|Climate study warns of vanishing safety window—here's why13-03-2019 03:52|
|Tai Hai Chen★★★★☆
|I noticed that the article is from National Geographic. |
It is summarily dismissed. I won't read it. I won't waste my time.
National Geographic used to be an excellent publication. Then readership declined, they got desperate and were one of the first casualties of the Church of Global Warming. They sold out their credibility and now cannot bring themselves to allow any science, or even any honesty, to creep into the text of their articles.
What a shame.
Yup, I don't read that publication anymore either... I also dismiss any Wikipedia article on sight, as they are often incomplete, inaccurate, and can be edited by virtually anyone. I also find it funny that if one watches any video on YouTube relating to global warming, they always put a little banner below it linking you to the Wikipedia page about global warming (to correct "misinformation" about the topic). Brainwashing, much??!!
|Into the Night★★★★★
|'Safety window'? Is that like...you know... a windshield or something? It is to protect the Church of Global Warming from crashing? Why is it vanishing? Is it eroding from all that sulfur dioxide the British want to pump into the atmosphere?|
|Year Long, Arctic Climate Change Study... How 'Green'?||1||21-09-2019 03:46|
|heres another||1||23-06-2019 19:58|
|Satellite confirms key NASA temperature data: The planet is warming — and fast||4||22-05-2019 18:30|
|Arctic's melting permafrost will cost nearly $70 trillion, study finds||1||01-05-2019 21:12|
|Climate change is on the move — but the political debate is standing still||1||30-04-2019 16:29|
|Barack Obama: Energy Independence and the Safety of Our Planet|