climate-debate.com - Where have all the members gone?

Into the Night wrote:
Well put.

I find it hilarious that Im a BM complains about the activity on this forum when he is clearly participating. He doesn't get much response here because several folks here know enough to call him on his BS or simply ignores it. He thinks he speaks for everybody, typical of an omniscience moron like this.

His jabberwocky doesn't work here. It is not science. His attention getting schemes are ineffective.

sealover wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
Well put.

I find it hilarious that Im a BM complains about the activity on this forum when he is clearly participating. He doesn't get much response here because several folks here know enough to call him on his BS or simply ignores it. He thinks he speaks for everybody, typical of an omniscience moron like this.

His jabberwocky doesn't work here. It is not science. His attention getting schemes are ineffective.

The main attraction of this website must be the member with 20750 posts.

Over the last eight years, his posts have been the most frequent.

Perhaps the high quality of these 20750 posts helps explain why so many members find this website such an attractive place to participate in

This week alone, there must have been five, maybe six or even seven members who posted something.

How could they resist, when the main attraction keeps putting out such interesting posts?

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

Im a BM wrote:A quick glance at the "most active users" list reveals that only 1% of the 1659 members have posted more than 1300 times.

Im a BM wrote:What if there were even just ONE thread for the other 99%?

Im a BM wrote:What if the other 99% had even just ONE thread where the 1% leave them alone?

Im a BM wrote: Just ONE thread where they won't have to read comments like, "you are a moron."

Im a BM wrote: A thread for the 99.75% would only exclude four members.

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:A quick glance at the "most active users" list reveals that only 1% of the 1659 members have posted more than 1300 times.

You are completely omitting all of the members who only want to read posts but not post anything themselves.

Im a BM wrote:What if there were even just ONE thread for the other 99%?

They have all of the threads already.

Im a BM wrote:What if the other 99% had even just ONE thread where the 1% leave them alone?

Why would they look to read posts where there aren't any?

Im a BM wrote: Just ONE thread where they won't have to read comments like, "you are a moron."

Who would erase those comments? Censors?

Im a BM wrote: A thread for the 99.75% would only exclude four members.

How would the 99.75% read the posts of the four excluded members?

Swan wrote:Facebook gets 500,000 new members every day, this place would have that many total members in 83,000 or so years

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Facebook gets 500,000 new members every day, this place would have that many total members in 83,000 or so years

That's all going to change when AI decides to take over quantum computing. This site will have that many new members in a fraction of the speed of light.

.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:A quick glance at the "most active users" list reveals that only 1% of the 1659 members have posted more than 1300 times.

You are completely omitting all of the members who only want to read posts but not post anything themselves.

Im a BM wrote:What if there were even just ONE thread for the other 99%?

They have all of the threads already.

Im a BM wrote:What if the other 99% had even just ONE thread where the 1% leave them alone?

Why would they look to read posts where there aren't any?

Im a BM wrote: Just ONE thread where they won't have to read comments like, "you are a moron."

Who would erase those comments? Censors?

Im a BM wrote: A thread for the 99.75% would only exclude four members.

How would the 99.75% read the posts of the four excluded members?

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

Again if this were a real website there would be at least one million members active every day instead of 3 to 5.

Swan wrote:
Furthermore every real website sells ads to generate income

Swan wrote:
this site does nothing as it is fully government funded and deep cover for schizzos

Into the Night wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:A quick glance at the "most active users" list reveals that only 1% of the 1659 members have posted more than 1300 times.

You are completely omitting all of the members who only want to read posts but not post anything themselves.

Im a BM wrote:What if there were even just ONE thread for the other 99%?

They have all of the threads already.

Im a BM wrote:What if the other 99% had even just ONE thread where the 1% leave them alone?

Why would they look to read posts where there aren't any?

Im a BM wrote: Just ONE thread where they won't have to read comments like, "you are a moron."

Who would erase those comments? Censors?

Im a BM wrote: A thread for the 99.75% would only exclude four members.

How would the 99.75% read the posts of the four excluded members?

He's also omitting the number of people that created an account here, posted prolifically, then never showed up again.

You are right though. Most accounts only read posts most of the time (if not all the time) and do not post. This is pretty normal for most forums.

I think BM's problem here is that he is desperate for attention. He complains there are not enough users to listen to his BS.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

Again if this were a real website there would be at least one million members active every day instead of 3 to 5.

Not the definition of a real website. True Scotsman fallacy.
A real website is any server that serves the HTTP or HTTPS protocol.

Swan wrote:
Furthermore every real website sells ads to generate income

Not a requirement for any website.

Swan wrote:
this site does nothing as it is fully government funded and deep cover for schizzos

So https://www.faa.gov it not a real website and does nothing??

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

Again if this were a real website there would be at least one million members active every day instead of 3 to 5. Furthermore every real website sells ads to generate income this site does nothing as it is fully government funded and deep cover for schizzos

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

Again if this were a real website there would be at least one million members active every day instead of 3 to 5. Furthermore every real website sells ads to generate income this site does nothing as it is fully government funded and deep cover for schizzos

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

So, why are you here, and not using a 'real' website? Where millions of users can be annoyed by you. Oh, you already made an ass of yourself, and got banned, learned nothing. So much for that almost 'genius' IQ... Bet you even got kicked off the tomato growers forum. Web hosting isn't always expensive. Some website accept ads from their host, to reduce cost. Some large sites might monetize, and sell ad space. It's not always about making money.

Your mind seems to function as a small child. With your stated intelligence, and finances, you don't seem to do much with the resources you claim. I have no trouble learning new skills. I don't need to learn everything required for certification. Just a functional knowledge to complete a task. And once learned, I remember, and can apply that knowledge to similar tasks. Not hard to figure out how to deal with what might be different.

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

Again if this were a real website there would be at least one million members active every day instead of 3 to 5. Furthermore every real website sells ads to generate income this site does nothing as it is fully government funded and deep cover for schizzos

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

So, why are you here, and not using a 'real' website? Where millions of users can be annoyed by you. Oh, you already made an ass of yourself, and got banned, learned nothing. So much for that almost 'genius' IQ... Bet you even got kicked off the tomato growers forum. Web hosting isn't always expensive. Some website accept ads from their host, to reduce cost. Some large sites might monetize, and sell ad space. It's not always about making money.

Your mind seems to function as a small child. With your stated intelligence, and finances, you don't seem to do much with the resources you claim. I have no trouble learning new skills. I don't need to learn everything required for certification. Just a functional knowledge to complete a task. And once learned, I remember, and can apply that knowledge to similar tasks. Not hard to figure out how to deal with what might be different.

Actually it is all about making money as without revenue a website cannot maintain itself, proving that this dump is government funded. I am here as your support group as without me this site shuts down out of boredom. THAT SAID WHO WOULD ADVERTISE ON A PAGE WITH 4 USERS.............

HE HE HE

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

Again if this were a real website there would be at least one million members active every day instead of 3 to 5.

Not the definition of a real website. True Scotsman fallacy.
A real website is any server that serves the HTTP or HTTPS protocol.

Swan wrote:
Furthermore every real website sells ads to generate income

Not a requirement for any website.

Swan wrote:
this site does nothing as it is fully government funded and deep cover for schizzos

So https://www.faa.gov it not a real website and does nothing??

PT Barnum had a name for you.

Sucker

PS. This is a fake website, if it were real it would have millions of post per year, if not per day instead of 82,000 in 8 years

Swan wrote:
Actually it is all about making money as without revenue a website cannot maintain itself,

Swan wrote:
proving that this dump is government funded.

Swan wrote:
I am here as your support group

Swan wrote:
as without me this site shuts down out of boredom.

Swan wrote:
THAT SAID WHO WOULD ADVERTISE ON A PAGE WITH 4 USERS.............

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

Again if this were a real website there would be at least one million members active every day instead of 3 to 5. Furthermore every real website sells ads to generate income this site does nothing as it is fully government funded and deep cover for schizzos

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

So, why are you here, and not using a 'real' website? Where millions of users can be annoyed by you. Oh, you already made an ass of yourself, and got banned, learned nothing. So much for that almost 'genius' IQ... Bet you even got kicked off the tomato growers forum. Web hosting isn't always expensive. Some website accept ads from their host, to reduce cost. Some large sites might monetize, and sell ad space. It's not always about making money.

Your mind seems to function as a small child. With your stated intelligence, and finances, you don't seem to do much with the resources you claim. I have no trouble learning new skills. I don't need to learn everything required for certification. Just a functional knowledge to complete a task. And once learned, I remember, and can apply that knowledge to similar tasks. Not hard to figure out how to deal with what might be different.

Actually it is all about making money as without revenue a website cannot maintain itself, proving that this dump is government funded. I am here as your support group as without me this site shuts down out of boredom. THAT SAID WHO WOULD ADVERTISE ON A PAGE WITH 4 USERS.............

HE HE HE

You really are a clueless moron... You pay for server space, to host your website. You can created/maintain it yourself, or you can pay a professional service. A website doesn't really require much maintenance, other than keeping the content below the amount of server space you paid for.

This site does seem well maintained though. Other than you, and Buddha, there isn't a spambot problem...

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

Again if this were a real website there would be at least one million members active every day instead of 3 to 5. Furthermore every real website sells ads to generate income this site does nothing as it is fully government funded and deep cover for schizzos

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

So, why are you here, and not using a 'real' website? Where millions of users can be annoyed by you. Oh, you already made an ass of yourself, and got banned, learned nothing. So much for that almost 'genius' IQ... Bet you even got kicked off the tomato growers forum. Web hosting isn't always expensive. Some website accept ads from their host, to reduce cost. Some large sites might monetize, and sell ad space. It's not always about making money.

Your mind seems to function as a small child. With your stated intelligence, and finances, you don't seem to do much with the resources you claim. I have no trouble learning new skills. I don't need to learn everything required for certification. Just a functional knowledge to complete a task. And once learned, I remember, and can apply that knowledge to similar tasks. Not hard to figure out how to deal with what might be different.

Actually it is all about making money as without revenue a website cannot maintain itself, proving that this dump is government funded. I am here as your support group as without me this site shuts down out of boredom. THAT SAID WHO WOULD ADVERTISE ON A PAGE WITH 4 USERS.............

HE HE HE

You really are a clueless moron... You pay for server space, to host your website. You can created/maintain it yourself, or you can pay a professional service. A website doesn't really require much maintenance, other than keeping the content below the amount of server space you paid for.

This site does seem well maintained though. Other than you, and Buddha, there isn't a spambot problem...

LOL, the other 3 schizzos do seem to agree with you. However as said no company would actually have a logical reason to advertise to myself and 3 schizzos

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

Again if this were a real website there would be at least one million members active every day instead of 3 to 5. Furthermore every real website sells ads to generate income this site does nothing as it is fully government funded and deep cover for schizzos

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

So, why are you here, and not using a 'real' website? Where millions of users can be annoyed by you. Oh, you already made an ass of yourself, and got banned, learned nothing. So much for that almost 'genius' IQ... Bet you even got kicked off the tomato growers forum. Web hosting isn't always expensive. Some website accept ads from their host, to reduce cost. Some large sites might monetize, and sell ad space. It's not always about making money.

Your mind seems to function as a small child. With your stated intelligence, and finances, you don't seem to do much with the resources you claim. I have no trouble learning new skills. I don't need to learn everything required for certification. Just a functional knowledge to complete a task. And once learned, I remember, and can apply that knowledge to similar tasks. Not hard to figure out how to deal with what might be different.

Actually it is all about making money as without revenue a website cannot maintain itself, proving that this dump is government funded. I am here as your support group as without me this site shuts down out of boredom. THAT SAID WHO WOULD ADVERTISE ON A PAGE WITH 4 USERS.............

HE HE HE

You really are a clueless moron... You pay for server space, to host your website. You can created/maintain it yourself, or you can pay a professional service. A website doesn't really require much maintenance, other than keeping the content below the amount of server space you paid for.

This site does seem well maintained though. Other than you, and Buddha, there isn't a spambot problem...

LOL, the other 3 schizzos do seem to agree with you. However as said no company would actually have a logical reason to advertise to myself and 3 schizzos

A lot of website accept ads from their host, for a reduced price, even free. They don't make money, just get a discount. Ads are mostly annoying, sometimes distracts from the website's content.

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

Again if this were a real website there would be at least one million members active every day instead of 3 to 5. Furthermore every real website sells ads to generate income this site does nothing as it is fully government funded and deep cover for schizzos

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

So, why are you here, and not using a 'real' website? Where millions of users can be annoyed by you. Oh, you already made an ass of yourself, and got banned, learned nothing. So much for that almost 'genius' IQ... Bet you even got kicked off the tomato growers forum. Web hosting isn't always expensive. Some website accept ads from their host, to reduce cost. Some large sites might monetize, and sell ad space. It's not always about making money.

Your mind seems to function as a small child. With your stated intelligence, and finances, you don't seem to do much with the resources you claim. I have no trouble learning new skills. I don't need to learn everything required for certification. Just a functional knowledge to complete a task. And once learned, I remember, and can apply that knowledge to similar tasks. Not hard to figure out how to deal with what might be different.

Actually it is all about making money as without revenue a website cannot maintain itself, proving that this dump is government funded. I am here as your support group as without me this site shuts down out of boredom. THAT SAID WHO WOULD ADVERTISE ON A PAGE WITH 4 USERS.............

HE HE HE

You really are a clueless moron... You pay for server space, to host your website. You can created/maintain it yourself, or you can pay a professional service. A website doesn't really require much maintenance, other than keeping the content below the amount of server space you paid for.

This site does seem well maintained though. Other than you, and Buddha, there isn't a spambot problem...

LOL, the other 3 schizzos do seem to agree with you. However as said no company would actually have a logical reason to advertise to myself and 3 schizzos

A lot of website accept ads from their host, for a reduced price, even free. They don't make money, just get a discount. Ads are mostly annoying, sometimes distracts from the website's content.

In reality ads earn websites millions in revenue, but not to fake websites with 4 total active users.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Yesterday, the 1657th member joined this website.

That makes 75 new members in the past year, after I first joined.

Yet, only five to ten members actually participate in the discussion.

And ALL of the new members who joined after I did have given up already.

The handful of members who do post have been here for years.

There must be something very unattractive about the discussion that repels even those who thought they wanted to be part of it at one time.

This is not a real website, it is a closed loop only for certain people. A real climate discussion page would have millions of participants. I thought you knew?

It is a real website, and we could discus climate, if there was anything there to discus. It's a scam, enough said... So, we discus other things like AI generated, quantum GMO, moraine-grown tomatoes. That the FBI doesn't want anyone to know about. Bet you just can't wait, another month or so, you'll be chokin'-the-chicken, as you squeeze the snot and seeds out of them tomatoes, making you special 'sauce'...

Again if this were a real website there would be at least one million members active every day instead of 3 to 5. Furthermore every real website sells ads to generate income this site does nothing as it is fully government funded and deep cover for schizzos

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

So, why are you here, and not using a 'real' website? Where millions of users can be annoyed by you. Oh, you already made an ass of yourself, and got banned, learned nothing. So much for that almost 'genius' IQ... Bet you even got kicked off the tomato growers forum. Web hosting isn't always expensive. Some website accept ads from their host, to reduce cost. Some large sites might monetize, and sell ad space. It's not always about making money.

Your mind seems to function as a small child. With your stated intelligence, and finances, you don't seem to do much with the resources you claim. I have no trouble learning new skills. I don't need to learn everything required for certification. Just a functional knowledge to complete a task. And once learned, I remember, and can apply that knowledge to similar tasks. Not hard to figure out how to deal with what might be different.

Actually it is all about making money as without revenue a website cannot maintain itself, proving that this dump is government funded. I am here as your support group as without me this site shuts down out of boredom. THAT SAID WHO WOULD ADVERTISE ON A PAGE WITH 4 USERS.............

HE HE HE

You really are a clueless moron... You pay for server space, to host your website. You can created/maintain it yourself, or you can pay a professional service. A website doesn't really require much maintenance, other than keeping the content below the amount of server space you paid for.

This site does seem well maintained though. Other than you, and Buddha, there isn't a spambot problem...

LOL, the other 3 schizzos do seem to agree with you. However as said no company would actually have a logical reason to advertise to myself and 3 schizzos

A lot of website accept ads from their host, for a reduced price, even free. They don't make money, just get a discount. Ads are mostly annoying, sometimes distracts from the website's content.

In reality ads earn websites millions in revenue, but not to fake websites with 4 total active users.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Seems to be a huge gap, between your adolescence, and your current lack of development. How many years were you a prison-play-thing? Who did you kill? Missed out on quite a few years. Or, did you like it so much, you just kept going back, until you got too old to be 'popular'...

HarveyH55 wrote:Seems to be a huge gap, between your adolescence, and your current lack of development. How many years were you a prison-play-thing? Who did you kill? Missed out on quite a few years. Or, did you like it so much, you just kept going back, until you got too old to be 'popular'...

IBdaMann wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:Seems to be a huge gap, between your adolescence, and your current lack of development. How many years were you a prison-play-thing? Who did you kill? Missed out on quite a few years. Or, did you like it so much, you just kept going back, until you got too old to be 'popular'...

This begs the question(s): Did Swan learn gardening in prison? Did Swan trade tomatoes for cigarettes? Did he bribe guards with eggplants? Did the FBI not interview Swan because they already knew everything they needed to know about him from his rap sheet? Is Swan simply disgruntled for having been a prison bitch for so many years?

Why didn't Swan just quantum teleport out of prison and make a break for it? Why didn't he just escape at ten-million times the speed of light? Surely he could have arranged a deal with Steve Jobs.

IBdaMann wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:Seems to be a huge gap, between your adolescence, and your current lack of development. How many years were you a prison-play-thing? Who did you kill? Missed out on quite a few years. Or, did you like it so much, you just kept going back, until you got too old to be 'popular'...

This begs the question(s): Did Swan learn gardening in prison? Did Swan trade tomatoes for cigarettes? Did he bribe guards with eggplants? Did the FBI not interview Swan because they already knew everything they needed to know about him from his rap sheet? Is Swan simply disgruntled for having been a prison bitch for so many years?

Why didn't Swan just quantum teleport out of prison and make a break for it? Why didn't he just escape at ten-million times the speed of light? Surely he could have arranged a deal with Steve Jobs.

IBdaMann wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:Seems to be a huge gap, between your adolescence, and your current lack of development. How many years were you a prison-play-thing? Who did you kill? Missed out on quite a few years. Or, did you like it so much, you just kept going back, until you got too old to be 'popular'...

This begs the question(s): Did Swan learn gardening in prison? Did Swan trade tomatoes for cigarettes? Did he bribe guards with eggplants? Did the FBI not interview Swan because they already knew everything they needed to know about him from his rap sheet? Is Swan simply disgruntled for having been a prison bitch for so many years?

Why didn't Swan just quantum teleport out of prison and make a break for it? Why didn't he just escape at ten-million times the speed of light? Surely he could have arranged a deal with Steve Jobs.

GasGuzzler wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:Seems to be a huge gap, between your adolescence, and your current lack of development. How many years were you a prison-play-thing? Who did you kill? Missed out on quite a few years. Or, did you like it so much, you just kept going back, until you got too old to be 'popular'...

This begs the question(s): Did Swan learn gardening in prison? Did Swan trade tomatoes for cigarettes? Did he bribe guards with eggplants? Did the FBI not interview Swan because they already knew everything they needed to know about him from his rap sheet? Is Swan simply disgruntled for having been a prison bitch for so many years?

Why didn't Swan just quantum teleport out of prison and make a break for it? Why didn't he just escape at ten-million times the speed of light? Surely he could have arranged a deal with Steve Jobs.

I think you have it a bit backwards. Swan traded cigarettes for tomatoes, and then traded the tomatoes for his double wide trailer. Turns out the trailer was stolen, which landed him in prison where he learned to grow and snort eggplant.

In prison is where he created a real website with advertising for eggplant blow and literally made his fortune from behind bars.

After serving his 20,000 year sentence, he was released on several conditions.

1) speaking with the FBI prohibited
2) growing tomatoes over 10ft tall prohibited.
3) throwing moraines prohibited
4) surfing fake websites prohibited
5) teleporting strictly prohibited

Swan wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:Seems to be a huge gap, between your adolescence, and your current lack of development. How many years were you a prison-play-thing? Who did you kill? Missed out on quite a few years. Or, did you like it so much, you just kept going back, until you got too old to be 'popular'...

This begs the question(s): Did Swan learn gardening in prison? Did Swan trade tomatoes for cigarettes? Did he bribe guards with eggplants? Did the FBI not interview Swan because they already knew everything they needed to know about him from his rap sheet? Is Swan simply disgruntled for having been a prison bitch for so many years?

Why didn't Swan just quantum teleport out of prison and make a break for it? Why didn't he just escape at ten-million times the speed of light? Surely he could have arranged a deal with Steve Jobs.

I think you have it a bit backwards. Swan traded cigarettes for tomatoes, and then traded the tomatoes for his double wide trailer. Turns out the trailer was stolen, which landed him in prison where he learned to grow and snort eggplant.

In prison is where he created a real website with advertising for eggplant blow and literally made his fortune from behind bars.

After serving his 20,000 year sentence, he was released on several conditions.

1) speaking with the FBI prohibited
2) growing tomatoes over 10ft tall prohibited.
3) throwing moraines prohibited
4) surfing fake websites prohibited
5) teleporting strictly prohibited

I now own your brain.

GasGuzzler wrote:

Swan wrote:I now own your brain.

Cool. Your 130 IQ is now plausible.

IBdaMann wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Swan wrote:I now own your brain.

Cool. Your 130 IQ is now plausible.

Awesome!

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:A quick glance at the "most active users" list reveals that only 1% of the 1659 members have posted more than 1300 times.

You are completely omitting all of the members who only want to read posts but not post anything themselves.

Im a BM wrote:What if there were even just ONE thread for the other 99%?

They have all of the threads already.

Im a BM wrote:What if the other 99% had even just ONE thread where the 1% leave them alone?

Why would they look to read posts where there aren't any?

Im a BM wrote: Just ONE thread where they won't have to read comments like, "you are a moron."

Who would erase those comments? Censors?

Im a BM wrote: A thread for the 99.75% would only exclude four members.

How would the 99.75% read the posts of the four excluded members?

Im a BM wrote:
A list of the most active users reveals that only 10 members have posted more than 2500 times.

Some of those ten haven't posted in years.

I propose an experiment:

A thread called "For members with fewer than 2500 posts"

Those with more than 2500 posts have hundreds of other threads to post on.

The thread may get no takers.

It certainly will not attract anyone new if the ten most active users post there.

It would only work if the handful of most active users voluntarily restrain themselves from posting on it.

But even if just those most active users posting on THIS thread were to agree to have ONE thread that they do not interfere with.

"How would the 99.75% read the posts of the four excluded members?"

There would be only one thread where they would NOT be able to read them.

If the 99.75% want to read the posts of the most active four members, it is pretty difficult to avoid them.

They dominate EVERY thread.

And there have been years of data that show how few other members find it to be a discussion they choose to participate in.

This year alone, several of the newest members attempted to participate actively.

Ironically, they were all climate "skeptics", quite willing to go along with the disdain for all who accept the scientific consensus.

But they weren't willing to go far enough.

They wouldn't provide unambiguous definitions for terms such as "fossil fuel".

They didn't believe in anthropogenic climate change.

But they weren't even supposed to believe in climate.

How about just ONE thread for those who believe that climate is real?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:A quick glance at the "most active users" list reveals that only 1% of the 1659 members have posted more than 1300 times.

You are completely omitting all of the members who only want to read posts but not post anything themselves.

Im a BM wrote:What if there were even just ONE thread for the other 99%?

They have all of the threads already.

Im a BM wrote:What if the other 99% had even just ONE thread where the 1% leave them alone?

Why would they look to read posts where there aren't any?

Im a BM wrote: Just ONE thread where they won't have to read comments like, "you are a moron."

Who would erase those comments? Censors?

Im a BM wrote: A thread for the 99.75% would only exclude four members.

How would the 99.75% read the posts of the four excluded members?

Im a BM wrote:
A list of the most active users reveals that only 10 members have posted more than 2500 times.

Some of those ten haven't posted in years.

I propose an experiment:

A thread called "For members with fewer than 2500 posts"

Those with more than 2500 posts have hundreds of other threads to post on.

The thread may get no takers.

It certainly will not attract anyone new if the ten most active users post there.

It would only work if the handful of most active users voluntarily restrain themselves from posting on it.

But even if just those most active users posting on THIS thread were to agree to have ONE thread that they do not interfere with.

"How would the 99.75% read the posts of the four excluded members?"

There would be only one thread where they would NOT be able to read them.

If the 99.75% want to read the posts of the most active four members, it is pretty difficult to avoid them.

They dominate EVERY thread.

And there have been years of data that show how few other members find it to be a discussion they choose to participate in.

This year alone, several of the newest members attempted to participate actively.

Ironically, they were all climate "skeptics", quite willing to go along with the disdain for all who accept the scientific consensus.

But they weren't willing to go far enough.

They wouldn't provide unambiguous definitions for terms such as "fossil fuel".

They didn't believe in anthropogenic climate change.

But they weren't even supposed to believe in climate.

How about just ONE thread for those who believe that climate is real?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:A quick glance at the "most active users" list reveals that only 1% of the 1659 members have posted more than 1300 times.

You are completely omitting all of the members who only want to read posts but not post anything themselves.

Im a BM wrote:What if there were even just ONE thread for the other 99%?

They have all of the threads already.

Im a BM wrote:What if the other 99% had even just ONE thread where the 1% leave them alone?

Why would they look to read posts where there aren't any?

Im a BM wrote: Just ONE thread where they won't have to read comments like, "you are a moron."

Who would erase those comments? Censors?

Im a BM wrote: A thread for the 99.75% would only exclude four members.

How would the 99.75% read the posts of the four excluded members?

HarveyH55 wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
A list of the most active users reveals that only 10 members have posted more than 2500 times.

Some of those ten haven't posted in years.

I propose an experiment:

A thread called "For members with fewer than 2500 posts"

Those with more than 2500 posts have hundreds of other threads to post on.

The thread may get no takers.

It certainly will not attract anyone new if the ten most active users post there.

It would only work if the handful of most active users voluntarily restrain themselves from posting on it.

But even if just those most active users posting on THIS thread were to agree to have ONE thread that they do not interfere with.

"How would the 99.75% read the posts of the four excluded members?"

There would be only one thread where they would NOT be able to read them.

If the 99.75% want to read the posts of the most active four members, it is pretty difficult to avoid them.

They dominate EVERY thread.

And there have been years of data that show how few other members find it to be a discussion they choose to participate in.

This year alone, several of the newest members attempted to participate actively.

Ironically, they were all climate "skeptics", quite willing to go along with the disdain for all who accept the scientific consensus.

But they weren't willing to go far enough.

They wouldn't provide unambiguous definitions for terms such as "fossil fuel".

They didn't believe in anthropogenic climate change.

But they weren't even supposed to believe in climate.

How about just ONE thread for those who believe that climate is real?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:A quick glance at the "most active users" list reveals that only 1% of the 1659 members have posted more than 1300 times.

You are completely omitting all of the members who only want to read posts but not post anything themselves.

Im a BM wrote:What if there were even just ONE thread for the other 99%?

They have all of the threads already.

Im a BM wrote:What if the other 99% had even just ONE thread where the 1% leave them alone?

Why would they look to read posts where there aren't any?

Im a BM wrote: Just ONE thread where they won't have to read comments like, "you are a moron."

Who would erase those comments? Censors?

Im a BM wrote: A thread for the 99.75% would only exclude four members.

How would the 99.75% read the posts of the four excluded members?

You could always start your own website, if this one, or any other doesn't fit your wants and needs. We often do get threads, where only the person who started it, was the only person who started it, posted... Would be odd to start a thread actually related to climate-debate, but reject any who would debate.

I do agree that the amphibious 'fossil-fuels' crap is annoying. The term has been used over 50 years. Stubborn refusal to acknowledge a long accept label, simply because it's not philosophically-correct is childish. It's a label, doesn't necessarily need to be accurate.

The concept of a 'global-climate' is idiotic. Average doesn't apply, since there are several areas on this planet, that never, ever share similar conditions. What areas roughly conform to the 'average-global-climate'? Average global temperature is equally pointless, other than for politics. sounds impressive, but doesn't actually mean much in the real world.