Remember me
▼ Content

CO2 finally gets credit for unleashing hell on Earth


CO2 finally gets credit for unleashing hell on Earth15-01-2020 06:27
GasGuzzlerProfile picture★★★★☆
(1798)
Why I read this crap, I do not know.

Forget all the errors in the article, just wondering if this was even realistic.

How many Hiroshima bombs would it take to raise the ocean temps 1 degree?

For CO2 not being a source of energy, well, that's a lot of energy!

https://futurism.com/scientists-ocean-warming-rate-five-a-bombs-per-second


All the time the base and surface are at equal temperature as the equilibrium graduates to establish the temperature development--Pete Rogers
15-01-2020 06:44
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(7475)
GasGuzzler wrote:
Why I read this crap, I do not know.

Forget all the errors in the article, just wondering if this was even realistic.

How many Hiroshima bombs would it take to raise the ocean temps 1 degree?

For CO2 not being a source of energy, well, that's a lot of energy!

I'm still trying to figure out why you read this crap.

The overall answer is that it is crap. CO2 does not create even a small amount of energy.

I'm imagining a world in which bizarre air currents channel all of the atmospheric CO2 to Japan ... and the US says "Hey, don't look at us, we only dropped two on you, not five." Then spot decries capitalism as being responsible for destruction.


... or you can just not read the crap in the first place.


.


A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
15-01-2020 07:00
GasGuzzlerProfile picture★★★★☆
(1798)
Think maybe you missed my real question. Everyone here knows that kind of math is way above my pay grade, I was just wondering if 3.6 billion Hiroshima size bombs was a insanely high number. Seems we could hard boil eggs pretty quick with that much atomic energy. Is it even calculable?

To be clear, CO2 has NOTHING to do with the temperature of the ocean, which is unknown, rising, steady or falling.
15-01-2020 07:06
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(13305)
GasGuzzler wrote:
Think maybe you missed my real question. Everyone here knows that kind of math is way above my pay grade, I was just wondering if 3.6 billion Hiroshima size bombs was a insanely high number. Seems we could hard boil eggs pretty quick with that much atomic energy. Is it even calculable?

To be clear, CO2 has NOTHING to do with the temperature of the ocean, which is unknown, rising, steady or falling.


Frankly, I think this is the perfect kind of question for xkcd. He likes to answer crazy physics questions like this.

See his 'what if' section at xkcd.com


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
15-01-2020 18:30
gfm7175Profile picture★★★★☆
(1217)
IBdaMann wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
Why I read this crap, I do not know.

Forget all the errors in the article, just wondering if this was even realistic.

How many Hiroshima bombs would it take to raise the ocean temps 1 degree?

For CO2 not being a source of energy, well, that's a lot of energy!

I'm still trying to figure out why you read this crap.

The overall answer is that it is crap. CO2 does not create even a small amount of energy.

I'm imagining a world in which bizarre air currents channel all of the atmospheric CO2 to Japan ... and the US says "Hey, don't look at us, we only dropped two on you, not five." Then spot decries capitalism as being responsible for destruction.


... or you can just not read the crap in the first place.


.

This is the option that I chose once I saw that moronic headline.
15-01-2020 19:08
GasGuzzlerProfile picture★★★★☆
(1798)
gfm7175 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
Why I read this crap, I do not know.

Forget all the errors in the article, just wondering if this was even realistic.

How many Hiroshima bombs would it take to raise the ocean temps 1 degree?

For CO2 not being a source of energy, well, that's a lot of energy!

I'm still trying to figure out why you read this crap.

The overall answer is that it is crap. CO2 does not create even a small amount of energy.

I'm imagining a world in which bizarre air currents channel all of the atmospheric CO2 to Japan ... and the US says "Hey, don't look at us, we only dropped two on you, not five." Then spot decries capitalism as being responsible for destruction.


... or you can just not read the crap in the first place.


.

This is the option that I chose once I saw that moronic headline.


OK, so I had a few drinks last night. Nice website suggestion ITN. That might be worse than the article I posted up!


All the time the base and surface are at equal temperature as the equilibrium graduates to establish the temperature development--Pete Rogers
15-01-2020 19:15
gfm7175Profile picture★★★★☆
(1217)
That kind of language ("A-bombs") does get people excited and it instills fear into them (if they don't know any better), which I suppose is the point. Gotta keep the Church members irrationally afraid.

PREACH THAT SERMON!!!
Edited on 15-01-2020 19:16
15-01-2020 19:33
HarveyH55
★★★★★
(2420)
Did they use to do a lot of under water testing a A-bombs? Maybe I'm thinking of one them Godzilla movies...
15-01-2020 20:47
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(13305)
GasGuzzler wrote:
gfm7175 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
Why I read this crap, I do not know.

Forget all the errors in the article, just wondering if this was even realistic.

How many Hiroshima bombs would it take to raise the ocean temps 1 degree?

For CO2 not being a source of energy, well, that's a lot of energy!

I'm still trying to figure out why you read this crap.

The overall answer is that it is crap. CO2 does not create even a small amount of energy.

I'm imagining a world in which bizarre air currents channel all of the atmospheric CO2 to Japan ... and the US says "Hey, don't look at us, we only dropped two on you, not five." Then spot decries capitalism as being responsible for destruction.


... or you can just not read the crap in the first place.


.

This is the option that I chose once I saw that moronic headline.


OK, so I had a few drinks last night. Nice website suggestion ITN. That might be worse than the article I posted up!


It probably is!


He has articles on what happens to a baseball pitch at near the speed of light, what would happen if you climbed up a rope from the Moon that stretched all the way to Earth, etc.

I've enjoyed a lot of his stuff. Despite his stick figure drawings, he writes a great comic.

For next time you happen to see the marching band out on the football field...https://xkcd.com/389/


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
15-01-2020 20:51
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(13305)
HarveyH55 wrote:
Did they use to do a lot of under water testing a A-bombs? Maybe I'm thinking of one them Godzilla movies...


They did some. Godzilla supposedly was a result of the A-bombing of Japan. I can only imagine what it would be like to commute to work with that thing stomping around Tokyo.
(What?? Your train was smashed off the rails by a giant radioactive mutant monster and it made you late AGAIN?!?)


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
15-01-2020 21:30
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(7475)
GasGuzzler wrote: I was just wondering if 3.6 billion Hiroshima size bombs was a insanely high number.


That comes out to a tad more than eighteen (18) nukes for every square mile of the earth's surface ... including the ocean. The fireball for each one would fill that square mile, and would start at many, many, many millions of degrees Celsius.

Ergo, the entire surface of the planet would be covered with 18-thick nuclear fireballs at absurd 18-thick nuclear fireball temperatures ... because when we're talking about Global Warming, we can't emphasize enough just how much the Greenhouse Effect impacts the Climate.


.


A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist




Join the debate CO2 finally gets credit for unleashing hell on Earth:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Why is CO2 the key to our survival?1327-09-2020 17:27
The NCOVID Lock Down Prove CO2 Emission Do Not Cause Global Warming Climate Change1215-09-2020 04:37
The ACTUAL Percentage of Atmospheric CO26403-09-2020 05:12
CO2 sensor112-08-2020 19:10
Less CO21022-07-2020 02:16
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact