Go Fund Me pitch for troll-infested website vermin eradication program manual

duncan61 wrote:Coal is formed when dead plant matter submerged in swamp environments is subjected to the geological forces of heat and pressure over hundreds of millions of years.

duncan61 wrote:Seems to make sense to me

duncan61 wrote: and there is oil and other stuff like gas and humans drill down and get it out the ground and refine it or is this all not true?

duncan61 wrote:Its called fossil fuel

duncan61 wrote:Declaring NO GAS OR VAPOUR CAN WARM THE EARTH.Is inferring the gas is doing the work.[/quite]
Hint: that's what that sentence means in English ... and the correct word is " implying" not "inferring."

[quote]duncan61 wrote:The Atmosphere makes our weather and planet the way it is.

duncan61 wrote:Change the Atmosphere the weather changes

duncan61 wrote:The alarmist are falling for the B.S.

duncan61 wrote:Its going to cook us all unless we stop it now.

duncan61 wrote:
Coal is formed when dead plant matter submerged in swamp environments is subjected to the geological forces of heat and pressure over hundreds of millions of years.

duncan61 wrote:
Over time, the plant matter transforms from moist, low-carbon peat, to coal, an energy- and carbon-dense black or brownish-black sedimentary rock.

duncan61 wrote:
15 Dec 2017.So this is a work of fiction?

duncan61 wrote:
Seems to make sense to me and there is oil and other stuff like gas and humans drill down and get it out the ground and refine it or is this all not true?

duncan61 wrote:
Its called fossil fuel

duncan61 wrote:
and I do not agree burning it is a big issue however the CO2 released from burning all this fuel has changed the atmosphere a tiny little bit. Amounts unknown. Why is that so hard to get your head around. Declaring NO GAS OR VAPOUR CAN WARM THE EARTH.Is inferring the gas is doing the work.

duncan61 wrote:
The sun is an uncontrolled heat source in plumbing design and in real world events. The Atmosphere makes our weather and planet the way it is.Change the Atmosphere the weather changes but it can not be measured or calculated and is doing sweet F all in the big picture.

duncan61 wrote:
The alarmist are falling for the B.S.Its going to cook us all unless we stop it now.

duncan61 wrote:
Germany of all places just failed the renewable pathway big time even bigger than Texas did and thats big LOL

sealover wrote:
This is the first time I started looking at some of the intraparty dymanics.
Looks like a very unequal distribution of power in the relationships.
Looks like "loyalty" requires absolute "honesty"
In other words if you don't back up my lie, you're a liar AND a traitor.
Well, I guess it keeps these guys off the street.
We're having a science vote at the club. If you don't take my side, to back up my truth, I'm gonna be pissed.
Well, I guess it keeps these guys off the streets.
Seriously, imagine the harm they might be doing out there if they were.

sealover wrote:
All we asked for was the Kiddie pool but you stupid pieces of shit refused.
Your sacrosanct entitle to troll every one of my posts.
Such trollings were required to put a check to my offenses against science.
I didn't want to have be be a ****ing trollslayer.
I just wanted to post science lessons.
You just refused to stop disrupting class.
So now I'm going to get my revenge every chance I get.
You don't seem to be aware how pathetically vulnerable you are to public humiliation at this point.
Believe me, this plot will have a twist.
You couldn't let us have the kiddie pool.
I guess we just have to drive you ignorant ****s out of here.
It will be remarkably easy to do.

duncan61 wrote:
The bulk of what ITN and IBDM post is good stuff they are just hung up on being right.I am still capable of learning anything new.My goal is to have the answers to the AGW/CC claims.As I have said I am very certain nothing is happening thats bad in the way described.Where I live we had 13 days over 40.c this summer and no one died from it.England has very cold winters and thousands of people die from it

sealover wrote:
Perfect Name for Bait: "climate-debate.com".

Let's imagine I want to create a website where I can lure in unsuspecting tree huggers, hippies, democrats, Communists, and false scientists who refuse to unambiguously define their terms, use buzzwords, employ fallacies, and just LIE ALL THE TIME.

Would a name like wehatescience.com do the job?

Would a name like wedontcareaboutthefuture.com do the job?

Would a name like wedenyreality.com do the job?

Would a name like wejustwanttohurtsomebody.com do the job?

Maybe not.

What about a name like climate-debate.com?

Those fools will come here thinking they will meet someone who gives a shit about climate!

Here comes one now!

Are you guys ready to pounce?

Bwah ha ha ha ha!

It is the PERFECT website name for bait

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IBdaMann wrote:

There are many options besides banning you. We'll hold out for one of those.

.

Into the Night wrote:So you are saying there is 'global warming', and that it's caused by CO2 somehow, but it's not serious. Right? This is what IBdaMann calls a 'warmazombie'.

sealover wrote:Frankly, what the trolls are doing here is a crime against humanity.

sealover wrote:
Frankly, what the trolls are doing here is a crime against humanity.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:So you are saying there is 'global warming', and that it's caused by CO2 somehow, but it's not serious. Right? This is what IBdaMann calls a 'warmazombie'.

Minor correction: This is a climate lemming. Warmizombies think it is a threat/danger/crisis that draweth the end nigh, and that we should incur new layers of taxation and legislation so that governments can have the funding and power they need to fix the problem that they gladly fabricated.

Technically, duncan is a climate lemming, like Earthling1. They pray all the same prayers to all the same deities (duncan adds gravity to his pantheon) just mindlessly following whatever belief system is leading them over the cliff ... because at some point they too became addicted to the numbing comfort of having someone else do their thinking for them. They don't, however, consider any of it any sort of reason to change their lifestyle and they don't see any sort of Climate calamity heading our way. They nonetheless are quick to anger and hatred towards those who contradict their faith and who urge them to reevaluate their happy path over the edge.

I apologize for any confusion I might have caused.

... and I didn't say this as a response to you personally, you see, but as a debate position to the audience. You shouldn't be expecting me to address you directly. That would be rude.

GasGuzzler wrote:

sealover wrote:
Frankly, what the trolls are doing here is a crime against humanity.

Frankly, what YOU are doing is a crime against humanity.

I will actually explain my position. Can you? Will you?

Here's the problem you have. Your claim is that climate change will destroy our planet, yet you haven't even attempted to define climate change. Furthermore, whatever the "fix" is for this undefined problem, it will no doubt cost trillions of dollars. Inevitably, you will be asking for my dollars to help fix an undefined problem.

If you think any rational adult will gladly cough up money to support fixing a problem that isn't defined, isn't explained, and isn't happening, then you need to slide over to the psychology dept over there at Berkley and have your head examined.

However, I know you won't get yourself checked out. You will do what all Marxist loving freedom hating morons do. You will demand I pay for your undefined problem through higher taxes. I pay them under threat of the government. Taxes are THEFT. You are a thief.

Also the federal mandates you will propose will have crushing economic effects. I will also pay this heavy price for your undefined problem.

In summary, what you must do is define the problem, EXPLAIN why it is significant, and then work with me on the best solution moving forward. This is how you gain support. You have done NONE of that. Any followers of your preaching are nothing more than blind faith clergymen.

Look, you have the right to think and live as you see fit. Just don't take my money and freedom to pay for it.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:So you are saying there is 'global warming', and that it's caused by CO2 somehow, but it's not serious. Right? This is what IBdaMann calls a 'warmazombie'.

Minor correction: This is a climate lemming. Warmizombies think it is a threat/danger/crisis that draweth the end nigh, and that we should incur new layers of taxation and legislation so that governments can have the funding and power they need to fix the problem that they gladly fabricated.

Technically, duncan is a climate lemming, like Earthling1. They pray all the same prayers to all the same deities (duncan adds gravity to his pantheon) just mindlessly following whatever belief system is leading them over the cliff ... because at some point they too became addicted to the numbing comfort of having someone else do their thinking for them. They don't, however, consider any of it any sort of reason to change their lifestyle and they don't see any sort of Climate calamity heading our way. They nonetheless are quick to anger and hatred towards those who contradict their faith and who urge them to reevaluate their happy path over the edge.

I apologize for any confusion I might have caused.

... and I didn't say this as a response to you personally, you see, but as a debate position to the audience. You shouldn't be expecting me to address you directly. That would be rude.

Into the Night wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

sealover wrote:
Frankly, what the trolls are doing here is a crime against humanity.

Frankly, what YOU are doing is a crime against humanity.

I will actually explain my position. Can you? Will you?

Here's the problem you have. Your claim is that climate change will destroy our planet, yet you haven't even attempted to define climate change. Furthermore, whatever the "fix" is for this undefined problem, it will no doubt cost trillions of dollars. Inevitably, you will be asking for my dollars to help fix an undefined problem.

If you think any rational adult will gladly cough up money to support fixing a problem that isn't defined, isn't explained, and isn't happening, then you need to slide over to the psychology dept over there at Berkley and have your head examined.

However, I know you won't get yourself checked out. You will do what all Marxist loving freedom hating morons do. You will demand I pay for your undefined problem through higher taxes. I pay them under threat of the government. Taxes are THEFT. You are a thief.

Also the federal mandates you will propose will have crushing economic effects. I will also pay this heavy price for your undefined problem.

In summary, what you must do is define the problem, EXPLAIN why it is significant, and then work with me on the best solution moving forward. This is how you gain support. You have done NONE of that. Any followers of your preaching are nothing more than blind faith clergymen.

Look, you have the right to think and live as you see fit. Just don't take my money and freedom to pay for it.

Well said!

gfm7175 wrote:I, however, was under the impression that both terms were interchangeable, due to how you currently have them presented in your Global Warming Mythology Reference Manual. It might be prudent to accordingly edit the related entries within The Manual for clarification purposes.

Into the Night wrote:

sealover wrote:
"This forum is moderated" - local genius

Really?

It sure is hard to tell.

Would somebody wake up the moderator, if there is one?

What do you expect him to do? Ban trolls like you?

sealover wrote:
Please stop. My widdle feewings are hurt.

Can you please find it in your heart to forgive me?

I promise to never again force you to post on my thread, where I subject you to so much disrespect.

And you are most worthy of respect, are you not?

I'm sorry I just can't be that person who gives you the respect that you so richly deserve.

In all sincerity.

I want very much for you to get everything that you deserve.

IBdaMann wrote:

sealover wrote:"What do you expect him to do? Ban trolls like you?"

I am not seeing any difference between you and trafn. You both are 100% intolerant of posters with differing views and you need them banned. You both have an intense need to thoroughly control all conversations. You both have difficulties with posting. You both hate Branner for not playing the role of your personal censor at the ready. You are both batshit crazy morons who spam this board out of uncontrollable temper tantrums. You were both chemistry students in New York and you both like the word "titration". You both believe that the primary "threat" to the planet is the methane and other gases being released from under the tundra as it melts.

Not that any of it matters ... it's just a difference that I am not seeing.

HarveyH55 wrote:

sealover wrote:
There is a two-pronged approach to troll eradication.

One is to simply by-pass them completely and go to a list of posts that includes none of theirs.

You never have to see a word they say, and it starves them out.

The second is just to drive them out with humiliation.

When pain of humiliation exceeds joy of sadism, they reach a tipping point.

Basically, your strategy is to troll-the-trolls, and obnoxiously derail any debate/discussion that doesn't meet with you approval.

Some how, I've got a feeling, that May 1st, nothing happens, nothing changes, except your departure. Really don't see this site overrun by obnoxious chemistry geeks. Disruptive individuals, are usually banned individuals.

sealover wrote:can't you have a worthwhile thread of your own?

sealover wrote:
obnoxiously derail any debate/discussion

Every time there is valid respectful debate/discussion on Harvey's thread, what happens?

That liberal Democrat sealover trolls in to obnoxiously derail it.

But check it out!

Somebody finally woke Branner up.

I bet Branner will make sure that sealover stops obnoxiously derailing everything.

In fact, ANYONE HERE can let Branner know how bad it's gotten since sealover...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HarveyH55 wrote:

sealover wrote:
There is a two-pronged approach to troll eradication.

One is to simply by-pass them completely and go to a list of posts that includes none of theirs.

You never have to see a word they say, and it starves them out.

The second is just to drive them out with humiliation.

When pain of humiliation exceeds joy of sadism, they reach a tipping point.

Basically, your strategy is to troll-the-trolls, and obnoxiously derail any debate/discussion that doesn't meet with you approval.

Some how, I've got a feeling, that May 1st, nothing happens, nothing changes, except your departure. Really don't see this site overrun by obnoxious chemistry geeks. Disruptive individuals, are usually banned individuals.

sealover wrote:
Here is something that anyone reading this could do.

I bet it would work.

What if someone set up a Go Fund Me account for vermin eradication?

I bet a whole lot of people would like to see these unmoderated forums fulfill their potential.

What if someone could think of ways to get the word around that there is a troll eradication program instruction manual, and all you have to do is go to climate-debate.com. You don't have to log in and I wouldn't recommend it.

There is much to be learned here and valid ideas to be discussed in a rational manner.

My personal goal is to make this a valuable resource for humanity.

You would almost think a prerequisite to join a site like this would be genuine concern for climate change.

I bet maybe one of you out there could quit your job and dedicate your time to this instead. A good pitch and I bet you'll get takers.

You wouldn't even need Go Fund Me if all you're doing is get the word out that a revolution is happening at climate-debate.com.



Wha

Swan wrote:
LOL 8 people are posting here so how is that a revolution?