Remember me
▼ Content

Definition of a Troll



Page 2 of 2<12
02-10-2022 00:41
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(2785)
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Science is not a 'method' or procedure.
A fact is not a proof nor a Universal Truth. Learn what 'fact' means.
A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around.
Science is not a 'research', business, or 'technology'. It is not logic. It is not mathematics. It does not use consensus. only religions and governments do that. There is no voting bloc in science. Science is not a debugging method. It is not a computer.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.

Religion is not science. Redefinition fallacy.

...deleted Mantras 5...17...1a...

No argument presented. Trolling.


So is your feeble response an indication of your limited IQ or of an equally limited vocabulary, or more likely both.

The rules do allow you to ask your mommy for help when you get stuck you know?


According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
02-10-2022 03:04
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(13031)
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:Science is not a 'method' or procedure. A fact is not a proof nor a Universal Truth. Learn what 'fact' means.
A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around. Science is not a 'research', business, or 'technology'. It is not logic. It is not mathematics. It does not use consensus. only religions and governments do that. There is no voting bloc in science. Science is not a debugging method. It is not a computer.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.

Religion is not science. Redefinition fallacy.
...deleted Mantras 5...17...1a...
No argument presented. Trolling.
So is your feeble response an indication of your limited IQ or of an equally limited vocabulary, or more likely both.

Into the Night is correct on all points. What point are you trying to make?
02-10-2022 11:15
Robert Wagner
★☆☆☆☆
(58)
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:

A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around.


Fail.

In scientific reasoning, a hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done. A theory, on the other hand, is supported by evidence: it's a principle formed as an attempt to explain things that have already been substantiated by data.

Hypothesis first, theory afterwards.

A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around. An example is the null hypothesis of a theory.
It is not possible to prove any theory True. Only fundamentalists try to do that.
Science is not data. Evidence is not a proof. All observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology.
Science is not a principle.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That's it. That's all.


Fail again.

Nope. The theory of the null hypothesis in statistics

No such theory in statistical math.
Robert Wagner wrote:
instructs you the formulate the null hypothesis and then test it i order to form your theory.

Null hypothesis first.

Circular definition. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).



Troll fails again.

In inferential statistics, the null hypothesis is that two possibilities are the same. The null hypothesis is that the observed difference is due to chance alone. Using statistical tests, it is possible to calculate the likelihood that the null hypothesis is true.
02-10-2022 12:01
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19854)
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Science is not a 'method' or procedure.
A fact is not a proof nor a Universal Truth. Learn what 'fact' means.
A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around.
Science is not a 'research', business, or 'technology'. It is not logic. It is not mathematics. It does not use consensus. only religions and governments do that. There is no voting bloc in science. Science is not a debugging method. It is not a computer.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.

Religion is not science. Redefinition fallacy.

...deleted Mantras 5...17...1a...

No argument presented. Trolling.

...deleted Mantras 17...1a...

No argument presented. Trolling.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
02-10-2022 12:02
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19854)
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:Science is not a 'method' or procedure. A fact is not a proof nor a Universal Truth. Learn what 'fact' means.
A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around. Science is not a 'research', business, or 'technology'. It is not logic. It is not mathematics. It does not use consensus. only religions and governments do that. There is no voting bloc in science. Science is not a debugging method. It is not a computer.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.

Religion is not science. Redefinition fallacy.
...deleted Mantras 5...17...1a...
No argument presented. Trolling.
So is your feeble response an indication of your limited IQ or of an equally limited vocabulary, or more likely both.

Into the Night is correct on all points. What point are you trying to make?

He isn't making any point. He's just trolling.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
02-10-2022 12:03
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19854)
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:

A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around.


Fail.

In scientific reasoning, a hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done. A theory, on the other hand, is supported by evidence: it's a principle formed as an attempt to explain things that have already been substantiated by data.

Hypothesis first, theory afterwards.

A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around. An example is the null hypothesis of a theory.
It is not possible to prove any theory True. Only fundamentalists try to do that.
Science is not data. Evidence is not a proof. All observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology.
Science is not a principle.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That's it. That's all.


Fail again.

Nope. The theory of the null hypothesis in statistics

No such theory in statistical math.
Robert Wagner wrote:
instructs you the formulate the null hypothesis and then test it i order to form your theory.

Null hypothesis first.

Circular definition. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).



Troll fails again.

In inferential statistics, the null hypothesis is that two possibilities are the same. The null hypothesis is that the observed difference is due to chance alone. Using statistical tests, it is possible to calculate the likelihood that the null hypothesis is true.

Circular definition. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Repetition fallacy (chanting). Redefinition fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. There is no such thing as 'statistical tests'.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
Edited on 02-10-2022 12:05
02-10-2022 12:13
Robert Wagner
★☆☆☆☆
(58)
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:

A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around.


Fail.

In scientific reasoning, a hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done. A theory, on the other hand, is supported by evidence: it's a principle formed as an attempt to explain things that have already been substantiated by data.

Hypothesis first, theory afterwards.

A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around. An example is the null hypothesis of a theory.
It is not possible to prove any theory True. Only fundamentalists try to do that.
Science is not data. Evidence is not a proof. All observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology.
Science is not a principle.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That's it. That's all.


Fail again.

Nope. The theory of the null hypothesis in statistics

No such theory in statistical math.
Robert Wagner wrote:
instructs you the formulate the null hypothesis and then test it i order to form your theory.

Null hypothesis first.

Circular definition. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).



Troll fails again.

In inferential statistics, the null hypothesis is that two possibilities are the same. The null hypothesis is that the observed difference is due to chance alone. Using statistical tests, it is possible to calculate the likelihood that the null hypothesis is true.

Circular definition. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Repetition fallacy (chanting). Redefinition fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. There is no such thing as 'statistical tests'.


Delusional troll argumentation.
02-10-2022 15:04
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(2785)
Into the Night wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:Science is not a 'method' or procedure. A fact is not a proof nor a Universal Truth. Learn what 'fact' means.
A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around. Science is not a 'research', business, or 'technology'. It is not logic. It is not mathematics. It does not use consensus. only religions and governments do that. There is no voting bloc in science. Science is not a debugging method. It is not a computer.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.

Religion is not science. Redefinition fallacy.
...deleted Mantras 5...17...1a...
No argument presented. Trolling.
So is your feeble response an indication of your limited IQ or of an equally limited vocabulary, or more likely both.

Into the Night is correct on all points. What point are you trying to make?

He isn't making any point. He's just trolling.


LOL says the schizzo who changes his name then has a seemingly rational conversation with himself, which is actually loonatickomundo

Take the Thorazine


According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
02-10-2022 20:40
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19854)
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:

A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around.


Fail.

In scientific reasoning, a hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done. A theory, on the other hand, is supported by evidence: it's a principle formed as an attempt to explain things that have already been substantiated by data.

Hypothesis first, theory afterwards.

A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around. An example is the null hypothesis of a theory.
It is not possible to prove any theory True. Only fundamentalists try to do that.
Science is not data. Evidence is not a proof. All observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology.
Science is not a principle.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That's it. That's all.


Fail again.

Nope. The theory of the null hypothesis in statistics

No such theory in statistical math.
Robert Wagner wrote:
instructs you the formulate the null hypothesis and then test it i order to form your theory.

Null hypothesis first.

Circular definition. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).



Troll fails again.

In inferential statistics, the null hypothesis is that two possibilities are the same. The null hypothesis is that the observed difference is due to chance alone. Using statistical tests, it is possible to calculate the likelihood that the null hypothesis is true.

Circular definition. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Repetition fallacy (chanting). Redefinition fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. There is no such thing as 'statistical tests'.

...deleted Mantra 17...

No argument presented. Trolling.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
02-10-2022 20:41
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19854)
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:Science is not a 'method' or procedure. A fact is not a proof nor a Universal Truth. Learn what 'fact' means.
A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around. Science is not a 'research', business, or 'technology'. It is not logic. It is not mathematics. It does not use consensus. only religions and governments do that. There is no voting bloc in science. Science is not a debugging method. It is not a computer.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.

Religion is not science. Redefinition fallacy.
...deleted Mantras 5...17...1a...
No argument presented. Trolling.
So is your feeble response an indication of your limited IQ or of an equally limited vocabulary, or more likely both.

Into the Night is correct on all points. What point are you trying to make?

He isn't making any point. He's just trolling.

...deleted Mantra 1d...

No argument presented. Trolling.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
02-10-2022 21:13
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(2785)
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:Science is not a 'method' or procedure. A fact is not a proof nor a Universal Truth. Learn what 'fact' means.
A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around. Science is not a 'research', business, or 'technology'. It is not logic. It is not mathematics. It does not use consensus. only religions and governments do that. There is no voting bloc in science. Science is not a debugging method. It is not a computer.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.

Religion is not science. Redefinition fallacy.
...deleted Mantras 5...17...1a...
No argument presented. Trolling.
So is your feeble response an indication of your limited IQ or of an equally limited vocabulary, or more likely both.

Into the Night is correct on all points. What point are you trying to make?

He isn't making any point. He's just trolling.

...deleted Mantra 1d...

No argument presented. Trolling.


LOL 7 years of college down the drain

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjIH1jdx2_A




According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
03-10-2022 05:43
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19854)
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:Science is not a 'method' or procedure. A fact is not a proof nor a Universal Truth. Learn what 'fact' means.
A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around. Science is not a 'research', business, or 'technology'. It is not logic. It is not mathematics. It does not use consensus. only religions and governments do that. There is no voting bloc in science. Science is not a debugging method. It is not a computer.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.

Religion is not science. Redefinition fallacy.
...deleted Mantras 5...17...1a...
No argument presented. Trolling.
So is your feeble response an indication of your limited IQ or of an equally limited vocabulary, or more likely both.

Into the Night is correct on all points. What point are you trying to make?

He isn't making any point. He's just trolling.

...deleted Mantra 1d...

No argument presented. Trolling.

...deleted Mantra 1a...

No argument presented. Trolling.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
Page 2 of 2<12





Join the debate Definition of a Troll:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Aesop's Fables - The Troll Who Cried Dead Barrier Reef804-09-2022 00:00
Ye Bible Troll Speaketh4124-04-2022 20:24
Go Fund Me pitch for troll-infested website vermin eradication program manual6022-04-2022 16:56
Safe Friends of "sealover" - Troll-free Library Networking. Join the List.622-03-2022 05:21
The Definition of an Average Climate6403-08-2020 22:53
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact