|Considering O2, N2, O3 absorb more than 99% of incoming shortwave radiation, which is far more powerful18-04-2019 16:52|
|Tai Hai Chen★★★★☆
|than long wave radiation, what makes IPCC scientists think they are not greenhouse gases whereas CO2 is?|
|Into the Night★★★★★
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
It is not about what is absorbed from incoming sunlight, it is about what is absorbed from light emitted from Earth. The so-called 'greenhouse effect' magickally creates extra energy by absorbing infrared light emitted by the Earth's surface (never mind the 1st law of thermodynamics). It then magickally warms the Earth's surface even further by radiating what it absorbed back toward the surface (never mind the 2nd law of thermodynamics). It thus magickally traps infrared light and keeps it from leaving Earth (never mind the Stefan-Boltzmann law).
Nitrogen, oxygen, and ozone do not absorb these frequencies of infrared, thus freeing them from all this magick.
The Parrot Killer
|What makes IPCC thinks CO2 is better than O2 at trapping heat?||0||28-04-2019 15:40|
|15 ppm O3 capture 98% of UV so what makes IPCC think 15 ppm CO2 don't capture 98% of those 3 bands of||0||19-04-2019 16:27|
|What makes IPCC thinks N2, O2, O3 are not as good at capturing and retaining heat than CO2 can?||2||18-04-2019 20:57|
|The first few (3 or 4) ppm CO2 absorb 99 percent of whatever IR CO2 absorbs, CO2 is certainly not logarit||3||31-03-2019 17:58|
|Oceans absorb almost a third of global CO2 emissions, but at what cost?||2||20-03-2019 04:36|