Remember me
▼ Content

FAT MAN DOES BACKFLIP


FAT MAN DOES BACKFLIP23-09-2026 17:08
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3606)
Check it out. Pretty awesome!

https://youtube.com/shorts/05P5OOnFly0?si=inWAhYDHc6OjR2I6




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
23-09-2026 17:34
sealover
★★★★★
(2171)
Spongy Iris wrote:
Check it out. Pretty awesome!

https://youtube.com/shorts/05P5OOnFly0?si=inWAhYDHc6OjR2I6


Quoting from the website home page (blue box at bottom):

"What is Climate-Debate.com

* This site is a neutral meeting place where everyone is invited to have their say on one of the most important discussions of our time."


It goes on to say more..

Well, it is certainly "neutral" in many ways.

"..one of the most important discussions of our time."?

A discussion so important that it must be prevented at any cost.

"Neutral" or not, mainstream science is not welcomed at this website by the members who have dominated the discussion for more than a decade.

"Climate cannot change", so don't you even try to discuss it.

But you can learn things here I've never seen ANYWHERE else.

Apparently, there is no such thing as "fossil fuel", for starters...

Yes, it is a place where rational discussion can evolve and grow, keeping up with current events, with respect displayed for all who participate.

If there were a conscious moderator paying any attention, would this thread qualify as "on topic"?

Just a hypothetical, because there is NO conscious moderator paying attention.
23-09-2026 18:13
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3606)
sealover wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Check it out. Pretty awesome!

https://youtube.com/shorts/05P5OOnFly0?si=inWAhYDHc6OjR2I6


Quoting from the website home page (blue box at bottom):

"What is Climate-Debate.com

* This site is a neutral meeting place where everyone is invited to have their say on one of the most important discussions of our time."


It goes on to say more..

Well, it is certainly "neutral" in many ways.

"..one of the most important discussions of our time."?

A discussion so important that it must be prevented at any cost.

"Neutral" or not, mainstream science is not welcomed at this website by the members who have dominated the discussion for more than a decade.

"Climate cannot change", so don't you even try to discuss it.

But you can learn things here I've never seen ANYWHERE else.

Apparently, there is no such thing as "fossil fuel", for starters...

Yes, it is a place where rational discussion can evolve and grow, keeping up with current events, with respect displayed for all who participate.

If there were a conscious moderator paying any attention, would this thread qualify as "on topic"?

Just a hypothetical, because there is NO conscious moderator paying attention.


Mmmbop

https://youtu.be/N53-LxbIizA?si=YvEtIqnBzULB9rPG




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
23-09-2026 21:42
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(24532)
Im a BM and sealover and Patricio and FakeGoogle wrote:
Quoting from the website home page (blue box at bottom):

"What is Climate-Debate.com
...deleted word games...
"Neutral" or not, mainstream science is not welcomed at this website by the members who have dominated the discussion for more than a decade.

Science is not 'mainstream' or any other 'stream'.
You continue to deny many theories of science.
Multiple people have already shown them to you.

Im a BM and sealover and Patricio and FakeGoogle wrote:
"Climate cannot change", so don't you even try to discuss it.

Climate cannot change. There is nothing that can 'change'. 'Climate' is a subjective word.
You are welcome to discuss any climate.

Im a BM and sealover and Patricio and FakeGoogle wrote:
But you can learn things here I've never seen ANYWHERE else.

Apparently, there is no such thing as "fossil fuel", for starters...

Fossils are not used as fuel. This is not the only place you can learn that fact, and you continue to deny it.

Im a BM and sealover and Patricio and FakeGoogle wrote:
Yes, it is a place where rational discussion can evolve and grow, keeping up with current events, with respect displayed for all who participate.

The Church of Global Warming is not a current event.
If you want current event discussions, try a political forum such as Just Plain Politics (pardon the plug here, Branner).

Im a BM and sealover and Patricio and FakeGoogle wrote:
If there were a conscious moderator paying any attention, would this thread qualify as "on topic"?

Just a hypothetical, because there is NO conscious moderator paying attention.

Branner still runs this board. Whining about him accomplishes nothing, Robert.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
26-09-2026 20:31
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3606)





https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
28-09-2026 01:52
Im a BM
★★★★★
(4054)
Spongy Iris wrote:


Is this image being presented as another example of a fat man doing a back flip?

Well, whatever may be it's gender, the person in the image is NOT fat.

I will confess to a defect of character that, as a bleeding-heart liberal, I am truly ashamed of.

I am not really comfortable with trans sexuals. More than fifty years ago, the first time I saw a photo of a person who had a penis, but also had breast implants, make up, female hairstyle, etc., it truly CREEPED ME OUT!

I wish I could remember the name of the beaver-shot rag.. Wait, I DO! It was called "Nugget". With that one exception, every other photo in the magazine was a natural born female with legs spread wide open to reveal natural born pussy. The tranny photo was a jarring exception that CREEPED ME OUT!

To this day, it still makes me somewhat uncomfortable.

I closely examine the photo in this newest post to look for clues of natural born gender. Breasts are too small, and appears to be somewhat of a bulge over the crotch area. From the side view, it's impossible to tell if the hips are broader than the shoulders. But it sure looks like broader shoulders than hips. Any sign of an Adam's Apple? Not really too much...

To this day it CREEPS ME OUT that someone would want their body to be surgically mutilated, to pretend to have a body they were not born with.

Again, the bleeding-heart liberal in me is ashamed that I cannot enthusiastically embrace the new trend.

I am also struck by how EXTREME is the criticism when a person does not accept the color of SKIN they were born with. Trying to "pass" for a different race gets a much different response than trying to "pass" for a different gender. I would not be welcomed to "self identify" as African American anywhere, but I would find plenty of acceptance should I decide to self identify as "female".

But the last official form with a related survey that I filled out has so many different categories to choose from! I think I was given seven choices. They did not have "autosexual" as an available designated category, so I selected "asexual". Trying to be more honest at this point in my life!

Trannies don't creep me out as much as they used to, but surgical mutilation rather than self acceptance still bothers me.
28-09-2026 02:30
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3606)
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:


Is this image being presented as another example of a fat man doing a back flip?

Well, whatever may be it's gender, the person in the image is NOT fat.

I will confess to a defect of character that, as a bleeding-heart liberal, I am truly ashamed of.

I am not really comfortable with trans sexuals. More than fifty years ago, the first time I saw a photo of a person who had a penis, but also had breast implants, make up, female hairstyle, etc., it truly CREEPED ME OUT!

I wish I could remember the name of the beaver-shot rag.. Wait, I DO! It was called "Nugget". With that one exception, every other photo in the magazine was a natural born female with legs spread wide open to reveal natural born pussy. The tranny photo was a jarring exception that CREEPED ME OUT!

To this day, it still makes me somewhat uncomfortable.

I closely examine the photo in this newest post to look for clues of natural born gender. Breasts are too small, and appears to be somewhat of a bulge over the crotch area. From the side view, it's impossible to tell if the hips are broader than the shoulders. But it sure looks like broader shoulders than hips. Any sign of an Adam's Apple? Not really too much...

To this day it CREEPS ME OUT that someone would want their body to be surgically mutilated, to pretend to have a body they were not born with.

Again, the bleeding-heart liberal in me is ashamed that I cannot enthusiastically embrace the new trend.

I am also struck by how EXTREME is the criticism when a person does not accept the color of SKIN they were born with. Trying to "pass" for a different race gets a much different response than trying to "pass" for a different gender. I would not be welcomed to "self identify" as African American anywhere, but I would find plenty of acceptance should I decide to self identify as "female".

But the last official form with a related survey that I filled out has so many different categories to choose from! I think I was given seven choices. They did not have "autosexual" as an available designated category, so I selected "asexual". Trying to be more honest at this point in my life!

Trannies don't creep me out as much as they used to, but surgical mutilation rather than self acceptance still bothers me.


The actress in the image is named Ashley Bell. She is not a transexual to my knowledge.

She played the heroine in the 2010 movie, The Last Exorcism. The picture is a promotion for that movie. I don't think she actually contorted her back that much. The picture appears a drawn exaggeration.




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html




Join the debate FAT MAN DOES BACKFLIP:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
A grown man ran onto a kids football field and tripped a 9 year old who was about to score and230-08-2026 04:47
Man-made climate change and why you're a moron!1501-06-2026 23:41
Pig arrest man for waiting for his ride on a bench. Pig gets fired. Why are pigs allowed to carry guns?908-02-2026 23:47
Cop/Pig shoots innocent man in the leg. Smarter people work at Taco Bell323-02-2025 22:22
22 Reasons to be Skeptical of Man-Made Global Warming4927-04-2024 04:05
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US
11% [59 Votes]

EU
27% [149 Votes]

China
19% [103 Votes]

Japan
4% [24 Votes]

India
4% [25 Votes]

Brazil
2% [13 Votes]

Other
6% [35 Votes]

Don't know
27% [148 Votes]

Votes: 556
Started: 07-02-2018

Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact