Climate change violates the laws of thermodenial

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > Climate change violates the laws of thermodenial > Page 2

Page 2 of 2

26-06-2024 20:15
keepit ★★★★★ (3330)	ibd, Name one or maybe a few. Opinion differences don't count.
26-06-2024 22:48
Into the Night★★★★★ (22614)	keepit wrote: ibd, Name one or maybe a few. RQAA. Stop playing dumb, keepit. (Well...dumber than usual!) The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 26-06-2024 22:49
27-06-2024 06:35
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14885)	keepit wrote: ibd, Name one or maybe a few. Fine. I name the 27th one "Steve."
15-07-2024 19:13
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1270)	1st Law of Thermodenial: Any and all evidence of climate change must be ignored, denied, belittled, dismissed, and rejected. 2nd Law of Thermodenial: Make frequent, vague references to the laws of thermodynamics, without concern for what those laws might actually mean. Use those references as the "scientific" basis for ignoring, denying, belittling, dismissing, and rejecting any and all evidence of climate change. 3rd Law of Thermodenial: Be sure to make it personal. Any and all persons who present evidence of climate change must be belittled, insulted, and falsely accused of being liars. They must be reminded that they are scientifically illiterate morons who are gullible enough to serve the evil agenda of Marxist masters who seek to harm humanity THE RIGID ANTI SCIENTIFIC DOGMA OF THE CHURCH OF THERMODENIAL Most WACKY religious cults have some kind of rigid dogma of required belief. The Church of Thermodenial has a rigid dogma of required DISbelief. The Commandments of No Such Thing is a long list of inconvenient truths that one must REFUSE TO BELIEVE. THERE IS NO SUCH THING as Climate change Global warming Fossil fuel Greenhouse gases Greenhouse effect But the list of "buzzwords" goes on and on... Alkalinity Organic carbon Organic nitrogen Biogeochemistry Oxidation in chemistry Sulfate reduction Nitrate reduction Metal complexing organic acids... There is no need to study any science at all to be a devoted follower in the Church of Thermodenial. One just needs to refuse to believe the scientists and learn what science is NOT. "There is no such thing as..." is how many thermodenial sentences begin. Refuse to believe, refuse to believe, refuse to believe, and it will go away.
16-07-2024 00:57
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14885)	Im a BM wrote: [b]1st Law of Thermodenial: Great ... the spam continues.

08-09-2024 22:54
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1270)	Does ocean "acidification" violate the laws of thermodenial? YES, it does! WHY? Allow me to quote the senior troll: "Also, the ocean's alkalinity comes from natural erosion, of which the 2nd law of thermodynamics guarantees us that the earth will always have plenty to keep the ocean very alkaline." Some might foolishly question whether or not the ocean is "very alkaline". Some applications of chemistry might even classify the ocean's pH as "circumneutral" because it is so close to 7.0 At pH 8.2, the sea is only a little to the alkaline side of neutral. Some might foolishly question whether or not EROSION is the source of alkalinity in the ocean. About 99% of the ocean's alkalinity is in the form of bicarbonate ions and carbonate ions. Some who pretend to be soil "scientists" might question whether or not erosion could possibly account for this. But thermodynamics controls erosion and erosion creates the "very alkaline" conditions of sea water. Therefore, ocean "acidification" violates the laws of thermodenial. Im a BM wrote: 1st Law of Thermodenial: Any and all evidence of climate change must be ignored, denied, belittled, dismissed, and rejected. 2nd Law of Thermodenial: Make frequent, vague references to the laws of thermodynamics, without concern for what those laws might actually mean. Use those references as the "scientific" basis for ignoring, denying, belittling, dismissing, and rejecting any and all evidence of climate change. 3rd Law of Thermodenial: Be sure to make it personal. Any and all persons who present evidence of climate change must be belittled, insulted, and falsely accused of being liars. They must be reminded that they are scientifically illiterate morons who are gullible enough to serve the evil agenda of Marxist masters who seek to harm humanity "Climate cannot change" If you never visited this website before, you might not realize that it is a "scientific" fact that "climate cannot change." The local trolls have proved, time and time again, beyond any reasonable doubt, that "climate cannot change". Because for climate to change would violate the laws of thermodenial. There has been NO significant increase in the average temperature of Earth's air, sea, or soil. The laws of thermodenial make it possible for air to hold a lot more water vapor at the same temperature as before. The laws of thermodenial make it possible for ice to melt at a lower temperature than before. Because there is NO WAY that average temperatures of air, sea, or soil could possibly have increased. It would violate the laws of thermodenial.
09-09-2024 01:13
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14885)	Im a BM wrote: Some might foolishly question whether or not the ocean is "very alkaline". Some applications of chemistry might even classify the ocean's pH as "circumneutral" because it is so close to 7.0 At pH 8.2, the sea is only a little to the alkaline side of neutral. I concede your point. I should not have referred to the ocean as "very alkaline" with a pH of ~8.2 . Im a BM wrote: Some might foolishly question whether or not EROSION is the source of alkalinity in the ocean. About 99% of the ocean's alkalinity is in the form of bicarbonate ions and carbonate ions. Yep. Erosion wears away rocks and minerals which end up in the ocean. Im a BM wrote: Some who pretend to be soil "scientists" might question whether or not erosion could possibly account for this. Some who pretend to be soil scientists can begin by showing how it can't. Im a BM wrote: Therefore, ocean "acidification" violates the laws of thermodenial. Your postulate of "alkalinity depletion" is false. Your "solutions" to the nonexistent "problem" don't solve any existing problems.
10-09-2024 22:38
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1270)	I FORGOT TO PROVIDE AN UNAMBIGUOUS DEFINITION FOR "THERMODENIAL" When introducing a term into discussion for the first time, it is important to make it clear what the word is intended to mean. This is NOT the case for using a term that is already so widely understood, any educated person already knows what it means when they see it, hear it, write it, or read it. For example, if the thread title were "Climate Change Violates the Laws of Thermodynamics", there would be no need to provide a definition for anything. Educated people already know what "thermodynamics" means. Educated people already know what "climate change" means. But I brought in a NEW term, and I really should have offered a clear definition. Thermodenial = Thermo + denial Thermo = related to heat, temperature, warming Denial = refusal to acknowledge a fact Thermodenial = refusal to acknowledge facts related to heat, temperature, and warming. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Does ocean "acidification" violate the laws of thermodenial? YES, it does! WHY? Allow me to quote the senior troll: "Also, the ocean's alkalinity comes from natural erosion, of which the 2nd law of thermodynamics guarantees us that the earth will always have plenty to keep the ocean very alkaline." Some might foolishly question whether or not the ocean is "very alkaline". Some applications of chemistry might even classify the ocean's pH as "circumneutral" because it is so close to 7.0 At pH 8.2, the sea is only a little to the alkaline side of neutral. Some might foolishly question whether or not EROSION is the source of alkalinity in the ocean. About 99% of the ocean's alkalinity is in the form of bicarbonate ions and carbonate ions. Some who pretend to be soil "scientists" might question whether or not erosion could possibly account for this. But thermodynamics controls erosion and erosion creates the "very alkaline" conditions of sea water. Therefore, ocean "acidification" violates the laws of thermodenial. Im a BM wrote: 1st Law of Thermodenial: Any and all evidence of climate change must be ignored, denied, belittled, dismissed, and rejected. 2nd Law of Thermodenial: Make frequent, vague references to the laws of thermodynamics, without concern for what those laws might actually mean. Use those references as the "scientific" basis for ignoring, denying, belittling, dismissing, and rejecting any and all evidence of climate change. 3rd Law of Thermodenial: Be sure to make it personal. Any and all persons who present evidence of climate change must be belittled, insulted, and falsely accused of being liars. They must be reminded that they are scientifically illiterate morons who are gullible enough to serve the evil agenda of Marxist masters who seek to harm humanity "Climate cannot change" If you never visited this website before, you might not realize that it is a "scientific" fact that "climate cannot change." The local trolls have proved, time and time again, beyond any reasonable doubt, that "climate cannot change". Because for climate to change would violate the laws of thermodenial. There has been NO significant increase in the average temperature of Earth's air, sea, or soil. The laws of thermodenial make it possible for air to hold a lot more water vapor at the same temperature as before. The laws of thermodenial make it possible for ice to melt at a lower temperature than before. Because there is NO WAY that average temperatures of air, sea, or soil could possibly have increased. It would violate the laws of thermodenial. [/quote]
11-09-2024 03:45
Into the Night★★★★★ (22614)	Im a BM wrote: I FORGOT TO PROVIDE AN UNAMBIGUOUS DEFINITION FOR "THERMODENIAL" ... Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. No argument presented. Most of the spam is deleted. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
12-09-2024 22:31
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1270)	Into the Night wrote: Im a BM wrote: I FORGOT TO PROVIDE AN UNAMBIGUOUS DEFINITION FOR "THERMODENIAL" ... Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. No argument presented. Most of the spam is deleted. Please provide an unambiguous definition for the term "spam". If you know that you can't possibly dazzle them with your brilliance, try to just baffle them with your bullshit.
13-09-2024 02:53
Into the Night★★★★★ (22614)	Im a BM wrote: Please provide an unambiguous definition for the term "spam". 1) A meat product produced by the Hormel company. Popular in Hawaii, especially on sushi. 2) Flooding media (typically phone or social media) with incessant unwanted ads. Most phone providers have mechanisms to limit this type of spam. 3) Colloquial term for an internet user that posts copies of their own posts, often lengthy, somewhat in the manner of definition (2). Cross post copying is also known as "spamming across threads" or "cross posting". Most forums discourage this practice, including climate-debate.com, and have in the past banned users for this practice. Both definitions (2) and (3) stem from an episode of Monty Python's Flying Circus. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 13-09-2024 02:57

Page 2 of 2

Join the debate Climate change violates the laws of thermodenial:

Threads	Replies	Last post
The Church of Thermodenial - DEFINE YOUR TERMS!	30	23-09-2024 00:57
Greenwashing laws	10	12-10-2023 19:56
Greenwashing laws	1	10-10-2023 03:41
New California Laws	1	13-10-2019 21:01
Greenhouse gas hypothesis violates Law of Conservation of Energy	2	18-03-2019 18:56