06-03-2025 20:54 |
Into the Night ★★★★★ (23078) |
Im a BM wrote: "Still infatuated with cow farts?"
This joke is so dang funny it gets repeated in multiple posts.
So here goes...
No, I am not.
I am INFLATUATED with cow BELCHES!
23,000 posts from the CHEMISTRY CLOWN, many of them even MORE hilarious than the cow fart jokes. And equally enlightening in regard to chemistry. You could always stop posting, clown.
Im a BM wrote: 3400 plus "views" on the cow gas thread.
It must be Snarky and the Chemistry Clown checking it out over and over and over because they just love to jerk off to their own tweets and re read their own hilarious comments about cow farts.
Why are you so infatuated with cow farts?
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
06-03-2025 23:30 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote: "Still infatuated with cow farts?"
This joke is so dang funny it gets repeated in multiple posts.
So here goes...
No, I am not.
I am INFLATUATED with cow BELCHES!
23,000 posts from the CHEMISTRY CLOWN, many of them even MORE hilarious than the cow fart jokes. And equally enlightening in regard to chemistry. You could always stop posting, clown.
Im a BM wrote: 3400 plus "views" on the cow gas thread.
It must be Snarky and the Chemistry Clown checking it out over and over and over because they just love to jerk off to their own tweets and re read their own hilarious comments about cow farts.
Why are you so infatuated with cow farts?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
This joke just never gets OLD!
In fact, it is funnier than ever now.
I would recommend some remedial education, but it seems a bit late for that...
BOVINE BURPS actually come out of the cow's MOUTH, in case that point needs to be made more explicitly.
Such commanding comprehension of chemistry is displayed by making unsupported contrarian assertions.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS...
According to the CHEMISTRY CLOWN, "There is no such thing as..."
"Climate change" or "Greenhouse Gas" "Alkalinity" or "Biogeochemistry" or "Terminal electron acceptor" or "pOH" or "Sulfate reduction" or "Zero valent metal" or any other term on a very long list of things...
Things that are NOT "science".
Things that are NOT a "chemical".
Things that are, in fact, meaningless "buzzwords" because they don't even exist.
It is a bit ironic that ANY of these terms will get recognition for their validity by doing the SIMPLEST search.
Google: "Is there such a thing as (ITN declared "buzzword")?"
Google seems to think that these things REALLY DO EXIST.
Google seems to think that these terms can be used meaningfully in a sentence of scientific significance.
Publishers of scientific textbooks and journals agree with Google, and disagree with the unsupported contrarian assertions of a scientifically illiterate troll.
Google won't just say: "Yup. It really does exist. RQAA."
Google offers a scientifically meaningful description of what it IS, not just an unsupported claim that something simply is NOT.
Even without Google's assistance, I am aware that there really IS "such a thing as" biogeochemistry. I have read biogeochemistry textbooks and passed upper division classes called "biogeochemistry" at institutions of higher learning.
As a biogeochemist, I published biogeochemistry research, some of which was published in a journal called "Biogeochemistry". About 500 citations for that one in other peer-reviewed publications about biogeochemistry research.
I am quite confident that there really IS such a thing as biogeochemistry, despite the local chemistry clown having posted, literally HUNDREDS OF TIMES, that "There is no such thing as biogeochemistry".
I am equally confident that there really IS such a thing as "alkalinity" or "terminal electron acceptor" or any other on the very long list of chemistry terms that ITN repeatedly insists that there is "no such thing as".
I am supremely confident that THERE IS NO SUCH THING as a person who has any legitimate claim whatsoever to the professional title of "chemist", who is posting at this website under the name "Into the Night".
The chemistry clown never even passed INTRODUCTORY college chemistry.
The claim that there is no such thing is simply a confession that he never studied enough chemistry to learn what it is.
And has no clue how to look it up.
Therefore, it cannot possibly exist.
Just like climate change.
Make it go away by pretending it doesn't exist and, therefore, it cannot even be discussed in any meaningful way.
Go and learn some science? |
08-03-2025 05:12 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions.
Edited on 08-03-2025 05:34 |
08-03-2025 19:35 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Im a BM wrote: COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions.
So we need more cows
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
08-03-2025 21:08 |
Into the Night ★★★★★ (23078) |
Im a BM wrote: I am INFLATUATED with cow BELCHES! You said it. Why are you so infatuated with cow farts and burps?
Im a BM wrote: "Climate change" or "Greenhouse Gas" "Alkalinity" or "Biogeochemistry" or "Terminal electron acceptor" or "pOH" or "Sulfate reduction" or "Zero valent metal" or any other term on a very long list of things...
Things that are NOT "science".
Things that are NOT a "chemical".
Things that are, in fact, meaningless "buzzwords" because they don't even exist.
It is a bit ironic that ANY of these terms will get recognition for their validity by doing the SIMPLEST search.
Google: "Is there such a thing as (ITN declared "buzzword")?"
Google seems to think that these things REALLY DO EXIST.
Google seems to think that these terms can be used meaningfully in a sentence of scientific significance. Google is not God. Science is not Google or any other website. [quote]Im a BM wrote: Publishers of scientific textbooks and journals agree with Google, and disagree with the unsupported contrarian assertions of a scientifically illiterate troll. Science is not a book, journal, website, paper, pamphlet, government agency, university, college, or class. [quote]Im a BM wrote: Google won't just say: "Yup. It really does exist. RQAA."
Google offers a scientifically meaningful description of what it IS, not just an unsupported claim that something simply is NOT. Void authority fallacy. Science is not Google.
Im a BM wrote: Even without Google's assistance, I am aware that there really IS "such a thing as" biogeochemistry. I have read biogeochemistry textbooks and passed upper division classes called "biogeochemistry" at institutions of higher learning. Science is not Google or a class. There is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry'.
Im a BM wrote: As a biogeochemist, I published biogeochemistry research, some of which was published in a journal called "Biogeochemistry". About 500 citations for that one in other peer-reviewed publications about biogeochemistry research. Science does not have a voting bloc, magazine, journal, book, or website. Consensus is not used in science. There is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry'.
Im a BM wrote: I am quite confident that there really IS such a thing as biogeochemistry, despite the local chemistry clown having posted, literally HUNDREDS OF TIMES, that "There is no such thing as biogeochemistry". There is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry'.
Im a BM wrote: I am equally confident that there really IS such a thing as "alkalinity" or "terminal electron acceptor" or any other on the very long list of chemistry terms that ITN repeatedly insists that there is "no such thing as". Alkalinity is not a chemical. There is no such thing as a 'terminal electron acceptor'. You are not discussing chemistry. Chemistry is not meaningless buzzwords.
Im a BM wrote: I am supremely confident that THERE IS NO SUCH THING as a person who has any legitimate claim whatsoever to the professional title of "chemist", who is posting at this website under the name "Into the Night". Too bad. I am a chemist.
Im a BM wrote: The chemistry clown never even passed INTRODUCTORY college chemistry. Chemistry is not a class or college.
Im a BM wrote: The claim that there is no such thing is simply a confession that he never studied enough chemistry to learn what it is. Inversion fallacy. You can't blame your problem on me or anybody else, Robert.
Im a BM wrote: And has no clue how to look it up.
Therefore, it cannot possibly exist. Chemistry does not need to be 'looked up'.
Im a BM wrote: Just like climate change. Climate cannot change.
Im a BM wrote: Make it go away by pretending it doesn't exist and, therefore, it cannot even be discussed in any meaningful way. You are not being meaningful. Buzzwords don't mean anything.
Im a BM wrote: Go and learn some science?
You deny science. You have already discarded the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and several theories of science around chemistry.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
|
11-03-2025 05:56 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
"There is no such thing as 'methanogenesis'.", says the Chemistry Clown whose 23,000 posts of parrot poop comprise more than one in five of all posts ever posted on this website.
According to Merriam-Webster, methanogenesis is the production of methane, especially by methanogens, occurring in anaerobic environments.
Like all the chemistry and biology textbooks, the Merriam-Webster dictionary seems to agree that there really IS such a thing as "methanogenesis".
It appears that there may only be ONE "chemist" in the entire world who is so well versed in the subject that he is aware there is NO SUCH THING as this meaningless "buzzword".
I hope Into the Night hurries up and publishes his revolutionary chemistry textbook, in order to correct the terribly wrong misconceptions all the other scientists have. No such thing as methanogenesis, for starters.
He might even reveal his secret definition for "pH" and the secret mechanism that enables water itself to behave as a an excellent pH buffer. And somehow prevents pH from EVER being greater than 14 or less than zero
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions. |
11-03-2025 20:08 |
Into the Night ★★★★★ (23078) |
Im a BM wrote: "There is no such thing as 'methanogenesis'.", says the Chemistry Clown whose 23,000 posts of parrot poop comprise more than one in five of all posts ever posted on this website.
According to Merriam-Webster, methanogenesis is the production of methane, especially by methanogens, occurring in anaerobic environments.
No dictionary defines any word. Neither chemistry nor any part of science is a dictionary.
Im a BM wrote: Like all the chemistry and biology textbooks, the Merriam-Webster dictionary seems to agree that there really IS such a thing as "methanogenesis". A dictionary is not science or chemistry. No dictionary defines any word. Science is not a dictionary.
Im a BM wrote: It appears that there may only be ONE "chemist" in the entire world who is so well versed in the subject that he is aware there is NO SUCH THING as this meaningless "buzzword". You don't get to speak for everyone, Robert. Omniscience fallacy.
Im a BM wrote: I hope Into the Night hurries up and publishes his revolutionary chemistry textbook, in order to correct the terribly wrong misconceptions all the other scientists have. No such thing as methanogenesis, for starters. Chemistry is not a book. No such thing as 'methanogenesis'.
Im a BM wrote: He might even reveal his secret definition for "pH" and the secret mechanism that enables water itself to behave as a an excellent pH buffer. And somehow prevents pH from EVER being greater than 14 or less than zero It is not possible for pH to be greater than 14 or less than zero, Robert. You don't know how to measure pH or even know what it is.
Im a BM wrote: ...deleted infatuation with cow farts...
Your weird infatuation with cow farts is not chemistry either, Robert.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
27-03-2025 21:58 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
March 27, 2025 This thread now has 3908 "views".
It picked up hundreds of additional "views" after it was buried beneath the list of 15 most active threads that one sees upon opening the website.
Hundreds of times, someone took the additional step of going down and clicking on "view older threads" near the bottom of the page.
While nobody was adding any additional posts, people kept opening it up.
I don't know if there is a single individual so obsessed with the thread that they keep going back to read it again. I know it is not myself.
I have to assume that the viewership of this website is NOT limited to a handful of scientifically illiterate trolls.
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions. |
28-03-2025 00:14 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Im a BM wrote: March 27, 2025 This thread now has 3908 "views".
It picked up hundreds of additional "views" after it was buried beneath the list of 15 most active threads that one sees upon opening the website.
Hundreds of times, someone took the additional step of going down and clicking on "view older threads" near the bottom of the page.
While nobody was adding any additional posts, people kept opening it up.
I don't know if there is a single individual so obsessed with the thread that they keep going back to read it again. I know it is not myself.
I have to assume that the viewership of this website is NOT limited to a handful of scientifically illiterate trolls.
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions.
LOL 3909 people at risk of hyperventilation from laughing.
PS. Any youtube video with under 1,000,000 views is not worth watching and no one brags about under 4 k views
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
28-03-2025 00:53 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
Swan wrote:
Im a BM wrote: March 27, 2025 This thread now has 3908 "views".
It picked up hundreds of additional "views" after it was buried beneath the list of 15 most active threads that one sees upon opening the website.
Hundreds of times, someone took the additional step of going down and clicking on "view older threads" near the bottom of the page.
While nobody was adding any additional posts, people kept opening it up.
I don't know if there is a single individual so obsessed with the thread that they keep going back to read it again. I know it is not myself.
I have to assume that the viewership of this website is NOT limited to a handful of scientifically illiterate trolls.
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions.
LOL 3909 people at risk of hyperventilation from laughing.
PS. Any youtube video with under 1,000,000 views is not worth watching and no one brags about under 4 k views
It is good to be funny.
I don't think the same three guys keep going back to read the joke over and over.
If this thread were a kitten video, there might be a broad appeal for quick, casual interest.
Hundreds of people went out of their way to open up a thread about cow gas.
Maybe it really IS that funny.
Don't you wish you knew how to be funny? |
28-03-2025 02:13 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Im a BM wrote:
Swan wrote:
Im a BM wrote: March 27, 2025 This thread now has 3908 "views".
It picked up hundreds of additional "views" after it was buried beneath the list of 15 most active threads that one sees upon opening the website.
Hundreds of times, someone took the additional step of going down and clicking on "view older threads" near the bottom of the page.
While nobody was adding any additional posts, people kept opening it up.
I don't know if there is a single individual so obsessed with the thread that they keep going back to read it again. I know it is not myself.
I have to assume that the viewership of this website is NOT limited to a handful of scientifically illiterate trolls.
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions.
LOL 3909 people at risk of hyperventilation from laughing.
PS. Any youtube video with under 1,000,000 views is not worth watching and no one brags about under 4 k views
It is good to be funny.
I don't think the same three guys keep going back to read the joke over and over.
If this thread were a kitten video, there might be a broad appeal for quick, casual interest.
Hundreds of people went out of their way to open up a thread about cow gas.
Maybe it really IS that funny.
Don't you wish you knew how to be funny?
500,000,000 Bison was once the normal. Bison's are farting bovines, so numbers wise all is normal
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
28-03-2025 04:46 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★ (2493) |
Swan wrote:
LOL 3909 people at risk of hyperventilation from laughing.
PS. Any youtube video with under 1,000,000 views is not worth watching and no one brags about under 4 k views
I thought it was the same 3 commenters revisiting again and again.
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
28-03-2025 17:56 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Im a BM wrote:
Swan wrote:
Im a BM wrote: March 27, 2025 This thread now has 3908 "views".
It picked up hundreds of additional "views" after it was buried beneath the list of 15 most active threads that one sees upon opening the website.
Hundreds of times, someone took the additional step of going down and clicking on "view older threads" near the bottom of the page.
While nobody was adding any additional posts, people kept opening it up.
I don't know if there is a single individual so obsessed with the thread that they keep going back to read it again. I know it is not myself.
I have to assume that the viewership of this website is NOT limited to a handful of scientifically illiterate trolls.
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions.
LOL 3909 people at risk of hyperventilation from laughing.
PS. Any youtube video with under 1,000,000 views is not worth watching and no one brags about under 4 k views
It is good to be funny.
I don't think the same three guys keep going back to read the joke over and over.
If this thread were a kitten video, there might be a broad appeal for quick, casual interest.
Hundreds of people went out of their way to open up a thread about cow gas.
Maybe it really IS that funny.
Don't you wish you knew how to be funny?
Ya know, now that I think about it, you are obviously the reigning World cow fart expert, and I am privileged to be posting in your wake. All hail the farthead
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
28-03-2025 21:31 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
Swan wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Swan wrote:
Im a BM wrote: March 27, 2025 This thread now has 3908 "views".
It picked up hundreds of additional "views" after it was buried beneath the list of 15 most active threads that one sees upon opening the website.
Hundreds of times, someone took the additional step of going down and clicking on "view older threads" near the bottom of the page.
While nobody was adding any additional posts, people kept opening it up.
I don't know if there is a single individual so obsessed with the thread that they keep going back to read it again. I know it is not myself.
I have to assume that the viewership of this website is NOT limited to a handful of scientifically illiterate trolls.
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions.
LOL 3909 people at risk of hyperventilation from laughing.
PS. Any youtube video with under 1,000,000 views is not worth watching and no one brags about under 4 k views
It is good to be funny.
I don't think the same three guys keep going back to read the joke over and over.
If this thread were a kitten video, there might be a broad appeal for quick, casual interest.
Hundreds of people went out of their way to open up a thread about cow gas.
Maybe it really IS that funny.
Don't you wish you knew how to be funny?
Ya know, now that I think about it, you are obviously the reigning World cow fart expert, and I am privileged to be posting in your wake. All hail the farthead
See? You don't even know how to be funny.
Perhaps I should applaud the attempt at humor, but...
Do you even understand why the joke failed? |
28-03-2025 23:13 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Im a BM wrote:
Swan wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Swan wrote:
Im a BM wrote: March 27, 2025 This thread now has 3908 "views".
It picked up hundreds of additional "views" after it was buried beneath the list of 15 most active threads that one sees upon opening the website.
Hundreds of times, someone took the additional step of going down and clicking on "view older threads" near the bottom of the page.
While nobody was adding any additional posts, people kept opening it up.
I don't know if there is a single individual so obsessed with the thread that they keep going back to read it again. I know it is not myself.
I have to assume that the viewership of this website is NOT limited to a handful of scientifically illiterate trolls.
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions.
LOL 3909 people at risk of hyperventilation from laughing.
PS. Any youtube video with under 1,000,000 views is not worth watching and no one brags about under 4 k views
It is good to be funny.
I don't think the same three guys keep going back to read the joke over and over.
If this thread were a kitten video, there might be a broad appeal for quick, casual interest.
Hundreds of people went out of their way to open up a thread about cow gas.
Maybe it really IS that funny.
Don't you wish you knew how to be funny?
Ya know, now that I think about it, you are obviously the reigning World cow fart expert, and I am privileged to be posting in your wake. All hail the farthead
See? You don't even know how to be funny.
Perhaps I should applaud the attempt at humor, but...
Do you even understand why the joke failed?
What joke? This thread is about your unending expertise at cow farts. You appear to be in denial of how talented and important your information is to the global climate. So do not back down and do keep us informed of all of your cow **** sniffs, remember the future of mother Earth is resting on what you post here at the **** of the internet.
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
|
29-03-2025 00:24 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
March 27, 2025 This thread now has 3908 "views".
It picked up hundreds of additional "views" after it was buried beneath the list of 15 most active threads that one sees upon opening the website.
Hundreds of times, someone took the additional step of going down and clicking on "view older threads" near the bottom of the page.
While nobody was adding any additional posts, people kept opening it up.
I don't know if there is a single individual so obsessed with the thread that they keep going back to read it again. I know it is not myself.
I have to assume that the viewership of this website is NOT limited to a handful of scientifically illiterate trolls.
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions.
Full disclosure - Bovine physiology and the microbial ecology and chemistry of cow guts are NOT my area of specialization.
The biogeochemistry of methanogens is something I studied far more intensively, and their presence in cow guts as the source of methane emissions is of interest to me in terms of evolutionary biology.
4000 million years ago, the archaebacteria that combine hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane changed the atmosphere in a manner that changed the climate. A LOT.
Back in those days, the Earth was quite cold, with the sun far less luminous than it is today. By taking out the weak greenhouse gas carbon dioxide and replacing it with double digit percentage atmospheric concentration of methane... It allowed the atmosphere to warm up enough to melt a whole lot of the ice and allow life to expand its range beyond the pockets of liquid water on the equator. |
29-03-2025 13:16 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Im a BM wrote: March 27, 2025 This thread now has 3908 "views".
It picked up hundreds of additional "views" after it was buried beneath the list of 15 most active threads that one sees upon opening the website.
Hundreds of times, someone took the additional step of going down and clicking on "view older threads" near the bottom of the page.
While nobody was adding any additional posts, people kept opening it up.
I don't know if there is a single individual so obsessed with the thread that they keep going back to read it again. I know it is not myself.
I have to assume that the viewership of this website is NOT limited to a handful of scientifically illiterate trolls.
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions.
Full disclosure - Bovine physiology and the microbial ecology and chemistry of cow guts are NOT my area of specialization.
The biogeochemistry of methanogens is something I studied far more intensively, and their presence in cow guts as the source of methane emissions is of interest to me in terms of evolutionary biology.
4000 million years ago, the archaebacteria that combine hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane changed the atmosphere in a manner that changed the climate. A LOT.
Back in those days, the Earth was quite cold, with the sun far less luminous than it is today. By taking out the weak greenhouse gas carbon dioxide and replacing it with double digit percentage atmospheric concentration of methane... It allowed the atmosphere to warm up enough to melt a whole lot of the ice and allow life to expand its range beyond the pockets of liquid water on the equator.
LOL, this thread has been open for 91 days, and garnered 43 post per day, 60 percent on average by the turd who posted the thread. So 1.78 post per hour is hardly breaking the internet as Facebook gets 510,000 post per minute, not 43 per day.
That said you are here and are the recognized cow f-art expert of planet Earth.
So you keep on sniffing girl
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
29-03-2025 16:32 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★ (2493) |
Swan wrote:
LOL, this thread has been open for 91 days, and garnered 43 post per day, 60 percent on average by the turd who posted the thread. So 1.78 post per hour is hardly breaking the internet as Facebook gets 510,000 post per minute, not 43 per day.
That said you are here and are the recognized cow f-art expert of planet Earth.
So you keep on sniffing girl
Math is not really your forte is it?
This thread has not gotten 43 posts per day.
It is more like ~ 200 posts total in ~ 90 days, which comes to barely more than 2 posts per day.
Maybe you go by the Mayan calendar or something like where every day is really 20 days...
40 days and 40 nights is really 800 days!
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
29-03-2025 20:51 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Swan wrote:
LOL, this thread has been open for 91 days, and garnered 43 post per day, 60 percent on average by the turd who posted the thread. So 1.78 post per hour is hardly breaking the internet as Facebook gets 510,000 post per minute, not 43 per day.
That said you are here and are the recognized cow f-art expert of planet Earth.
So you keep on sniffing girl
Math is not really your forte is it?
This thread has not gotten 43 posts per day.
It is more like ~ 200 posts total in ~ 90 days, which comes to barely more than 2 posts per day.
Maybe you go by the Mayan calendar or something like where every day is really 20 days...
40 days and 40 nights is really 800 days!
I just pointed out that by using her own math that she is a failure. Because nothing here is worth either reading or verifying, if you counted and got a different number then you wasted your time not mine.
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
29-03-2025 21:29 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
Swan wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Swan wrote:
LOL, this thread has been open for 91 days, and garnered 43 post per day, 60 percent on average by the turd who posted the thread. So 1.78 post per hour is hardly breaking the internet as Facebook gets 510,000 post per minute, not 43 per day.
That said you are here and are the recognized cow f-art expert of planet Earth.
So you keep on sniffing girl
Math is not really your forte is it?
This thread has not gotten 43 posts per day.
It is more like ~ 200 posts total in ~ 90 days, which comes to barely more than 2 posts per day.
Maybe you go by the Mayan calendar or something like where every day is really 20 days...
40 days and 40 nights is really 800 days!
I just pointed out that by using her own math that she is a failure. Because nothing here is worth either reading or verifying, if you counted and got a different number then you wasted your time not mine.
This was not the only important thing that Swan pointed out.
Swan is a scientific genius who fully debunked the cow gas hoax.
Swan provided the link for the scientific proof that "grass decays into methane" whether cows eat it or not.
Swan is so smart, he knows that grass doesn't REALLY decompose under aerobic conditions to produce carbon dioxide. It all "decays into methane".
It is fortunate for this discussion that a scientific genius such as Swan offers his assistance with important relevant information. |
29-03-2025 22:42 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Im a BM wrote:
Swan wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Swan wrote:
LOL, this thread has been open for 91 days, and garnered 43 post per day, 60 percent on average by the turd who posted the thread. So 1.78 post per hour is hardly breaking the internet as Facebook gets 510,000 post per minute, not 43 per day.
That said you are here and are the recognized cow f-art expert of planet Earth.
So you keep on sniffing girl
Math is not really your forte is it?
This thread has not gotten 43 posts per day.
It is more like ~ 200 posts total in ~ 90 days, which comes to barely more than 2 posts per day.
Maybe you go by the Mayan calendar or something like where every day is really 20 days...
40 days and 40 nights is really 800 days!
I just pointed out that by using her own math that she is a failure. Because nothing here is worth either reading or verifying, if you counted and got a different number then you wasted your time not mine.
This was not the only important thing that Swan pointed out.
Swan is a scientific genius who fully debunked the cow gas hoax.
Swan provided the link for the scientific proof that "grass decays into methane" whether cows eat it or not.
Swan is so smart, he knows that grass doesn't REALLY decompose under aerobic conditions to produce carbon dioxide. It all "decays into methane".
It is fortunate for this discussion that a scientific genius such as Swan offers his assistance with important relevant information.
More great infor from the nations most esteemed cow f-arting expert
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
30-03-2025 00:31 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
"There is no such thing as 'methanogenesis'.", says the Chemistry Clown whose 23,000 posts of parrot poop comprise more than one in five of all posts ever posted on this website.
According to Merriam-Webster, methanogenesis is the production of methane, especially by methanogens, occurring in anaerobic environments.
Like all the chemistry and biology textbooks, the Merriam-Webster dictionary seems to agree that there really IS such a thing as "methanogenesis".
It appears that there may only be ONE "chemist" in the entire world who is so well versed in the subject that he is aware there is NO SUCH THING as this meaningless "buzzword".
I hope Into the Night hurries up and publishes his revolutionary chemistry textbook, in order to correct the terribly wrong misconceptions all the other scientists have. No such thing as methanogenesis, for starters.
He might even reveal his secret definition for "pH" and the secret mechanism that enables water itself to behave as a an excellent pH buffer. And somehow prevents pH from EVER being greater than 14 or less than zero
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions. |
30-03-2025 00:42 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★ (2493) |
Im a BM wrote:
Swan wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Swan wrote:
LOL, this thread has been open for 91 days, and garnered 43 post per day, 60 percent on average by the turd who posted the thread. So 1.78 post per hour is hardly breaking the internet as Facebook gets 510,000 post per minute, not 43 per day.
That said you are here and are the recognized cow f-art expert of planet Earth.
So you keep on sniffing girl
Math is not really your forte is it?
This thread has not gotten 43 posts per day.
It is more like ~ 200 posts total in ~ 90 days, which comes to barely more than 2 posts per day.
Maybe you go by the Mayan calendar or something like where every day is really 20 days...
40 days and 40 nights is really 800 days!
I just pointed out that by using her own math that she is a failure. Because nothing here is worth either reading or verifying, if you counted and got a different number then you wasted your time not mine.
This was not the only important thing that Swan pointed out.
Swan is a scientific genius who fully debunked the cow gas hoax.
Swan provided the link for the scientific proof that "grass decays into methane" whether cows eat it or not.
Swan is so smart, he knows that grass doesn't REALLY decompose under aerobic conditions to produce carbon dioxide. It all "decays into methane".
It is fortunate for this discussion that a scientific genius such as Swan offers his assistance with important relevant information.
Here is a question I have regarding that.
If grass just decayed into carbon dioxide, versus being digested by cows and farting out as methane, would the weight in methane versus the weight in carbon dioxide be the same result? In other words, if it just decayed would there be more of the lighter carbon dioxide, and if it got digested would there be less of the heavier methane, effectively leading to the same weight in greenhouse gases?
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
30-03-2025 00:55 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Swan wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Swan wrote:
LOL, this thread has been open for 91 days, and garnered 43 post per day, 60 percent on average by the turd who posted the thread. So 1.78 post per hour is hardly breaking the internet as Facebook gets 510,000 post per minute, not 43 per day.
That said you are here and are the recognized cow f-art expert of planet Earth.
So you keep on sniffing girl
Math is not really your forte is it?
This thread has not gotten 43 posts per day.
It is more like ~ 200 posts total in ~ 90 days, which comes to barely more than 2 posts per day.
Maybe you go by the Mayan calendar or something like where every day is really 20 days...
40 days and 40 nights is really 800 days!
I just pointed out that by using her own math that she is a failure. Because nothing here is worth either reading or verifying, if you counted and got a different number then you wasted your time not mine.
This was not the only important thing that Swan pointed out.
Swan is a scientific genius who fully debunked the cow gas hoax.
Swan provided the link for the scientific proof that "grass decays into methane" whether cows eat it or not.
Swan is so smart, he knows that grass doesn't REALLY decompose under aerobic conditions to produce carbon dioxide. It all "decays into methane".
It is fortunate for this discussion that a scientific genius such as Swan offers his assistance with important relevant information.
Here is a question I have regarding that.
If grass just decayed into carbon dioxide, versus being digested by cows and farting out as methane, would the weight in methane versus the weight in carbon dioxide be the same result? In other words, if it just decayed would there be more of the lighter carbon dioxide, and if it got digested would there be less of the heavier methane, effectively leading to the same weight in greenhouse gases?
Fair question.
I'll give the benefit of the doubt that the "farting" reference is not spiteful sarcasm. It seems unlikely that it was not clear that cows BELCH methane.
Methane is a LOT lighter than carbon dioxide, if the issue is MASS of gas released from grass as it is transformed.
Methane is CH4. One carbon atom and four hydrogen atoms. 16 grams per mole.
Carbon dioxide is CO2. One carbon atom and two oxygen atoms. 48 grams per mole.
So, if grass decomposes aerobically into carbon dioxide, it puts almost three times as much mass of gas into the atmosphere as that same grass fermenting into methane.
If your goal is to take weight off the atmosphere, you would rather see methanogenesis that aerobic decomposition of all that grass.
Doe that put Spongy Iris into the pro-cow-gas column now? |
30-03-2025 01:06 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★ (2493) |
Im a BM wrote:
Doe that put Spongy Iris into the pro-cow-gas column now?
Oh yeah I remember burning methane takes weight out of the atmosphere.
Well it seems like a pro, but the cow is also breathing out a lot of carbon dioxide too, I assume.
As long as the cow population doesn't get too big, I think it will be fine.
I think grass fed beef tastes better than corn fed beef.
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
30-03-2025 01:15 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
CORRECTION - with apologies to Spongy Iris. The molecular weight of carbon dioxide is 44 grams per mole. I carelessly wrote 48 grams per mole in a previous post. In any case, it weighs a LOT more than methane.
"There is no such thing as 'methanogenesis'.", says the Chemistry Clown whose 23,000 posts of parrot poop comprise more than one in five of all posts ever posted on this website.
According to Merriam-Webster, methanogenesis is the production of methane, especially by methanogens, occurring in anaerobic environments.
Like all the chemistry and biology textbooks, the Merriam-Webster dictionary seems to agree that there really IS such a thing as "methanogenesis".
It appears that there may only be ONE "chemist" in the entire world who is so well versed in the subject that he is aware there is NO SUCH THING as this meaningless "buzzword".
I hope Into the Night hurries up and publishes his revolutionary chemistry textbook, in order to correct the terribly wrong misconceptions all the other scientists have. No such thing as methanogenesis, for starters.
He might even reveal his secret definition for "pH" and the secret mechanism that enables water itself to behave as a an excellent pH buffer. And somehow prevents pH from EVER being greater than 14 or less than zero
COW GAS forms in the rumen, not the "true" stomach.
One reason cows BURP methane rather than farting it (tee hee) is that the methane is generated before the cow's meal even gets into into its "true" stomach.
Cows are ruminants, a line of animals that have a rumen "stomach" where their meal is fermented before it enters the "true" stomach where it is digested.
Our stomachs are pretty much like the cow's true stomach, generating very low pH (2-4) with hydrochloric acid to digest our food.
But ruminants evolved a big stomach-like pouch (rumen) where they ferment their meal before beginning to digest it. The pH in the rumen is MUCH closer to neutral than the cow's acidic "true" stomach. Rumen pH ranges about 5.5-6.9.
Cows don't absorb any nutrients from their rumens. They just use it as a fermentation chamber where a microbial feeding frenzy occurs under very low oxygen conditions.
Some of those microorganisms generate hydrogen gas in the cow's rumen. Methanogenic archaebacteria in the rumen then combine that hydrogen with carbon dioxide to make methane.
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O plus small exothermic energy yield
All this happens before the fermenting cud ever gets into the cow's "true" stomach. The methane produced by bacteria in the cow's rumen only has one way to get out - BELCH!
So, when the cud is nicely fermented it contains a lot of bacterial biomass that transformed the cow's cellulose-rich feed into protein-rich, fat-rich microorganisms. It is then passed into the true stomach where actual digestion and nutrient absorption occurs under strongly acidic conditions.
By the time it gets into the cow's intestines, the methanogenic bacteria are digested and absorbed and unable to make any more cow gas.
Another fun fact. Like every other vertebrate, cows cannot produce an enzyme that could digest cellulose.
However, there is a single-celled protozoan in the cow's rumen, far larger and more complex than the multiple species of bacteria also present. That protozoan harbors a bacteria that makes the elusive enzyme to digest cellulose. In a three-way symbiosis, the cow hosts the protozoan which hosts the bacteria that makes the cellulase enzyme. The fermented cud is loaded with microbial biomass far more nutritious than the original fodder the cow took in.
I'm not saying that ruminants are incapable of flatulence.
But "cow gas" virtually ALL comes out of the FRONT end of the cow.
Fart jokes can be funny.
But dismissing and belittling the climate change contribution of cow gas by mocking it as "farts" displays more than just veterinary ignorance.
Here it is:
August 25, 2024 The Washington Post
Scientists may have found a radical solution for making your hamburger less bad for the planet. by Shannon Osaka and Emily Wright
----------------------------------------------------------
COW GAS!
The dreaded methane emissions from bovine digestion.
Gram per gram, methane has 20-30 times as much global warming potential as carbon dioxide.
Why do cows emit methane?
Well, cow guts create extreme low oxygen conditions that allow microbiological fermentation reactions to occur.
Some of those little critters produce hydrogen gas.
Okay, so if cows are emitting hydrogen gas, that's not so bad, right?
But that's where some different little critters some in.
Methanogenic bacteria.
Descendants of one of Earth's very oldest line of bacteria.
They combine hydrogen gas with carbon dioxide to produce methane.
So, a lot of work has already been done looking at how to optimize the composition of the feed to minimize methane emissions from cows.
I take pride in having pioneered research into polyphenols for such applications.
But the NEWEST twist may be to just tip the scales of the microbiological ecology of what happens inside the cow guts.
One approach is to introduce a different guy who is better adapted to catch the hydrogen gas, intercepting it before the methanogens get a shot at it.
Another approach is to introduce more of the guys who ferment WITHOUT generating hydrogen gas in the process.
Either way, germ warfare could help us cut back on cow gas emissions. |
30-03-2025 01:17 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Swan wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Swan wrote:
LOL, this thread has been open for 91 days, and garnered 43 post per day, 60 percent on average by the turd who posted the thread. So 1.78 post per hour is hardly breaking the internet as Facebook gets 510,000 post per minute, not 43 per day.
That said you are here and are the recognized cow f-art expert of planet Earth.
So you keep on sniffing girl
Math is not really your forte is it?
This thread has not gotten 43 posts per day.
It is more like ~ 200 posts total in ~ 90 days, which comes to barely more than 2 posts per day.
Maybe you go by the Mayan calendar or something like where every day is really 20 days...
40 days and 40 nights is really 800 days!
I just pointed out that by using her own math that she is a failure. Because nothing here is worth either reading or verifying, if you counted and got a different number then you wasted your time not mine.
This was not the only important thing that Swan pointed out.
Swan is a scientific genius who fully debunked the cow gas hoax.
Swan provided the link for the scientific proof that "grass decays into methane" whether cows eat it or not.
Swan is so smart, he knows that grass doesn't REALLY decompose under aerobic conditions to produce carbon dioxide. It all "decays into methane".
It is fortunate for this discussion that a scientific genius such as Swan offers his assistance with important relevant information.
Here is a question I have regarding that.
If grass just decayed into carbon dioxide, versus being digested by cows and farting out as methane, would the weight in methane versus the weight in carbon dioxide be the same result? In other words, if it just decayed would there be more of the lighter carbon dioxide, and if it got digested would there be less of the heavier methane, effectively leading to the same weight in greenhouse gases?
The thing that all of you are missing is that greenhouse gasses are responsible for life on the Earth. So stop doing the aliens bidding already
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
30-03-2025 01:27 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★ (2493) |
Ah that must be why cow meat is so much better than pig meat.
As is written in the KJV, it cheweth the cud.
General ~ rule of thumb for storing meat in a refrigerator, is that chicken meat is only good for 10 days after the slaughter date, pigs 20, and cows 30. Goat and sheep meat might even keep longer than cow meat, or similar, as they are also ruminants.
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
30-03-2025 01:36 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Spongy Iris wrote: Ah that must be why cow meat is so much better than pig meat.
As is written in the KJV, it cheweth the cud.
General ~ rule of thumb for storing meat in a refrigerator, is that chicken meat is only good for 10 days after the slaughter date, pigs 20, and cows 30. Goat and sheep meat might even keep longer than cow meat, or similar, as they are also ruminants.
Some steakhouses age beef over 200 days
The thing that all of you are missing is that greenhouse gasses are responsible for life on the Earth. So stop doing the aliens bidding already
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
Edited on 30-03-2025 01:37 |
30-03-2025 01:39 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Doe that put Spongy Iris into the pro-cow-gas column now?
Oh yeah I remember burning methane takes weight out of the atmosphere.
Well it seems like a pro, but the cow is also breathing out a lot of carbon dioxide too, I assume.
As long as the cow population doesn't get too big, I think it will be fine.
I think grass fed beef tastes better than corn fed beef.
Spongy Iris, let me offer a suggestion for a serious strategy to prevent the use of fossil fuel from adding mass to the atmosphere.
I say this in all seriousness, because reducing the amount of atmospheric mass that fossil fuel use adds turns out to be a "fringe benefit" of something that both reduces emission of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere and directly enables the ocean to cope with our acidifying activities.
When we burn fossil fuel using oxygen, atmospheric oxygen gets turned into atmospheric carbon dioxide, increasing atmospheric mass.
If we were to oxidize fossil fuel to get our energy needs met, but we used a different terminal electron acceptor than oxygen, we could do so without adding ANY mass to the atmosphere.
Sulfate reducing bacteria figured out how to do this thousands of millions of years ago.
Sulfate reducing bacteria use sulfate, SO4(2-), rather than oxygen to oxidize organic carbon and get metabolic energy. Using sulfate as terminal electron acceptor, rather than producing carbon dioxide (gas), it produces bicarbonate ion and carbonate ion. These ions are dissolved in water and add no mass to the atmosphere.
Furthermore, these ions can be flushed to the sea to neutralize acidification.
Whatever tiny benefit for grass to ferment to methane rather than decompose aerobically into carbon dioxide, in terms of human activity adding less mass to the atmosphere...
Well, we can reduce the amount of mass we add to the atmosphere a whole lot more if we started using a different terminal electron acceptor to oxidize our fossil fuel to get the energy we need.
It would also reduce the amount of CO2 we add to the atmosphere (global warming stuff), and help restore alkalinity to the sea (ocean acidification stuff). |
|
30-03-2025 01:52 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Doe that put Spongy Iris into the pro-cow-gas column now?
Oh yeah I remember burning methane takes weight out of the atmosphere.
Well it seems like a pro, but the cow is also breathing out a lot of carbon dioxide too, I assume.
As long as the cow population doesn't get too big, I think it will be fine.
I think grass fed beef tastes better than corn fed beef.
Spongy Iris, let me offer a suggestion for a serious strategy to prevent the use of fossil fuel from adding mass to the atmosphere.
I say this in all seriousness, because reducing the amount of atmospheric mass that fossil fuel use adds turns out to be a "fringe benefit" of something that both reduces emission of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere and directly enables the ocean to cope with our acidifying activities.
When we burn fossil fuel using oxygen, atmospheric oxygen gets turned into atmospheric carbon dioxide, increasing atmospheric mass.
If we were to oxidize fossil fuel to get our energy needs met, but we used a different terminal electron acceptor than oxygen, we could do so without adding ANY mass to the atmosphere.
Sulfate reducing bacteria figured out how to do this thousands of millions of years ago.
Sulfate reducing bacteria use sulfate, SO4(2-), rather than oxygen to oxidize organic carbon and get metabolic energy. Using sulfate as terminal electron acceptor, rather than producing carbon dioxide (gas), it produces bicarbonate ion and carbonate ion. These ions are dissolved in water and add no mass to the atmosphere.
Furthermore, these ions can be flushed to the sea to neutralize acidification.
Whatever tiny benefit for grass to ferment to methane rather than decompose aerobically into carbon dioxide, in terms of human activity adding less mass to the atmosphere...
Well, we can reduce the amount of mass we add to the atmosphere a whole lot more if we started using a different terminal electron acceptor to oxidize our fossil fuel to get the energy we need.
It would also reduce the amount of CO2 we add to the atmosphere (global warming stuff), and help restore alkalinity to the sea (ocean acidification stuff).
Not even thru death can you escape.
The thing that all of you are missing is that greenhouse gases are responsible for life on the Earth. So stop doing the aliens bidding already
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
30-03-2025 01:57 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★ (2493) |
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Doe that put Spongy Iris into the pro-cow-gas column now?
Oh yeah I remember burning methane takes weight out of the atmosphere.
Well it seems like a pro, but the cow is also breathing out a lot of carbon dioxide too, I assume.
As long as the cow population doesn't get too big, I think it will be fine.
I think grass fed beef tastes better than corn fed beef.
Spongy Iris, let me offer a suggestion for a serious strategy to prevent the use of fossil fuel from adding mass to the atmosphere.
I say this in all seriousness, because reducing the amount of atmospheric mass that fossil fuel use adds turns out to be a "fringe benefit" of something that both reduces emission of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere and directly enables the ocean to cope with our acidifying activities.
When we burn fossil fuel using oxygen, atmospheric oxygen gets turned into atmospheric carbon dioxide, increasing atmospheric mass.
If we were to oxidize fossil fuel to get our energy needs met, but we used a different terminal electron acceptor than oxygen, we could do so without adding ANY mass to the atmosphere.
Sulfate reducing bacteria figured out how to do this thousands of millions of years ago.
Sulfate reducing bacteria use sulfate, SO4(2-), rather than oxygen to oxidize organic carbon and get metabolic energy. Using sulfate as terminal electron acceptor, rather than producing carbon dioxide (gas), it produces bicarbonate ion and carbonate ion. These ions are dissolved in water and add no mass to the atmosphere.
Furthermore, these ions can be flushed to the sea to neutralize acidification.
Whatever tiny benefit for grass to ferment to methane rather than decompose aerobically into carbon dioxide, in terms of human activity adding less mass to the atmosphere...
Well, we can reduce the amount of mass we add to the atmosphere a whole lot more if we started using a different terminal electron acceptor to oxidize our fossil fuel to get the energy we need.
It would also reduce the amount of CO2 we add to the atmosphere (global warming stuff), and help restore alkalinity to the sea (ocean acidification stuff).
Hmm, burning natural gas and gasoline uses more weight in oxygen, then it adds in carbon dioxide, if I did those chemical reaction formulas correct.
So burning these fuels is a pro, as far as mitigating the risk of climate change, the way I see it.
However breathing and burning coal adds weight.
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
30-03-2025 03:06 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Doe that put Spongy Iris into the pro-cow-gas column now?
Oh yeah I remember burning methane takes weight out of the atmosphere.
Well it seems like a pro, but the cow is also breathing out a lot of carbon dioxide too, I assume.
As long as the cow population doesn't get too big, I think it will be fine.
I think grass fed beef tastes better than corn fed beef.
Spongy Iris, let me offer a suggestion for a serious strategy to prevent the use of fossil fuel from adding mass to the atmosphere.
I say this in all seriousness, because reducing the amount of atmospheric mass that fossil fuel use adds turns out to be a "fringe benefit" of something that both reduces emission of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere and directly enables the ocean to cope with our acidifying activities.
When we burn fossil fuel using oxygen, atmospheric oxygen gets turned into atmospheric carbon dioxide, increasing atmospheric mass.
If we were to oxidize fossil fuel to get our energy needs met, but we used a different terminal electron acceptor than oxygen, we could do so without adding ANY mass to the atmosphere.
Sulfate reducing bacteria figured out how to do this thousands of millions of years ago.
Sulfate reducing bacteria use sulfate, SO4(2-), rather than oxygen to oxidize organic carbon and get metabolic energy. Using sulfate as terminal electron acceptor, rather than producing carbon dioxide (gas), it produces bicarbonate ion and carbonate ion. These ions are dissolved in water and add no mass to the atmosphere.
Furthermore, these ions can be flushed to the sea to neutralize acidification.
Whatever tiny benefit for grass to ferment to methane rather than decompose aerobically into carbon dioxide, in terms of human activity adding less mass to the atmosphere...
Well, we can reduce the amount of mass we add to the atmosphere a whole lot more if we started using a different terminal electron acceptor to oxidize our fossil fuel to get the energy we need.
It would also reduce the amount of CO2 we add to the atmosphere (global warming stuff), and help restore alkalinity to the sea (ocean acidification stuff).
Hmm, burning natural gas and gasoline uses more weight in oxygen, then it adds in carbon dioxide, if I did those chemical reaction formulas correct.
So burning these fuels is a pro, as far as mitigating the risk of climate change, the way I see it.
However breathing and burning coal adds weight.
Weight is never added it merely shifts
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
30-03-2025 03:19 |
Im a BM★★★★★ (2324) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Doe that put Spongy Iris into the pro-cow-gas column now?
Oh yeah I remember burning methane takes weight out of the atmosphere.
Well it seems like a pro, but the cow is also breathing out a lot of carbon dioxide too, I assume.
As long as the cow population doesn't get too big, I think it will be fine.
I think grass fed beef tastes better than corn fed beef.
Spongy Iris, let me offer a suggestion for a serious strategy to prevent the use of fossil fuel from adding mass to the atmosphere.
I say this in all seriousness, because reducing the amount of atmospheric mass that fossil fuel use adds turns out to be a "fringe benefit" of something that both reduces emission of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere and directly enables the ocean to cope with our acidifying activities.
When we burn fossil fuel using oxygen, atmospheric oxygen gets turned into atmospheric carbon dioxide, increasing atmospheric mass.
If we were to oxidize fossil fuel to get our energy needs met, but we used a different terminal electron acceptor than oxygen, we could do so without adding ANY mass to the atmosphere.
Sulfate reducing bacteria figured out how to do this thousands of millions of years ago.
Sulfate reducing bacteria use sulfate, SO4(2-), rather than oxygen to oxidize organic carbon and get metabolic energy. Using sulfate as terminal electron acceptor, rather than producing carbon dioxide (gas), it produces bicarbonate ion and carbonate ion. These ions are dissolved in water and add no mass to the atmosphere.
Furthermore, these ions can be flushed to the sea to neutralize acidification.
Whatever tiny benefit for grass to ferment to methane rather than decompose aerobically into carbon dioxide, in terms of human activity adding less mass to the atmosphere...
Well, we can reduce the amount of mass we add to the atmosphere a whole lot more if we started using a different terminal electron acceptor to oxidize our fossil fuel to get the energy we need.
It would also reduce the amount of CO2 we add to the atmosphere (global warming stuff), and help restore alkalinity to the sea (ocean acidification stuff).
Hmm, burning natural gas and gasoline uses more weight in oxygen, then it adds in carbon dioxide, if I did those chemical reaction formulas correct.
So burning these fuels is a pro, as far as mitigating the risk of climate change, the way I see it.
However breathing and burning coal adds weight.
Actually, your calculations are NOT correct.
Let's just follow along with one molecule of oxygen in the atmosphere.
If it gets used to burn fossil fuel of ANY kind, for a brief moment it is taken out of the atmosphere while it reacts with the fossil fuel on the ground.
Then the same two atoms of oxygen from that molecule RETURN to the atmosphere. Only now they have combined with an atom of carbon to become CO2. Atmospheric mass increased by the weight of one more carbon atom.
The difference between methane and coal is that burning methane ALSO produces two molecules of water per molecule methane oxidized. At least initially, those two molecules of water are in a vapor state, adding their weight to the atmosphere for a time before they condense and rain back down.
Gasoline, jet fuel, diesel, and fuel oil, are all intermediate between methane and coal in terms of adding mass to the atmosphere upon combustion.
Coal puts out zero molecules of water per carbon atom oxidized. Methane puts out two molecules of water per carbon atom oxidized. The other fuels all put out about ONE molecule of water to the atmosphere for every atom of carbon oxidized.
The mass of water vapor in the atmosphere is quite variable from time to time and place to place.
The steady state humidity achieved anywhere is regulated mainly by temperature and proximity to liquid water.
It could be argued that those water molecules emitted during fossil fuel combustion don't really add mass to the atmosphere, other than an ephemeral localized effect. |
30-03-2025 03:49 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★ (2493) |
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Doe that put Spongy Iris into the pro-cow-gas column now?
Oh yeah I remember burning methane takes weight out of the atmosphere.
Well it seems like a pro, but the cow is also breathing out a lot of carbon dioxide too, I assume.
As long as the cow population doesn't get too big, I think it will be fine.
I think grass fed beef tastes better than corn fed beef.
Spongy Iris, let me offer a suggestion for a serious strategy to prevent the use of fossil fuel from adding mass to the atmosphere.
I say this in all seriousness, because reducing the amount of atmospheric mass that fossil fuel use adds turns out to be a "fringe benefit" of something that both reduces emission of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere and directly enables the ocean to cope with our acidifying activities.
When we burn fossil fuel using oxygen, atmospheric oxygen gets turned into atmospheric carbon dioxide, increasing atmospheric mass.
If we were to oxidize fossil fuel to get our energy needs met, but we used a different terminal electron acceptor than oxygen, we could do so without adding ANY mass to the atmosphere.
Sulfate reducing bacteria figured out how to do this thousands of millions of years ago.
Sulfate reducing bacteria use sulfate, SO4(2-), rather than oxygen to oxidize organic carbon and get metabolic energy. Using sulfate as terminal electron acceptor, rather than producing carbon dioxide (gas), it produces bicarbonate ion and carbonate ion. These ions are dissolved in water and add no mass to the atmosphere.
Furthermore, these ions can be flushed to the sea to neutralize acidification.
Whatever tiny benefit for grass to ferment to methane rather than decompose aerobically into carbon dioxide, in terms of human activity adding less mass to the atmosphere...
Well, we can reduce the amount of mass we add to the atmosphere a whole lot more if we started using a different terminal electron acceptor to oxidize our fossil fuel to get the energy we need.
It would also reduce the amount of CO2 we add to the atmosphere (global warming stuff), and help restore alkalinity to the sea (ocean acidification stuff).
Hmm, burning natural gas and gasoline uses more weight in oxygen, then it adds in carbon dioxide, if I did those chemical reaction formulas correct.
So burning these fuels is a pro, as far as mitigating the risk of climate change, the way I see it.
However breathing and burning coal adds weight.
Actually, your calculations are NOT correct.
Let's just follow along with one molecule of oxygen in the atmosphere.
If it gets used to burn fossil fuel of ANY kind, for a brief moment it is taken out of the atmosphere while it reacts with the fossil fuel on the ground.
Then the same two atoms of oxygen from that molecule RETURN to the atmosphere. Only now they have combined with an atom of carbon to become CO2. Atmospheric mass increased by the weight of one more carbon atom.
The difference between methane and coal is that burning methane ALSO produces two molecules of water per molecule methane oxidized. At least initially, those two molecules of water are in a vapor state, adding their weight to the atmosphere for a time before they condense and rain back down.
Gasoline, jet fuel, diesel, and fuel oil, are all intermediate between methane and coal in terms of adding mass to the atmosphere upon combustion.
Coal puts out zero molecules of water per carbon atom oxidized. Methane puts out two molecules of water per carbon atom oxidized. The other fuels all put out about ONE molecule of water to the atmosphere for every atom of carbon oxidized.
The mass of water vapor in the atmosphere is quite variable from time to time and place to place.
The steady state humidity achieved anywhere is regulated mainly by temperature and proximity to liquid water.
It could be argued that those water molecules emitted during fossil fuel combustion don't really add mass to the atmosphere, other than an ephemeral localized effect.
I remember you used the same argument about water when I first started a thread on this here:
https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/burn-gasoline-and-natural-gas-to-fight-against-climate-change-d6-e4756.php
But it wasn't enough for me to change my position, that burning gasoline and natural gas mitigates the risk of climate catastrophe.
I think I agree with ITN on this point, that water is never really a gas. It does not get high enough in the atmosphere to pose any risk of climate catastrophe.
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
30-03-2025 03:50 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★ (2493) |
Swan wrote:
Weight is never added it merely shifts
My point about the risk is when it shifts from the land to the air.
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
30-03-2025 03:57 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★ (2493) |
Swan wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: Ah that must be why cow meat is so much better than pig meat.
As is written in the KJV, it cheweth the cud.
General ~ rule of thumb for storing meat in a refrigerator, is that chicken meat is only good for 10 days after the slaughter date, pigs 20, and cows 30. Goat and sheep meat might even keep longer than cow meat, or similar, as they are also ruminants.
Some steakhouses age beef over 200 days
The thing that all of you are missing is that greenhouse gasses are responsible for life on the Earth. So stop doing the aliens bidding already
This guy looks like he did a pretty good job aging a steak 200 days.
https://youtu.be/Xz7S6Q1Ix_M
Or a pretty bad job from the cow's perspective.
Some say the ideal % of CO2 in the atmosphere is 0.02% and now estimates are 0.04%.
I have no idea what the maximum sustainable ratio is. I just point out the risk if it goes beyond the maximum, whatever that maximum may be.
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
Edited on 30-03-2025 04:05 |
30-03-2025 04:07 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Swan wrote:
Weight is never added it merely shifts
My point about the risk is when it shifts from the land to the air.
No human life exists on Earth without greenhouse gasses in the air
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
30-03-2025 04:09 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★ (2493) |
Swan wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Swan wrote:
Weight is never added it merely shifts
My point about the risk is when it shifts from the land to the air.
No human life exists on Earth without greenhouse gasses in the air
Some say the ideal % of CO2 in the atmosphere is 0.02% and now estimates are 0.04%.
I have no idea what the maximum sustainable ratio is. I just point out the risk if it goes beyond the maximum, whatever that maximum may be.
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
30-03-2025 04:17 |
Swan ★★★★★ (6801) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Swan wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Swan wrote:
Weight is never added it merely shifts
My point about the risk is when it shifts from the land to the air.
No human life exists on Earth without greenhouse gasses in the air
Some say the ideal % of CO2 in the atmosphere is 0.02% and now estimates are 0.04%.
I have no idea what the maximum sustainable ratio is. I just point out the risk if it goes beyond the maximum, whatever that maximum may be.
LOL, Al Bore gave up that argument over two decades ago. If you are really afraid of CO2 then kill yourself to save yourself
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?

Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |