Remember me
▼ Content

I agree CO2 should be restricted, but not for the reason promoted


I agree CO2 should be restricted, but not for the reason promoted30-01-2017 22:17
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1085)
I don't think CO2 causes global warming. CO2 is harmless to the body except in very large quantities. I think CO2 restricted to no more than 440 ppm is enough.
30-01-2017 22:22
Tim the plumber
★★★★☆
(1339)
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
I don't think CO2 causes global warming. CO2 is harmless to the body except in very large quantities. I think CO2 restricted to no more than 440 ppm is enough.


Why 440ppm???

The CO2 in the room you are in is loads more than that.

This is a science area of debate. If you know nothing about science then you can't be in it.
31-01-2017 00:23
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1085)
Tim the plumber wrote:
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
I don't think CO2 causes global warming. CO2 is harmless to the body except in very large quantities. I think CO2 restricted to no more than 440 ppm is enough.


Why 440ppm???

The CO2 in the room you are in is loads more than that.

This is a science area of debate. If you know nothing about science then you can't be in it.


440 because that's what it was tens of millions of years ago and which is known to be safe levels for all floral and fauna.
31-01-2017 01:05
Tim the plumber
★★★★☆
(1339)
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
Tim the plumber wrote:
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
I don't think CO2 causes global warming. CO2 is harmless to the body except in very large quantities. I think CO2 restricted to no more than 440 ppm is enough.


Why 440ppm???

The CO2 in the room you are in is loads more than that.

This is a science area of debate. If you know nothing about science then you can't be in it.


440 because that's what it was tens of millions of years ago and which is known to be safe levels for all floral and fauna.


It is known to be safe for al lflora and fauna at far higher levels than that.

Flora loves the stuff. Commercial greenhouses are kept at high levels of it, sometimes at such levels that it is deadly for humans.
31-01-2017 01:11
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
Its important that "sigh-ants" be delineated by...... old sick silly sleepy sleazy slimy steenkin' AGW denier liar whiners without science chemistry astronomy physics algebra & pre-calc in unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.
Edited on 31-01-2017 01:13




Join the debate I agree CO2 should be restricted, but not for the reason promoted:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Proof That Too Much CO2 Is An Existential Threat9829-05-2022 08:26
Co2 ice samples727-05-2022 15:38
Fossil Fuel Substitution for reduced emission of CO2, mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium..7107-05-2022 20:14
The True Reason Behind The Russia Ukraine War Is The Great Economic Reset System013-03-2022 06:45
The Real Reason Of Climate Change Is People Too Stupid, Live Without True Purpose Of Existence113-07-2021 01:45
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact