are amphibious. All those insects, crustaceans, etc., with a two stage life cycle, air-breathing versus gilled, are NOT vertebrates. To be an amphibian, an animal has to be a vertebrate. Alligators are vertebrates, but they are REPTILES. NOT amphibians, despite being amphibious. "Watch out for trolls who hide behind word games.." - IBdaMann
16-04-2026 22:50
Into the Night★★★★★ (23897)	Im a BM wrote: Google will once again display this website high on the results list for those seeking a climate change discussion website. Climate cannot change. This site is called climate-debate.com. Im a BM wrote: Other websites offer "skeptic" science. Sure, climate changes. But there is no definitive proof that humans are responsible, right? WRONG! Climate cannot change. Only humans are responsible for this buzzword. Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that CLIMATE CANNOT CHANGE. Ever. By any plausible mechanism of any kind. It can't. There is no 'mechanism'. Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that it is simply not possible to know what happened in the past, because we were not there to personally witness it. This is also true. Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that it is simply not possible to measure climate-related parameters. What 'climate-related parameters'? What are you measuring? Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that there is "no such thing" as climate change, or biogeochemistry, terminal electron acceptors, organic carbon... the list goes on and on for the HARD CORE SCIENCE DENIAL that you can find at climate-debate.com Climate cannot change. There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as 'terminal electron acceptors'. Carbon is not organic. You can't blame your illiteracy and denial of theories of science on anybody else, Robert. They are YOUR problems. Im a BM wrote: None of this half ass pussy "skeptic" shit here. They go ALL THE WAY with the science denial here. 'They' is YOU, Robert. Im a BM wrote: There is simply "no such thing" as "climate change". Climate cannot change. Im a BM wrote: According to the scientifically illiterate trolls who took over climate-debate.com No, Robert. You claim that climate can somehow 'change'. I ask you again: What is 'changing'? The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
16-04-2026 22:51
Into the Night★★★★★ (23897)	Im a BM wrote: Google will once again display this website high on the results list for those seeking a climate change discussion website. Climate cannot change. This site is called climate-debate.com. Im a BM wrote: Other websites offer "skeptic" science. Sure, climate changes. But there is no definitive proof that humans are responsible, right? WRONG! Climate cannot change. Only humans are responsible for this buzzword. Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that CLIMATE CANNOT CHANGE. Ever. By any plausible mechanism of any kind. It can't. There is no 'mechanism'. Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that it is simply not possible to know what happened in the past, because we were not there to personally witness it. This is also true. Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that it is simply not possible to measure climate-related parameters. What 'climate-related parameters'? What are you measuring? Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that there is "no such thing" as climate change, or biogeochemistry, terminal electron acceptors, organic carbon... the list goes on and on for the HARD CORE SCIENCE DENIAL that you can find at climate-debate.com Climate cannot change. There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as 'terminal electron acceptors'. Carbon is not organic. You can't blame your illiteracy and denial of theories of science on anybody else, Robert. They are YOUR problems. Im a BM wrote: None of this half ass pussy "skeptic" shit here. They go ALL THE WAY with the science denial here. 'They' is YOU, Robert. Im a BM wrote: There is simply "no such thing" as "climate change". Climate cannot change. Im a BM wrote: According to the scientifically illiterate trolls who took over climate-debate.com No, Robert. You claim that climate can somehow 'change'. I ask you again: What is 'changing'? The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
16-04-2026 22:57
Swan★★★★★ (7864)	Into the Night wrote: Im a BM wrote: Google will once again display this website high on the results list for those seeking a climate change discussion website. Climate cannot change. This site is called climate-debate.com. Im a BM wrote: Other websites offer "skeptic" science. Sure, climate changes. But there is no definitive proof that humans are responsible, right? WRONG! Climate cannot change. Only humans are responsible for this buzzword. Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that CLIMATE CANNOT CHANGE. Ever. By any plausible mechanism of any kind. It can't. There is no 'mechanism'. Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that it is simply not possible to know what happened in the past, because we were not there to personally witness it. This is also true. Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that it is simply not possible to measure climate-related parameters. What 'climate-related parameters'? What are you measuring? Im a BM wrote: Here is where they insist that there is "no such thing" as climate change, or biogeochemistry, terminal electron acceptors, organic carbon... the list goes on and on for the HARD CORE SCIENCE DENIAL that you can find at climate-debate.com Climate cannot change. There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as 'terminal electron acceptors'. Carbon is not organic. You can't blame your illiteracy and denial of theories of science on anybody else, Robert. They are YOUR problems. Im a BM wrote: None of this half ass pussy "skeptic" shit here. They go ALL THE WAY with the science denial here. 'They' is YOU, Robert. Im a BM wrote: There is simply "no such thing" as "climate change". Climate cannot change. Im a BM wrote: According to the scientifically illiterate trolls who took over climate-debate.com No, Robert. You claim that climate can somehow 'change'. I ask you again: What is 'changing'? If you say so IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
16-04-2026 23:05
Into the Night★★★★★ (23897)	Im a BM wrote: You were so awesome in the "alligators are amphibians" debate! You want to play this word game again, Robert? Im a BM wrote: You backed up IBdaMann's demands with righteous indignation. You told me that I had been "politely asked" to make a statement about whether alligators are AMPHIBIOUS, because that means science calls them "amphibians". Alligators are amphibians. Im a BM wrote: There are salamanders that are amphibians, but they are not amphibious. If they are not amphibious, they are not amphbians. Im a BM wrote: They will die if taken out of the water, as some species of salamanders have adults with no lungs and only gills. They are amphibians because they are vertebrates in the amphibian family. The "amphi bios" (two lives) refers to the two stage life cycle, not the aquatic versus land environment. Such a creature is not an amphibian. Im a BM wrote: There are frogs that are amphibians, and they live their entire lives in trees. Never once go down to the ground to lay eggs in water. They complete the entire larval stage of their life cycle while still in the egg, which doesn't hatch until they emerge as air breathing adults. Such a frog is not an amphibian. Im a BM wrote: Soooo.... I guess I'm the bad guy because I was "politely" asked to repeat a sentence about whether or not alligators are "amphibious". They are. Im a BM wrote: There are MANY species of animals with two stage life cycles. Among them, many have a gilled juvenile stage in water and an air breathing adult stage. But most amphibious animals are NOT amphibians. All amphibious animals are amphibian. Im a BM wrote: And not all amphibians are amphibious. ALL amphibians are amphibious. Im a BM wrote: All those insects, crustaceans, etc., with a two stage life cycle, air-breathing versus gilled, are NOT vertebrates. So? Im a BM wrote: To be an amphibian, an animal has to be a vertebrate. Nope. Having a vertebra is not required to be amphibian. Im a BM wrote: Alligators are vertebrates, but they are REPTILES. NOT amphibians, despite being amphibious. Alligators are amphibian and reptiles. Im a BM wrote: "Watch out for trolls who hide behind word games.." - IBdaMann He is right. Your word games won't work,Robert. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
16-04-2026 23:16
sealover ★★★★☆ (1953)	Into the Night wrote: Im a BM wrote: You were so awesome in the "alligators are amphibians" debate! You want to play this word game again, Robert? Im a BM wrote: You backed up IBdaMann's demands with righteous indignation. You told me that I had been "politely asked" to make a statement about whether alligators are AMPHIBIOUS, because that means science calls them "amphibians". Alligators are amphibians. Im a BM wrote: There are salamanders that are amphibians, but they are not amphibious. If they are not amphibious, they are not amphbians. Im a BM wrote: They will die if taken out of the water, as some species of salamanders have adults with no lungs and only gills. They are amphibians because they are vertebrates in the amphibian family. The "amphi bios" (two lives) refers to the two stage life cycle, not the aquatic versus land environment. Such a creature is not an amphibian. Im a BM wrote: There are frogs that are amphibians, and they live their entire lives in trees. Never once go down to the ground to lay eggs in water. They complete the entire larval stage of their life cycle while still in the egg, which doesn't hatch until they emerge as air breathing adults. Such a frog is not an amphibian. Im a BM wrote: Soooo.... I guess I'm the bad guy because I was "politely" asked to repeat a sentence about whether or not alligators are "amphibious". They are. Im a BM wrote: There are MANY species of animals with two stage life cycles. Among them, many have a gilled juvenile stage in water and an air breathing adult stage. But most amphibious animals are NOT amphibians. All amphibious animals are amphibian. Im a BM wrote: And not all amphibians are amphibious. ALL amphibians are amphibious. Im a BM wrote: All those insects, crustaceans, etc., with a two stage life cycle, air-breathing versus gilled, are NOT vertebrates. So? Im a BM wrote: To be an amphibian, an animal has to be a vertebrate. Nope. Having a vertebra is not required to be amphibian. Im a BM wrote: Alligators are vertebrates, but they are REPTILES. NOT amphibians, despite being amphibious. Alligators are amphibian and reptiles. Im a BM wrote: "Watch out for trolls who hide behind word games.." - IBdaMann He is right. Your word games won't work,Robert. How would YOU know? "Having a vertebra is not required to be an amphibian" - Into the Nitght No, not if you call a motorized water craft capable of driving on land "amphibian" The tragic tale of the scientifically illiterate Internet troll.. He once briefly attempted post secondary education in science. He didn't get far at all. He got into Bum**** College, or maybe even College State University. But he couldn't hack it. Science is HARD! And those guys don't know anything. I nevur rilly liked coledge anyways...
16-04-2026 23:19
Into the Night★★★★★ (23897)	sealover wrote: Into the Night wrote: Im a BM wrote: You were so awesome in the "alligators are amphibians" debate! You want to play this word game again, Robert? Im a BM wrote: You backed up IBdaMann's demands with righteous indignation. You told me that I had been "politely asked" to make a statement about whether alligators are AMPHIBIOUS, because that means science calls them "amphibians". Alligators are amphibians. Im a BM wrote: There are salamanders that are amphibians, but they are not amphibious. If they are not amphibious, they are not amphbians. Im a BM wrote: They will die if taken out of the water, as some species of salamanders have adults with no lungs and only gills. They are amphibians because they are vertebrates in the amphibian family. The "amphi bios" (two lives) refers to the two stage life cycle, not the aquatic versus land environment. Such a creature is not an amphibian. Im a BM wrote: There are frogs that are amphibians, and they live their entire lives in trees. Never once go down to the ground to lay eggs in water. They complete the entire larval stage of their life cycle while still in the egg, which doesn't hatch until they emerge as air breathing adults. Such a frog is not an amphibian. Im a BM wrote: Soooo.... I guess I'm the bad guy because I was "politely" asked to repeat a sentence about whether or not alligators are "amphibious". They are. Im a BM wrote: There are MANY species of animals with two stage life cycles. Among them, many have a gilled juvenile stage in water and an air breathing adult stage. But most amphibious animals are NOT amphibians. All amphibious animals are amphibian. Im a BM wrote: And not all amphibians are amphibious. ALL amphibians are amphibious. Im a BM wrote: All those insects, crustaceans, etc., with a two stage life cycle, air-breathing versus gilled, are NOT vertebrates. So? Im a BM wrote: To be an amphibian, an animal has to be a vertebrate. Nope. Having a vertebra is not required to be amphibian. Im a BM wrote: Alligators are vertebrates, but they are REPTILES. NOT amphibians, despite being amphibious. Alligators are amphibian and reptiles. Im a BM wrote: "Watch out for trolls who hide behind word games.." - IBdaMann He is right. Your word games won't work,Robert. How would YOU know? "Having a vertebra is not required to be an amphibian" - Into the Nitght No, not if you call a motorized water craft capable of driving on land "amphibian" The tragic tale of the scientifically illiterate Internet troll.. He once briefly attempted post secondary education in science. He didn't get far at all. He got into Bum** College, or maybe even College State University. But he couldn't hack it. Science is HARD! And those guys don't know anything. I nevur rilly liked coledge anyways... YARP The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan**
16-04-2026 23:34
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	Into the Night wrote: sealover wrote: Into the Night wrote: Im a BM wrote: You were so awesome in the "alligators are amphibians" debate! You want to play this word game again, Robert? Im a BM wrote: You backed up IBdaMann's demands with righteous indignation. You told me that I had been "politely asked" to make a statement about whether alligators are AMPHIBIOUS, because that means science calls them "amphibians". Alligators are amphibians. Im a BM wrote: There are salamanders that are amphibians, but they are not amphibious. If they are not amphibious, they are not amphbians. Im a BM wrote: They will die if taken out of the water, as some species of salamanders have adults with no lungs and only gills. They are amphibians because they are vertebrates in the amphibian family. The "amphi bios" (two lives) refers to the two stage life cycle, not the aquatic versus land environment. Such a creature is not an amphibian. Im a BM wrote: There are frogs that are amphibians, and they live their entire lives in trees. Never once go down to the ground to lay eggs in water. They complete the entire larval stage of their life cycle while still in the egg, which doesn't hatch until they emerge as air breathing adults. Such a frog is not an amphibian. Im a BM wrote: Soooo.... I guess I'm the bad guy because I was "politely" asked to repeat a sentence about whether or not alligators are "amphibious". They are. Im a BM wrote: There are MANY species of animals with two stage life cycles. Among them, many have a gilled juvenile stage in water and an air breathing adult stage. But most amphibious animals are NOT amphibians. All amphibious animals are amphibian. Im a BM wrote: And not all amphibians are amphibious. ALL amphibians are amphibious. Im a BM wrote: All those insects, crustaceans, etc., with a two stage life cycle, air-breathing versus gilled, are NOT vertebrates. So? Im a BM wrote: To be an amphibian, an animal has to be a vertebrate. Nope. Having a vertebra is not required to be amphibian. Im a BM wrote: Alligators are vertebrates, but they are REPTILES. NOT amphibians, despite being amphibious. Alligators are amphibian and reptiles. Im a BM wrote: "Watch out for trolls who hide behind word games.." - IBdaMann He is right. Your word games won't work,Robert. How would YOU know? "Having a vertebra is not required to be an amphibian" - Into the Nitght No, not if you call a motorized water craft capable of driving on land "amphibian" The tragic tale of the scientifically illiterate Internet troll.. He once briefly attempted post secondary education in science. He didn't get far at all. He got into Bum**** College, or maybe even College State University. But he couldn't hack it. Science is HARD! And those guys don't know anything. I nevur rilly liked coledge anyways... YARP And the WINNER is the guy with 23,545 posts, or more than ONE IN FIVE of all posts EVER put up at climate-debate.com Very, very persistent. Year after year, post after post. Of course that would mean that IBdaMann is NUMBER TWO! It's a fact, no matter how you interpret it. Congratulations! You won the climate-debate.com debate! But watch your back, because IBdaMann is still NUMBER TWO.
23-04-2026 20:45
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . What criteria should the judges use to determine the winner of the competition? What did IBdaMann do to "win"? He has not yet won the Last Troll Standing contest. In terms of bandwidth consumption and volume, IBdaMann has fewer posts than Into the Night. Perhaps the distinction is post QUALITY rather than QUANTITY, because IBdaMann is smaller than Into the Night, if size is what really matters. If the criteria is the ability to generate a RESPONSE to posts, then the "winner" isn't the one with the most posts, it's the one whose posts get the most replies. There is no way to determine how many "views" an individual post gets, but it is possible to distinguish which threads are attracting the most views. Perhaps an additional criteria to determine the "winner" would include assessment of whose threads are attracting the most views. Is climate-debate.com a meritocracy, or do we give rewards on the basis of seniority? More than 11 years since IBdaMann's first post here, so he has EARNED that seniority entitlement. However, I suspect that IBdaMann's thinking was more "King of the Hill" competition. "There can be only ONE!" Trust me on this one, IBdaMann. They will NEVER let you be the Last Troll Standing at climate-debate.com, no matter how quiet it seems to get. Science is not a chemical! Edited on 23-04-2026 20:53
25-04-2026 22:13
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . "You won't be here long." - IBdaMann I nominate IBdaMann as the Climate Debate winner, assuming that "debate" means driving away new members as soon as they dare to say "climate change". Like war medals, IBdaMann quotes his vanquished enemies in his signature line. The senior and dominant troll who used to lead a tiny Cult of Thermodenial. Okay, now tell us what he won!
26-04-2026 02:42
Swan★★★★★ (7864)	Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . "You won't be here long." - IBdaMann I nominate IBdaMann as the Climate Debate winner, assuming that "debate" means driving away new members as soon as they dare to say "climate change". Like war medals, IBdaMann quotes his vanquished enemies in his signature line. The senior and dominant troll who used to lead a tiny Cult of Thermodenial. Okay, now tell us what he won! Climate change on Earth began around 5 billion years ago, so get used to it loony IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
26-04-2026 02:56
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	Swan wrote: Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . "You won't be here long." - IBdaMann I nominate IBdaMann as the Climate Debate winner, assuming that "debate" means driving away new members as soon as they dare to say "climate change". Like war medals, IBdaMann quotes his vanquished enemies in his signature line. The senior and dominant troll who used to lead a tiny Cult of Thermodenial. Okay, now tell us what he won! Climate change on Earth began around 5 billion years ago, so get used to it loony This is a teachable moment When did climate change begin? "around 5 billion years ago"? This 5000 million year figure is off by about 800 million years. The Earth wasn't even assembled as a functioning planet until about 4600 million years ago. It took at least 400 million years before the Earth cooled enough to even HAVE a climate that could change. Without liquid water oceans and only the thinnest atmosphere, the kind of precipitation, temperature, wind, and humidity regimes that comprise "climate" don't really exist.
26-04-2026 14:25
Swan★★★★★ (7864)	Im a BM wrote: Swan wrote: Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . "You won't be here long." - IBdaMann I nominate IBdaMann as the Climate Debate winner, assuming that "debate" means driving away new members as soon as they dare to say "climate change". Like war medals, IBdaMann quotes his vanquished enemies in his signature line. The senior and dominant troll who used to lead a tiny Cult of Thermodenial. Okay, now tell us what he won! Climate change on Earth began around 5 billion years ago, so get used to it loony This is a teachable moment When did climate change begin? "around 5 billion years ago"? This 5000 million year figure is off by about 800 million years. The Earth wasn't even assembled as a functioning planet until about 4600 million years ago. It took at least 400 million years before the Earth cooled enough to even HAVE a climate that could change. Without liquid water oceans and only the thinnest atmosphere, the kind of precipitation, temperature, wind, and humidity regimes that comprise "climate" don't really exist. Wrong again as your figure is based upon the oldest known rocks on Earth. You are wrong because the Earth is older than that as the first rocks were all recycled thru volcanism on an earlier hotter Earth. Feel free to try again child. You can even ask your mom for helpy Next IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
26-04-2026 15:57
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3283)	Swan wrote: Im a BM wrote: Swan wrote: Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . "You won't be here long." - IBdaMann I nominate IBdaMann as the Climate Debate winner, assuming that "debate" means driving away new members as soon as they dare to say "climate change". Like war medals, IBdaMann quotes his vanquished enemies in his signature line. The senior and dominant troll who used to lead a tiny Cult of Thermodenial. Okay, now tell us what he won! Climate change on Earth began around 5 billion years ago, so get used to it loony This is a teachable moment When did climate change begin? "around 5 billion years ago"? This 5000 million year figure is off by about 800 million years. The Earth wasn't even assembled as a functioning planet until about 4600 million years ago. It took at least 400 million years before the Earth cooled enough to even HAVE a climate that could change. Without liquid water oceans and only the thinnest atmosphere, the kind of precipitation, temperature, wind, and humidity regimes that comprise "climate" don't really exist. Wrong again as your figure is based upon the oldest known rocks on Earth. You are wrong because the Earth is older than that as the first rocks were all recycled thru volcanism on an earlier hotter Earth. Feel free to try again child. You can even ask your mom for helpy Next My mom says your "earlier hotter Earth" hypothesis is pretty far fetched. Okay, you're saying that there were regional climatic regimes of precipitation, wind, humidity, etc. BEFORE there were any bodies of standing liquid water? It took a while for the Earth to be cool enough to make any kind of solid "rock" material we would recognize today as rocks. I'm sure that your secret source of information knows more than I ever will. I'm so ignorant, I didn't even know that Bush was in charge of the CIA at the time of the JKF assassination. Your secret sources know more than I do.
26-04-2026 21:08
Into the Night★★★★★ (23897)	Swan wrote: Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . "You won't be here long." - IBdaMann I nominate IBdaMann as the Climate Debate winner, assuming that "debate" means driving away new members as soon as they dare to say "climate change". Like war medals, IBdaMann quotes his vanquished enemies in his signature line. The senior and dominant troll who used to lead a tiny Cult of Thermodenial. Okay, now tell us what he won! Climate change on Earth began around 5 billion years ago, so get used to it loony What is 'changing' in climate? The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
26-04-2026 21:10
Into the Night★★★★★ (23897)	Swan wrote: Im a BM wrote: Swan wrote: Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner. Are there any seconds? Thirds? . "You won't be here long." - IBdaMann I nominate IBdaMann as the Climate Debate winner, assuming that "debate" means driving away new members as soon as they dare to say "climate change". Like war medals, IBdaMann quotes his vanquished enemies in his signature line. The senior and dominant troll who used to lead a tiny Cult of Thermodenial. Okay, now tell us what he won! Climate change on Earth began around 5 billion years ago, so get used to it loony This is a teachable moment When did climate change begin? "around 5 billion years ago"? This 5000 million year figure is off by about 800 million years. The Earth wasn't even assembled as a functioning planet until about 4600 million years ago. It took at least 400 million years before the Earth cooled enough to even HAVE a climate that could change. Without liquid water oceans and only the thinnest atmosphere, the kind of precipitation, temperature, wind, and humidity regimes that comprise "climate" don't really exist. Wrong again as your figure is based upon the oldest known rocks on Earth. You are wrong because the Earth is older than that as the first rocks were all recycled thru volcanism on an earlier hotter Earth. Feel free to try again child. You can even ask your mom for helpy Next You don't know how old a rock is. Did you know that most of the Earth is molten? The crust you stand on is very thin. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan

Page 1 of 3

Join the debate I nominate Swan as the Climate Debate winner:

Threads	Replies	Last post
Why is Climate-debate.com so messed up?	224	02-05-2026 08:49
Who is who on Climate-debate.com	148	02-05-2026 01:21
Another better way to post on Climate-debate.com	62	30-04-2026 20:20
Time to Ban Swan?	65	30-04-2026 10:47
Please join me in a moment of silence for the passing of Climate-Debate.com	16	29-04-2026 08:43