Climate Change is Dead

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:Google say: "IBdaMann is a pseudonymous online commenter and forum participant active in internet discussion boards, climate change blogs, and debate spaces (such as climate-debate.com and general forums. Known for persistent contrarian commentary opposing mainstream climate science, IBdaMann typically characterizes standard scientific consensus as unfalsifiable belief or 'religion' rather than empirical science.

blah blah blah

Style: Engages in adversarial, repetitive back-and-forth arguments with proponents of mainstream climate science, often labeled by opponents as a persistent forum troll."

Interesting! When did Google adopt your writing style, your diction and your tone of voice?

Im a BM wrote:
Yes, you finally figured it out!

Of course, you did due diligence and made the same inquiry of Google.

You saw that Google and I used the same words.

Now you know why Google keeps LYING about chemistry!

It's ME! I'm the one who controls Google and tells it which LIES to say.

I made up a horrible, vicious LIE that IBdaMann was some kind of ugly troll, actually an "abusive troll fraud" who "drives the discussion into the muck.."

Then I programmed Google to repeat that lie for anyone who inquires about what sort of reputation, after more than a dozen years of trolling, IBdaMann has earned with his participation in internet discussion sites.

If you ask Google, "Why do so many people at climate discussion websites hate the internet troll known as 'IBdaMann'?"

Well, I programmed Google to tell some horrible lies about the guy.

Im a BM wrote:
Such as "People dislike internet commenters or trolls like IBdaMann on climate forums because they repeatedly dismiss mainstream scientific consensus as a rigid 'religion' or dogma rather than engaging in good-faith, evidence-based discussion."

Im a BM wrote:
Yes, Google adopted my writing style, my diction, and my tone of voice because I am the HEAD COMMUNIST at Google! I tell Google what to say.

Don't believe me?

I told Google to LIE that "Yes, soil does have pH." Google does what I tell it to.

Here is just a partial list of LIES that I have PERSONALLY programmed Google to repeat:

Im a BM wrote:
* Dilution is NOT a mechanism of pH buffering

* Climate CAN change

* Petroleum, coal, and buried natural gas deposits DID form from organic carbon formerly contained in ancient living organisms.

* Soil DOES have pH

* the sea's "carbonate system" of pH buffering DOES exist

* it IS possible to measure the pH of sea water

* there IS such a thing as organic carbon

* there IS such a thing as biogeochemistry

and the list goes on and on of all the LIES that I, as the HEAD COMMUNIST at Google, have programmed into the system

I didn't like the way the AI was imitating my tone of voice, so I bypassed it to just use MY words exactly as I have programmed them. My crappy writing style and diction are programmed into the system now.

For I so loved the world that I gave my only begotten AI child, that whosoever believeth should not publish but have everlasting lies. In my own writing style, diction, and tone of voice!

IBdaMann wrote:
The Climate Change religion has gone the way of many others, and is no more.

This is what happens when a religious dogma insists on a core belief that is both a logical contradiction and a violation of science.

This is what happens when a doomsday cult promises the world will end in a given time frame, and then keeps pushing the date back when the world does not end.

This is what happens when a religion insists that science can be routinely violated.

What's the next religion to appeal to the feeble-minded?


[*-ClimateChangeIsDead]

Im a BM and sealover and Patricio wrote:
So, why is nobody talking about climate change anymore?

Im a BM and sealover and Patricio wrote:
Since that question included a false assumption, here is a more honest one:

Why is nobody talking about climate change anymore at climate-debate.com?

Im a BM and sealover and Patricio wrote:
Is it because the WACKY religion has been defeated in some way?

Google offers some insight:

The following quote is the last paragraph of Google's answer to the inquiry: "Why is the internet persona known as 'Into the Night' considered to be a troll at climate discussion websites?"

Im a BM and sealover and Patricio wrote:
...deleted remaining spam and whining...
Nobody is talking about climate change because the topic was trolled to death.

Im a BM wrote:So, why is nobody talking about climate change anymore?

Im a BM wrote:Since that question included a false assumption,

Im a BM wrote:Is it because the WACKY religion has been defeated in some way?

Im a BM wrote:Of course, we all know that science is NOT a "textbook"!

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:Google say: "IBdaMann is a pseudonymous online commenter and forum participant active in internet discussion boards, climate change blogs, and debate spaces (such as climate-debate.com and general forums. Known for persistent contrarian commentary opposing mainstream climate science, IBdaMann typically characterizes standard scientific consensus as unfalsifiable belief or 'religion' rather than empirical science.

blah blah blah

Style: Engages in adversarial, repetitive back-and-forth arguments with proponents of mainstream climate science, often labeled by opponents as a persistent forum troll."

Interesting! When did Google adopt your writing style, your diction and your tone of voice?

IBdaMann wrote:
The Climate Change religion has gone the way of many others, and is no more.

This is what happens when a religious dogma insists on a core belief that is both a logical contradiction and a violation of science.

This is what happens when a doomsday cult promises the world will end in a given time frame, and then keeps pushing the date back when the world does not end.

This is what happens when a religion insists that science can be routinely violated.

What's the next religion to appeal to the feeble-minded?


[*-ClimateChangeIsDead]

Im a BM wrote:
...deleted spam and whining...

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
...deleted spam and whining...

Stop spamming.

Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night, you came here about ELEVEN YEARS AGO to preach a WACKY religion based purely on FAITH, with no evidence of any kind to support it.

Im a BM wrote:
Your redefinition of the laws of thermodynamics may be enough to satisfy your personal requirements, but they don't stand up to actual scientific scrutiny.

Im a BM wrote:
You insist, literally THOUSANDS of times, that anthropogenic climate change is IMPOSSIBLE because "Climate cannot change" by ANY mechanism.

Im a BM wrote:
The burden of proof for this truly extraordinary contrarian assertion falls squarely on the individual who insists that the entire scientific community is WRONG about the most basic understandings of physics and chemistry.

Im a BM wrote:
You can repeat your stupid mantras, of LIE that you somehow explained your position in the past by ignoring all questions and simply posting "RQAA".

Im a BM wrote:
If someone is willing to go through more than 24,000 of your STUPID posts, you assure us that SOMEWHERE among them you actually once addressed the question. It would be far too much work to scratch out a new sentence to repeat some version of that explanation.