Remember me
▼ Content

"Cost effective" MUST be the message

"Cost effective" MUST be the message04-01-2014 22:53
Stating that climate change must be confronted at ANY COST is not going to win the war. So far I have only seen one post by one person on this forum who seems to get that. And it also doesn't help that word is out Al Gore owns the intellectual property (process) for creating a carbon trading system and stands to make billions if cap and trade is ever implemented.

The day we start talking about real solutions with proven cost/ benefit analysis included, based on real scientific/economic data is the day we start winning the hearts and minds of the masses.

Oh, and it cannot be channeled through Washington DC either, since anyone who thinks sending them our money is going to accomplish ANYTHING is delusional
04-01-2014 22:55
Please read post by Brettbyers, the guy who gets it!
Join the debate "Cost effective" MUST be the message:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Message from above.230-11-2020 16:30
Arctic's melting permafrost will cost nearly $70 trillion, study finds101-05-2019 21:12
Climate change could cost the U.S. economy hundreds of billions a year by 2090030-04-2019 15:38
Cost of climate change rising even faster028-04-2019 15:56
City of Toronto staff to explore cost of climate change, legal options for compensation from greenhouse g026-04-2019 15:37
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?








Don't know

Thanks for supporting
Copyright © 2009-2020 | About | Contact