|Global warming and the answer .22-10-2013 17:30|
|Huynh Phu Dat☆☆☆☆☆
|At many meeting about anti climate change problem , our governments signed many decree about decrease carbon dioxide value but are they correct ? We know :|
The atmosphere of the earth = 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.039% carbon dioxide, and small amounts of other gases .
The atmosphere of the earth = total atmosphere of all countries so each country have to create 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.039% carbon dioxide, and small amounts of other gases base on the area of that country .
I call the tree/plant create O2 and decrease CO2 - value of O2 / CO2 base on the area of 1 country is A1 - original O2 /CO2 value of country A without the appearance of citizens of A .
When citizens of country A appear , they use O2 and create CO2 so country A have to create O2 value and decrease CO2 value for citizens of A , then citizens of A destroy tree / plant of country A ( build house , .... ) so country A have to restoring O2 value and decreasing CO2 value of tree / plant when they destroy tree / plant .
I call this is A2 value - O2 / CO2 value of country A must have for the appearance of citizens of country A .
So real O2 / CO2 value of country A or A0 = A1 + A2
Total A0 of all countries = ( total A1 + total A2 ) of all countries - KEY TO SOLVE CLIMATE CHANGE ( I only talk about O2 and CO2 only )
But all things our government signed about anti climate change is decrease CO2 , and all our scientists think about decreasing CO2 , right ?
If we talk about climate change , we talk about human kind create too much CO2 value , but all of us forget O2 value . When architectures destroy tree/plant and build many famous places such as White House , NATO headquater , WHO , United Nation , .... , our architectures didn't compare the value of O2/CO2 of tree / plant they destroy – A3 and O2/CO2 of tree / plant they re – create around the building after they build the building – A4 . When people work in that building , they use O2 and create CO2 – A5 so tree / plant of that area must :
A4 must = A3 + A5 .
But our architectures always create A4 < A3 – because they choose the beauty of the building or the beautiful view of the building , not choose A3 value and forget A5 value ( no one teach this things at university ) .
I choose Parliament House of German is a example . Of course , when the German build this building , they destroy the wild tree/plant at the place they build Parliament House of German – or almost no O2/CO2 come from here , A4 of the building almost = 0 .
And in front of the building , when they destroy wild tree/plant with really high value of O2/ CO2 – contain high height grass , low height tree, middle height tree , high or very high tree – A3 , they choose the beautiful view of the building , the beauty of the building and use grass – which give us low value of O2/CO2 , if they plant tree on the grass , we can have more O2/CO2 .
Most of famous place we visit every year always choose low value of O2/CO2 plant such as flower and grass in climate change age .
Even at White House , I'm sure 100% when they choose grass in front of their building , of course
A4 < A3 + A5 .
In climate change , every city , town , ward , district ... must know the original value of O2/CO2 of wild tree/plant of the area of the city before they build the city , ..... , then is O2/CO2 of tree / plant which we re-create , and the value of O2/CO2 of all the people living or working in that place , area , ...
I want to talk about human design our cities , but I think this is enough .
Finally , in climate change age , all of famous places we will see here will choose the beauty of the building or the value of O2/CO2 ?
And here are images of some famous places I collect : ( I don't have enough knowledge to collect all the famous places in this world , and if I want to do it , I must have more than just 1 foreign language to use Google to search )
Another example White House , they plant a lot of trees around the building but in front of White House , they choose large area of grass , or choose the low value of O2 / CO2 , if they think about what trees they destroy when they build this building , they will choose grass + trees , not only grass area .
If the way we design our society is right , we will not have global warming .If at White House , they choose grass in front of the building , if this is 1 error when the value of O2 is created / CO2 is decreased < value of O2 is created / CO2 is decreased of the plant they destroy when they create this building so this is 1 error .
We have 7 000 000 000 people in this world , it's meant we can have about 500 000 000 errors of design of the houses , many errors of the buildings of the government , errors of the roads about O2 / CO2 problem around this world and we are destroying the forrest , ...... Oh man , decreasing CO2 will help us anti global warming .Who is the guy gave people this idea ? I think he's just kidding with our home , this Earth .
For more info , please go to :
( I have more than 20 images , too long to post here .... )
|IPCC sucks. They have no answer for natural climatic cooling other than painting houses black to decrease||0||19-04-2019 16:32|
|Is it climate change or global warming? How science and a secret memo shaped the answer||1||03-03-2019 22:20|
|Coal is the Answer||8||12-11-2016 01:21|
|Are "popcorn" black holes the answer to linear entropy and, maybe, M2C2?||4||12-10-2015 23:06|
|Is involuntary population control the answer to man-made climate change?||5||11-10-2015 23:33|