Elon Musk just violated the Hatch act by threatening to turn off Starlink for the Ukraine

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

Spongy Iris wrote:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Spongy Iris wrote:
Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

Spongy Iris wrote:

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

Im a BM wrote:
Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

So you know of Ukranian satellite guided torpedo's.

OKEEDOKEE

They are coming now to take you to a happy place, do not resist as they have darts and cattle prods

Swan wrote:
Musk is the head of a cabinet dept, so paid or not he is a federal employee. Though he may be the first unpaid cabinet head.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

Swan wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

So you know of Ukranian satellite guided torpedo's.

OKEEDOKEE

They are coming now to take you to a happy place, do not resist as they have darts and cattle prods

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Musk is the head of a cabinet dept, so paid or not he is a federal employee. Though he may be the first unpaid cabinet head.

Musk is not a federal employee.
No violation of the Hatch Act occurred.

Even if Musk WAS a federal employee, no violation of the Hatch Act occurred.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

So you know of Ukranian satellite guided torpedo's.

OKEEDOKEE

They are coming now to take you to a happy place, do not resist as they have darts and cattle prods

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

That is not a Hatch Act violation.

Swan wrote:

Did Gabbard fire any of your trans NSA pals?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Did Gabbard fire any of your trans NSA pals?

Tulsi Gabbard's initials, TG, stand for Toxoplasma Gondii.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Did Gabbard fire any of your trans NSA pals?

Tulsi Gabbard's initials, TG, stand for Toxoplasma Gondii.

Trans-NSA stands for unemployed

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Did Gabbard fire any of your trans NSA pals?

Tulsi Gabbard's initials, TG, stand for Toxoplasma Gondii.

Trans-NSA stands for unemployed

Although women have a much higher infection rate than men, of TG, men can certainly be infected by TG.

It may also interest readers to know that a seminal odor has been detected in women's breath post orgasm.

That is what I call some trans parasites.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Did Gabbard fire any of your trans NSA pals?

Tulsi Gabbard's initials, TG, stand for Toxoplasma Gondii.

Trans-NSA stands for unemployed

Although women have a much higher infection rate than men, of TG, men can certainly be infected by TG.

It may also interest readers to know that a seminal odor has been detected in women's breath post orgasm.

That is what I call some trans parasites.

THEN STOP SNIFFING YOUR MOMS BREATH AFTER ORGASM

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Did Gabbard fire any of your trans NSA pals?

Tulsi Gabbard's initials, TG, stand for Toxoplasma Gondii.

Trans-NSA stands for unemployed

Although women have a much higher infection rate than men, of TG, men can certainly be infected by TG.

It may also interest readers to know that a seminal odor has been detected in women's breath post orgasm.

That is what I call some trans parasites.

THEN STOP SNIFFING YOUR MOMS BREATH AFTER ORGASM

Sheesh that is rude.

The only gentleman conduct for such a nasty statement is to say:

Orgasm can cause bad breath.
An hour after sex, "a slight seminal odor" can be detected on the breath of a woman, according to so-called semen connoisseur Theodore van de Velde.

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/news/a12027/ten-facts-about-orgasm/

Semen demon. Use it or lose it.

Swan wrote:

Mrth id bsd, do you should stop

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Mrth id bsd, do you should stop

Your AI appears to be acting up again, spell check isn't working, call the grammar police.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

So you know of Ukranian satellite guided torpedo's.

OKEEDOKEE

They are coming now to take you to a happy place, do not resist as they have darts and cattle prods

Im a BM wrote:
You claim that your IQ = 130, just in case that truth is not self evident.

Someone with IQ = 130 ought to be able to comprehend this.

Im a BM wrote:
If I provide you with multiple references where credible information has been published about the drone torpedoes that ran aground on the beaches after they reached the unexpected Starlink dark zone, you can debunk them.

When you are unable to debunk them, I offer you a deal.

Im a BM wrote:
Swan, if you can agree to stop TROLLING the threads about subjects you know or care nothing about (science, etc.)...

Im a BM wrote:
Then I will agree to stop trolling, spamming, or posting ANYTHING on the threads about the subjects you DO know or care something about.

[b]Im a BM wrote:
"Nitrous oxide has two molecules of nitrogen and one molecule of oxygen.", says the guy who wants to be sure you know his IQ has been measured at 130.[/b]

Im a BM wrote:
The same guy whose EVERY post reminds everyone that "IBdaMann claims that gold is a molecule."

Im a BM wrote:
Because it is necessary to humiliate those who make inaccurate chemical claims.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

So you know of Ukranian satellite guided torpedo's.

OKEEDOKEE

They are coming now to take you to a happy place, do not resist as they have darts and cattle prods

You claim that your IQ = 130, just in case that truth is not self evident.

Someone with IQ = 130 ought to be able to comprehend this.

If I provide you with multiple references where credible information has been published about the drone torpedoes that ran aground on the beaches after they reached the unexpected Starlink dark zone, you can debunk them.

When you are unable to debunk them, I offer you a deal.

Swan, if you can agree to stop TROLLING the threads about subjects you know or care nothing about (science, etc.)...

Then I will agree to stop trolling, spamming, or posting ANYTHING on the threads about the subjects you DO know or care something about.

"Nitrous oxide has two molecules of nitrogen and one molecule of oxygen.", says the guy who wants to be sure you know his IQ has been measured at 130.

The same guy whose EVERY post reminds everyone that "IBdaMann claims that gold is a molecule."

Because it is necessary to humiliate those who make inaccurate chemical claims.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

So you know of Ukranian satellite guided torpedo's.

OKEEDOKEE

They are coming now to take you to a happy place, do not resist as they have darts and cattle prods

You claim that your IQ = 130, just in case that truth is not self evident.

Someone with IQ = 130 ought to be able to comprehend this.

If I provide you with multiple references where credible information has been published about the drone torpedoes that ran aground on the beaches after they reached the unexpected Starlink dark zone, you can debunk them.

When you are unable to debunk them, I offer you a deal.

Swan, if you can agree to stop TROLLING the threads about subjects you know or care nothing about (science, etc.)...

Then I will agree to stop trolling, spamming, or posting ANYTHING on the threads about the subjects you DO know or care something about.

"Nitrous oxide has two molecules of nitrogen and one molecule of oxygen.", says the guy who wants to be sure you know his IQ has been measured at 130.

The same guy whose EVERY post reminds everyone that "IBdaMann claims that gold is a molecule."

Because it is necessary to humiliate those who make inaccurate chemical claims.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

So you know of Ukranian satellite guided torpedo's.

OKEEDOKEE

They are coming now to take you to a happy place, do not resist as they have darts and cattle prods

You claim that your IQ = 130, just in case that truth is not self evident.

Someone with IQ = 130 ought to be able to comprehend this.

If I provide you with multiple references where credible information has been published about the drone torpedoes that ran aground on the beaches after they reached the unexpected Starlink dark zone, you can debunk them.

When you are unable to debunk them, I offer you a deal.

Swan, if you can agree to stop TROLLING the threads about subjects you know or care nothing about (science, etc.)...

Then I will agree to stop trolling, spamming, or posting ANYTHING on the threads about the subjects you DO know or care something about.

"Nitrous oxide has two molecules of nitrogen and one molecule of oxygen.", says the guy who wants to be sure you know his IQ has been measured at 130.

The same guy whose EVERY post reminds everyone that "IBdaMann claims that gold is a molecule."

Because it is necessary to humiliate those who make inaccurate chemical claims.

There are multiple NOx molecules. Gases in this group are Nitrous Oxide (N2O), Nitrogen Monoxide (NO), Dinitrogen Trioxide (N2O3), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Dinitrogen Pentoxide (N2O5), Dinitrogen Tetroxide (N2O4)

If you need any further instruction do not hesitate to ask as I may help. At least if I am not laughing too hard at the government excuse for a chemist

Hopefully I have not disturbed your fingerpainting or forced you to paint your keyboard

CIAO/130

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

So you know of Ukranian satellite guided torpedo's.

OKEEDOKEE

They are coming now to take you to a happy place, do not resist as they have darts and cattle prods

You claim that your IQ = 130, just in case that truth is not self evident.

Someone with IQ = 130 ought to be able to comprehend this.

If I provide you with multiple references where credible information has been published about the drone torpedoes that ran aground on the beaches after they reached the unexpected Starlink dark zone, you can debunk them.

When you are unable to debunk them, I offer you a deal.

Swan, if you can agree to stop TROLLING the threads about subjects you know or care nothing about (science, etc.)...

Then I will agree to stop trolling, spamming, or posting ANYTHING on the threads about the subjects you DO know or care something about.

"Nitrous oxide has two molecules of nitrogen and one molecule of oxygen.", says the guy who wants to be sure you know his IQ has been measured at 130.

The same guy whose EVERY post reminds everyone that "IBdaMann claims that gold is a molecule."

Because it is necessary to humiliate those who make inaccurate chemical claims.

There are multiple NOx molecules. Gases in this group are Nitrous Oxide (N2O), Nitrogen Monoxide (NO), Dinitrogen Trioxide (N2O3), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Dinitrogen Pentoxide (N2O5), Dinitrogen Tetroxide (N2O4)

If you need any further instruction do not hesitate to ask as I may help. At least if I am not laughing too hard at the government excuse for a chemist

Hopefully I have not disturbed your fingerpainting or forced you to paint your keyboard

CIAO/130

3768 "views" of "COW GAS!..." thread.

And now that it has dropped below the 15 most recently active threads displayed, I can measure the rate at which it continues to pick up additional views.

Just think, Swan, all those people get to read your shit.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

Im a BM wrote:
March 18, 2025 - "Trump releases classified files on JFK assassination. Here's what they say." Story title from USA today, written by Josh Meyer.

It includes a link for the curious reader to see the files with their own eyes.

Yeah, that happened today. It seems to me that Swan has mentioned in recent years, more than a few times actually, about that great moment when Trump might or might not release these files that, as of today, any of us can read.

Swan has obsessed on the topic so many times that he has proposed multiple, incompatible theories about Trump's release of these files. Does he keep them secret to have extortion leverage over any double-deep-state holdouts? Does he brazenly lie to the American people and release files that he knows are false? Does someone have extortion leverage over Trump in relation to these files?

The fun never stops!

Keep it funny!

That's my motto.

Gotta LOVE that Elon Musk too.


Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
March 18, 2025 - "Trump releases classified files on JFK assassination. Here's what they say." Story title from USA today, written by Josh Meyer.

It includes a link for the curious reader to see the files with their own eyes.

Yeah, that happened today. It seems to me that Swan has mentioned in recent years, more than a few times actually, about that great moment when Trump might or might not release these files that, as of today, any of us can read.

Swan has obsessed on the topic so many times that he has proposed multiple, incompatible theories about Trump's release of these files. Does he keep them secret to have extortion leverage over any double-deep-state holdouts? Does he brazenly lie to the American people and release files that he knows are false? Does someone have extortion leverage over Trump in relation to these files?

The fun never stops!

Keep it funny!

That's my motto.

Gotta LOVE that Elon Musk too.


Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

I also mentioned that Trump has and is not releasing the real JFK files, while he is alive.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Persons connected to reality know that Elon Musk already used his power over Starlink to sabotage Ukraine's military effort three years ago.

The Russian fleet was precariously positioned within range of Ukrainian drones, and the drones were on their way to sink it. They suddenly found themselves blind to the position of their targets. The torpedoes alone would have been devastating if they hadn't blindly crashed into the beaches.

So, it is not an empty threat for Musk to say he could do it again.

I hope the Europeans hook Ukraine up with more reliable intelligence.

Maybe Ukraine should offer that sweet mineral deal to the EU.

There is no good reason for them to trust the United States at this point.

Our stable genius president has made it very clear he expects Ukraine to surrender a lot of territory to Russia.

Perhaps along with a humble apology to Putin for all the war crimes they forced him to commit by taking SO LONG to surrender.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
If the dumocrats do not respond the lie deepens.

Billionaire Elon Musk said Sunday that Ukraine's frontline would collapse if he turned off his Starlink satellite internet constellation in the country amid its war with Russia, stressing his frustration with "years of slaughter in a stalemate that Ukraine will inevitably lose."

Musk, also a senior advisor to President Donald Trump, first reacted to a post on X by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said "Not another penny to Ukraine" in response to a post from another user questioning if U.S. taxpayers paid for a huge Ukrainian flag that was unfurled in front of the White House.

So lets see if the dumocrats have the nerve to even challenge Musk.

PS My popcorn is on reserve

PSS. See I told you that Starlink was a DOD grid to keep the GPS system up after the main GPS sats went down.

PSSS. Since the chinks and ruskies already know this the only secret is from the American people who are funding this through Tesla subsidies.

Here is the quote from Musk, which he typed on his porn site, X:

"I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army. Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off."

Musk has about as much control over satellites as he does to quit jacking off.

PS, stop indulging in popcorn, prick.

Musk does have control of starlink access. But I am more concerned that he just violated the Hatch act and no democrat seems to care because this is all one big lie

He is not a federal employee. The Hatch act only applies to federal employees. Further, no satellite shutoff has occurred.

Elon Must owns Starlink. He has all the access to the system.

Musk is certainly a federal employee as he is a cabinet head, and just the mere threat to turn off satellite communications is interference enough to result in a Hatch act violation. This is clear, what is not clear is why the dems who claim to hate Musk are being so silent?

So you know of Ukranian satellite guided torpedo's.

OKEEDOKEE

They are coming now to take you to a happy place, do not resist as they have darts and cattle prods

You claim that your IQ = 130, just in case that truth is not self evident.

Someone with IQ = 130 ought to be able to comprehend this.

If I provide you with multiple references where credible information has been published about the drone torpedoes that ran aground on the beaches after they reached the unexpected Starlink dark zone, you can debunk them.

When you are unable to debunk them, I offer you a deal.

Swan, if you can agree to stop TROLLING the threads about subjects you know or care nothing about (science, etc.)...

Then I will agree to stop trolling, spamming, or posting ANYTHING on the threads about the subjects you DO know or care something about.

"Nitrous oxide has two molecules of nitrogen and one molecule of oxygen.", says the guy who wants to be sure you know his IQ has been measured at 130.

The same guy whose EVERY post reminds everyone that "IBdaMann claims that gold is a molecule."

Because it is necessary to humiliate those who make inaccurate chemical claims.

There are multiple NOx molecules. Gases in this group are Nitrous Oxide (N2O), Nitrogen Monoxide (NO), Dinitrogen Trioxide (N2O3), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Dinitrogen Pentoxide (N2O5), Dinitrogen Tetroxide (N2O4)

If you need any further instruction do not hesitate to ask as I may help. At least if I am not laughing too hard at the government excuse for a chemist

Hopefully I have not disturbed your fingerpainting or forced you to paint your keyboard

CIAO/130

3768 "views" of "COW GAS!..." thread.

And now that it has dropped below the 15 most recently active threads displayed, I can measure the rate at which it continues to pick up additional views.

Just think, Swan, all those people get to read your shit.

Swan wrote:
There are multiple NOx molecules. Gases in this group are Nitrous Oxide (N2O), Nitrogen Monoxide (NO), Dinitrogen Trioxide (N2O3), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Dinitrogen Pentoxide (N2O5), Dinitrogen Tetroxide (N2O4)

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
There are multiple NOx molecules. Gases in this group are Nitrous Oxide (N2O), Nitrogen Monoxide (NO), Dinitrogen Trioxide (N2O3), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Dinitrogen Pentoxide (N2O5), Dinitrogen Tetroxide (N2O4)

NOx is not a molecule.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
There are multiple NOx molecules. Gases in this group are Nitrous Oxide (N2O), Nitrogen Monoxide (NO), Dinitrogen Trioxide (N2O3), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Dinitrogen Pentoxide (N2O5), Dinitrogen Tetroxide (N2O4)

NOx is not a molecule.

No it is not, it is as I said a group label for the Nitrogen Oxides that I mentioned. You do know that as a government employee that you are clearly inferior in all manner of things.

No you would not know that as a government employee. So do you have a shared space cubicle or an office. Oar a sink to wash the plates at?

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
There are multiple NOx molecules. Gases in this group are Nitrous Oxide (N2O), Nitrogen Monoxide (NO), Dinitrogen Trioxide (N2O3), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Dinitrogen Pentoxide (N2O5), Dinitrogen Tetroxide (N2O4)

NOx is not a molecule.

No it is not, it is as I said a group label for the Nitrogen Oxides that I mentioned. You do know that as a government employee that you are clearly inferior in all manner of things.

No you would not know that as a government employee. So do you have a shared space cubicle or an office. Oar a sink to wash the plates at?

So, Swan, you were NOT correct to assert that nitrous oxide has two molecules of nitrogen and one molecule of oxygen. N2O is the chemical formula for nitrous oxide. The letter "N" is for the element nitrogen. The number "2" indicates that are TWO ATOMS of nitrogen in the compound. The letter "O" is for the element oxygen. Without a number subscript designated, it means there is ONE ATOM of oxygen in the compound.

ITN astutely observes that something is not something else. Such genius.

"NOx is not a molecule."

Well, that explains EVERYTHING. Now we know one of the million things that NOx is NOT.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Many papers about nitrous oxide emissions in agriculture and natural ecosystems cite my research about what regulates/mitigates N2O production.

Unless all you really need to know is that something is not something else.