Remember me
▼ Content

Crypto-Climate Watch List



Page 13 of 14<<<11121314>
15-01-2023 12:24
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
It seems that Solana has made about 2x at 22.60 ( was under 10 not so long time ago).
15-01-2023 14:49
duncan61
★★★★★
(2021)
Be interesting to see where it goes. I have no open positions at the moment but AU$‪1,279.49 in 48 hours worked
15-01-2023 17:22
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Xadoman wrote:It seems that Solana has made about 2x at 22.60 ( was under 10 not so long time ago).

A totally meaningless statement. The spike from $16.xx to $22.xx occurred withn one hour for no market reason, i.e. very few people benefitted from previously lower price because everyone had been selling. However, as gullible gamblers (who are addicted to being manipulated) fall for the artificial appearance of "mooning" , a pyramid scheme is created, with each spike making it more and more expensive for the next group of FOMO-lemmngs.

All pyramids collapse.

We watched this exact same tactic with Safemoon in the two months before it was rug-pulled.

And once again we see that you are encouraging others to throw their money into it with unbelievable after-the-fact claims of making a profit.

Why did you never comment on Solana going down? My presumption is that you have embarrassingly lost big time on Solana and you believe that the artificial spike in price affords you the opportunity to appear as a savvy "investor".

If you are gambling on Solana with your own money, that's one thing. I wish you the best.

If you are pushing others to gamble in a rigged casino just to make yourself feel better about your gambling addiction, that's totally different. It's reprehensible.

You never uttered a peep as Solana plummeted.
15-01-2023 17:51
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
I did not bought any Solana. I just made a comment that those who bought the dip under 10 made a noice 2x.
15-01-2023 19:10
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Xadoman wrote:
I did not bought any Solana. I just made a comment that those who bought the dip under 10 made a noice 2x.

That was effectively nobody. Everyone was selling at that point.

The artificial price spikes merely serve as the scaffolding for the new pyramid.

All pyramids collapse.

I don't know how high they'll take it artificially but at some point they'll begin draining the value. The height the price goes before that point will be reflective of their success appealing to the FOMO-lemmings.
16-01-2023 01:12
duncan61
★★★★★
(2021)
The figures I posted were a copy and paste. Somehow you have become an even bigger miserable cunt than you were before
16-01-2023 03:59
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
duncan61 wrote:The figures I posted were a copy and paste. Somehow you have become an even bigger miserable cunt than you were before

Somehow your miserable reading comprehension managed to get even worse. I fully acknowledge that you copy-pasted the figures that you posted. You totally missed my point. I recommend you not worry about it.
07-02-2023 01:56
duncan61
★★★★★
(2021)
I have done it again and bought Solana on the dip.It gained for a bit but this morning is down over $300.00 My gambling has become a bigger problem than the weather which just happens to be perfect right now.
08-02-2023 03:02
duncan61
★★★★★
(2021)
I am plus over $200 and should close but I am going to let it ride. 23.92
09-02-2023 16:59
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
The long-running (10 years) crypto exchange, LocalBitCoins, has milked compulsive gamblers of about all they're going to get, so they are pulling chocks and just walking away (shutting down permanently).

Their officially announced rationale for shutting down: "The ongoing very cold crypto winter."
10-02-2023 22:46
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(5645)
IBdaMann wrote:
The long-running (10 years) crypto exchange, LocalBitCoins, has milked compulsive gamblers of about all they're going to get, so they are pulling chocks and just walking away (shutting down permanently).

Their officially announced rationale for shutting down: "The ongoing very cold crypto winter."


How does that effect the finches?


IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA

So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?


It's time to dig up Joseph Mccarthey and show him TikTok, then duck.


Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
11-02-2023 03:45
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
The long-running (10 years) crypto exchange, LocalBitCoins, has milked compulsive gamblers of about all they're going to get, so they are pulling chocks and just walking away (shutting down permanently).

Their officially announced rationale for shutting down: "The ongoing very cold crypto winter."


How does that effect the finches?

It affects the crypto-finches. They absolutely love a long, cold crypto winter. And don't even get me started about the crypto-puffins.
Edited on 11-02-2023 03:45
11-02-2023 04:22
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(5645)
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
The long-running (10 years) crypto exchange, LocalBitCoins, has milked compulsive gamblers of about all they're going to get, so they are pulling chocks and just walking away (shutting down permanently).

Their officially announced rationale for shutting down: "The ongoing very cold crypto winter."


How does that effect the finches?

It affects the crypto-finches. They absolutely love a long, cold crypto winter. And don't even get me started about the crypto-puffins.


Actually the crabs only come onto the beach at night during the full moon in July


IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA

So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?


It's time to dig up Joseph Mccarthey and show him TikTok, then duck.


Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
19-02-2023 14:11
duncan61
★★★★★
(2021)
I closed $2.21 as it went down past -$1300 last week. Cryptos are crap. I have been trying to tell ya all
20-02-2023 19:50
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
It seems that Solana has made about 2x at 22.60 ( was under 10 not so long time ago).


Looks like the price is moving up - 25.81. It was under 10 a couple of months back.

It still is a crypto winter therefore I am not interested to jump into the shitcoins at the moment.


What do you guys think about forex trading. I just saw this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MU_I6F8UsY&t=631s&ab_channel=NickShawn

I am quite bad at math but this video gives me some confidence that I could pull it off.
20-02-2023 20:28
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Xadoman wrote:Looks like the price is moving up - 25.81. It was under 10 a couple of months back.

The price increased three times, each time within a span of an hour. Outside of those three one-hour intervals, the price pretty much remained flat.. what does that tell you?

Xadoman wrote:It still is a crypto winter

What do you think this means? This is the agreed-upon term used by shitcoin managers to explain the losses incurred by their victims instead of "we robbed you blind, that's why we're incorporated offshore".

Xadoman wrote:therefore I am not interested to jump into the shitcoins at the moment.

Nothing has changed in the world of cryptoscams since you were so eager to throw your money away ... except for the awareness you now have that you are throwing your money away.

Xadoman wrote:What do you guys think about forex trading.

Where is it located? When they clean you out, to whom will you turn for justice and restitution?

Forex.com has learned a great deal from the previous cryptoexchanges that were incorporated offshore, i.e. that although immensely protected, those offshore banana republics can still find ways to investigate and prosecute.

Forex.com, on the other hand, is NOWHERE. They describe themselves as "completely decentralized.". This means that there is nothing to stop them from stealing every penny you give them.

Xadoman, Forex.com is for you!

Xadoman wrote:I am quite bad at math but this video gives me some confidence that I could pull it off.

So, you didn't understand any of the gibber-babble fast talk ... and naturally that gave you the warm, fuzzy feeling that this time you're going to be a winner.
21-02-2023 01:08
duncan61
★★★★★
(2021)
I closed too early. I had my close margin at 24.5 for $700 plus. It would of matured. Maybe next time
21-02-2023 08:14
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
duncan61 wrote:I closed too early. I had my close margin at 24.5 for $700 plus. It would of matured. Maybe next time

But you made a profit. That's good. I recommend dropping your winnings/gains/earnings into an actual investment, e.g. real estate or start your own business. You're probably pretty good at what you do so that should be your default go-to investment.
21-02-2023 12:57
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
I recommend dropping your winnings/gains/earnings into an actual investment, e.g. real estate


You are giving out outdated information.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__3cnV0wVCc&ab_channel=RobMoore
Edited on 21-02-2023 12:58
21-02-2023 13:05
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
Here is another good video about property:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75tRMST78XI&ab_channel=SmartMoneyClub
21-02-2023 13:37
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(5645)
Xadoman wrote:
Here is another good video about property:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75tRMST78XI&ab_channel=SmartMoneyClub


Do you enjoy a good dog wonton soup?


IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA

So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?


It's time to dig up Joseph Mccarthey and show him TikTok, then duck.


Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
21-02-2023 14:01
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
Do you enjoy a good dog wonton soup?


You are the one who belives that moon has rotational energy. Tell me, what are you enjoying?
21-02-2023 15:21
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Xadoman wrote:You are the one who belives that moon has rotational energy.

Refresh my memory. What was your rationale for denying the lunar rotation that you were shown?
21-02-2023 15:32
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
"The unfailing test of the spinning of a mass is, however, the existence of energy of motion. The moon is not posest of such vis viva." By this I meant that "axial rotation" is not simply "rotation upon an axis nonchalantly defined in dictionaries, but is a circular motion in the true physical sense — that is, one in which half the product of the mass with the square of velocity is a definite and positive quantity. The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch."


N. Tesla


https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/articles/moons-rotation

https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/articles/moons-rotation-follow-up

https://drnikolatesla.tumblr.com/post/175060756638/by-nikola-tesla-famous-scientific-illusions
Edited on 21-02-2023 15:34
21-02-2023 17:13
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Xadoman wrote:
[quote]"The unfailing test of the spinning of a mass is, however, the existence of energy of motion. The moon is not posest of such vis viva." By this I meant that "axial rotation" is not simply "rotation upon an axis nonchalantly defined in dictionaries, but is a circular motion in the true physical sense — that is, one in which half the product of the mass with the square of velocity is a definite and positive quantity. The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch."

- N. Tesla


Xadoman, your rationale above for the moon "not rotating" actually eplains that the moon rotates, very slowly, just like everyone else told you, in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. The concern above is not that the moon does not rotate, but that there is very little energy, i.e. "Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch."

So I ask you, do you accept this?
21-02-2023 17:51
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
Xadoman, your rationale above for the moon "not rotating" actually eplains that the moon rotates, very slowly, just like everyone else told you, in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. The concern above is not that the moon does not rotate, but that there is very little energy, i.e. "Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch."

So I ask you, do you accept this?


Nope. As Tesla said, there is not enough energy to run even a delicate watch. Rotational energy is zero.

There is a big difference between two energy levels: between zero( ziltch , null, nada , nothing) and "1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Do not you agree?
21-02-2023 17:55
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Xadoman wrote:
Xadoman, your rationale above for the moon "not rotating" actually eplains that the moon rotates, very slowly, just like everyone else told you, in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. The concern above is not that the moon does not rotate, but that there is very little energy, i.e. "Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch."

So I ask you, do you accept this?


Nope. As Tesla said, there is not enough energy to run even a delicate watch. Rotational energy is zero.

There is a big difference between two energy levels: between zero( ziltch , null, nada , nothing) and "1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Do not you agree?

What you posted does not say "zero rotational energy." It explains "very little rotational energy." There is a big difference between zero and non-zero, do you not agree?
21-02-2023 18:17
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(5645)
Xadoman wrote:
Do you enjoy a good dog wonton soup?


You are the one who belives that moon has rotational energy. Tell me, what are you enjoying?


The moon's rotation around the Earth is a result of gravity. Is this not true for chinky imbeciles who eat puppies?


IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA

So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?


It's time to dig up Joseph Mccarthey and show him TikTok, then duck.


Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
21-02-2023 19:01
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Swan wrote:The moon's rotation around the Earth

The moon's revolution around the earth. The moon's rotation is about its axis.
21-02-2023 19:06
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch."


Zero IS "not enough energy" to run a delicate watch.

Swan belives on the other hand that there is enough energy to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. He belives it because he has read it from wiki or from some other bulls..hit mainstream source.

We are talking about arrogance here- some guys think they are smarter than Tesla


Swan, what are you eating
I might want some
21-02-2023 19:44
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Xadoman wrote:Zero IS "not enough energy" to run a delicate watch.

You have it backwards.

"not enough energy" is not zero. You are simply assigning the value of zero when it is a non-zero number. I realize that English is not your first language and that you might not realize that we don't speak in that manner. When we say "not enough" or "insufficient", the implication is a positive, non-zero value that falls short of some mark.

Anyway, you were shown that the moon rotates slowly. Now you have Tesla explaining that the moon rotates slowly. Do you accept that the moon rotates slowly?
21-02-2023 20:19
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
Nikola Tesla was born in modern-day Croatia in 1856


English was not the first language for Tesla. The context should be understandable for you( as a math wizard).
21-02-2023 22:09
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Xadoman wrote:
Nikola Tesla was born in modern-day Croatia in 1856


English was not the first language for Tesla. The context should be understandable for you( as a math wizard).

Tesla was a different person. You reveal errors in your English proficiency. You also need to be told that you are not Tesla.

Do you now accept that the moon is rotating slowly?
21-02-2023 22:17
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(5645)
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:The moon's rotation around the Earth

The moon's revolution around the earth. The moon's rotation is about its axis.


Why does the moon rotate at the same rate it revolves?

An enduring myth about the Moon is that it doesn't rotate. While it's true that the Moon keeps the same face to us, this only happens because the Moon rotates at the same rate as its orbital motion, a special case of tidal locking called synchronous rotation.

Which is about 12 pay grades over your base camp


IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA

So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?


It's time to dig up Joseph Mccarthey and show him TikTok, then duck.


Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
21-02-2023 23:00
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
Tesla was a different person. You reveal errors in your English proficiency. You also need to be told that you are not Tesla.


I was simply quoting Tesla. I am going to quote it again:

"The unfailing test of the spinning of a mass is, however, the existence of energy of motion. The moon is not posest of such vis viva." By this I meant that "axial rotation" is not simply "rotation upon an axis nonchalantly defined in dictionaries, but is a circular motion in the true physical sense — that is, one in which half the product of the mass with the square of velocity is a definite and positive quantity. The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch."


Tesla`s first language was not English. Though the context and numbers should be understandable for you( as a math wizard).

I specially bolded the line in which Tesla says that the moon has 0( zero, ziltch , null , nada ) rotational energy. You misunderstood the line as if "it has a little" of it.

Nope. In his quote Tesla specially pointed out the difference between 0( zero, ziltch, null, nada, nothing) and " 1,000,000,000 horsepower to run for a period of 1,323 years".
21-02-2023 23:28
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
An enduring myth about the Moon is that it doesn't rotate. While it's true that the Moon keeps the same face to us, this only happens because the Moon rotates at the same rate as its orbital motion, a special case of tidal locking called synchronous rotation.



An explanation from Ken Dine:

How long is a day on Venus, and how does its slow rotation contribute to the planet's extreme temperatures?
#1 – Venus's slow backwards (CW) rotation has nothing to do with its harsh climate!

As for the length of Venus's day, that is often reported as being shorter than its year by many people who don't understand the sidereal perspective, which is simply viewing an astronomical body from the theoretical OUTSIDE perspective, which is an ancient carryover from early astronomers who had attempted to view our solar system (and universe) from the perspective of God.

How could God's View be wrong?

Frankly, the only practical purpose for the sidereal perspective is when aiming Earth-bound telescopes, but other than that, the sidereal perspective merely confuses many people who illogically believe that this theoretical outside perspective shows the true reality of a rotating body, which is false.

All the sidereal perspective does is it aggregates together a body's 360° REVOLUTION (orbit) in with the body's 360° polar axial ROTATIONS (if any), which is why their sidereal rotations and actual polar axial rotations will always differ by one (1) rotation, as explained here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidereal_time#Sidereal_days_compared_to_solar_days_on_other_planets

Using the above rule, Earth has 366 sidereal rotations:

366 - 1 = 365 solar days per year.

Our moon has 1 sidereal rotation:

1 - 1 = 0 actual polar axial rotations per orbit, as viewed from Earth.

Planet Mercury likewise confuses many people with its 3:2 sidereal spin rate.

NO, Mercury doesn't have 3 solar days per two orbits, Mercury instead has one (1) solar day per two complete orbits since due to its eccentric orbit Mercury does a 180° flip each orbit.

Since 3:2 is essentially the same as 1.5:1, the math is simple:

1.5 - 1 = .5 (so, there's your 180° flip).

If our moon spun down like this:

4 ~ 3 ~ 2 ~ 1

Then, where's the dang ZERO?

The sidereal perspective does have a zero when a body spins down, but you need to look at Venus to find it, which brings us to answering your question.

Since Venus rotates slowly backwards (CW), the sidereal perspective gets really interesting when applying the Sidereal RULE to Venus, since we instead need to add one (1) to Venus's sidereal rotations instead of subtracting one (1), as we did for the CCW rotating bodies:

* A day on the surface of Venus (solar day) would appear to take 117 Earth days

* A year on Venus takes 225 Earth days.

Thus, a Venusian solar day lasts 117 Earth days, versus 225 Earth days to complete an orbit, so there's your 1.92 ratio.

Curiously, since Venus is now at 1.92 CW polar axial rotations per orbit, Venus has recently passed thru a rate of two (2) solar days per orbit, and after Venus loses 0.92 CW rotations of its remaining 1.92 CW polar rotations, Venus will then have a sidereal rotation rate of zero (0:1).

SO, there's your sidereal ZERO!

Since Venus actually has 1.92 solar days left today, at zero sidereal rotations (0:1) Venus will still have one final CW polar axial rotation left to lose before stopping at a final 1:1 sidereal spin rate.

As Venus proves, an astronomical body with a 0:1 sidereal rotation rate is possible, it just doesn't last for very long since a 0:1 rotation rate is transitory as it spins down to 1:1.

In short, the sidereal perspective is not some *God's Eye* view of reality since the sidereal perspective has its obvious quirks, which are more readily apparent with Venus due to Venus's retrograde CW rotations!

Using the convention that astronomers prefer to use (of sidereal rotations / orbit), Venus is slowing down like this (starting arbitrarily with 3 solar days left to lose):

2:1 (3 solar days) –– 1:1 (2 solar days left) –– 0:1 (1 solar day left) –– 1:1 (one long solar day on one side, perpetual darkness on the other side).

2 ~ 1 ~ 0 ~ 1

NOTE how Venus will have two 1:1 sidereal spin rates as Venus is fully despun!

Of course, from the sun's center-point perspective, Venus will spin down like this:

3 ~ 2 ~ 1 ~ 0

Remember, the center-point and sidereal (outside) perspectives will always differ by one (1), and as Venus proves, the sidereal perspective has its obvious quirks!

Clearly, the sidereal perspective does not reflect reality as many early astronomers had thought!

Our moon takes 29.5 days to fully orbit Earth, and the sidereal perspective has nothing to do with it, other than to confuse the kajeebers out of most folks!
22-02-2023 00:12
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(5645)
Xadoman wrote:
An enduring myth about the Moon is that it doesn't rotate. While it's true that the Moon keeps the same face to us, this only happens because the Moon rotates at the same rate as its orbital motion, a special case of tidal locking called synchronous rotation.



An explanation from Ken Dine:

How long is a day on Venus, and how does its slow rotation contribute to the planet's extreme temperatures?
#1 – Venus's slow backwards (CW) rotation has nothing to do with its harsh climate!

As for the length of Venus's day, that is often reported as being shorter than its year by many people who don't understand the sidereal perspective, which is simply viewing an astronomical body from the theoretical OUTSIDE perspective, which is an ancient carryover from early astronomers who had attempted to view our solar system (and universe) from the perspective of God.

How could God's View be wrong?

Frankly, the only practical purpose for the sidereal perspective is when aiming Earth-bound telescopes, but other than that, the sidereal perspective merely confuses many people who illogically believe that this theoretical outside perspective shows the true reality of a rotating body, which is false.

All the sidereal perspective does is it aggregates together a body's 360° REVOLUTION (orbit) in with the body's 360° polar axial ROTATIONS (if any), which is why their sidereal rotations and actual polar axial rotations will always differ by one (1) rotation, as explained here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidereal_time#Sidereal_days_compared_to_solar_days_on_other_planets

Using the above rule, Earth has 366 sidereal rotations:

366 - 1 = 365 solar days per year.

Our moon has 1 sidereal rotation:

1 - 1 = 0 actual polar axial rotations per orbit, as viewed from Earth.

Planet Mercury likewise confuses many people with its 3:2 sidereal spin rate.

NO, Mercury doesn't have 3 solar days per two orbits, Mercury instead has one (1) solar day per two complete orbits since due to its eccentric orbit Mercury does a 180° flip each orbit.

Since 3:2 is essentially the same as 1.5:1, the math is simple:

1.5 - 1 = .5 (so, there's your 180° flip).

If our moon spun down like this:

4 ~ 3 ~ 2 ~ 1

Then, where's the dang ZERO?

The sidereal perspective does have a zero when a body spins down, but you need to look at Venus to find it, which brings us to answering your question.

Since Venus rotates slowly backwards (CW), the sidereal perspective gets really interesting when applying the Sidereal RULE to Venus, since we instead need to add one (1) to Venus's sidereal rotations instead of subtracting one (1), as we did for the CCW rotating bodies:

* A day on the surface of Venus (solar day) would appear to take 117 Earth days

* A year on Venus takes 225 Earth days.

Thus, a Venusian solar day lasts 117 Earth days, versus 225 Earth days to complete an orbit, so there's your 1.92 ratio.

Curiously, since Venus is now at 1.92 CW polar axial rotations per orbit, Venus has recently passed thru a rate of two (2) solar days per orbit, and after Venus loses 0.92 CW rotations of its remaining 1.92 CW polar rotations, Venus will then have a sidereal rotation rate of zero (0:1).

SO, there's your sidereal ZERO!

Since Venus actually has 1.92 solar days left today, at zero sidereal rotations (0:1) Venus will still have one final CW polar axial rotation left to lose before stopping at a final 1:1 sidereal spin rate.

As Venus proves, an astronomical body with a 0:1 sidereal rotation rate is possible, it just doesn't last for very long since a 0:1 rotation rate is transitory as it spins down to 1:1.

In short, the sidereal perspective is not some *God's Eye* view of reality since the sidereal perspective has its obvious quirks, which are more readily apparent with Venus due to Venus's retrograde CW rotations!

Using the convention that astronomers prefer to use (of sidereal rotations / orbit), Venus is slowing down like this (starting arbitrarily with 3 solar days left to lose):

2:1 (3 solar days) –– 1:1 (2 solar days left) –– 0:1 (1 solar day left) –– 1:1 (one long solar day on one side, perpetual darkness on the other side).

2 ~ 1 ~ 0 ~ 1

NOTE how Venus will have two 1:1 sidereal spin rates as Venus is fully despun!

Of course, from the sun's center-point perspective, Venus will spin down like this:

3 ~ 2 ~ 1 ~ 0

Remember, the center-point and sidereal (outside) perspectives will always differ by one (1), and as Venus proves, the sidereal perspective has its obvious quirks!

Clearly, the sidereal perspective does not reflect reality as many early astronomers had thought!

Our moon takes 29.5 days to fully orbit Earth, and the sidereal perspective has nothing to do with it, other than to confuse the kajeebers out of most folks!


You are now owned


IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA

So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?


It's time to dig up Joseph Mccarthey and show him TikTok, then duck.


Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
20-03-2023 00:17
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1003)
Now that the banks are collapsing left and right, what do you think, IBdaMann, about buying some bitcoin now?
20-03-2023 02:45
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Xadoman wrote:Now that the banks are collapsing left and right, what do you think, IBdaMann, about buying some bitcoin now?

Nope. Why would anyone want to buy a currency?

Buy real estate or start a business.
05-09-2023 16:34
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14349)
Question: Can SafeMoon V2 reach $1 dollar?
Expert Analysis: As per our long-term Safemoon V2 price prediction, SFM Coin may reach the target of $1 target in 2030-35.
Safemoon Price (21 December 2021): $0.001654
Safemoon Price (05 September 2023): $0.00012522 [loss of 93%]


Question: Will the Arctic be ice-free?
IPCC Analysis: We assess the Arctic is projected to be on average practically ice-free in September near mid-century under intermediate and high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios.
Arctic Sea Ice (16 August 2021): 5.77 million km^2 (2.23 million miles^2)
Arctic Sea Ice (15 August 2023): 5.74 million km^2 (2.22 million miles^2)
Page 13 of 14<<<11121314>





Join the debate Crypto-Climate Watch List:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Ho Ho Ho, did everyone send in their Christmas list? A few ground rules though228-12-2023 19:16
Tom Brady lost $30 million after FTX crypto collapse. Too bad307-09-2023 15:54
$740M in crypto assets recovered in FTX bankruptcy so far024-11-2022 11:07
Crypto exchanges disintegrating as you read this, FTX is gone bitcoin is down 65% this year417-11-2022 16:19
Lispy Leftist List of Linguistic Lunacy5131-10-2022 19:43
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact