"Define Your Terms!": Battle Cry of climate-debate.com

Im a BM wrote:
For years before my arrival, no less than five members of this website joined in the Battle Cry for every new member who dared to post any concerns about so-called "climate change".

"Define your terms, you scientifically illiterate moron." Was a common reply to any new member's first post.

Im a BM wrote:
However, trolls are unable to define their own terms when asked.

Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night loves to employ terms "chemist" and "pH" and "buffering".

ITN insists that HE is some kind of "chemist", whereas he asserts I am NOT.

According to the rules of "Define Your Terms", so aggressively enforced for all those years, it is only a MEANINGLESS BUZZWORD until an unambiguous definition had been offered and then approved by the "Board" here.

Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night REFUSES to define his terms, with virtually only one exception.

ITN WILL say what "science" IS in a seven-word sentence.

Other than that, ITN will only make assertions about what is NOT.

Into the Night, prove again that you have NO IDEA what "pH" or "buffering" mean by saying "RQAA" instead of offering anything resembling a definition.

And then prove you don't even know what a "chemist" is. Apparently, you fancy yourself to be some kind of "chemist" while you insist that I am NOT.

Yes, DEFINE YOUR TERMS.

That used to be your Battle Cry.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
For years before my arrival, no less than five members of this website joined in the Battle Cry for every new member who dared to post any concerns about so-called "climate change".

"Define your terms, you scientifically illiterate moron." Was a common reply to any new member's first post.

Because they, like you, use a lot of meaningless buzzwords.

Im a BM wrote:
However, trolls are unable to define their own terms when asked.

Yet I still ask. You're not even a very good troll.

Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night loves to employ terms "chemist" and "pH" and "buffering".

ITN insists that HE is some kind of "chemist", whereas he asserts I am NOT.

According to the rules of "Define Your Terms", so aggressively enforced for all those years, it is only a MEANINGLESS BUZZWORD until an unambiguous definition had been offered and then approved by the "Board" here.

Chemistry is not a vote.

Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night REFUSES to define his terms, with virtually only one exception.

ITN WILL say what "science" IS in a seven-word sentence.

Other than that, ITN will only make assertions about what is NOT.

Into the Night, prove again that you have NO IDEA what "pH" or "buffering" mean by saying "RQAA" instead of offering anything resembling a definition.

And then prove you don't even know what a "chemist" is. Apparently, you fancy yourself to be some kind of "chemist" while you insist that I am NOT.

Yes, DEFINE YOUR TERMS.

That used to be your Battle Cry.

RQAA

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
For years before my arrival, no less than five members of this website joined in the Battle Cry for every new member who dared to post any concerns about so-called "climate change".

"Define your terms, you scientifically illiterate moron." Was a common reply to any new member's first post.

Because they, like you, use a lot of meaningless buzzwords.

Im a BM wrote:
However, trolls are unable to define their own terms when asked.

Yet I still ask. You're not even a very good troll.

Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night loves to employ terms "chemist" and "pH" and "buffering".

ITN insists that HE is some kind of "chemist", whereas he asserts I am NOT.

According to the rules of "Define Your Terms", so aggressively enforced for all those years, it is only a MEANINGLESS BUZZWORD until an unambiguous definition had been offered and then approved by the "Board" here.

Chemistry is not a vote.

Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night REFUSES to define his terms, with virtually only one exception.

ITN WILL say what "science" IS in a seven-word sentence.

Other than that, ITN will only make assertions about what is NOT.

Into the Night, prove again that you have NO IDEA what "pH" or "buffering" mean by saying "RQAA" instead of offering anything resembling a definition.

And then prove you don't even know what a "chemist" is. Apparently, you fancy yourself to be some kind of "chemist" while you insist that I am NOT.

Yes, DEFINE YOUR TERMS.

That used to be your Battle Cry.

RQAA

Keep saying "RQAA" but you have NEVER ONCE offered a definition for pH beyond vague reference to a "ratio"

Let's pretend that hundreds of new viewers are looking at this website every day and they have no idea where you might have "RQAA" the answer before.

Can you offer THEM an actual definition for pH? A definition for pH buffering?

I didn't think so.

The SECRET "chemist" never reveals the source of his omniscience.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
For years before my arrival, no less than five members of this website joined in the Battle Cry for every new member who dared to post any concerns about so-called "climate change".

"Define your terms, you scientifically illiterate moron." Was a common reply to any new member's first post.

Because they, like you, use a lot of meaningless buzzwords.

Im a BM wrote:
However, trolls are unable to define their own terms when asked.

Yet I still ask. You're not even a very good troll.

Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night loves to employ terms "chemist" and "pH" and "buffering".

ITN insists that HE is some kind of "chemist", whereas he asserts I am NOT.

According to the rules of "Define Your Terms", so aggressively enforced for all those years, it is only a MEANINGLESS BUZZWORD until an unambiguous definition had been offered and then approved by the "Board" here.

Chemistry is not a vote.

Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night REFUSES to define his terms, with virtually only one exception.

ITN WILL say what "science" IS in a seven-word sentence.

Other than that, ITN will only make assertions about what is NOT.

Into the Night, prove again that you have NO IDEA what "pH" or "buffering" mean by saying "RQAA" instead of offering anything resembling a definition.

And then prove you don't even know what a "chemist" is. Apparently, you fancy yourself to be some kind of "chemist" while you insist that I am NOT.

Yes, DEFINE YOUR TERMS.

That used to be your Battle Cry.

RQAA

Keep saying "RQAA" but you have NEVER ONCE offered a definition for pH beyond vague reference to a "ratio"

Let's pretend that hundreds of new viewers are looking at this website every day and they have no idea where you might have "RQAA" the answer before.

Can you offer THEM an actual definition for pH? A definition for pH buffering?

I didn't think so.

The SECRET "chemist" never reveals the source of his omniscience.

RQAA

Im a BM wrote:

What about your LIE that agent Ross used a "vest camera" to record his heroic encounter with the dangerous domestic terrorist who nearly succeeded in her attempt to kill him?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

What about your LIE that agent Ross used a "vest camera" to record his heroic encounter with the dangerous domestic terrorist who nearly succeeded in her attempt to kill him?

Even Kristi Noem, who I always remember for her guardian skills which lead her to kill her pet dog, AND WRITE A MEMOIR ABOUT IT, would probably admit it wasn't a body camera in his vest.

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

What about your LIE that agent Ross used a "vest camera" to record his heroic encounter with the dangerous domestic terrorist who nearly succeeded in her attempt to kill him?

Even Kristi Noem, who I always remember for her guardian skills which lead her to kill her pet dog, AND WRITE A MEMOIR ABOUT IT, would probably admit it wasn't a body camera in his vest.

She won't pretend it was a body cam.

She won't admit there might have been anything inappropriate about his decision to use one hand to record the adventure with his personal cell phone. It's all about creating "content" to post on the Internet. That's okay. His bosses do it too. I'm sure we'll learn it was agent Ross who said "f**king bitch" immediately after completing the double double tap.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

What about your LIE that agent Ross used a "vest camera" to record his heroic encounter with the dangerous domestic terrorist who nearly succeeded in her attempt to kill him?

Even Kristi Noem, who I always remember for her guardian skills which lead her to kill her pet dog, AND WRITE A MEMOIR ABOUT IT, would probably admit it wasn't a body camera in his vest.

She won't pretend it was a body cam.

She won't admit there might have been anything inappropriate about his decision to use one hand to record the adventure with his personal cell phone. It's all about creating "content" to post on the Internet. That's okay. His bosses do it too. I'm sure we'll learn it was agent Ross who said "f**king bitch" immediately after completing the double double tap.

Another one I always remember:

"I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?" Trump remarked at a campaign stop at Dordt College in Sioux Center, Iowa. "It's, like, incredible."