02-12-2019 19:01 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:Dictionaries simply collect consensus on meaning. Nope. Dictionaries are not a voting system. They do not define any word. tmiddles wrote: WRONG. The definition of heat comes from the 2nd law of thermodynamics, which you deny. tmiddles wrote: YOU made the paradox. YOU must clear your paradox. Only YOU can clear your paradox. Which is it, dude? The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
02-12-2019 19:07 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:they more or less arbitrarily decide what they are going to write,Not at all. Okay. You have undefined 'word'. Define 'word'. tmiddles wrote: IBDaMann does not have a religion. RQAA. tmiddles wrote: WRONG. Words are created by individuals all the time. tmiddles wrote: Dictionaries are not tasked with anything. They don't do work. tmiddles wrote: Dictionaries are not a voting bloc. No dictionary defines any word. That is not the purpose of a dictionary. tmiddles wrote: False authority fallacy. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
02-12-2019 19:09 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
James___ wrote:IBdaMann wrote:tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:they more or less arbitrarily decide what they are going to write,Not at all. There is no Hawai'i. A type of climate is not a climate 'change'. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
02-12-2019 19:12 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
tmiddles wrote:James___ wrote:Neither of you can define climate change.None of us can create a private definition for any word or phrase. Sure they can. You are doing so right now. You might try English, it works better. tmiddles wrote: So no one talks to themselves, eh? tmiddles wrote: Climate has no temperature. It has no humidity. It has no quantifiable elements at all. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
02-12-2019 19:14 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
James___ wrote:Proof by identity.tmiddles wrote:James___ wrote:Neither of you can define climate change.None of us can create a private definition for any word or phrase. Language is communal. James___ wrote:Proof by identity. James___ wrote:Proof by identity. James___ wrote:Proof identity. James___ wrote: You just failed the Turing test. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
02-12-2019 19:18 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
James___ wrote:Proof by identity. [/quote] Sadly Christians offer this.[/quote]No. Logic offers this. [/quote] There is no proof of faith[/quote]Proof by identity. [/quote] Faith is the belief in absence of evidence.[/quote]WRONG. Faith is another word for the circular argument. [/quote] When proof of faith is offered, then faith never happened.[/quote]WRONG. The circular argument still happened, therefore faith still happened. Proof by identity and equivalence. Attempting to prove a circular argument is a fallacy. [/quote] Faith has no proof. Either someone believes or they don't. [/quote] Faith exists. Proof by identity. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
02-12-2019 19:20 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:you see? You had to move to the minimum for communication to mean anything, two people. No, this is what YOU are doing. Inversion fallacy. tmiddles wrote:Inversion fallacy. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
02-12-2019 19:36 | |
keepit★★★★★ (3055) |
Way too much energy going into semantics here. People that are in contact can understand the ideas of what is being said without rambling on about semantics, which in this case is just slowing down communication of climate change ideas. |
02-12-2019 21:23 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14377) |
keepit wrote: Way too much energy going into semantics here. Hey keepit, speak up. Dollars-to-donuts says that you personally don't have a clue as to what is being said. Let's clarify this right now. What is the definition of the global climate that isn't a logical contradiction that you understand from all this? . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
02-12-2019 22:50 | |
keepit★★★★★ (3055) |
IBDM, You've gotten your self confused with all these slogans that you've gotten from who knows where, |
02-12-2019 23:02 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
keepit wrote: Define 'climate change'. You can't communicate about 'climate change' until you can define it! The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
02-12-2019 23:04 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
keepit wrote: Can't define 'climate change', eh? Guess I'll just have to assume you have no clue and just want to chant meaningless phrases and words. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 02-12-2019 23:05 |
02-12-2019 23:12 | |
keepit★★★★★ (3055) |
Assume what you want ITN. But i'm sure you know better than to assume too much. |
03-12-2019 00:16 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
keepit wrote: You have not yet defined 'climate change' or 'global warming'. You seem unwilling to do so. All that's left is your meaningless chants. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
03-12-2019 00:44 | |
keepit★★★★★ (3055) |
ITN, I'm just guessing but i wouldn't be surprised if half your posts ask the question, "What is climate change?". |
03-12-2019 04:27 | |
James___★★★★★ (5513) |
Into the Night wrote:James___ wrote: Spoken like a 2nd or 3rd grader. keepit doesn't understand that in the 5 years that you and ibdm have been posting, you're saying the same thing today as you did then. This is like a drug to you and you need your fix. BTW, identity is not proof of life. For all I know you're unhappy because the world is constantly changing and you got left behind. Kind of why I spend some of my time actually learning something. That will allow me to create my own opportunities and yet you are still unable to consider what a climate is. For it to have any meaning, you need to learn for yourself or move on to something else in life that you can understand or accept. |
03-12-2019 17:50 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
keepit wrote: Neither would I. So far no one has been able to answer that question. Define 'climate change'. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
03-12-2019 20:23 | |
James___★★★★★ (5513) |
Into the Night wrote:keepit wrote: What does it mean to you? If it means nothing to you then how can someone define for you that which you don't value? You say identity is proof of life when it is not. Proof of life allows for identity and not vice versa. If there is nothing you value then your logic is flawed because you wish to define that WHICH YOU FIND WORTHLESS. It's a fool's game that you play. |
03-12-2019 23:24 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:And where would one look that up?tmiddles wrote: Into the Night wrote: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/climate?s=t "The composite or generally prevailing weather conditions of a region, as temperature, air pressure, humidity, precipitation, sunshine, cloudiness, and winds, throughout the year, averaged over a series of years." Climate change means a change in long therm weather conditions. It's also the topic of this board and clearly understood buy all of us here. The topic is AGW temperature increase on Earth. You are hit over the head with the theory everyday on the news. You're just trying to sabotage the board ITN. All you and IBD have done for 5 years. Keepit & James: Let's not let them prevent us from talking about other things. |
04-12-2019 00:06 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
tmiddles wrote:RQAA.Into the Night wrote:And where would one look that up?tmiddles wrote: tmiddles wrote:From when to when? Why are those two points in time significant? Why are any other two points in time significant?Into the Night wrote: There is no average of a composite value. What is a desert climate, then? It is not describing any temperature, humidity, precipitation, sunshine, cloudiness or wind speed at all. Yet it's a climate. What is wrong with this dictionary? tmiddles wrote: Define 'long term weather conditions'. tmiddles wrote:From when to when? How do you know it's increasing at all? It's not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. tmiddles wrote:No theory is possible. You cannot have a theory based on an undefined word or phrase. (Internal consistency error) tmiddles wrote: I assure you. I have no access to the code. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
04-12-2019 02:08 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote: One year or more on Earth. Define temperature ITN |
04-12-2019 02:28 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14377) |
Into the Night wrote: What is a desert climate, then? It's a desert. Into the Night wrote:It is not describing any temperature, humidity, precipitation, sunshine, cloudiness or wind speed at all. Yet it's a climate. Hazelnut, two scoops. Into the Night wrote:What is wrong with this dictionary? It's a paperback, dammit! Any respectable dictionary is of a proper hard-cover breed. tmiddles wrote: Climate change means a change in long therm weather conditions. What a fugging idiot. What do you say to someone like tmiddles that takes pride in being a moron. He considers it "virtue-signalling" to broadcast how he refuses to learn anything. All I can say is ... keepit, you are an even bigger fugging moron for trying to outdo tmiddles. You can't know less than zero. tmiddles wrote: It's also the topic of this board and clearly understood buy all of us here. This HAS to be a mental condition. You CANNOT stop believing that you speak for the rest of the fugging planet. You don't realize that you have no arguments that aren't based on you fiercely deluding yourself into believing that you control how others think. You believe that the violations of physics that you desperately need to be real can, in fact, become real by you declaring that everyone esle believes thusly. This is so sad that I'm laughing so hard that I can't breathe. Maybe the Raiders will ask you to play your delusions in their next game against the Jets. Into the Night wrote:Define 'long term weather conditions'. Obviously, it's every time the weather doesn't change over a thirty-year period. It occurs frequently underwater, normally off the coast of Belize. I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
04-12-2019 04:11 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
IBdaMann wrote:...You don't realize that you have no arguments that aren't based on you fiercely deluding yourself...Actually I don't have many arguments of my own it's true. Almost none on this topic. I agree with the experts like Max Planck, Pierre Provost, Tyndall and Fourier. You of course know I'm not privy to your and ITN's connect on the street to learn Physics in a oral tradition without book. I believe the 12 references I found proving your corruption on the 2nd LTD is a lie. So yeah I accept what I've been handed by the scientists respected in their field after looking it over and considering a few counter arguments including your own. Even my net-thermal-radiation-you-in-a-room-as-a-reference example that stumps you and ITN completely wasn't my work. Lifted it from an introductory college physics textbook. "Good tests kill flawed theories; we remain alive to guess again." - Karl Popper ITN/IBD Fraud exposed: The 2nd LTD add on claiming radiance from cooler bodies can't be absorbed Max Planck debunks, they can't explain:net-thermal-radiation-you-in-a-room-as-a-reference & Proof: no data is ever valid for them |
04-12-2019 16:44 | |
James___★★★★★ (5513) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:...You don't realize that you have no arguments that aren't based on you fiercely deluding yourself...Actually I don't have many arguments of my own it's true. Almost none on this topic. I agree with the experts like Max Planck, Pierre Provost, Tyndall and Fourier. You of course know I'm not privy to your and ITN's connect on the street to learn Physics in a oral tradition without book. I believe the 12 references I found proving your corruption on the 2nd LTD is a lie. In the example you give, it's incomplete or is wrong. I saw no mention of capillaries reducing blood flow in the skin. Also fat or fatty tissue acts as insulation. There's also skin itself. Does the skin emissivity change between Asians, Caucasians and Africans? |
04-12-2019 16:48 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14377) |
tmiddles wrote: Actually I don't have many arguments of my own it's true. Almost none on this topic. Not true. You have plenty of arguments. You just won't support them, mostly because you don't really believe them. You came here for the purpose of preaching your religion and of disrupting any discussions that lead to conclusions that run counter to your religious dogma. Success! You deserve an award. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
04-12-2019 17:17 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
IBdaMann wrote:Please up your image game IBD. To call this crap trite would be generous. And your post has no content at all. My point, which is important on any subject, is that I am subscribing to the status quo position. I have questioned it but find that it's solid. More importantly this area, science and engineering, is one that bears fruit and is tested on a regular basis. The argument that experts who are able to successfully do things WITH science and engineering, like get a probe to land on Venus and send back data, are somehow also clueless about it, as you argue, is not any easy case to make. Probably why you make no attempt to do so. |
04-12-2019 18:10 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote: RQAA. Evasion. Answer the question. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 04-12-2019 18:11 |
04-12-2019 18:12 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote: I did One year or more |
04-12-2019 18:15 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:...You don't realize that you have no arguments that aren't based on you fiercely deluding yourself...Actually I don't have many arguments of my own it's true. Almost none on this topic. I agree with the experts like Max Planck, Pierre Provost, Tyndall and Fourier. Dropping names of people that you deny is not going to work. tmiddles wrote: Quoting books out of context is not going to work. tmiddles wrote: No scientist handed you anything. You deny physics. You deny mathematics. You deny logic. You deny philosophy. It is your fundamentalist belief in your religion that has brought you here. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
04-12-2019 18:20 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:when something is misrepresented by excluding the context there's a really easy way to expose that: provide the context You got nothing |
04-12-2019 18:26 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:Please up your image game IBD. To call this crap trite would be generous. But it does. He gave you an award for your strong faith in your fundamentalist religion. tmiddles wrote: No, you are not. You want to: * destroy the existing energy market and implement an oligarchy replacing it that you control. * destroy the Constitution of the United States by implementing fascism by oligarchy. * cause the religion of the Church of Global Warming to become the State religion. * throw any unbelievers into prison. * invent and implement some type of terraforming device. * ban a naturally occurring gas in the atmosphere in the name of your religion. * sacrifice the economy and industry in the name of your religion. Hardly the status quo. tmiddles wrote: Denying theories of science isn't solid. Denying mathematics isn't solid. Denying logic isn't solid. Denying philosophy isn't solid. You have built your religion on a sandbar and the sea around you is rising. tmiddles wrote: Then why do you deny them? tmiddles wrote: Define 'experts'. tmiddles wrote: A single thermometer is not the temperature of Venus. tmiddles wrote: Inversion fallacy. You are reading more into data than is there. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
04-12-2019 18:27 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:when something is misrepresented by excluding the context there's a really easy way to expose that: provide the context RQAA The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
04-12-2019 18:44 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Korolev You also argue the temperature of Denver is unknowable. Good luck with that. |
04-12-2019 18:59 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote: That is correct. tmiddles wrote: Don't need luck. Just need the math. Math that YOU deny. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
04-12-2019 20:09 | |
keepit★★★★★ (3055) |
You deny common sense ITN. There is no "Church of Global Warming". It's only in your mind as are many of the things you post on this website. |
04-12-2019 21:38 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14377) |
tmiddles wrote: My point, which is important on any subject, is that I am subscribing to the status quo position. Nope. You don't get to define your WACKY religion as the "status quo" any more than you get to speak for everyone else on the planet. tmiddles wrote: I have questioned it but find that it's solid. Nope. You don't question a thing about the religion you preach. If you were to question then the physics violations would fundamentally shake your faith. Instead, you find that not questioning anything allows you to maintain your delusion that it is solid. tmiddles wrote: More importantly this area, science and engineering, is one that bears fruit and is tested on a regular basis. The fruit is born with the engineering and that fruit is technology. Science comprises the tools used by the engineers. tmiddles wrote: The argument that experts who are able to successfully do things WITH science and engineering, like get a probe to land on Venus and send back data, are somehow also clueless about it, as you argue, is not any easy case to make. So this is today's bogus position that you are assigning me. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
04-12-2019 21:42 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21559) |
keepit wrote: Define 'common sense'. keepit wrote: There certainly is. It is a religion. I named it. It exists. keepit wrote: Of course they are. No one else posts for me. A religion is nothing more than some initial circular argument with arguments extending from it. The other name for the circular argument is 'faith'. The Church of Global Warming is no exception. The initial circular argument of the Church of Global Warming is that the Earth is warming. All other arguments made by the Church of Global Warming stem from that initial circular argument. The Church of Global Warming is a fundamentalist style religion. Its members try to prove a circular argument, resulting in a circular argument fallacy. That's what any fundamentalist does. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 04-12-2019 21:47 |
04-12-2019 22:00 | |
keepit★★★★★ (3055) |
The thing is, a legitimate Church has the backing of God as a Church. Your comment about posts being in your mind ignored the fact that some are ONLY in your mind. We all know that your posts are in your mind. The problem is that some of them are only in your mind. Edited on 04-12-2019 22:01 |
04-12-2019 22:14 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
IBdaMann wrote:Among your many dismissals of the scientific achievements of others you have claimed that the scientists behind the russian Venera probe were dishonest and incompetent:tmiddles wrote: More importantly this area, science and engineering, is one that bears fruit and is tested on a regular basis. tmiddles wrote:IBD response: IBdaMann wrote: As well as: IBdaMann wrote:You baselessly slander great work because it suits you to pretend we learned nothing about Venus. Guilty as charged. Edited on 04-12-2019 23:00 |
04-12-2019 22:15 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14377) |
keepit wrote: You deny common sense ITN. You deny common sense keepit. keepit wrote: There is no "Church of Global Warming". You think that by telling yourself this until you actually believe it will make it true. Unfortunately your faith in the Global Warming religion is preventing you from being a Christian. You are a heretic. I wish you luck with that. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
Threads | Replies | Last post |
Clouds | 57 | 21-09-2022 19:01 |
Clouds | 4 | 01-04-2022 02:54 |
Do CO2 Emissions Create More Clouds? | 124 | 19-01-2020 23:09 |
Experts reveal that clouds have moderated warming triggered by climate change | 10 | 06-11-2019 23:54 |
High CO2 levels can destabilize marine layer clouds | 1 | 06-03-2019 22:01 |