Does Anyone Know Anything about Polyphenols?
| 18-05-2026 17:41 | |
| Im a BM★★★★★ (3489) |
When a member doxes himself or herself, IBdaMann is sometimes required to post a map with a photo of what IBdaMann believes to be that member's home. I've gotten used to it. One time he posted a map to the apartment I actually lived in at the time. Along with names of my mother, son, nephew, colleagues, phone number, street address, email address. All is fair in scientific "debate"! Another time he posted a map and photo of a house I lived in 20 years ago. I wondered how he lost the correct info he posted previously. But in the interest of ensuring quality control for the "debate", IBdaMann may have no choice but to dox me... I mean, act as my hand while I dox MYSELF again. I'm still not sure what IBdaMann is trying to prove with the doxing. It doesn't do anything to dispel the obvious fact that IBdaMann is, LITERALLY, a "scientifically illiterate moron". His pathetic sidekick is significantly MORE stupid than IBdaMann. It thinks its a "chemist" and doesn't even know it's a TROLL. IBdaMann wrote:Im a BM wrote: I'm not sure what the Grammer Police, so concerned about improper use of terms such as "they", "them" and "their" would say about, "As the cat buries their excretions.." Scientists use a lot of quantitative terms that the layman may think are just some kind of adjective. "Alkalinity", for example, is most often used to refer to a quantity reported as moles per liter H+ neutralizing capacity, or grams per liter CaCO3 equivalents. The decline in sea water "alkalinity" isn't some abstract movement on the pH scale, barely discernable because the sea is so well buffered against pH change. "pH" is another quantitative term, but it is an exponential function, so it gets a little complicated. pH = -log(H+). Scientists are strictly faithful to math, so they must accept the consequences for the equations. pH CAN and WILL be BELOW ZERO if (H+) > 1.0 Tell your little friend that is IS possible, even if we let him call pH a "ratio". I'm "woke" enough now to give him some leeway to self identify as "chemist", regardless of what the scientists wrote on his Education Certificate. But he doesn't get to redefine the quantitative terms used in chemistry. pH can only be a "ratio" until you try to use in ANY equations. Actual "chemists" use pH in a LOT of equations. For example, from 1990 at the big conference... when YOU first taught ME about pH and buffering. "Northup, RR, and JG McColl. Phenols and organic carbon in litter leachates and effects of acidity. Agronomy Abstracts. 1990 Annual Meetings, October 21-26, San Antonio, Texas." Showing the relationship between pH and solubility of organic carbon. Yes, there IS "such a thing" as organic carbon. And the solubility of phenolic substances is strongly influenced by pH, because the phenol, carboxylic acids in forest floors are mostly DEPROTONATED. So they provide BUFFERING upon protonation by the "acid" in "acid rain". But they basically only soluble while they are DEPROTONATED. All about pH and buffering. Surely you can expose my fraud and give me another, "So, Mr. Chemistry Genius, the correct answer.." and then explain why the impact is so much more pronounced, depending on the availability of buffers in solution... The "exponential effects" and the "basicity scale" and how the "magnitude of effect" can be calculated from "delta(solution)". Yes, you published it all RIGHT HERE at climate-debate.com, where future generations of scientists will always be able to cite it. |
| 18-05-2026 20:52 | |
Into the Night ★★★★★(24080) |
Im a BM wrote: Alkalinity is not a chemical. Im a BM wrote: Science is not a certificate. You deny science. You still deny the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. Im a BM wrote: There is no such thing as a 'quantitative term'. Im a BM wrote: Carbon is not organic. Carbon is not acidic. Im a BM wrote: Carbon is not organic. Im a BM wrote: Chemistry isn't buzzwords. Science isn't buzzwords. You deny both. You are no chemist. You are no scientist. You're a religious nut that has a lot of trouble with English. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
Join the debate Does Anyone Know Anything about Polyphenols?: