How Sensors Using Quantum Entanglement Could Improve Earthquake Detection

Xadoman wrote:
I am sorry but quantum mechanics is scam.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZngxijknKs&ab_channel=ItsBS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm9tUVI6Ehk&t=77s&ab_channel=ItsBS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhW3jckKMM4&t=586s&ab_channel=ItsBS

Xadoman wrote:
I am sorry but quantum mechanics is scam.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZngxijknKs&ab_channel=ItsBS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm9tUVI6Ehk&t=77s&ab_channel=ItsBS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhW3jckKMM4&t=586s&ab_channel=ItsBS

Swan wrote:
Suspending atoms at ultra-cold temperatures (near 0 degrees Kelvin) in laser arrays, quantum sensors can detect minute changes in gravity waves while becoming even more sensitive when quantum entangled.

While this setup offers more thorough data for improving earthquake models, it can be costly.

Scientists are working on adding quantum entanglement to these sensors, where two particles within the apparatus would be entangled or have interdependent quantum states. When this happens, the atoms are less susceptible to environmental noise, giving more precise readings of gravitational wave fluctuations.

Although the entangled quantum sensors may not be plagued by the problems of traditional seismographs, such as signal jamming, they have their issues, mainly the flimsiness of the entire system.

Quantum entanglement is incredibly fragile and can break quickly. That makes the implementation and maintenance of such a system difficult and costly. But research is underway to make these systems more robust, especially for creating other devices like quantum computers.

Improving Earthquake Detection
Boddice is one of the many researchers looking into leveraging these quantum devices for an improved earthquake detection system.

"By adding a network of permanently monitoring gravimeter sensors, if you detected a mass shift caused by the plate movement on multiple detectors simultaneously, you'd have an earlier warning," Boddice says. That could then be confirmed once the accelerometers started to detect wave arrivals as the gravitational signal travels at light speed.

Combining quantum sensors with traditional seismographs could provide more precise data for researchers to use in earthquake models, leading to better hot-spot predictions and more effective warning systems.

Benefits of Quantum Sensing
The sensitivity gained through this sort of quantum sensing "has the potential of saving thousands of lives by providing the critical extra seconds needed to reach safer locations at the onset of an earthquake," says Anjul Loiacono, vice president of Quantum Signal Processing at Infleqtion (formerly ColdQuanta), a quantum computing company developing quantum sensors for gravitational wave detection.

Though the warning window may be expanded only slightly, Boddice believes that this extra time can still make a difference in reducing fatalities during an earthquake.

"For example, if a rail under a train buckles while the train is moving, it will crash; so it's better to stop the train to avoid that impact," he says. "You can take action to avoid people getting into riskier places."

This might apply to the operation of elevators, or closing entrances to tunnels where people may get trapped when an earthquake starts. You could also shut off power and gas networks to avoid fires in the event of a rupture during a tremor.

"Individually these actions might seem like tiny things, but cumulatively for a big enough earthquake, they might make a significant difference to casualties," Boddice adds.

The approval of the morons here is not needed in any way shape or form. Wave now

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Suspending atoms at ultra-cold temperatures (near 0 degrees Kelvin) in laser arrays, quantum sensors can detect minute changes in gravity waves while becoming even more sensitive when quantum entangled.

While this setup offers more thorough data for improving earthquake models, it can be costly.

Scientists are working on adding quantum entanglement to these sensors, where two particles within the apparatus would be entangled or have interdependent quantum states. When this happens, the atoms are less susceptible to environmental noise, giving more precise readings of gravitational wave fluctuations.

Although the entangled quantum sensors may not be plagued by the problems of traditional seismographs, such as signal jamming, they have their issues, mainly the flimsiness of the entire system.

Quantum entanglement is incredibly fragile and can break quickly. That makes the implementation and maintenance of such a system difficult and costly. But research is underway to make these systems more robust, especially for creating other devices like quantum computers.

Improving Earthquake Detection
Boddice is one of the many researchers looking into leveraging these quantum devices for an improved earthquake detection system.

"By adding a network of permanently monitoring gravimeter sensors, if you detected a mass shift caused by the plate movement on multiple detectors simultaneously, you'd have an earlier warning," Boddice says. That could then be confirmed once the accelerometers started to detect wave arrivals as the gravitational signal travels at light speed.

Combining quantum sensors with traditional seismographs could provide more precise data for researchers to use in earthquake models, leading to better hot-spot predictions and more effective warning systems.

Benefits of Quantum Sensing
The sensitivity gained through this sort of quantum sensing "has the potential of saving thousands of lives by providing the critical extra seconds needed to reach safer locations at the onset of an earthquake," says Anjul Loiacono, vice president of Quantum Signal Processing at Infleqtion (formerly ColdQuanta), a quantum computing company developing quantum sensors for gravitational wave detection.

Though the warning window may be expanded only slightly, Boddice believes that this extra time can still make a difference in reducing fatalities during an earthquake.

"For example, if a rail under a train buckles while the train is moving, it will crash; so it's better to stop the train to avoid that impact," he says. "You can take action to avoid people getting into riskier places."

This might apply to the operation of elevators, or closing entrances to tunnels where people may get trapped when an earthquake starts. You could also shut off power and gas networks to avoid fires in the event of a rupture during a tremor.

"Individually these actions might seem like tiny things, but cumulatively for a big enough earthquake, they might make a significant difference to casualties," Boddice adds.

The approval of the morons here is not needed in any way shape or form. Wave now

There is no such thing as a 'quantum sensor'.
You appear to be entangled.

Swan wrote:There was no such thing as nuclear fission until it became commonplace.

Swan wrote: My entire life is a failure, and I cannot accept that the World will not sit back and say that nothing can be achieved like my mother taught me to accept using double negatives.

Swan wrote: Quantum Sensing measures activity in the subspace purveying dilithium crystals using Krieger waves. The significantly more accurate data it provides makes subsequent versions of existing technologies obsolete at a million time the speed of light. Sunday mass collections and using better prayers yield better results.

IBdaMann wrote:
Swan, for a 1 lb. kimchi burger, answer the following:

What was the state of nuclear before it became commonplace?

Swan wrote:There was no such thing as nuclear fission until it became commonplace.

Correct! One kimchi burger coming your way.

Now Swan, just come clean ...

Swan wrote: My entire life is a failure, and I cannot accept that the World will not sit back and say that nothing can be achieved like my mother taught me to accept using double negatives.

Swan, for a 2 oz. tofu lip balm, answer the following:

In popular science fiction, for what is "Quantum Sensing" used?

Swan wrote: Quantum Sensing measures activity in the subspace purveying dilithium crystals using Krieger waves. The significantly more accurate data it provides makes subsequent versions of existing technologies obsolete at a million time the speed of light. Sunday mass collections and using better prayers yield better results.

Ooooh, I'm sorry, you confused "Quantum Sensing" with Dr. Apgar's "Collimated Lambda Field Pulses. We thank you for playing and we have some lovely parting gifts for you.

IBdaMann wrote:
Swan, for a 1 lb. kimchi burger, answer the following:

What was the state of nuclear before it became commonplace?

Swan wrote:There was no such thing as nuclear fission until it became commonplace.

Correct! One kimchi burger coming your way.

Now Swan, just come clean ...

Swan wrote: My entire life is a failure, and I cannot accept that the World will not sit back and say that nothing can be achieved like my mother taught me to accept using double negatives.

Swan, for a 2 oz. tofu lip balm, answer the following:

In popular science fiction, for what is "Quantum Sensing" used?

Swan wrote: Quantum Sensing measures activity in the subspace purveying dilithium crystals using Krieger waves. The significantly more accurate data it provides makes subsequent versions of existing technologies obsolete at a million time the speed of light. Sunday mass collections and using better prayers yield better results.

Ooooh, I'm sorry, you confused "Quantum Sensing" with Dr. Apgar's "Collimated Lambda Field Pulses. We thank you for playing and we have some lovely parting gifts for you.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
Swan, for a 1 lb. kimchi burger, answer the following:

What was the state of nuclear before it became commonplace?

Swan wrote:There was no such thing as nuclear fission until it became commonplace.

Correct! One kimchi burger coming your way.

Now Swan, just come clean ...

Swan wrote: My entire life is a failure, and I cannot accept that the World will not sit back and say that nothing can be achieved like my mother taught me to accept using double negatives.

Swan, for a 2 oz. tofu lip balm, answer the following:

In popular science fiction, for what is "Quantum Sensing" used?

Swan wrote: Quantum Sensing measures activity in the subspace purveying dilithium crystals using Krieger waves. The significantly more accurate data it provides makes subsequent versions of existing technologies obsolete at a million time the speed of light. Sunday mass collections and using better prayers yield better results.

Ooooh, I'm sorry, you confused "Quantum Sensing" with Dr. Apgar's "Collimated Lambda Field Pulses. We thank you for playing and we have some lovely parting gifts for you.

LI-COR LI-192SA Underwater Quantum Sensor
For use with the Li-Cor® LI-1500 Light Sensor Logger (sold separately) to measure underwater or atmospheric photosynthetic photon flux density. Measures PAR in the 400-700 nm waveband using a Silicon Photodiode and glass filters encased in a waterproof housing. Typical output is in umol s-1 m-2. For use in freshwater or saltwater in pressures up to 800 psi (5,500 kPa, 560 meters depth). Requires underwater cable and lowering frame (each sold separately).

In Stock
Item #: 92534
$955.00

Any more questions Bubba?

LOL do you have radio in your West Virginia shack yet?

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
Swan, for a 1 lb. kimchi burger, answer the following:

What was the state of nuclear before it became commonplace?

Swan wrote:There was no such thing as nuclear fission until it became commonplace.

Correct! One kimchi burger coming your way.

Now Swan, just come clean ...

Swan wrote: My entire life is a failure, and I cannot accept that the World will not sit back and say that nothing can be achieved like my mother taught me to accept using double negatives.

Swan, for a 2 oz. tofu lip balm, answer the following:

In popular science fiction, for what is "Quantum Sensing" used?

Swan wrote: Quantum Sensing measures activity in the subspace purveying dilithium crystals using Krieger waves. The significantly more accurate data it provides makes subsequent versions of existing technologies obsolete at a million time the speed of light. Sunday mass collections and using better prayers yield better results.

Ooooh, I'm sorry, you confused "Quantum Sensing" with Dr. Apgar's "Collimated Lambda Field Pulses. We thank you for playing and we have some lovely parting gifts for you.

Or you can try to digest this

Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields. They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century; think of a magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, machine, which tracks flips in the magnetic spin of individual hydrogen atoms to peer into a body. But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

Strategists must understand the new capabilities that quantum sensing will provide and start planning countermeasures today. Here are three examples that help explain why.

Measuring time

Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date, for it adds precision to all other forms of sensing. For instance, it allows us to make repeated observations and combine them, an approach that is sometimes called "super resolution." Think of the way today's photographers take four or eight photos of the same scene and then combine the images using software. Better timing allows the same kind of thing with all kinds of measurements.

The atomic clocks of the 1970s that underlie the Global Positioning System and its attendant revolution—and miniaturized atomic clock are becoming commercially available. Microsemi Corporation, for example, sells a 35-gram "space chip scale atomic clock." Laboratories are working on even better timing technology that promises to be just as transformative. In 2018, NIST announced a breakthrough: a clock based on a lattice of ytterbium atoms so sensitive that it wouldn't drift more than a second in 10 billion years.

Location, location, location

Beyond making super-accurate GPS, quantum sensors can measure the shape and gravitational field of Earth to within a centimeter. Such sensing can be useful both for mapping out underground mineral resources and for precisely calculating the trajectories of ballistic missiles and other munitions.

Militaries have long sought ways to get extremely precise location data without using easily jammed GPS-type signals at all. Quantum positioning sensors track minute changes to rotation and acceleration, using Newton's laws (adjusted for relativity) to accurately infer changes to location over time. Because they do not depend on signals from satellites or ground stations, they work anywhere—indoors, underground or underwater—and resist jamming. Defense contractors are starting to make portable QPS packages that could fit into weapons.

Any more questions doolittle

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
Swan, for a 1 lb. kimchi burger, answer the following:

What was the state of nuclear before it became commonplace?

Swan wrote:There was no such thing as nuclear fission until it became commonplace.

Correct! One kimchi burger coming your way.

Now Swan, just come clean ...

Swan wrote: My entire life is a failure, and I cannot accept that the World will not sit back and say that nothing can be achieved like my mother taught me to accept using double negatives.

Swan, for a 2 oz. tofu lip balm, answer the following:

In popular science fiction, for what is "Quantum Sensing" used?

Swan wrote: Quantum Sensing measures activity in the subspace purveying dilithium crystals using Krieger waves. The significantly more accurate data it provides makes subsequent versions of existing technologies obsolete at a million time the speed of light. Sunday mass collections and using better prayers yield better results.

Ooooh, I'm sorry, you confused "Quantum Sensing" with Dr. Apgar's "Collimated Lambda Field Pulses. We thank you for playing and we have some lovely parting gifts for you.

Or you can try to digest this

Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields. They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century; think of a magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, machine, which tracks flips in the magnetic spin of individual hydrogen atoms to peer into a body. But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

Strategists must understand the new capabilities that quantum sensing will provide and start planning countermeasures today. Here are three examples that help explain why.

Measuring time

Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date, for it adds precision to all other forms of sensing. For instance, it allows us to make repeated observations and combine them, an approach that is sometimes called "super resolution." Think of the way today's photographers take four or eight photos of the same scene and then combine the images using software. Better timing allows the same kind of thing with all kinds of measurements.

The atomic clocks of the 1970s that underlie the Global Positioning System and its attendant revolution—and miniaturized atomic clock are becoming commercially available. Microsemi Corporation, for example, sells a 35-gram "space chip scale atomic clock." Laboratories are working on even better timing technology that promises to be just as transformative. In 2018, NIST announced a breakthrough: a clock based on a lattice of ytterbium atoms so sensitive that it wouldn't drift more than a second in 10 billion years.

Location, location, location

Beyond making super-accurate GPS, quantum sensors can measure the shape and gravitational field of Earth to within a centimeter. Such sensing can be useful both for mapping out underground mineral resources and for precisely calculating the trajectories of ballistic missiles and other munitions.

Militaries have long sought ways to get extremely precise location data without using easily jammed GPS-type signals at all. Quantum positioning sensors track minute changes to rotation and acceleration, using Newton's laws (adjusted for relativity) to accurately infer changes to location over time. Because they do not depend on signals from satellites or ground stations, they work anywhere—indoors, underground or underwater—and resist jamming. Defense contractors are starting to make portable QPS packages that could fit into weapons.

Any more questions doolittle

There is no such thing as a 'quantum sensor'.

Swan wrote:Or you can try to digest this

Swan wrote:Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter ...

Swan wrote: ... to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields.

Swan wrote:They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century;

Swan wrote:But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

Swan wrote:Measuring time: Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date,

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Or you can try to digest this

Why not? I've already popped a couple of antacid tabs.

Swan wrote:Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter ...

I believe you. The smallest amount is zero, and that's how much a non-existent thing uses.

Swan wrote: ... to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields.

Computers compute, they don't detect or measure.

Swan wrote:They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century;

None have ever existed.

Swan wrote:But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

There has been no progress in making the impossible occur on-demand, and certainly no progress to suggest any such thing.

Swan wrote:Measuring time: Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date,

This has not been achieved. Computers compute, they don't measure anything, much less "ultra-precisely".

.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Or you can try to digest this

Why not? I've already popped a couple of antacid tabs.

Swan wrote:Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter ...

I believe you. The smallest amount is zero, and that's how much a non-existent thing uses.

Swan wrote: ... to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields.

Computers compute, they don't detect or measure.

Swan wrote:They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century;

None have ever existed.

Swan wrote:But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

There has been no progress in making the impossible occur on-demand, and certainly no progress to suggest any such thing.

Swan wrote:Measuring time: Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date,

This has not been achieved. Computers compute, they don't measure anything, much less "ultra-precisely".

.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
Swan, for a 1 lb. kimchi burger, answer the following:

What was the state of nuclear before it became commonplace?

Swan wrote:There was no such thing as nuclear fission until it became commonplace.

Correct! One kimchi burger coming your way.

Now Swan, just come clean ...

Swan wrote: My entire life is a failure, and I cannot accept that the World will not sit back and say that nothing can be achieved like my mother taught me to accept using double negatives.

Swan, for a 2 oz. tofu lip balm, answer the following:

In popular science fiction, for what is "Quantum Sensing" used?

Swan wrote: Quantum Sensing measures activity in the subspace purveying dilithium crystals using Krieger waves. The significantly more accurate data it provides makes subsequent versions of existing technologies obsolete at a million time the speed of light. Sunday mass collections and using better prayers yield better results.

Ooooh, I'm sorry, you confused "Quantum Sensing" with Dr. Apgar's "Collimated Lambda Field Pulses. We thank you for playing and we have some lovely parting gifts for you.

Or you can try to digest this

Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields. They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century; think of a magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, machine, which tracks flips in the magnetic spin of individual hydrogen atoms to peer into a body. But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

Strategists must understand the new capabilities that quantum sensing will provide and start planning countermeasures today. Here are three examples that help explain why.

Measuring time

Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date, for it adds precision to all other forms of sensing. For instance, it allows us to make repeated observations and combine them, an approach that is sometimes called "super resolution." Think of the way today's photographers take four or eight photos of the same scene and then combine the images using software. Better timing allows the same kind of thing with all kinds of measurements.

The atomic clocks of the 1970s that underlie the Global Positioning System and its attendant revolution—and miniaturized atomic clock are becoming commercially available. Microsemi Corporation, for example, sells a 35-gram "space chip scale atomic clock." Laboratories are working on even better timing technology that promises to be just as transformative. In 2018, NIST announced a breakthrough: a clock based on a lattice of ytterbium atoms so sensitive that it wouldn't drift more than a second in 10 billion years.

Location, location, location

Beyond making super-accurate GPS, quantum sensors can measure the shape and gravitational field of Earth to within a centimeter. Such sensing can be useful both for mapping out underground mineral resources and for precisely calculating the trajectories of ballistic missiles and other munitions.

Militaries have long sought ways to get extremely precise location data without using easily jammed GPS-type signals at all. Quantum positioning sensors track minute changes to rotation and acceleration, using Newton's laws (adjusted for relativity) to accurately infer changes to location over time. Because they do not depend on signals from satellites or ground stations, they work anywhere—indoors, underground or underwater—and resist jamming. Defense contractors are starting to make portable QPS packages that could fit into weapons.

Any more questions doolittle

There is no such thing as a 'quantum sensor'.

True...

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Or you can try to digest this

Why not? I've already popped a couple of antacid tabs.

Swan wrote:Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter ...

I believe you. The smallest amount is zero, and that's how much a non-existent thing uses.

Swan wrote: ... to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields.

Computers compute, they don't detect or measure.

Swan wrote:They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century;

None have ever existed.

Swan wrote:But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

There has been no progress in making the impossible occur on-demand, and certainly no progress to suggest any such thing.

Swan wrote:Measuring time: Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date,

This has not been achieved. Computers compute, they don't measure anything, much less "ultra-precisely".

.

LOL, there

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Or you can try to digest this

Why not? I've already popped a couple of antacid tabs.

Swan wrote:Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter ...

I believe you. The smallest amount is zero, and that's how much a non-existent thing uses.

Swan wrote: ... to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields.

Computers compute, they don't detect or measure.

Swan wrote:They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century;

None have ever existed.

Swan wrote:But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

There has been no progress in making the impossible occur on-demand, and certainly no progress to suggest any such thing.

Swan wrote:Measuring time: Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date,

This has not been achieved. Computers compute, they don't measure anything, much less "ultra-precisely".

.

Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Or you can try to digest this

Why not? I've already popped a couple of antacid tabs.

Swan wrote:Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter ...

I believe you. The smallest amount is zero, and that's how much a non-existent thing uses.

Swan wrote: ... to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields.

Computers compute, they don't detect or measure.

Swan wrote:They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century;

None have ever existed.

Swan wrote:But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

There has been no progress in making the impossible occur on-demand, and certainly no progress to suggest any such thing.

Swan wrote:Measuring time: Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date,

This has not been achieved. Computers compute, they don't measure anything, much less "ultra-precisely".

.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
Swan, for a 1 lb. kimchi burger, answer the following:

What was the state of nuclear before it became commonplace?

Swan wrote:There was no such thing as nuclear fission until it became commonplace.

Correct! One kimchi burger coming your way.

Now Swan, just come clean ...

Swan wrote: My entire life is a failure, and I cannot accept that the World will not sit back and say that nothing can be achieved like my mother taught me to accept using double negatives.

Swan, for a 2 oz. tofu lip balm, answer the following:

In popular science fiction, for what is "Quantum Sensing" used?

Swan wrote: Quantum Sensing measures activity in the subspace purveying dilithium crystals using Krieger waves. The significantly more accurate data it provides makes subsequent versions of existing technologies obsolete at a million time the speed of light. Sunday mass collections and using better prayers yield better results.

Ooooh, I'm sorry, you confused "Quantum Sensing" with Dr. Apgar's "Collimated Lambda Field Pulses. We thank you for playing and we have some lovely parting gifts for you.

LI-COR LI-192SA Underwater Quantum Sensor
For use with the Li-Cor® LI-1500 Light Sensor Logger (sold separately) to measure underwater or atmospheric photosynthetic photon flux density. Measures PAR in the 400-700 nm waveband using a Silicon Photodiode and glass filters encased in a waterproof housing. Typical output is in umol s-1 m-2. For use in freshwater or saltwater in pressures up to 800 psi (5,500 kPa, 560 meters depth). Requires underwater cable and lowering frame (each sold separately).

In Stock
Item #: 92534
$955.00

Any more questions Bubba?

LOL do you have radio in your West Virginia shack yet?

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Or you can try to digest this

Why not? I've already popped a couple of antacid tabs.

Swan wrote:Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter ...

I believe you. The smallest amount is zero, and that's how much a non-existent thing uses.

Swan wrote: ... to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields.

Computers compute, they don't detect or measure.

Swan wrote:They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century;

None have ever existed.

Swan wrote:But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

There has been no progress in making the impossible occur on-demand, and certainly no progress to suggest any such thing.

Swan wrote:Measuring time: Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date,

This has not been achieved. Computers compute, they don't measure anything, much less "ultra-precisely".

.

Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

A sensor is not a computer. There is no such thing as an MPG sensor.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
Swan, for a 1 lb. kimchi burger, answer the following:

What was the state of nuclear before it became commonplace?

Swan wrote:There was no such thing as nuclear fission until it became commonplace.

Correct! One kimchi burger coming your way.

Now Swan, just come clean ...

Swan wrote: My entire life is a failure, and I cannot accept that the World will not sit back and say that nothing can be achieved like my mother taught me to accept using double negatives.

Swan, for a 2 oz. tofu lip balm, answer the following:

In popular science fiction, for what is "Quantum Sensing" used?

Swan wrote: Quantum Sensing measures activity in the subspace purveying dilithium crystals using Krieger waves. The significantly more accurate data it provides makes subsequent versions of existing technologies obsolete at a million time the speed of light. Sunday mass collections and using better prayers yield better results.

Ooooh, I'm sorry, you confused "Quantum Sensing" with Dr. Apgar's "Collimated Lambda Field Pulses. We thank you for playing and we have some lovely parting gifts for you.

LI-COR LI-192SA Underwater Quantum Sensor
For use with the Li-Cor® LI-1500 Light Sensor Logger (sold separately) to measure underwater or atmospheric photosynthetic photon flux density. Measures PAR in the 400-700 nm waveband using a Silicon Photodiode and glass filters encased in a waterproof housing. Typical output is in umol s-1 m-2. For use in freshwater or saltwater in pressures up to 800 psi (5,500 kPa, 560 meters depth). Requires underwater cable and lowering frame (each sold separately).

In Stock
Item #: 92534
$955.00

Any more questions Bubba?

LOL do you have radio in your West Virginia shack yet?

Your ignorance of technology is epic... A photo diode is basically the same thing as solar cell, just a single element.

HarveyH55 wrote:
An LED can be used as a photo diode. It's nothing new, all semiconductors are light-sensitive. Some are very sensitiveness to specific wavelengths of light. I've got a parts draw full of photo diodes, sensitive to infrared band light.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Starting to get the impression that 'quantum' is just re-branding long existing technology.

HarveyH55 wrote:
The only thing new, is the wording used to describe how works.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Sort of like alligators are reptiles/amphibians. Still the same animal, still a reptile...

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Or you can try to digest this

Why not? I've already popped a couple of antacid tabs.

Swan wrote:Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter ...

I believe you. The smallest amount is zero, and that's how much a non-existent thing uses.

Swan wrote: ... to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields.

Computers compute, they don't detect or measure.

Swan wrote:They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century;

None have ever existed.

Swan wrote:But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

There has been no progress in making the impossible occur on-demand, and certainly no progress to suggest any such thing.

Swan wrote:Measuring time: Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date,

This has not been achieved. Computers compute, they don't measure anything, much less "ultra-precisely".

.

Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

A sensor is not a computer. There is no such thing as an MPG sensor.

Actually a fuel use sensor measures the fuel use which is divided by the miles driven sensor to determine the mpg. Your claim that such a routine and common thing does not exist is comical.

Please continue your verbal masturbating

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Or you can try to digest this

Why not? I've already popped a couple of antacid tabs.

Swan wrote:Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter ...

I believe you. The smallest amount is zero, and that's how much a non-existent thing uses.

Swan wrote: ... to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields.

Computers compute, they don't detect or measure.

Swan wrote:They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century;

None have ever existed.

Swan wrote:But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

There has been no progress in making the impossible occur on-demand, and certainly no progress to suggest any such thing.

Swan wrote:Measuring time: Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date,

This has not been achieved. Computers compute, they don't measure anything, much less "ultra-precisely".

.

Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

A sensor is not a computer. There is no such thing as an MPG sensor.

Actually a fuel use sensor measures the fuel use which is divided by the miles driven sensor to determine the mpg. Your claim that such a routine and common thing does not exist is comical.

Please continue your verbal masturbating

There is no such thing as a 'fuel use sensor'.

Again, you demonstrate you know nothing about cars.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Or you can try to digest this

Why not? I've already popped a couple of antacid tabs.

Swan wrote:Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter ...

I believe you. The smallest amount is zero, and that's how much a non-existent thing uses.

Swan wrote: ... to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields.

Computers compute, they don't detect or measure.

Swan wrote:They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century;

None have ever existed.

Swan wrote:But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

There has been no progress in making the impossible occur on-demand, and certainly no progress to suggest any such thing.

Swan wrote:Measuring time: Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date,

This has not been achieved. Computers compute, they don't measure anything, much less "ultra-precisely".

.

Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

A sensor is not a computer. There is no such thing as an MPG sensor.

Actually a fuel use sensor measures the fuel use which is divided by the miles driven sensor to determine the mpg. Your claim that such a routine and common thing does not exist is comical.

Please continue your verbal masturbating

There is no such thing as a 'fuel use sensor'.

Again, you demonstrate you know nothing about cars.

Every car with electronic fuel injection has a fuel sensor, again you demonstrate your ignorance. You do know that the computer feeds the fuel into new engines and not a throttle cable.

Wait, all you understand is the peeler.

Continue babbling

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Or you can try to digest this

Why not? I've already popped a couple of antacid tabs.

Swan wrote:Quantum sensors use the smallest amounts of energy and matter ...

I believe you. The smallest amount is zero, and that's how much a non-existent thing uses.

Swan wrote: ... to detect and measure tiny changes in time, gravity, temperature, pressure, rotation, acceleration, frequency, and magnetic and electric fields.

Computers compute, they don't detect or measure.

Swan wrote:They've been commercially available in various forms for more than a half-century;

None have ever existed.

Swan wrote:But recent progress in the field suggests that such sensors will soon bring a revolution in measurement and signals intelligence—possibly by making it far easier to detect submarines, spacecraft, and underground facilities.

There has been no progress in making the impossible occur on-demand, and certainly no progress to suggest any such thing.

Swan wrote:Measuring time: Ultra-precise timekeeping is the most important quantum-sensing achievement to date,

This has not been achieved. Computers compute, they don't measure anything, much less "ultra-precisely".

.

Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

A sensor is not a computer. There is no such thing as an MPG sensor.

Actually a fuel use sensor measures the fuel use which is divided by the miles driven sensor to determine the mpg. Your claim that such a routine and common thing does not exist is comical.

Please continue your verbal masturbating

There is no such thing as a 'fuel use sensor'.

Again, you demonstrate you know nothing about cars.

Every car with electronic fuel injection has a fuel sensor, again you demonstrate your ignorance. You do know that the computer feeds the fuel into new engines and not a throttle cable.

Wait, all you understand is the peeler.

Continue babbling

There is no such thing as a 'fuel sensor'. Cables do not feed fuel into engines. Neither does a computer, not even with FADEC.

So I guess you figure a coil of wire is a sophisticated 'electronic device'. You ARE a gullible one!

I actually did own a Dodge Dart. Piece of shit car, although it did get decent gas mileage with a carburetor.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

A sensor is not a computer. There is no such thing as an MPG sensor.

Actually a fuel use sensor measures the fuel use which is divided by the miles driven sensor to determine the mpg. Your claim that such a routine and common thing does not exist is comical.

Please continue your verbal masturbating

There is no such thing as a 'fuel use sensor'.

Again, you demonstrate you know nothing about cars.

Every car with electronic fuel injection has a fuel sensor, again you demonstrate your ignorance. You do know that the computer feeds the fuel into new engines and not a throttle cable.

Wait, all you understand is the peeler.

Continue babbling

There is no such thing as a 'fuel sensor'. Cables do not feed fuel into engines. Neither does a computer, not even with FADEC.

So I guess you figure a coil of wire is a sophisticated 'electronic device'. You ARE a gullible one!

I actually did own a Dodge Dart. Piece of shit car, although it did get decent gas mileage with a carburetor.

LOL Google returned 211,000,000 hits on fuel sensor.

Swan wrote:
So is it fun being a sociopath?

Swan wrote:
Actually cars used to have a cable attached to the gas pedal that literally opened the carb 2 or 4 barrels.

Swan wrote:
Obviously you never replaced a fuel cable or rebuilt a Rochester Quadri jet carb like I did with my Camaro.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

A sensor is not a computer. There is no such thing as an MPG sensor.

Actually a fuel use sensor measures the fuel use which is divided by the miles driven sensor to determine the mpg. Your claim that such a routine and common thing does not exist is comical.

Please continue your verbal masturbating

There is no such thing as a 'fuel use sensor'.

Again, you demonstrate you know nothing about cars.

Every car with electronic fuel injection has a fuel sensor, again you demonstrate your ignorance. You do know that the computer feeds the fuel into new engines and not a throttle cable.

Wait, all you understand is the peeler.

Continue babbling

There is no such thing as a 'fuel sensor'. Cables do not feed fuel into engines. Neither does a computer, not even with FADEC.

So I guess you figure a coil of wire is a sophisticated 'electronic device'. You ARE a gullible one!

I actually did own a Dodge Dart. Piece of shit car, although it did get decent gas mileage with a carburetor.

LOL Google returned 211,000,000 hits on fuel sensor.

Google isn't a fuel sensor. There is no such thing as a fuel sensor.

Swan wrote:
So is it fun being a sociopath?

Ask yourself.

Swan wrote:
Actually cars used to have a cable attached to the gas pedal that literally opened the carb 2 or 4 barrels.

Nope. Everything operated at once. Many cars had 3 circuits (or 'barrels'). Others had only 1 or two.

Swan wrote:
Obviously you never replaced a fuel cable or rebuilt a Rochester Quadri jet carb like I did with my Camaro.

You never did. Stop posing.
There is no such thing as a 'fuel cable'.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

A sensor is not a computer. There is no such thing as an MPG sensor.

Actually a fuel use sensor measures the fuel use which is divided by the miles driven sensor to determine the mpg. Your claim that such a routine and common thing does not exist is comical.

Please continue your verbal masturbating

There is no such thing as a 'fuel use sensor'.

Again, you demonstrate you know nothing about cars.

Every car with electronic fuel injection has a fuel sensor, again you demonstrate your ignorance. You do know that the computer feeds the fuel into new engines and not a throttle cable.

Wait, all you understand is the peeler.

Continue babbling

There is no such thing as a 'fuel sensor'. Cables do not feed fuel into engines. Neither does a computer, not even with FADEC.

So I guess you figure a coil of wire is a sophisticated 'electronic device'. You ARE a gullible one!

I actually did own a Dodge Dart. Piece of shit car, although it did get decent gas mileage with a carburetor.

LOL Google returned 211,000,000 hits on fuel sensor.

Google isn't a fuel sensor. There is no such thing as a fuel sensor.

Swan wrote:
So is it fun being a sociopath?

Ask yourself.

Swan wrote:
Actually cars used to have a cable attached to the gas pedal that literally opened the carb 2 or 4 barrels.

Nope. Everything operated at once. Many cars had 3 circuits (or 'barrels'). Others had only 1 or two.

Swan wrote:
Obviously you never replaced a fuel cable or rebuilt a Rochester Quadri jet carb like I did with my Camaro.

You never did. Stop posing.
There is no such thing as a 'fuel cable'.

Fuel sensor

Swan wrote:
Fuel cable on engine

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

A sensor is not a computer. There is no such thing as an MPG sensor.

Actually a fuel use sensor measures the fuel use which is divided by the miles driven sensor to determine the mpg. Your claim that such a routine and common thing does not exist is comical.

Please continue your verbal masturbating

There is no such thing as a 'fuel use sensor'.

Again, you demonstrate you know nothing about cars.

Every car with electronic fuel injection has a fuel sensor, again you demonstrate your ignorance. You do know that the computer feeds the fuel into new engines and not a throttle cable.

Wait, all you understand is the peeler.

Continue babbling

There is no such thing as a 'fuel sensor'. Cables do not feed fuel into engines. Neither does a computer, not even with FADEC.

So I guess you figure a coil of wire is a sophisticated 'electronic device'. You ARE a gullible one!

I actually did own a Dodge Dart. Piece of shit car, although it did get decent gas mileage with a carburetor.

LOL Google returned 211,000,000 hits on fuel sensor.

Google isn't a fuel sensor. There is no such thing as a fuel sensor.

Swan wrote:
So is it fun being a sociopath?

Ask yourself.

Swan wrote:
Actually cars used to have a cable attached to the gas pedal that literally opened the carb 2 or 4 barrels.

Nope. Everything operated at once. Many cars had 3 circuits (or 'barrels'). Others had only 1 or two.

Swan wrote:
Obviously you never replaced a fuel cable or rebuilt a Rochester Quadri jet carb like I did with my Camaro.

You never did. Stop posing.
There is no such thing as a 'fuel cable'.

Fuel sensor

Not a fuel sensor.

Swan wrote:
Fuel cable on engine

Not a fuel cable.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

A sensor is not a computer. There is no such thing as an MPG sensor.

Actually a fuel use sensor measures the fuel use which is divided by the miles driven sensor to determine the mpg. Your claim that such a routine and common thing does not exist is comical.

Please continue your verbal masturbating

There is no such thing as a 'fuel use sensor'.

Again, you demonstrate you know nothing about cars.

Every car with electronic fuel injection has a fuel sensor, again you demonstrate your ignorance. You do know that the computer feeds the fuel into new engines and not a throttle cable.

Wait, all you understand is the peeler.

Continue babbling

There is no such thing as a 'fuel sensor'. Cables do not feed fuel into engines. Neither does a computer, not even with FADEC.

So I guess you figure a coil of wire is a sophisticated 'electronic device'. You ARE a gullible one!

I actually did own a Dodge Dart. Piece of shit car, although it did get decent gas mileage with a carburetor.

LOL Google returned 211,000,000 hits on fuel sensor.

Google isn't a fuel sensor. There is no such thing as a fuel sensor.

Swan wrote:
So is it fun being a sociopath?

Ask yourself.

Swan wrote:
Actually cars used to have a cable attached to the gas pedal that literally opened the carb 2 or 4 barrels.

Nope. Everything operated at once. Many cars had 3 circuits (or 'barrels'). Others had only 1 or two.

Swan wrote:
Obviously you never replaced a fuel cable or rebuilt a Rochester Quadri jet carb like I did with my Camaro.

You never did. Stop posing.
There is no such thing as a 'fuel cable'.

Fuel sensor

Not a fuel sensor.

Swan wrote:
Fuel cable on engine

Not a fuel cable.

LOL, the only reason that you can make your nonsense claims is that this is a private network, disguised as a climate board, and I am literally the only non schizzo here. Really try denying that fuel sensors or cables exist at an OReile auto parts where they are sold everyday.

Really why do you mock yourself, when no one cares? Is this the only way that you can get attention, or are you really Stormy Daniels genius attorney Michael Avesnotty?

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Actually sensors measure stuff of all kinds that is sorted out by computer processing. LOL, just like the mpg on your moped

A sensor is not a computer. There is no such thing as an MPG sensor.

Actually a fuel use sensor measures the fuel use which is divided by the miles driven sensor to determine the mpg. Your claim that such a routine and common thing does not exist is comical.

Please continue your verbal masturbating

There is no such thing as a 'fuel use sensor'.

Again, you demonstrate you know nothing about cars.

Every car with electronic fuel injection has a fuel sensor, again you demonstrate your ignorance. You do know that the computer feeds the fuel into new engines and not a throttle cable.

Wait, all you understand is the peeler.

Continue babbling

There is no such thing as a 'fuel sensor'. Cables do not feed fuel into engines. Neither does a computer, not even with FADEC.

So I guess you figure a coil of wire is a sophisticated 'electronic device'. You ARE a gullible one!

I actually did own a Dodge Dart. Piece of shit car, although it did get decent gas mileage with a carburetor.

LOL Google returned 211,000,000 hits on fuel sensor.

Google isn't a fuel sensor. There is no such thing as a fuel sensor.

Swan wrote:
So is it fun being a sociopath?

Ask yourself.

Swan wrote:
Actually cars used to have a cable attached to the gas pedal that literally opened the carb 2 or 4 barrels.

Nope. Everything operated at once. Many cars had 3 circuits (or 'barrels'). Others had only 1 or two.

Swan wrote:
Obviously you never replaced a fuel cable or rebuilt a Rochester Quadri jet carb like I did with my Camaro.

You never did. Stop posing.
There is no such thing as a 'fuel cable'.

Fuel sensor

Not a fuel sensor.

Swan wrote:
Fuel cable on engine

Not a fuel cable.

LOL, the only reason that you can make your nonsense claims is that this is a private network,

Swan wrote:
disguised as a climate board,

Swan wrote:
and I am literally the only non schizzo here.

Swan wrote:
Really try denying that fuel sensors or cables exist

Swan wrote:
at an OReile auto parts where they are sold everyday.

Swan wrote:
Really why do you mock yourself, when no one cares? Is this the only way that you can get attention, or are you really Stormy Daniels genius attorney Michael Avesnotty?

Swan wrote:
Actually every auto parts store has stock of, or will order any fuel sensor or throttle body cable.
...deleted Mantra 40a.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Looks like an oxygen sensor... Only fuel sensor I ever heard of is in the gas tank, for the fuel gauge. Don't know much about those fancy newer models with computerized everything. Not sure of the benefits of a quantum fuel sensor or throttle cable. Usually when stuff under the hood get entangled, it fukks shit up.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Looks like an oxygen sensor... Only fuel sensor I ever heard of is in the gas tank, for the fuel gauge. Don't know much about those fancy newer models with computerized everything. Not sure of the benefits of a quantum fuel sensor or throttle cable. Usually when stuff under the hood get entangled, it fukks shit up.

Into the Night wrote:
One nice thing about FADEC vehicles. Gone are the days of high tension wires and distributors and their points wearing out and needing adjusting. Everything is electronic now, and automatically learns and adjusts for differences as engines age, as well as adjusting to each specific engine automatically (each engine is slightly different).

Lash adjusters that automatically adjust for lash. Cam adjusters (phasers) that advance or retard the cam to more ideal conditions for that engine speed and power demands. Low tension ignition systems. No central coil No central condensor (capacitor). No high tension wires anywhere. No distributor. Just small 12v wires commanding when a spark plug should fire. The coil and capacitor are built right into each spark plug connector. Pretty reliable little suckers, too. If one DOES fail, the other cylinders just keep right on working.

No cables to wear out or find a way to route around the engine compartment. No throttle cable, no brake cable, no clutch cable, nuthin'.

No more convoluted vacuum systems required for various carburetor compensation circuits. The vacuum hose routine is simpler now.

No more funky emulsion problems, choke thermostat failures, induction heat, acceleration pumps, wildly mismatched air/fuel mixtures. All those problems with those carburetors just disappear with FADEC. Today, the throttle body is electronically controlled, and just controls airflow, no fuel. No choke plate at all. Just a throttle plate.

Sure, there's a computer now...but it's just like any computer, you only need to understand the program it runs.

Sensors providing primary timing (the crank sensor), the airflow (the MAF sensor), and user inputs (the accelerator pedal and throttle body position sensor), all run to a simply lookup table. That table determines how long to fire the injector for. The longer the firing pulse, the more fuel injected directly into the cylinder. Another lookup table determines when to fire the spark plug. A simple 12v pulse does this now.

That's it. That's the primary program the computer runs. As long as it gets a crank sensor pulsing, and the fuel is pumping, and air can get to the engine, the engine will continue to run. Shutting it off is easy. Just use a relay to shut off power to the fuel pump. Without fuel, the engine will die. It won't diesel (like the carburetor engines did!), it won't stutter and buck, it will just shut off...nice and sweet.

The engine runs far more efficiently, quieter, is self adjusting and self compensating, and is now built to very precise tolerances, allowing for thinner oils providing better lubrication. (Subaru and some Hondas and Toyotas can now use 0-20w synthetic oil!).

Secondary and convenience programs run in various computers in your car (including the engine control computer) to handle security (key fobs, keyless ignition, etc), error reporting (ODBC code readers and the like), automatic lighting and warning indicators, and a host of other convenience features.

Into the Night wrote:Psychoquackery. Everyone is wrong but you, eh? The height of arrogance.