Forget climate change, as it is Terminator time

Swan wrote:
This robot clearly got pissed that it was tied up. So was that the real T1 terminator

And the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372485988112

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
This robot clearly got pissed that it was tied up. So was that the real T1 terminator

And the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372485988112

I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for why that machine started raging.

Looks like one guy was able to turn it off near the end of the video.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
This robot clearly got pissed that it was tied up. So was that the real T1 terminator

And the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372485988112

I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for why that machine started raging.

Looks like one guy was able to turn it off near the end of the video.

Machines are not able to rage. So if it did, then it is aware and alive. It stopped whe the power was withdrawn

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
This robot clearly got pissed that it was tied up. So was that the real T1 terminator

And the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372485988112

I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for why that machine started raging.

Looks like one guy was able to turn it off near the end of the video.

Machines are not able to rage. So if it did, then it is aware and alive. It stopped whe the power was withdrawn

Maybe it was programmed to flail about like that.

On another note, I'm reading that nobody knows how AI works. I wonder how it got invented if nobody knows how it works???

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
This robot clearly got pissed that it was tied up. So was that the real T1 terminator

And the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372485988112

I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for why that machine started raging.

Looks like one guy was able to turn it off near the end of the video.

Machines are not able to rage. So if it did, then it is aware and alive. It stopped whe the power was withdrawn

Maybe it was programmed to flail about like that.

On another note, I'm reading that nobody knows how AI works. I wonder how it got invented if nobody knows how it works???

Perhaps it was programmed to do that. Then again perhaps it was not programmed to do that. Remember that everything is a lie, just so you do not know, and if you do know, it does not matter because everything is a lie, including the truth that you know, which becomes irrelevant. All the JFK files were released=Lie

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
This robot clearly got pissed that it was tied up. So was that the real T1 terminator

And the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372485988112

I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for why that machine started raging.

Looks like one guy was able to turn it off near the end of the video.

Machines are not able to rage. So if it did, then it is aware and alive. It stopped whe the power was withdrawn

Maybe it was programmed to flail about like that.

On another note, I'm reading that nobody knows how AI works. I wonder how it got invented if nobody knows how it works???

Perhaps it was programmed to do that. Then again perhaps it was not programmed to do that. Remember that everything is a lie, just so you do not know, and if you do know, it does not matter because everything is a lie, including the truth that you know, which becomes irrelevant. All the JFK files were released=Lie

I have seen a few more videos of the raging robot, folks are calling it an AI robot.

Looks like the reason nobody knows why AI works is because its reactions are based on a neural network loosely modeled like the human brain.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
This robot clearly got pissed that it was tied up. So was that the real T1 terminator

And the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372485988112

I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for why that machine started raging.

Looks like one guy was able to turn it off near the end of the video.

Machines are not able to rage. So if it did, then it is aware and alive. It stopped whe the power was withdrawn

Maybe it was programmed to flail about like that.

On another note, I'm reading that nobody knows how AI works. I wonder how it got invented if nobody knows how it works???

Perhaps it was programmed to do that. Then again perhaps it was not programmed to do that. Remember that everything is a lie, just so you do not know, and if you do know, it does not matter because everything is a lie, including the truth that you know, which becomes irrelevant. All the JFK files were released=Lie

I have seen a few more videos of the raging robot, folks are calling it an AI robot.

Looks like the reason nobody knows why AI works is because its reactions are based on a neural network loosely modeled like the human brain.

Nope as ai means thousands of different things and nothing as well

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
This robot clearly got pissed that it was tied up. So was that the real T1 terminator

And the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372485988112

I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for why that machine started raging.

Looks like one guy was able to turn it off near the end of the video.

Machines are not able to rage. So if it did, then it is aware and alive. It stopped whe the power was withdrawn

Maybe it was programmed to flail about like that.

On another note, I'm reading that nobody knows how AI works. I wonder how it got invented if nobody knows how it works???

Perhaps it was programmed to do that. Then again perhaps it was not programmed to do that. Remember that everything is a lie, just so you do not know, and if you do know, it does not matter because everything is a lie, including the truth that you know, which becomes irrelevant. All the JFK files were released=Lie

I have seen a few more videos of the raging robot, folks are calling it an AI robot.

Looks like the reason nobody knows why AI works is because its reactions are based on a neural network loosely modeled like the human brain.

Nope as ai means thousands of different things and nothing as well

In any case, AI robots have neural networks, judging by this quote from Science Direct:

"Object detection and recognition are critical tasks in robotics that have become possible thanks to deep learning. By training neural networks with massive amounts of labeled data, robots can identify and classify objects in their environment with high accuracy."

As stated by Science Direct, AI robots are trained (which is quite different than programmed).

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
This robot clearly got pissed that it was tied up. So was that the real T1 terminator

And the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372485988112

I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for why that machine started raging.

Looks like one guy was able to turn it off near the end of the video.

Machines are not able to rage. So if it did, then it is aware and alive. It stopped whe the power was withdrawn

Maybe it was programmed to flail about like that.

On another note, I'm reading that nobody knows how AI works. I wonder how it got invented if nobody knows how it works???

Perhaps it was programmed to do that. Then again perhaps it was not programmed to do that. Remember that everything is a lie, just so you do not know, and if you do know, it does not matter because everything is a lie, including the truth that you know, which becomes irrelevant. All the JFK files were released=Lie

I have seen a few more videos of the raging robot, folks are calling it an AI robot.

Looks like the reason nobody knows why AI works is because its reactions are based on a neural network loosely modeled like the human brain.

Nope as ai means thousands of different things and nothing as well

In any case, AI robots have neural networks, judging by this quote from Science Direct:

"Object detection and recognition are critical tasks in robotics that have become possible thanks to deep learning. By training neural networks with massive amounts of labeled data, robots can identify and classify objects in their environment with high accuracy."

As stated by Science Direct, AI robots are trained (which is quite different than programmed).

Not all ai is neural network based. At this point ai has no real meaning because it encompasses too many different systems, many of which are fraud based

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
This robot clearly got pissed that it was tied up. So was that the real T1 terminator

And the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372485988112

I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for why that machine started raging.

Looks like one guy was able to turn it off near the end of the video.

Machines are not able to rage. So if it did, then it is aware and alive. It stopped whe the power was withdrawn

Maybe it was programmed to flail about like that.

On another note, I'm reading that nobody knows how AI works. I wonder how it got invented if nobody knows how it works???

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
This robot clearly got pissed that it was tied up. So was that the real T1 terminator

And the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6372485988112

I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for why that machine started raging.

Looks like one guy was able to turn it off near the end of the video.

Machines are not able to rage. So if it did, then it is aware and alive. It stopped whe the power was withdrawn

Maybe it was programmed to flail about like that.

On another note, I'm reading that nobody knows how AI works. I wonder how it got invented if nobody knows how it works???

Perhaps it was programmed to do that. Then again perhaps it was not programmed to do that. Remember that everything is a lie, just so you do not know, and if you do know, it does not matter because everything is a lie, including the truth that you know, which becomes irrelevant. All the JFK files were released=Lie

I have seen a few more videos of the raging robot, folks are calling it an AI robot.

Looks like the reason nobody knows why AI works is because its reactions are based on a neural network loosely modeled like the human brain.

Swan wrote:
Nope as ai means thousands of different things and nothing as well

Spongy Iris wrote:
In any case, AI robots have neural networks, judging by this quote from Science Direct:

"Object detection and recognition are critical tasks in robotics that have become possible thanks to deep learning. By training neural networks with massive amounts of labeled data, robots can identify and classify objects in their environment with high accuracy."

As stated by Science Direct, AI robots are trained (which is quite different than programmed).

Swan wrote:
Not all ai is neural network based. At this point ai has no real meaning because it encompasses too many different systems, many of which are fraud based

Spongy Iris wrote:
It is an interesting thought experiment to wonder, if you give a machine a working brain it will become sentient. The video has captured many imaginations: Skynet has been activated! lol

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Nope as ai means thousands of different things and nothing as well

AI is specifically defined. It is a program with a feedback loop (usually automated in some way, but even that has manual intervention), used to expand a 'dictionary' or an interpreted command list.

It can be used for comprehensive data analysis, simulation of vision and hearing, or as an aid to searching the web.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Nope as ai means thousands of different things and nothing as well

AI is specifically defined. It is a program with a feedback loop (usually automated in some way, but even that has manual intervention), used to expand a 'dictionary' or an interpreted command list.

It can be used for comprehensive data analysis, simulation of vision and hearing, or as an aid to searching the web.

They claimed ai in 1995 with win95, that was not ai it was a programmed computer faking people like you. Literally every company making an ai product has their own definition, so there is no consensus because ai is undefined

Into the Night wrote:

NONE of it is conscious. NONE of is 'aware'. NONE of it is sentient.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Nope as ai means thousands of different things and nothing as well

AI is specifically defined. It is a program with a feedback loop (usually automated in some way, but even that has manual intervention), used to expand a 'dictionary' or an interpreted command list.

It can be used for comprehensive data analysis, simulation of vision and hearing, or as an aid to searching the web.

They claimed ai in 1995 with win95, that was not ai it was a programmed computer faking people like you. Literally every company making an ai product has their own definition, so there is no consensus because ai is undefined

Random phrases. No apparent coherency.

Try again.

Swan wrote: Nope as ai means thousands of different things and nothing as well

Into the Night wrote: It is a program with a feedback loop (usually automated in some way, but even that has manual intervention), used to expand a 'dictionary' or an interpreted command list.

Into the Night wrote:It can be used for comprehensive data analysis, simulation of vision and hearing, or as an aid to searching the web.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote: Nope as ai means thousands of different things and nothing as well

This is an interesting point. You are correct that there are no organizational bodies who feel qualified to define AI, even international organizations seeking to govern AI and to inform AI industry governance and legislation.

With that said, Into the Night is correct that AI is a concrete science that you can learn at any university or community college. It seems that humans still cannot define intelligence but have nonetheless spent decades discovering and refining ways to get the needed/desired results thereof.

Into the Night wrote: It is a program with a feedback loop (usually automated in some way, but even that has manual intervention), used to expand a 'dictionary' or an interpreted command list.

An instance of AI is a program, i.e. an element of implementation, however the class "AI" is a model, i.e. an element of definition.

The model includes a feedback loop, as you indicated; an instance of a feedback loop is "machine learning (ML)."

The net result is the refinement of the knowledge base from which the decisions are made that ultimately simulate intelligence. Refinement means "adding to", "deleting from", and simply altering elements in the knowledge base.

Into the Night wrote:It can be used for comprehensive data analysis, simulation of vision and hearing, or as an aid to searching the web.

Three major categories for AI are 1) pattern recogniztion, 2) error/fault anticipation and, combining those two, 3) forensic analysis + anomaly warnings through establishing baseline behavior, continuous monitoring, and using network activity to inform the machine learning process.

Swan wrote: Google, Apple, IBM, Lockheed ect all have top secret programs not yet available to the public in any fashion.

Swan wrote: Google is rumored to have a conscious program that would redefine everything

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote: Google, Apple, IBM, Lockheed ect all have top secret programs not yet available to the public in any fashion.

How "top secret" can they be if you know all about them?

Swan wrote: Google is rumored to have a conscious program that would redefine everything

Well, this clearly must be true. Will the program redefine "quantum computing"? I'm asking you because it's got to be top secret and not yet available to the public in any fashion.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote: Google, Apple, IBM, Lockheed ect all have top secret programs not yet available to the public in any fashion.

How "top secret" can they be if you know all about them?

Swan wrote: Google is rumored to have a conscious program that would redefine everything

Well, this clearly must be true. Will the program redefine "quantum computing"? I'm asking you because it's got to be top secret and not yet available to the public in any fashion.

Perhaps you missed it, as usual

Google has fired a software engineer who claimed an AI chatbot was sentient
Blake Lemoine was placed on leave last month. Google and many leading scientists were quick to dismiss Lemoine's views as misguided.

Alphabet Inc's Google said on Friday it has dismissed a senior software engineer who claimed the company's artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot LaMDA was a self-aware person.

Google, which placed software engineer Blake Lemoine on leave last month, said he had violated company policies and that it found his claims on LaMDA to be "wholly unfounded."

"It's regrettable that despite lengthy engagement on this topic, Blake still chose to persistently violate clear employment and data security policies that include the need to safeguard product information," a Google spokesperson said in an email to Reuters.

It's ok, we all know that you have loose screws

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote: Google, Apple, IBM, Lockheed ect all have top secret programs not yet available to the public in any fashion.

How "top secret" can they be if you know all about them?

Swan wrote: Google is rumored to have a conscious program that would redefine everything

Well, this clearly must be true. Will the program redefine "quantum computing"? I'm asking you because it's got to be top secret and not yet available to the public in any fashion.

Perhaps you missed it, as usual

Google has fired a software engineer who claimed an AI chatbot was sentient
Blake Lemoine was placed on leave last month. Google and many leading scientists were quick to dismiss Lemoine's views as misguided.

Alphabet Inc's Google said on Friday it has dismissed a senior software engineer who claimed the company's artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot LaMDA was a self-aware person.

Google, which placed software engineer Blake Lemoine on leave last month, said he had violated company policies and that it found his claims on LaMDA to be "wholly unfounded."

"It's regrettable that despite lengthy engagement on this topic, Blake still chose to persistently violate clear employment and data security policies that include the need to safeguard product information," a Google spokesperson said in an email to Reuters.

It's ok, we all know that you have loose screws

I doubt that if you give a robot a brain, it will become sentient.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote: Google, Apple, IBM, Lockheed ect all have top secret programs not yet available to the public in any fashion.

How "top secret" can they be if you know all about them?

Swan wrote: Google is rumored to have a conscious program that would redefine everything

Well, this clearly must be true. Will the program redefine "quantum computing"? I'm asking you because it's got to be top secret and not yet available to the public in any fashion.

Perhaps you missed it, as usual

Google has fired a software engineer who claimed an AI chatbot was sentient
Blake Lemoine was placed on leave last month. Google and many leading scientists were quick to dismiss Lemoine's views as misguided.

Alphabet Inc's Google said on Friday it has dismissed a senior software engineer who claimed the company's artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot LaMDA was a self-aware person.

Google, which placed software engineer Blake Lemoine on leave last month, said he had violated company policies and that it found his claims on LaMDA to be "wholly unfounded."

"It's regrettable that despite lengthy engagement on this topic, Blake still chose to persistently violate clear employment and data security policies that include the need to safeguard product information," a Google spokesperson said in an email to Reuters.

It's ok, we all know that you have loose screws

I doubt that if you give a robot a brain, it will become sentient.

No robot or brain is needed, just the right software running.

You have any good hot dogs today, junior?

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Nope as ai means thousands of different things and nothing as well

AI is specifically defined. It is a program with a feedback loop (usually automated in some way, but even that has manual intervention), used to expand a 'dictionary' or an interpreted command list.

It can be used for comprehensive data analysis, simulation of vision and hearing, or as an aid to searching the web.

They claimed ai in 1995 with win95, that was not ai it was a programmed computer faking people like you. Literally every company making an ai product has their own definition, so there is no consensus because ai is undefined

Random phrases. No apparent coherency.

Try again.