Doctors to study possible long-term effects on patients that died from COVID-19

Doctors said there is a real need to monitor those seriously affected by COVID-19.
A study out of Germany on MRI's showed that of the 100 patients who were not in the high-risk age, 75% of them had inflammation or muscle damage. Another study looked at autopsies in people 65 and older, which showed high virus levels in the heart.

HarveyH55 wrote:
https://www.wftv.com/news/local/doctors-continue-study-possible-long-term-effects-lungs-heart-those-who-recover-covid-19/BGYR67EAQBHP3O5F5CCM3DEQKM/

Doctors said there is a real need to monitor those seriously affected by COVID-19.
A study out of Germany on MRI's showed that of the 100 patients who were not in the high-risk age, 75% of them had inflammation or muscle damage. Another study looked at autopsies in people 65 and older, which showed high virus levels in the heart.

The keep down playing that these patients were all from the ICU, who went through extremely aggressive treatments, like ventilators. The data they study, are from test given, just before discharge from the hospital, either as survivors, or to be fitted for a box and a plot. They aren't going to get many survivors to return for tests, without funds to pay for them. Insurance wouldn't want to foot the bill, if the tests aren't necessary, and only to enrich the researchers...

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
https://www.wftv.com/news/local/doctors-continue-study-possible-long-term-effects-lungs-heart-those-who-recover-covid-19/BGYR67EAQBHP3O5F5CCM3DEQKM/

Doctors said there is a real need to monitor those seriously affected by COVID-19.
A study out of Germany on MRI's showed that of the 100 patients who were not in the high-risk age, 75% of them had inflammation or muscle damage. Another study looked at autopsies in people 65 and older, which showed high virus levels in the heart.

The keep down playing that these patients were all from the ICU, who went through extremely aggressive treatments, like ventilators. The data they study, are from test given, just before discharge from the hospital, either as survivors, or to be fitted for a box and a plot. They aren't going to get many survivors to return for tests, without funds to pay for them. Insurance wouldn't want to foot the bill, if the tests aren't necessary, and only to enrich the researchers...

Is it possible for you to prove that you were a "live" birth? This requires proof of life when exiting the birth canal or matrix of the sentient being which you said procreated you.
An algorithm representing your DNA matrix will suffice. Without proof, you are merely a viral malware program.

HarveyH55 wrote:

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
https://www.wftv.com/news/local/doctors-continue-study-possible-long-term-effects-lungs-heart-those-who-recover-covid-19/BGYR67EAQBHP3O5F5CCM3DEQKM/

Doctors said there is a real need to monitor those seriously affected by COVID-19.
A study out of Germany on MRI's showed that of the 100 patients who were not in the high-risk age, 75% of them had inflammation or muscle damage. Another study looked at autopsies in people 65 and older, which showed high virus levels in the heart.

The keep down playing that these patients were all from the ICU, who went through extremely aggressive treatments, like ventilators. The data they study, are from test given, just before discharge from the hospital, either as survivors, or to be fitted for a box and a plot. They aren't going to get many survivors to return for tests, without funds to pay for them. Insurance wouldn't want to foot the bill, if the tests aren't necessary, and only to enrich the researchers...

Is it possible for you to prove that you were a "live" birth? This requires proof of life when exiting the birth canal or matrix of the sentient being which you said procreated you.
An algorithm representing your DNA matrix will suffice. Without proof, you are merely a viral malware program.

Wasn't much in the way of computers, when I was born...

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
https://www.wftv.com/news/local/doctors-continue-study-possible-long-term-effects-lungs-heart-those-who-recover-covid-19/BGYR67EAQBHP3O5F5CCM3DEQKM/

Doctors said there is a real need to monitor those seriously affected by COVID-19.
A study out of Germany on MRI's showed that of the 100 patients who were not in the high-risk age, 75% of them had inflammation or muscle damage. Another study looked at autopsies in people 65 and older, which showed high virus levels in the heart.

The keep down playing that these patients were all from the ICU, who went through extremely aggressive treatments, like ventilators. The data they study, are from test given, just before discharge from the hospital, either as survivors, or to be fitted for a box and a plot. They aren't going to get many survivors to return for tests, without funds to pay for them. Insurance wouldn't want to foot the bill, if the tests aren't necessary, and only to enrich the researchers...

Is it possible for you to prove that you were a "live" birth? This requires proof of life when exiting the birth canal or matrix of the sentient being which you said procreated you.
An algorithm representing your DNA matrix will suffice. Without proof, you are merely a viral malware program.

Wasn't much in the way of computers, when I was born...

Read about Rosalind Franklin. She was screwed because she was a woman. If you've read about this, you know it's true. As it says;
Her x-ray crystallography images of DNA led Francis Crick and James Watson to develop their double helix model of DNA, for which the male scientists (along with Maurice Wilkins) were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1962.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/women-nobel-prize_b_4074382#:~:text=By%201962%2C%20when%20work%20on%20the%20double%20helix,to%20adopt--let%27s%20say%2C%20a%20patronizing%20attitude%20towards%20her.%22

And all she got was people saying she got screwed. Some of us like science.