Climate change violates the laws of thermodenial

Im a BM wrote:
"Climate cannot change"

If you never visited this website before, you might not realize that it is a "scientific" fact that "climate cannot change."

The local trolls have proved, time and time again, beyond any reasonable doubt, that "climate cannot change".

Because for climate to change would violate the laws of thermodenial.

There has been NO significant increase in the average temperature of Earth's air, sea, or soil.

The laws of thermodenial make it possible for air to hold a lot more water vapor at the same temperature as before.

The laws of thermodenial make it possible for ice to melt at a lower temperature than before.

Because there is NO WAY that average temperatures of air, sea, or soil could possibly have increased.

It would violate the laws of thermodenial.

Im a BM wrote:
1st Law of Thermodenial:

Any and all evidence of climate change must be ignored, denied, belittled, dismissed, and rejected.


2nd Law of Thermodenial:

Make frequent, vague references to the laws of thermodynamics, without concern for what those laws might actually mean. Use those references as the "scientific" basis for ignoring, denying, belittling, dismissing, and rejecting any and all evidence of climate change.

Im a BM wrote:
"Climate cannot change"

If you never visited this website before, you might not realize that it is a "scientific" fact that "climate cannot change."

The local trolls have proved, time and time again, beyond any reasonable doubt, that "climate cannot change".

Because for climate to change would violate the laws of thermodenial.

There has been NO significant increase in the average temperature of Earth's air, sea, or soil.

The laws of thermodenial make it possible for air to hold a lot more water vapor at the same temperature as before.

The laws of thermodenial make it possible for ice to melt at a lower temperature than before.

Because there is NO WAY that average temperatures of air, sea, or soil could possibly have increased.

It would violate the laws of thermodenial.

Im a BM wrote:


Any and all evidence of climate change must be ignored, denied, belittled, dismissed, and rejected.

Im a BM wrote:
2nd Law of Thermodenial:
Make frequent, vague references to the laws of thermodynamics,

Im a BM wrote:
Confession: I had pretty much stopped reading the troll posts.

Im a BM wrote:
without concern for what those laws might actually mean.

Im a BM wrote:
[b]1st Law of Thermodenial:

Any and all evidence of climate change must be ignored, denied, belittled, dismissed, and rejected.

sealover wrote:
GREENHOUSE GAS RANK ORDER FOR GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL

sealover wrote:
The four most important greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, in order of abundance, are water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide.

sealover wrote:
Fortunately, this is the OPPOSITE rank order of their global warming potential, on a molecule per molecule basis.

sealover wrote:
water << carbon dioxide << methane << nitrous oxide.

Objective analysis reveals differential capacity to absorb infrared radiation among the four different gases. It can be measured very precisely.

sealover wrote:
For the underlying discussion, the null hypothesis is that there has been NO significant increase in average temperatures of the air, sea, or soil.

sealover wrote:
In which case, the deep melting of permafrost,

sealover wrote:
loss of glaciers

sealover wrote:
and sea ice,

sealover wrote:
etc., has somehow occurred without it having gotten any warmer.

sealover wrote:
On the other hand, it is NOT pure coincidence that the global changes

sealover wrote:
observed have happened precisely when human activity has increased the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

sealover wrote:
Without having to radically revise the laws of thermodynamics, this is perfectly consistent with the fact that temperatures DID increase in the air, sea, and soil.

sealover wrote:
The same argument holds for the vapor pressure of water in relation to temperature and the objectively measured significant increase in the concentration of water vapor in the atmosphere.

sealover wrote:
Simply admitting that it really IS getting warmer,

sealover wrote:
and acknowledging the reality of physical properties of greenhouse gases,

sealover wrote:
the physics makes perfect sense again.

sealover wrote:


1st Law of Thermodenial:

Any and all evidence of climate change must be ignored, denied, belittled, dismissed, and rejected.

[b]sealover wrote:

2nd Law of Thermodenial:

Make frequent, vague references to the laws of thermodynamics, without concern for what those laws might actually mean.

sealover wrote:
Use those references as the "scientific" basis

sealover wrote:
for ignoring, denying, belittling, dismissing, and rejecting any and all evidence of climate change.

sealover wrote:

3rd Law of Thermodenial:

Be sure to make it personal. Any and all persons who present evidence of climate change must be belittled, insulted, and falsely accused of being liars. They must be reminded that they are scientifically illiterate morons who are gullible enough to serve the evil agenda of Marxist masters who seek to harm humanity[/b]

sealover wrote: The four most important greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, in order of abundance, are water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide.

Fortunately, this is the OPPOSITE rank order of their global warming potential, on a molecule per molecule basis.

Im a BM wrote: 1st Law of Thermodenial: Any and all evidence of climate change must be ignored, denied, belittled, dismissed, and rejected.

Im a BM wrote: 2nd Law of Thermodenial: Make frequent, vague references to the laws of thermodynamics, without concern for what those laws might actually mean. Use those references as the "scientific" basis for ignoring, denying, belittling, dismissing, and rejecting any and all evidence of climate change.

Im a BM wrote: 3rd Law of Thermodenial: Be sure to make it personal. Any and all persons who present evidence of climate change must be belittled, insulted, and falsely accused of being liars. They must be reminded that they are scientifically illiterate morons who are gullible enough to serve the evil agenda of Marxist masters who seek to harm humanity

Im a BM wrote: Most WACKY religious cults have some kind of rigid dogma of required belief.

Im a BM wrote: The Church of Thermodenial has a rigid dogma of required DISbelief.

keepit wrote: ibd, Sarcasm and snide remarks are no substitute for good science.

keepit wrote: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Into the Night wrote:
Stop spamming.

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
Stop spamming.

Let us examine the thermodynamic implications of the Global Warming "hoax".
...deleted remaining spam...

Im a BM wrote: 1st Law of Thermodenial:

Im a BM wrote: Biogeochemistry is an important field of science that came of age in the 1980s.

Im a BM wrote: The sentence, "There is no such thing as biogeochemistry" has been published here in more than 100 different posts by Into the Night and IBdaMann.

Im a BM wrote: But it finally makes sense, as explained by IBdaMann on the "Is promoting the use of seaweed..." thread.

Im a BM wrote: The word "thing" is very rigidly defined to include only material objects or substances.

Im a BM wrote: [ couple of pages of spam deleted ]

keepit wrote: Biochemistry plus geochemistry equals biogeochemistry. Admittedly it's a simplistic comment but still...

keepit wrote:I read books. That's how i know.

keepit wrote: ibd, is your education from a different time and a different place than the usa.

keepit wrote:ibd, Doesn't seem global and timeless.

keepit wrote:
ibd,
you live in a strange world.

you ought to evaluate your obsession with punctuation importance relative to grammar importance. for example, neither are as important as content.

keepit wrote: itn, i don't have a clue what you're talking about.

keepit wrote: ibd, try to stick to reality.