Remember me
▼ Content

Conservative Donald Trump pokes fun at Marxist Amy Klobuchar about global warming


Conservative Donald Trump pokes fun at Marxist Amy Klobuchar about global warming11-02-2019 16:20
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1085)
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1094718856197799936

in reference to this

https://youtu.be/JMb59UaMLPA
Edited on 11-02-2019 16:45
12-02-2019 00:38
Wake
★★★★★
(4034)
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1094718856197799936

in reference to this

https://youtu.be/JMb59UaMLPA
The problem with these people is that they are doing something that a thinking man doesn't do - they are submitting to authority. If the authority you are submitting to has ulterior motives then you have done nothing more than enslaved yourself to another being.

The entire "science of climate change" was taken over by the "environmentalists". One of THEIR ulterior motives among several is that there are too many people on this planet. This is something they have PUBLISHED and not a suspicion.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/are-there-just-too-many-p_b_144065.html

The people who hold this belief, strangely, are not people who can themselves do anything to support themselves in a rural economy. They would be helpless and soon die. I suppose their real vision is of themselves as masters and all the rest would be the slaves of the Pharaoh.

Just read ANY of the complaints about Donald Trump - these are people who know nothing, they can do nothing, they have never achieved anything and yet they will call Donald Trump - a self made billionaire so is actually nothing more than a middle class man who believed in the system and made it work for him - as stupid. This is the view of 20% of the people in this country - ALL leftists.
12-02-2019 02:36
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(21559)
Wake wrote:
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1094718856197799936

in reference to this

https://youtu.be/JMb59UaMLPA
The problem with these people is that they are doing something that a thinking man doesn't do - they are submitting to authority. If the authority you are submitting to has ulterior motives then you have done nothing more than enslaved yourself to another being.

The entire "science of climate change"
There is no science. Science has no theories about meaningless buzzwords.
Wake wrote:
was taken over by the "environmentalists".
It wasn't taken over at all. The Church of Global Warming stems from the Church of Green. It was created by the Church of Green. That in turn stems from the Church of Karl Marx.
Wake wrote:
One of THEIR ulterior motives among several is that there are too many people on this planet.

The Church of Green does make this argument, yes. It is part of their basic tenet.
Wake wrote:
This is something they have PUBLISHED and not a suspicion.
...deleted redundant link...
They have published it many times.
Wake wrote:
The people who hold this belief, strangely, are not people who can themselves do anything to support themselves in a rural economy.
You mean city folk. You are one of the, Wake.
Wake wrote:
They would be helpless and soon die.

At least you recognize that no city can neither house, nor feed, nor warm their inhabitants without continuous supplies from outside. It is why sieges are so effective.
Wake wrote:
I suppose their real vision is of themselves as masters and all the rest would be the slaves of the Pharaoh.
Pharaoh was a dictator (actually TWO different dictators, much of the time). What the liberals are envisioning is a dictatorship by committee. An oligarchy (with themselves as the 'elite').
Wake wrote:
Just read ANY of the complaints about Donald Trump - these are people who know nothing, they can do nothing, they have never achieved anything and yet they will call Donald Trump - a self made billionaire so is actually nothing more than a middle class man who believed in the system and made it work for him - as stupid. This is the view of 20% of the people in this country - ALL leftists.

The usual types of arguments made by any socialist.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
13-02-2019 22:40
Wake
★★★★★
(4034)
Into the Night wrote:
Wake wrote:
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1094718856197799936

in reference to this

https://youtu.be/JMb59UaMLPA
The problem with these people is that they are doing something that a thinking man doesn't do - they are submitting to authority. If the authority you are submitting to has ulterior motives then you have done nothing more than enslaved yourself to another being.

The entire "science of climate change"
There is no science. Science has no theories about meaningless buzzwords.
Wake wrote:
was taken over by the "environmentalists".
It wasn't taken over at all. The Church of Global Warming stems from the Church of Green. It was created by the Church of Green. That in turn stems from the Church of Karl Marx.
Wake wrote:
One of THEIR ulterior motives among several is that there are too many people on this planet.

The Church of Green does make this argument, yes. It is part of their basic tenet.
Wake wrote:
This is something they have PUBLISHED and not a suspicion.
...deleted redundant link...
They have published it many times.
Wake wrote:
The people who hold this belief, strangely, are not people who can themselves do anything to support themselves in a rural economy.
You mean city folk. You are one of the, Wake.
Wake wrote:
They would be helpless and soon die.

At least you recognize that no city can neither house, nor feed, nor warm their inhabitants without continuous supplies from outside. It is why sieges are so effective.
Wake wrote:
I suppose their real vision is of themselves as masters and all the rest would be the slaves of the Pharaoh.
Pharaoh was a dictator (actually TWO different dictators, much of the time). What the liberals are envisioning is a dictatorship by committee. An oligarchy (with themselves as the 'elite').
Wake wrote:
Just read ANY of the complaints about Donald Trump - these are people who know nothing, they can do nothing, they have never achieved anything and yet they will call Donald Trump - a self made billionaire so is actually nothing more than a middle class man who believed in the system and made it work for him - as stupid. This is the view of 20% of the people in this country - ALL leftists.

The usual types of arguments made by any socialist.


Let's make this clear - you don't get to make up definitions of English terms or to deny entire branches of science because it disproves your religious beliefs. Climatology or climate science is the scientific study of climate, scientifically defined as weather conditions averaged over a period of time. That is not a "circular definition" as you would have any moron believe.

Whether or not there is any benefit to knowing anything about that makes no difference. That is a REAL science and you stupid continuing argument that there isn't any science in the matter is nothing more than a specious lie. But that isn't anything new from you.
13-02-2019 23:26
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(21559)
Wake wrote:
Let's make this clear - you don't get to make up definitions of English terms
I'm not trying to define 'global warming' or 'climate change'. YOU are.
Wake wrote:
or to deny entire branches of science
Spectroscopy is not a branch of science, Wake. It's just a few theories in physics.
Wake wrote:
because it disproves your religious beliefs.
Science doesn't prove any religion is false or true, Wake.
Wake wrote:
Climatology or climate science
There is no such thing, Wake.
Wake wrote:
is the scientific study of climate,
There are no theories of science about unquantifiable things, Wake. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That means they must be tested using definable tests that are specific, and produce specific results.
Wake wrote:
scientifically defined
Science doesn't define anything by itself, Wake. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.
Wake wrote:
as weather conditions averaged over a period of time.
That is the usual definition of 'climate'. It is NOT the definition of 'climate change'. This is a subjective definition, and not one that a theory (scientific or otherwise) can be formed around. Such a theory is a void argument.
Wake wrote:
That is not a "circular definition"
No, it isn't. But 'climate change' IS.
Wake wrote:
as you would have any moron believe.
I'm not trying to define 'climate change', Wake. YOU are.
Wake wrote:
Whether or not there is any benefit to knowing anything about that makes no difference.

Makes all the difference. You can't have any theories about something you can't define or about something you can't quantify.
Wake wrote:
That is a REAL science

True Scotsman fallacy, Wake. Science is a set of falsifiable theories, nothing more.
Wake wrote:
and you stupid continuing argument that there isn't any science in the matter is nothing more than a specious lie.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Buzzword fallacy.
Wake wrote:
But that isn't anything new from you.

Insult fallacy.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan




Join the debate Conservative Donald Trump pokes fun at Marxist Amy Klobuchar about global warming:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Do you think the Supreme Court will ban Trump6431-01-2024 22:27
How many of the unreleased FBI-Swan Interview files does Trump have?416-09-2023 03:05
How many of the unreleased FBI-JFK assassination files does Trump have?4513-09-2023 22:50
The deep state has a choice, destroy Trump, or help him get reelected113-09-2023 01:14
Trump appointed federal Judge Limits Federal Government's Contact with Social Media Companies306-07-2023 18:11
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact