Do CO2 Emissions Create More Clouds?

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > Do CO2 Emissions Create More Clouds? > Page 4

Page 4 of 5

19-01-2020 08:02
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15030)	Into the Night wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: I don't recall you explaining the process of how "high frequencies are filtered out more than lower frequencies" Smaller wavelength simply scatter easier than longer ones. Exactly. It's the same principle behind submarines being limited to very low frequency (VLF) communications. I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
19-01-2020 20:18
Spongy Iris★★★★★ (3042)	Hello ITN and IBDM twins, I have never seen the natural Atmosphere make the Sun appear yellow or orange or pink or red. It is white (or it is blocked by clouds and unseen). Only thing I have seen make the Sun appear slightly pink is a smoke screen from terrible fires. And only thing I have seen make the Sun appear orange is eclipse glasses. The Sky appears those colors often, but not the Sun. You should really get outside and open your eyes once in a while. Judging by the frequency and responsiveness of your posting in here, it seems you never look away from your computer or phone screen. I call bull what you are saying about frequencies. Different subject than the color of the Sky and Sun. If the Sun is shining on your green grass lawn, is that green light scattering??? Maybe I should stare at a lawn at high noon to see if the grass turns purple due to it being hit with higher frequencies... Dude do a Google search "liquid oxygen images." What color do you see? I don't know about you, but I can't see radio waves the same as I can see visible light.
19-01-2020 20:50
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15030)	Spongy Iris wrote: I have never seen the natural Atmosphere make the Sun appear yellow or orange or pink or red. Hmmm, I wonder if your perception is reality ... or if it is more likely that your lack of perception is just your problem. Hmmmm, I'll have to think about this one for a bit. Spongy Iris wrote: Only thing I have seen make the Sun appear slightly pink is a smoke screen from terrible fires. Do you accept the observations of others or do you reaccomplish all science experiments ever performed? Spongy Iris wrote: And only thing I have seen make the Sun appear orange is eclipse glasses. I don't know what to tell you. I have seen the sun appear many different colors while riding the horizon. Spongy Iris wrote:The Sky appears those colors often, but not the Sun. I have never seen an orange sky but I'll take your word for it that you have. Spongy Iris wrote: You should really get outside and open your eyes once in a while. What a funny coincidence. I was just about to tell you the same thing. Spongy Iris wrote: Judging by the frequency and responsiveness of your posting in here, it seems you never look away from your computer or phone screen. Are you implying that there are other things? Spongy Iris wrote: I call bull what you are saying about frequencies. ... that they are the inverse of wavelengths? Are you crazy? Spongy Iris wrote: If the Sun is shining on your green grass lawn, is that green light scattering??? Is that another way of saying computer or phone screen? Spongy Iris wrote: Dude do a Google search "liquid oxygen images." What color do you see? Clear. This is an excellent video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ab3hyDKsj0 . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
19-01-2020 21:21
Into the Night★★★★★ (23226)	Spongy Iris wrote: Hello ITN and IBDM twins, We are not twins. We are not even related. We don't even live in the same State. Spongy Iris wrote: I have never seen the natural Atmosphere make the Sun appear yellow or orange Then you haven't looked. Spongy Iris wrote: or pink or red. That can happen with smoke and particulates in the air. Spongy Iris wrote: It is white (or it is blocked by clouds and unseen). In the atmosphere, the sun appears yellow-white at noon. In space, the Sun appears white. Spongy Iris wrote: Only thing I have seen make the Sun appear slightly pink is a smoke screen from terrible fires. Yes. Smoke particulates can do this. Spongy Iris wrote: And only thing I have seen make the Sun appear orange is eclipse glasses. Take off your glasses. Spongy Iris wrote: The Sky appears those colors often, but not the Sun. The Sun appears yellow-white on the surface of Earth. It is because blue light is scattering, producing the 'blue sky' effect. Spongy Iris wrote: You should really get outside and open your eyes once in a while. I fly, dumbass. I even manage to get above the clouds and see the Sun more often than my fellows around here. I live in Seattle. Spongy Iris wrote: Judging by the frequency and responsiveness of your posting in here, it seems you never look away from your computer or phone screen. You misjudge. Spongy Iris wrote: I call bull what you are saying about frequencies. Argument of the stone. Spongy Iris wrote: Different subject than the color of the Sky and Sun. If the Sun is shining on your green grass lawn, is that green light scattering??? Nope. Green light is being reflected from the lawn. Spongy Iris wrote: Maybe I should stare at a lawn at high noon to see if the grass turns purple due to it being hit with higher frequencies... It won't. It might yellow a little. Keep it watered. Spongy Iris wrote: Dude do a Google search "liquid oxygen images." What color do you see? Blue. There is no liquid oxygen in the atmosphere. Oxygen is colorless as a gas. Spongy Iris wrote: I don't know about you, but I can't see radio waves the same as I can see visible light. We aren't talking about radio waves. With appropriate instrumentation, you can see radio waves. There will be no distinct image due to the long wavelength of these waves. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
19-01-2020 23:09
Spongy Iris★★★★★ (3042)	Into the Night wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Hello ITN and IBDM twins, We are not twins. We are not even related. We don't even live in the same State. Spongy Iris wrote: I have never seen the natural Atmosphere make the Sun appear yellow or orange Then you haven't looked. Spongy Iris wrote: or pink or red. That can happen with smoke and particulates in the air. Spongy Iris wrote: It is white (or it is blocked by clouds and unseen). In the atmosphere, the sun appears yellow-white at noon. In space, the Sun appears white. Spongy Iris wrote: Only thing I have seen make the Sun appear slightly pink is a smoke screen from terrible fires. Yes. Smoke particulates can do this. Spongy Iris wrote: And only thing I have seen make the Sun appear orange is eclipse glasses. Take off your glasses. Spongy Iris wrote: The Sky appears those colors often, but not the Sun. The Sun appears yellow-white on the surface of Earth. It is because blue light is scattering, producing the 'blue sky' effect. Spongy Iris wrote: You should really get outside and open your eyes once in a while. I fly, dumbass. I even manage to get above the clouds and see the Sun more often than my fellows around here. I live in Seattle. Spongy Iris wrote: Judging by the frequency and responsiveness of your posting in here, it seems you never look away from your computer or phone screen. You misjudge. Spongy Iris wrote: I call bull what you are saying about frequencies. Argument of the stone. Spongy Iris wrote: Different subject than the color of the Sky and Sun. If the Sun is shining on your green grass lawn, is that green light scattering??? Nope. Green light is being reflected from the lawn. Spongy Iris wrote: Maybe I should stare at a lawn at high noon to see if the grass turns purple due to it being hit with higher frequencies... It won't. It might yellow a little. Keep it watered. Spongy Iris wrote: Dude do a Google search "liquid oxygen images." What color do you see? Blue. There is no liquid oxygen in the atmosphere. Oxygen is colorless as a gas. Spongy Iris wrote: I don't know about you, but I can't see radio waves the same as I can see visible light. We aren't talking about radio waves. With appropriate instrumentation, you can see radio waves. There will be no distinct image due to the long wavelength of these waves. I'd love to stay and debate the twin clowns ITN and IBDM if they were actually sincere about having an honest discussion. Obviously they are not. There is nothing more to gain from their shenanigans. I will leave them with my blog of sun pics goingdum.blogspot.com Lets see if, unlike Isaac Newton, they can look at the Sun without having a mental breakdown, and see that it is white!

23-07-2025 23:28
Im a BM ★★★★★ (2540)	Spongy Iris wrote: If there are more clouds, it warms up a frigid climate, because it blankets the land, and traps in the very little heat gotten from the sun But in a hot climate where the land is getting blasted by the sun, more clouds block the sun and helps cool temps. Thus I'm wondering if CO2 emissions are to blame for the record ice melt I've been hearing about in the Arctic ? This must be harmful for Polar bears who lose hunting ground... What are some more harmful effects of increased clouds? Don't feel bad, Spongy Iris. This thread of yours got 6891 views. I'm not saying you necessarily reached thousands of people with your message. But at least SOME of them must have had genuine interest and learned something useful from it, right? It was before my time here, so I only now can provide a response to your inquiry. "What are some more harmful effects of increased clouds?" Let's do a cost-benefit analysis, weighing the harmful effects against the beneficial effects of "increased clouds". On the positive side, more clouds reflect more sunlight to keep things cooler. On the negative side, more clouds dump more rain to cause flooding. But then you have to explain what you mean by "more clouds". The same amount of water vapor can condense into much more reflective clouds in the presence of aerosols for nucleation of droplet formation. These "brighter" clouds are comprised of much smaller droplets of water. the benefits include keeping off the heat as they reflect sunlight, rather than allow it to heat the surface. The harm includes clouds that don't provide farmers with the kind of rain you get (and need) from a "normal" cloud. Those tiny droplets tend to stay tiny and fade away, rather than combining into larger droplets that fall as rain. Blaming CO2 emissions for the record Arctic ice melt is tricky. Yes, CO2 was the main driver for it being warmer than it would have been otherwise. But on any given day, it's a tug of war between global warming and global dimming. More days with "increased clouds" give global dimming a better shot at holding back global warming. The sun ain't getting any cooler!
24-07-2025 00:02
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	Im a BM wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: If there are more clouds, it warms up a frigid climate, because it blankets the land, and traps in the very little heat gotten from the sun But in a hot climate where the land is getting blasted by the sun, more clouds block the sun and helps cool temps. Thus I'm wondering if CO2 emissions are to blame for the record ice melt I've been hearing about in the Arctic ? This must be harmful for Polar bears who lose hunting ground... What are some more harmful effects of increased clouds? Don't feel bad, Spongy Iris. This thread of yours got 6891 views. I'm not saying you necessarily reached thousands of people with your message. But at least SOME of them must have had genuine interest and learned something useful from it, right? It was before my time here, so I only now can provide a response to your inquiry. "What are some more harmful effects of increased clouds?" Let's do a cost-benefit analysis, weighing the harmful effects against the beneficial effects of "increased clouds". On the positive side, more clouds reflect more sunlight to keep things cooler. On the negative side, more clouds dump more rain to cause flooding. But then you have to explain what you mean by "more clouds". The same amount of water vapor can condense into much more reflective clouds in the presence of aerosols for nucleation of droplet formation. These "brighter" clouds are comprised of much smaller droplets of water. the benefits include keeping off the heat as they reflect sunlight, rather than allow it to heat the surface. The harm includes clouds that don't provide farmers with the kind of rain you get (and need) from a "normal" cloud. Those tiny droplets tend to stay tiny and fade away, rather than combining into larger droplets that fall as rain. Blaming CO2 emissions for the record Arctic ice melt is tricky. Yes, CO2 was the main driver for it being warmer than it would have been otherwise. But on any given day, it's a tug of war between global warming and global dimming. More days with "increased clouds" give global dimming a better shot at holding back global warming. The sun ain't getting any cooler! In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
24-07-2025 04:59
GasGuzzler ★★★★★ (3115)	Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan
24-07-2025 05:19
GasGuzzler ★★★★★ (3115)	I'm full of BS wrote: The same amount of water vapor can condense into much more reflective clouds in the presence of aerosols for nucleation of droplet formation. These "brighter" clouds are comprised of much smaller droplets of water. Care to explain this at all?
24-07-2025 08:07
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15030)	Spongy Iris wrote: If there are more clouds, it warms up a frigid climate, Nope. Clouds do not have any special magical superpowers to generate energy out of nothing. Spongy Iris wrote: because it blankets the land, So do stupid ideas. "Blankets" is not a verb. Spongy Iris wrote: and traps in the very little heat gotten from the sun Heat is not something that can be trapped. Spongy Iris wrote: But in a hot climate where the land is getting blasted by the sun, more clouds block the sun and helps cool temps. Nope. Clouds that are blasted by the sun absorb that electromagnetic radiation and increase in temperature themselves, they then heat the surrounding air by conduction (and convection). Spongy Iris wrote: Thus I'm wondering if CO2 emissions are to blame for the record ice melt I've been hearing about in the Arctic ? There is no "record ice melt" in the Arctic; there is only continuous ice accumulation, meters per year, that calves off into icebergs. Spongy Iris wrote: This must be harmful for Polar bears who lose hunting ground... Polar bears are thriving, moreso than ever before.
24-07-2025 08:21
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15030)	Im a BM wrote: Let's do a cost-benefit analysis, weighing the harmful effects against the beneficial effects of "increased clouds". On the positive side, more clouds reflect more sunlight to keep things cooler. If you were, say, a chemist, you'd understand that clouds absorb solar energy. You would do well to learn a little about the science you are pretending to discuss. Im a BM wrote: On the negative side, more clouds dump more rain to cause flooding. If you were a "bio"-anything you'd realize that where there is more rainfall, there is more life. Im a BM wrote:Blaming CO2 emissions for the record Arctic ice melt is tricky. Yes, CO2 was the main driver for it being warmer than it would have been otherwise. You wouldn't say this if you had learned science at some point. Hey, when you tell other people that you are a chemist, do you mention that one way to heat a cold apartment whent he electricity is out is to spray CO2 into a few rooms? Do you tell people that they should cook food with CO2, seeing as how it is a "driver" for "heat"? You really suck at science. Please, feign more indignation. You have no clue about thermodynamics. Im a BM wrote: But on any given day, it's a tug of war between global warming and global dimming. Two great tastes that would taste great together if only they were real. Im a BM wrote: More days with "increased clouds" give global dimming a better shot at holding back global warming. The sun ain't getting any cooler! Clouds don't matter. The earth ain't getting any warmer.
24-07-2025 14:52
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Heat evaporates water vapor, both from the land and the atmosphere They teach this on the first day of kindergarten which you missed obviously. Case in point Mercury has no clouds and Venis has zero water vapor clouds at all. IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
24-07-2025 16:00
GasGuzzler ★★★★★ (3115)	Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Heat evaporates water vapor , Water vapor is water that has already been evaporated, dumbass. Swan wrote: both from the land and the atmosphere It was 95 and very humid here yesterday with a dewpoint of 79, yet there were no clouds. Would you care to explain why? Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan
24-07-2025 18:11
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Heat evaporates water vapor , Water vapor is water that has already been evaporated, dumbass. Swan wrote: both from the land and the atmosphere It was 95 and very humid here yesterday with a dewpoint of 79, yet there were no clouds. Would you care to explain why? I did explain it. It is also not my purpose to teach you what at least 25 years of teachers and professors all failed at. Climate change began on the Earth BEFORE the Earth had a climate, this however can only be understood by logical thinkers, which logically excludes you and your parents who actually believe the NSA lie that climate change is a modern and unknown to history thing. You are literally an ant following the ant in front of you, and you are completely ignorant of the rest of the Earth. Of which you care not because all of your duties are following instead of leading. Not much of a life is it? IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
24-07-2025 18:30
GasGuzzler ★★★★★ (3115)	Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Heat evaporates water vapor , Water vapor is water that has already been evaporated, dumbass. Swan wrote: both from the land and the atmosphere It was 95 and very humid here yesterday with a dewpoint of 79, yet there were no clouds. Would you care to explain why? I did explain it. It is also not my purpose to teach you what at least 25 years of teachers and professors all failed at. Climate change began on the Earth BEFORE the Earth had a climate, this however can only be understood by logical thinkers, which logically excludes you and your parents who actually believe the NSA lie that climate change is a modern and unknown to history thing. You are literally an ant following the ant in front of you, and you are completely ignorant of the rest of the Earth. Of which you care not because all of your duties are following instead of leading. Not much of a life is it? Nice pivot. However, you did not explain anything with the only exception being your IQ around 73. You claimed hot weather will result in more clouds. I said it was very hot and humid here yesterday with no clouds and I asked you to explain it. You did not. Do you stand by your claim that hot weather results in more clouds? Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan

24-07-2025 18:56
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Heat evaporates water vapor , Water vapor is water that has already been evaporated, dumbass. Swan wrote: both from the land and the atmosphere It was 95 and very humid here yesterday with a dewpoint of 79, yet there were no clouds. Would you care to explain why? I did explain it. It is also not my purpose to teach you what at least 25 years of teachers and professors all failed at. Climate change began on the Earth BEFORE the Earth had a climate, this however can only be understood by logical thinkers, which logically excludes you and your parents who actually believe the NSA lie that climate change is a modern and unknown to history thing. You are literally an ant following the ant in front of you, and you are completely ignorant of the rest of the Earth. Of which you care not because all of your duties are following instead of leading. Not much of a life is it? Nice pivot. However, you did not explain anything with the only exception being your IQ around 73. You claimed hot weather will result in more clouds. I said it was very hot and humid here yesterday with no clouds and I asked you to explain it. You did not. Do you stand by your claim that hot weather results in more clouds? Well there you go being wrong again because what I said was, and I quote myself "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" So were you born this stupid, or did you give a college $500,000.00 to teach you? I guess the losers before you forgot to tell you that I eat behavioral analyst as a preworkout snack. Cheerio IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
24-07-2025 23:05
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Heat evaporates water vapor , Water vapor is water that has already been evaporated, dumbass. Swan wrote: both from the land and the atmosphere It was 95 and very humid here yesterday with a dewpoint of 79, yet there were no clouds. Would you care to explain why? I did explain it. It is also not my purpose to teach you what at least 25 years of teachers and professors all failed at. Climate change began on the Earth BEFORE the Earth had a climate, this however can only be understood by logical thinkers, which logically excludes you and your parents who actually believe the NSA lie that climate change is a modern and unknown to history thing. You are literally an ant following the ant in front of you, and you are completely ignorant of the rest of the Earth. Of which you care not because all of your duties are following instead of leading. Not much of a life is it? Nice pivot. However, you did not explain anything with the only exception being your IQ around 73. You claimed hot weather will result in more clouds. I said it was very hot and humid here yesterday with no clouds and I asked you to explain it. You did not. Do you stand by your claim that hot weather results in more clouds? I like these senility tests. See if you can process this answer. Market Summary > Apple Inc 213.76 USD +213.69 (305,271.43%)all time Cowabunga dude IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
25-07-2025 04:43
GasGuzzler ★★★★★ (3115)	Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Heat evaporates water vapor , Water vapor is water that has already been evaporated, dumbass. Swan wrote: both from the land and the atmosphere It was 95 and very humid here yesterday with a dewpoint of 79, yet there were no clouds. Would you care to explain why? I did explain it. It is also not my purpose to teach you what at least 25 years of teachers and professors all failed at. Climate change began on the Earth BEFORE the Earth had a climate, this however can only be understood by logical thinkers, which logically excludes you and your parents who actually believe the NSA lie that climate change is a modern and unknown to history thing. You are literally an ant following the ant in front of you, and you are completely ignorant of the rest of the Earth. Of which you care not because all of your duties are following instead of leading. Not much of a life is it? Nice pivot. However, you did not explain anything with the only exception being your IQ around 73. You claimed hot weather will result in more clouds. I said it was very hot and humid here yesterday with no clouds and I asked you to explain it. You did not. Do you stand by your claim that hot weather results in more clouds? Well there you go being wrong again because what I said was, and I quote myself "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more I stand corrected. You did indeed say hotter temps would result in less clouds, not more. Can you explain why? I suspect you cannot, but I'll give you a chance. Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan
25-07-2025 06:30
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Heat evaporates water vapor , Water vapor is water that has already been evaporated, dumbass. Swan wrote: both from the land and the atmosphere It was 95 and very humid here yesterday with a dewpoint of 79, yet there were no clouds. Would you care to explain why? I did explain it. It is also not my purpose to teach you what at least 25 years of teachers and professors all failed at. Climate change began on the Earth BEFORE the Earth had a climate, this however can only be understood by logical thinkers, which logically excludes you and your parents who actually believe the NSA lie that climate change is a modern and unknown to history thing. You are literally an ant following the ant in front of you, and you are completely ignorant of the rest of the Earth. Of which you care not because all of your duties are following instead of leading. Not much of a life is it? Nice pivot. However, you did not explain anything with the only exception being your IQ around 73. You claimed hot weather will result in more clouds. I said it was very hot and humid here yesterday with no clouds and I asked you to explain it. You did not. Do you stand by your claim that hot weather results in more clouds? Well there you go being wrong again because what I said was, and I quote myself "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more I stand corrected. You did indeed say hotter temps would result in less clouds, not more. Can you explain why? I suspect you cannot, but I'll give you a chance. You ** up everything, admit such, then offer chances. LOL, your only chance is for a good Thorazine induced coma. Halfwits IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop** I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
25-07-2025 06:39
GasGuzzler ★★★★★ (3115)	Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Heat evaporates water vapor , Water vapor is water that has already been evaporated, dumbass. Swan wrote: both from the land and the atmosphere It was 95 and very humid here yesterday with a dewpoint of 79, yet there were no clouds. Would you care to explain why? I did explain it. It is also not my purpose to teach you what at least 25 years of teachers and professors all failed at. Climate change began on the Earth BEFORE the Earth had a climate, this however can only be understood by logical thinkers, which logically excludes you and your parents who actually believe the NSA lie that climate change is a modern and unknown to history thing. You are literally an ant following the ant in front of you, and you are completely ignorant of the rest of the Earth. Of which you care not because all of your duties are following instead of leading. Not much of a life is it? Nice pivot. However, you did not explain anything with the only exception being your IQ around 73. You claimed hot weather will result in more clouds. I said it was very hot and humid here yesterday with no clouds and I asked you to explain it. You did not. Do you stand by your claim that hot weather results in more clouds? Well there you go being wrong again because what I said was, and I quote myself "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more I stand corrected. You did indeed say hotter temps would result in less clouds, not more. Can you explain why? I suspect you cannot, but I'll give you a chance. You **** up everything, admit such, then offer chances. So you can't, because naturally you're wrong. This is what happens to Googally educated morons. You wind up with nothing to explain your Google search copynpaste. Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan
25-07-2025 13:41
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Heat evaporates water vapor , Water vapor is water that has already been evaporated, dumbass. Swan wrote: both from the land and the atmosphere It was 95 and very humid here yesterday with a dewpoint of 79, yet there were no clouds. Would you care to explain why? I did explain it. It is also not my purpose to teach you what at least 25 years of teachers and professors all failed at. Climate change began on the Earth BEFORE the Earth had a climate, this however can only be understood by logical thinkers, which logically excludes you and your parents who actually believe the NSA lie that climate change is a modern and unknown to history thing. You are literally an ant following the ant in front of you, and you are completely ignorant of the rest of the Earth. Of which you care not because all of your duties are following instead of leading. Not much of a life is it? Nice pivot. However, you did not explain anything with the only exception being your IQ around 73. You claimed hot weather will result in more clouds. I said it was very hot and humid here yesterday with no clouds and I asked you to explain it. You did not. Do you stand by your claim that hot weather results in more clouds? Well there you go being wrong again because what I said was, and I quote myself "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more I stand corrected. You did indeed say hotter temps would result in less clouds, not more. Can you explain why? I suspect you cannot, but I'll give you a chance. You ** up everything, admit such, then offer chances. So you can't, because naturally you're wrong. This is what happens to Googally educated morons. You wind up with nothing to explain your Google search copynpaste. Let me explain what you did for the jelly donut seeking crowd. I said that more heat means less clouds not more. Then you in an effort to subvert the conversation and prove me senile said that I cannot prove that more heat means more clouds in the hopes that I would not notice the change and pick up your new argument that you created for me, which if I participated in would prove that my train of thought was jelly like Kamala Harrise's and yours. You are also a piece of inebriated dead meat that clearly does not know what a woman is. Furthermore your delusion that you have some intrinsic worth to humanity and that people are seeking to prove things to you is a textbook example of a woke delusion where your own brain recreates reality to make a safe space for you to wait to die in. LOL are you now saying that if I do not prove gravity to you that gravity is not real? Newton, Einstein and Hawking all failed as in their equations 2M+2E=0.2A, see if you can prove me wrong on that level Shirley. PS, this has nothing to do with the JFK and covid files or the full Epstein list taped under Trumps pen holder on his desk that the FBI farts all missed when they were in his home. Yup, in fact 10 million typical files can be scanned to a 1TB micro sd card. Let the retarded judge and your hero who does not know what a woman is, and yet does not excuse herself from cases requiring such knowledge. PSS Climate change began on Earth 5 billion years ago, not 150 years ago, but you do not care, as all you do is to follow the NSA ant in front of you as the entire colony is depending on your holding up your end of the lie. You have no life, no loving family and hopefully your coat hanger never fails. Now keep everyone in the loop apprised on how you got me to prove something that you specified. Now I have to go see if my eggplants are ready for Parma CIAO IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop** I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
25-07-2025 15:49
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: GasGuzzler wrote: Swan wrote: In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh Care to explain this at all? Heat evaporates water vapor , Water vapor is water that has already been evaporated, dumbass. Swan wrote: both from the land and the atmosphere It was 95 and very humid here yesterday with a dewpoint of 79, yet there were no clouds. Would you care to explain why? I did explain it. It is also not my purpose to teach you what at least 25 years of teachers and professors all failed at. Climate change began on the Earth BEFORE the Earth had a climate, this however can only be understood by logical thinkers, which logically excludes you and your parents who actually believe the NSA lie that climate change is a modern and unknown to history thing. You are literally an ant following the ant in front of you, and you are completely ignorant of the rest of the Earth. Of which you care not because all of your duties are following instead of leading. Not much of a life is it? Nice pivot. However, you did not explain anything with the only exception being your IQ around 73. You claimed hot weather will result in more clouds. I said it was very hot and humid here yesterday with no clouds and I asked you to explain it. You did not. Do you stand by your claim that hot weather results in more clouds? Well there you go being wrong again because what I said was, and I quote myself "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more I stand corrected. You did indeed say hotter temps would result in less clouds, not more. Can you explain why? I suspect you cannot, but I'll give you a chance. You ** up everything, admit such, then offer chances. So you can't, because naturally you're wrong. This is what happens to Googally educated morons. You wind up with nothing to explain your Google search copynpaste. Let me explain what you did for the jelly donut seeking crowd. I said that more heat means less clouds not more. Then you in an effort to subvert the conversation and prove me senile said that I cannot prove that more heat means more clouds in the hopes that I would not notice the change and pick up your new argument that you created for me, which if I participated in would prove that my train of thought was jelly like Kamala Harrise's and yours. You are also a piece of inebriated dead meat that clearly does not know what a woman is. Furthermore your delusion that you have some intrinsic worth to humanity and that people are seeking to prove things to you is a textbook example of a woke delusion where your own brain recreates reality to make a safe space for you to wait to die in. LOL are you now saying that if I do not prove gravity to you that gravity is not real? Newton, Einstein and Hawking all failed as in their equations 2M+2E=0.2A, see if you can prove me wrong on that level Shirley. PS, this has nothing to do with the JFK and covid files or the full Epstein list taped under Trumps pen holder on his desk that the FBI farts all missed when they were in his home. Yup, in fact 10 million typical files can be scanned to a 1TB micro sd card. Let the retarded judge and your hero who does not know what a woman is, and yet does not excuse herself from cases requiring such knowledge. PSS Climate change began on Earth 5 billion years ago, not 150 years ago, but you do not care, as all you do is to follow the NSA ant in front of you as the entire colony is depending on your holding up your end of the lie. You have no life, no loving family and hopefully your coat hanger never fails. Now keep everyone in the loop apprised on how you got me to prove something that you specified. Now I have to go see if my eggplants are ready for Parma CIAO Great news, I just picked one classic and two black beauty eggplants. MM good PS. In Godwins law everything reverts to Adolph, in Swans law everything reverts back to JFK. PSS. Hoffa update, the FBI is still digging but rest easy because everything will be fine when they find the body. Right? IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop** I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
26-07-2025 02:26
Spongy Iris★★★★★ (3042)	Swan wrote: "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" The total solar irradiance (TSI) — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth — varies by only about 0.1% over the sunspot cycle. At solar maximum: ~1362 W/m² At solar minimum: ~1361 W/m² Seems negligible. But an increase of CO2 in the atmosphere can lead to more clouds. And the relative increase in CO2 in the atmosphere seems much more significant than the very narrow fluctuation range of solar output. https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
26-07-2025 03:04
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" The total solar irradiance (TSI) — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth — varies by only about 0.1% over the sunspot cycle. At solar maximum: ~1362 W/m² At solar minimum: ~1361 W/m² Seems negligible. But an increase of CO2 in the atmosphere can lead to more clouds. And the relative increase in CO2 in the atmosphere seems much more significant than the very narrow fluctuation range of solar output. Except that CO2 was far higher in the distant past and long before humans. So how did that happen without humans burning oil and gas. LOL climate change is just another NSA lie to confuse humans before the aliens take over, fully. IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
26-07-2025 04:29
Spongy Iris★★★★★ (3042)	Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" The total solar irradiance (TSI) — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth — varies by only about 0.1% over the sunspot cycle. At solar maximum: ~1362 W/m² At solar minimum: ~1361 W/m² Seems negligible. But an increase of CO2 in the atmosphere can lead to more clouds. And the relative increase in CO2 in the atmosphere seems much more significant than the very narrow fluctuation range of solar output. Except that CO2 was far higher in the distant past and long before humans. So how did that happen without humans burning oil and gas. LOL climate change is just another NSA lie to confuse humans before the aliens take over, fully. How do you know CO2 was far higher in the distant past? I'm pretty sure it was, and that was why there was a "Great Flood." https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
26-07-2025 04:38
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" The total solar irradiance (TSI) — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth — varies by only about 0.1% over the sunspot cycle. At solar maximum: ~1362 W/m² At solar minimum: ~1361 W/m² Seems negligible. But an increase of CO2 in the atmosphere can lead to more clouds. And the relative increase in CO2 in the atmosphere seems much more significant than the very narrow fluctuation range of solar output. Except that CO2 was far higher in the distant past and long before humans. So how did that happen without humans burning oil and gas. LOL climate change is just another NSA lie to confuse humans before the aliens take over, fully. How do you know CO2 was far higher in the distant past? I'm pretty sure it was, and that was why there was a "Great Flood." 1. How is it that you do not know that CO2 levels were higher in the past 2. Again I do not have to prove anything IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
26-07-2025 05:57
GasGuzzler ★★★★★ (3115)	Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" The total solar irradiance (TSI) — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth — varies by only about 0.1% over the sunspot cycle. At solar maximum: ~1362 W/m² At solar minimum: ~1361 W/m² Seems negligible. But an increase of CO2 in the atmosphere can lead to more clouds. And the relative increase in CO2 in the atmosphere seems much more significant than the very narrow fluctuation range of solar output. Except that CO2 was far higher in the distant past and long before humans. So how did that happen without humans burning oil and gas. LOL climate change is just another NSA lie to confuse humans before the aliens take over, fully. How do you know CO2 was far higher in the distant past? I'm pretty sure it was, and that was why there was a "Great Flood." How does more CO2 lead to more clouds? How does more CO2 cause a flood? I was told by an "expert" that it causes drought. Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan
26-07-2025 08:08
Spongy Iris★★★★★ (3042)	GasGuzzler wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" The total solar irradiance (TSI) — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth — varies by only about 0.1% over the sunspot cycle. At solar maximum: ~1362 W/m² At solar minimum: ~1361 W/m² Seems negligible. But an increase of CO2 in the atmosphere can lead to more clouds. And the relative increase in CO2 in the atmosphere seems much more significant than the very narrow fluctuation range of solar output. Except that CO2 was far higher in the distant past and long before humans. So how did that happen without humans burning oil and gas. LOL climate change is just another NSA lie to confuse humans before the aliens take over, fully. How do you know CO2 was far higher in the distant past? I'm pretty sure it was, and that was why there was a "Great Flood." How does more CO2 lead to more clouds? How does more CO2 cause a flood? I was told by an "expert" that it causes drought. Just look at how carbonated water fizzes, same idea. Did you forget about my Heaven's Glass position, and how to make a dry ice bomb? https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
26-07-2025 08:20
Spongy Iris★★★★★ (3042)	Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" The total solar irradiance (TSI) — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth — varies by only about 0.1% over the sunspot cycle. At solar maximum: ~1362 W/m² At solar minimum: ~1361 W/m² Seems negligible. But an increase of CO2 in the atmosphere can lead to more clouds. And the relative increase in CO2 in the atmosphere seems much more significant than the very narrow fluctuation range of solar output. Except that CO2 was far higher in the distant past and long before humans. So how did that happen without humans burning oil and gas. LOL climate change is just another NSA lie to confuse humans before the aliens take over, fully. How do you know CO2 was far higher in the distant past? I'm pretty sure it was, and that was why there was a "Great Flood." 1. How is it that you do not know that CO2 levels were higher in the past 2. Again I do not have to prove anything I couldn't think of any good ways to debunk the evidence that atmospheric CO2 levels were much higher in the ancient past. But I also couldn't take the position, that just a decrease in CO2, from ~ 1500 ppm to 400 ppm, would turn Antarctica from a lush forest into a permanently frozen desert. There has to be another factor. The Bible says it is wind. So I think Earth's rotation sped up to create more wind, which lead to colder more severe weather. As such, I don't think the Earth would be able to tolerate ~ 1500 ppm atmospheric CO2 as it did in the ancient past. https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
26-07-2025 13:28
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" The total solar irradiance (TSI) — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth — varies by only about 0.1% over the sunspot cycle. At solar maximum: ~1362 W/m² At solar minimum: ~1361 W/m² Seems negligible. But an increase of CO2 in the atmosphere can lead to more clouds. And the relative increase in CO2 in the atmosphere seems much more significant than the very narrow fluctuation range of solar output. Except that CO2 was far higher in the distant past and long before humans. So how did that happen without humans burning oil and gas. LOL climate change is just another NSA lie to confuse humans before the aliens take over, fully. How do you know CO2 was far higher in the distant past? I'm pretty sure it was, and that was why there was a "Great Flood." 1. How is it that you do not know that CO2 levels were higher in the past 2. Again I do not have to prove anything I couldn't think of any good ways to debunk the evidence that atmospheric CO2 levels were much higher in the ancient past. But I also couldn't take the position, that just a decrease in CO2, from ~ 1500 ppm to 400 ppm, would turn Antarctica from a lush forest into a permanently frozen desert. There has to be another factor. The Bible says it is wind. So I think Earth's rotation sped up to create more wind, which lead to colder more severe weather. As such, I don't think the Earth would be able to tolerate ~ 1500 ppm atmospheric CO2 as it did in the ancient past. The only thing that you said that was correct is that you do not think IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL

26-07-2025 16:07
Im a BM ★★★★★ (2540)	Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" The total solar irradiance (TSI) — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth — varies by only about 0.1% over the sunspot cycle. At solar maximum: ~1362 W/m² At solar minimum: ~1361 W/m² Seems negligible. But an increase of CO2 in the atmosphere can lead to more clouds. And the relative increase in CO2 in the atmosphere seems much more significant than the very narrow fluctuation range of solar output. Except that CO2 was far higher in the distant past and long before humans. So how did that happen without humans burning oil and gas. LOL climate change is just another NSA lie to confuse humans before the aliens take over, fully. How do you know CO2 was far higher in the distant past? I'm pretty sure it was, and that was why there was a "Great Flood." 1. How is it that you do not know that CO2 levels were higher in the past 2. Again I do not have to prove anything I couldn't think of any good ways to debunk the evidence that atmospheric CO2 levels were much higher in the ancient past. But I also couldn't take the position, that just a decrease in CO2, from ~ 1500 ppm to 400 ppm, would turn Antarctica from a lush forest into a permanently frozen desert. There has to be another factor. The Bible says it is wind. So I think Earth's rotation sped up to create more wind, which lead to colder more severe weather. As such, I don't think the Earth would be able to tolerate ~ 1500 ppm atmospheric CO2 as it did in the ancient past. The only thing that you said that was correct is that you do not think When I joined climate-debate.com three and a half years ago, it was still a somewhat lively place. About two or three new members joined every week at the time I joined. Admittedly, most new members did not post ANYTHING. Their names went on the list of new registrations, but most of them decided not to post anything. Three new members have joined in the last three months, but they were all the same new Messiah. Google stopped directing folks to this website, for more than a year now. Back when Google DID constantly bring new eyes to the site, when I first joined, it might have been a chance to take it from trash talk to science related to climate change. If the administrator could have created at least one small forum where obnoxious trolling would not be allowed... It's too late now. Google no longer draws in new members and new eyes. Yet, the biogeochemistry threads keep racking up more and more "views", even as they lay dormant at the bottom of the list where the extra step is required to "View older threads". Must be the FBI just messing with me. It's too soon for another biogeochemistry spam attack.
26-07-2025 20:06
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	Im a BM wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" The total solar irradiance (TSI) — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth — varies by only about 0.1% over the sunspot cycle. At solar maximum: ~1362 W/m² At solar minimum: ~1361 W/m² Seems negligible. But an increase of CO2 in the atmosphere can lead to more clouds. And the relative increase in CO2 in the atmosphere seems much more significant than the very narrow fluctuation range of solar output. Except that CO2 was far higher in the distant past and long before humans. So how did that happen without humans burning oil and gas. LOL climate change is just another NSA lie to confuse humans before the aliens take over, fully. How do you know CO2 was far higher in the distant past? I'm pretty sure it was, and that was why there was a "Great Flood." 1. How is it that you do not know that CO2 levels were higher in the past 2. Again I do not have to prove anything I couldn't think of any good ways to debunk the evidence that atmospheric CO2 levels were much higher in the ancient past. But I also couldn't take the position, that just a decrease in CO2, from ~ 1500 ppm to 400 ppm, would turn Antarctica from a lush forest into a permanently frozen desert. There has to be another factor. The Bible says it is wind. So I think Earth's rotation sped up to create more wind, which lead to colder more severe weather. As such, I don't think the Earth would be able to tolerate ~ 1500 ppm atmospheric CO2 as it did in the ancient past. The only thing that you said that was correct is that you do not think When I joined climate-debate.com three and a half years ago, it was still a somewhat lively place. About two or three new members joined every week at the time I joined. Admittedly, most new members did not post ANYTHING. Their names went on the list of new registrations, but most of them decided not to post anything. Three new members have joined in the last three months, but they were all the same new Messiah. Google stopped directing folks to this website, for more than a year now. Back when Google DID constantly bring new eyes to the site, when I first joined, it might have been a chance to take it from trash talk to science related to climate change. If the administrator could have created at least one small forum where obnoxious trolling would not be allowed... It's too late now. Google no longer draws in new members and new eyes. Yet, the biogeochemistry threads keep racking up more and more "views", even as they lay dormant at the bottom of the list where the extra step is required to "View older threads". Must be the FBI just messing with me. It's too soon for another biogeochemistry spam attack. Climate change is an NSA derived lie, people are waking up and no one cares like they did three years ago. Grow up, you are not paid for your views so they are irrelevant IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
26-07-2025 20:23
Spongy Iris★★★★★ (3042)	Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: 1. How is it that you do not know that CO2 levels were higher in the past 2. Again I do not have to prove anything I couldn't think of any good ways to debunk the evidence that atmospheric CO2 levels were much higher in the ancient past. But I also couldn't take the position, that just a decrease in CO2, from ~ 1500 ppm to 400 ppm, would turn Antarctica from a lush forest into a permanently frozen desert. There has to be another factor. The Bible says it is wind. So I think Earth's rotation sped up to create more wind, which lead to colder more severe weather. As such, I don't think the Earth would be able to tolerate ~ 1500 ppm atmospheric CO2 as it did in the ancient past. The only thing that you said that was correct is that you do not think I'm dead certain that I don't think the Earth would be able to tolerate ~ 1500 ppm atmospheric CO2 as it did in the ancient past is a correct statement. I can't go wrong searching for evidence to back up Genesis life sciences. And God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the cattle that was with him in the ark: and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters assuaged; Genesis 8:1 https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html Edited on 26-07-2025 20:24
26-07-2025 22:10
Spongy Iris★★★★★ (3042)	Im a BM wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: "In reality hotter temps would mean less clouds, not more Duh" The total solar irradiance (TSI) — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth — varies by only about 0.1% over the sunspot cycle. At solar maximum: ~1362 W/m² At solar minimum: ~1361 W/m² Seems negligible. But an increase of CO2 in the atmosphere can lead to more clouds. And the relative increase in CO2 in the atmosphere seems much more significant than the very narrow fluctuation range of solar output. Except that CO2 was far higher in the distant past and long before humans. So how did that happen without humans burning oil and gas. LOL climate change is just another NSA lie to confuse humans before the aliens take over, fully. How do you know CO2 was far higher in the distant past? I'm pretty sure it was, and that was why there was a "Great Flood." 1. How is it that you do not know that CO2 levels were higher in the past 2. Again I do not have to prove anything I couldn't think of any good ways to debunk the evidence that atmospheric CO2 levels were much higher in the ancient past. But I also couldn't take the position, that just a decrease in CO2, from ~ 1500 ppm to 400 ppm, would turn Antarctica from a lush forest into a permanently frozen desert. There has to be another factor. The Bible says it is wind. So I think Earth's rotation sped up to create more wind, which lead to colder more severe weather. As such, I don't think the Earth would be able to tolerate ~ 1500 ppm atmospheric CO2 as it did in the ancient past. The only thing that you said that was correct is that you do not think When I joined climate-debate.com three and a half years ago, it was still a somewhat lively place. About two or three new members joined every week at the time I joined. Admittedly, most new members did not post ANYTHING. Their names went on the list of new registrations, but most of them decided not to post anything. Three new members have joined in the last three months, but they were all the same new Messiah. Google stopped directing folks to this website, for more than a year now. Back when Google DID constantly bring new eyes to the site, when I first joined, it might have been a chance to take it from trash talk to science related to climate change. If the administrator could have created at least one small forum where obnoxious trolling would not be allowed... It's too late now. Google no longer draws in new members and new eyes. Yet, the biogeochemistry threads keep racking up more and more "views", even as they lay dormant at the bottom of the list where the extra step is required to "View older threads". Must be the FBI just messing with me. It's too soon for another biogeochemistry spam attack. Hey check out my cover. I got like 700 views in the first 24 hours after posting. That is a record for me in just 1 day, but little more than a rounding error compared to the original, which has cracked the billion views club. I think I have found my voice. It ain't pitch perfect. https://youtube.com/shorts/C-__tUgmnmI?si=QkuDugohfI5DQgJR The view tally has pretty much died at this point, but let's see if I can give it a boost by reposting it here. https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html Edited on 26-07-2025 22:10
27-07-2025 02:49
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: Spongy Iris wrote: Swan wrote: 1. How is it that you do not know that CO2 levels were higher in the past 2. Again I do not have to prove anything I couldn't think of any good ways to debunk the evidence that atmospheric CO2 levels were much higher in the ancient past. But I also couldn't take the position, that just a decrease in CO2, from ~ 1500 ppm to 400 ppm, would turn Antarctica from a lush forest into a permanently frozen desert. There has to be another factor. The Bible says it is wind. So I think Earth's rotation sped up to create more wind, which lead to colder more severe weather. As such, I don't think the Earth would be able to tolerate ~ 1500 ppm atmospheric CO2 as it did in the ancient past. The only thing that you said that was correct is that you do not think I'm dead certain that I don't think the Earth would be able to tolerate ~ 1500 ppm atmospheric CO2 as it did in the ancient past is a correct statement. I can't go wrong searching for evidence to back up Genesis life sciences. And God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the cattle that was with him in the ark: and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters assuaged; Genesis 8:1 When you are certain of a scientific statement that is an opinion, this is a delusion. As a matter of fact the Earth could tolerate a 100% CO2 atmosphere quite well IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
27-07-2025 03:47
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15030)	Swan wrote: Heat evaporates water vapor, both from the land and the atmosphere They teach this on the first day of kindergarten which you missed obviously. Nope. On day-1 they teach that water vapor cannot evaporate because it is already water vapor. You obviously missed that day. Swan wrote:Case in point Mercury has no clouds and Venis has zero water vapor clouds at all. Mercury has no clouds because it has no atmosphere, not because it is a case in point. You don't know Venus' atmospheric water content any more than you know what occurred in the distant, unobserved past.
27-07-2025 03:55
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote: Heat evaporates water vapor, both from the land and the atmosphere They teach this on the first day of kindergarten which you missed obviously. Nope. On day-1 they teach that water vapor cannot evaporate because it is already water vapor. You obviously missed that day. Swan wrote:Case in point Mercury has no clouds and Venis has zero water vapor clouds at all. Mercury has no clouds because it has no atmosphere, not because it is a case in point. You don't know Venus' atmospheric water content any more than you know what occurred in the distant, unobserved past. Actually genius heat causes evaporation, and cooling causes condensation as rain, so if there were just heat without cooling there could never be rain. But since you missed day 1, you are clueless. What is Venus' atmosphere filled with? Its gaseous envelope is composed of more than 96 percent carbon dioxide and 3.5 percent molecular nitrogen. Trace amounts of other gases are present, including carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, water vapour, argon, and helium. IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
27-07-2025 04:03
Im a BM ★★★★★ (2540)	15,000! POST NUMBER FIFTEEN THOUSAND! 15,000 IBdaMann Posts... THIS one is special. Congratulations on this magnificent acccomplishment. Future generations will benefit from the IBdaMann wisdom archived here. IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote: Heat evaporates water vapor, both from the land and the atmosphere They teach this on the first day of kindergarten which you missed obviously. Nope. On day-1 they teach that water vapor cannot evaporate because it is already water vapor. You obviously missed that day. Swan wrote:Case in point Mercury has no clouds and Venis has zero water vapor clouds at all. Mercury has no clouds because it has no atmosphere, not because it is a case in point. You don't know Venus' atmospheric water content any more than you know what occurred in the distant, unobserved past. WOO HOO!!! 15,000 of these masterpiece posts by IBdaMann! It's enough to fill a fat lesbian mother with pride.
27-07-2025 09:12
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15030)	Swan wrote: Actually genius heat causes evaporation, Actually, genius, heat does not cause evaporation, and both liquid and solid water evaporate at any temperature. Please pass this on to Robert. But water vapor does not evaporate, despite your delusion that it does. You see, water vapor can condense, but it cannot evaporate because it is already water vapor. Did Robert tell you that water vapor evaporates? Swan wrote: and cooling causes condensation as rain, Water vapor can condense under increased temperatures. Go ahead and ask me how. Then ask me how amphibious animals are amphibians. Swan wrote: so if there were just heat without cooling there could never be rain. Great non sequitur. If there were only heat without cooling then there would be no 2nd law of thermodynamics. Swan wrote: What is Venus' atmosphere filled with? Let me guess, you're going to pretend to know because you read erroneous information that regurgitates erroneous information that regurgitates erroneous information.
27-07-2025 13:10
Swan★★★★★ (7581)	IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote: Actually genius heat causes evaporation, Actually, genius, heat does not cause evaporation, and both liquid and solid water evaporate at any temperature. Please pass this on to Robert. But water vapor does not evaporate, despite your delusion that it does. You see, water vapor can condense, but it cannot evaporate because it is already water vapor. Did Robert tell you that water vapor evaporates? Swan wrote: and cooling causes condensation as rain, Water vapor can condense under increased temperatures. Go ahead and ask me how. Then ask me how amphibious animals are amphibians. Swan wrote: so if there were just heat without cooling there could never be rain. Great non sequitur. If there were only heat without cooling then there would be no 2nd law of thermodynamics. Swan wrote: What is Venus' atmosphere filled with? Let me guess, you're going to pretend to know because you read erroneous information that regurgitates erroneous information that regurgitates erroneous information. The post was about heat not causing more but less clouds but you the failed psychiatrist who ended up here at the ass-hole of the Earth, pretending to have a physics degree clearly have dark matter and the errors in gravitational theory all solved. Too bad that no one is paying attention. And on the record, that you will never exceed, clouds are condensation, and with only heat clouds cannot form and eventuallly all or at least most evaporation would be lost to space. In fact you obviously have a cool condensation area between your ears. In other news, please take your Thorazine before posting as you ramble less that way IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL Edited on 27-07-2025 13:19

Page 4 of 5

Join the debate Do CO2 Emissions Create More Clouds?:

Threads	Replies	Last post
Fossil Fuel Substitution for reduced emission of CO2, mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium..	501	16-11-2025 21:02
What happened to all the CO2 doomsday posts?	84	03-06-2025 04:34
Proof That Too Much CO2 Is An Existential Threat	326	07-11-2023 19:16
The EPA's ambitious plan to cut auto emissions to slow climate change runs into skepticism	1	06-08-2023 20:31
There is no scientific theory or evidence that suggest CO2 traps heat better than O2 or N2	533	30-01-2023 07:22