|Tim the plumber★★★★☆
Since I cannot understand what you are talking about on that thread, due to no actual mechanism being detailed, I cannot comment on it.
If you had something you would have taken tha opportunity to explain it here.
|@climate scientist, Ceist and Tototo only:|
- climate scientist: yes, they are immense factors when you add them up on a global scale. I once heard one lecturer talk about the additional energy M2C2 is adding to our oceans. On a per square meter of ocean surface basis, it was some tiny, tiny amount. But when you added it all up around the globe (a total ocean surface basis), it was equivalent to exploding 400,000 Hiroshima type atomic bombs every day!
Now that's what I call making a real mountain out of a mistaken mole hill!
The 2015 M2C2 (Global 9/11) Denialist Troll Awards
1st Place - Jep Branner - Our Stupid Administrator!
2nd Place - IBdaMann - Science IS cherry picking!
3rd Place - Into the Night - Mr. Nonsense numbers!
4th Place - Tim the plumber - The Drivel Queen!
...and that's all you needed to be completely convinced that whatever claim he would make, no matter how wacky, would be the absolute truth.
trafn wrote: But when you added it all up around the globe (a total ocean surface basis), it was equivalent to exploding 400,000 Hiroshima type atomic bombs every day!
...and none of this raised any red flags with you, did it? You have the utmost faith that this is the truth, the light and the way.
Did this lecturer explain how he (or someone) traversed the ocean depths separating the energy therein between "natural" energy and "M2C2" energy, and then how it was all "added up"...all of it, the whole watery globe's worth?
Well, I'm sure that's not important. All that matters is how reassured we feel to hear/read those words, right?
Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.
Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn
You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.
The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank
:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude
IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
|Early IPCC Reports||9||08-07-2019 07:48|
|What makes IPCC scientists sure warmer air hundreds of millions of years ago due to||71||06-06-2019 23:39|
|The IPCC in 2013||82||25-05-2019 07:21|
|How come they never let a Chinese be in IPCC or UN climate department?||2||29-04-2019 01:38|
|What makes IPCC thinks CO2 is better than O2 at trapping heat?||0||28-04-2019 15:40|