Climate change in green land

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > Climate change in green land > Page 2

Page 2 of 2

2

03-04-2020 23:24
Tim the plumber ★★★★☆ (1356)	James___ wrote: Tim the plumber wrote: James___ wrote: Tim the plumber wrote: To get a single 1mm rise in sea level you need 361 Gt of land ice to melt. That is 361 cubic kilometers, well a little more but close enough. [/color] Why I mentioned the graph about sea level. It agreed until about 1950 with global warming. Harvey and Duncan missed that and basically everyone else. Also, air pressure is not based on air pressure. Easy enough to understand if you know the history of science. But it seems people don't know anything before WW II. I think that's when real science was last accomplished. After that, it became commercialized. Well that has lost me. I can measure air pressure, using either mercury or water. Mecury is easier if you can get it but water will do, just need a 34 foot height to work with. If you do that with water, then you'll see the problem. Well, the evaportaion will cause a gas to form, steam, above the water and you will have it never get to the 10m it is supposed to but.... You could easily put a pressure guage on the top of it and draw a graph using the data untill it gets close to zero.
03-04-2020 23:38
James___ ★★★★★ (5513)	Tim the plumber wrote: James___ wrote: Tim the plumber wrote: James___ wrote: Tim the plumber wrote: To get a single 1mm rise in sea level you need 361 Gt of land ice to melt. That is 361 cubic kilometers, well a little more but close enough. [/color] Why I mentioned the graph about sea level. It agreed until about 1950 with global warming. Harvey and Duncan missed that and basically everyone else. Also, air pressure is not based on air pressure. Easy enough to understand if you know the history of science. But it seems people don't know anything before WW II. I think that's when real science was last accomplished. After that, it became commercialized. Well that has lost me. I can measure air pressure, using either mercury or water. Mecury is easier if you can get it but water will do, just need a 34 foot height to work with. If you do that with water, then you'll see the problem. Well, the evaportaion will cause a gas to form, steam, above the water and you will have it never get to the 10m it is supposed to but.... You could easily put a pressure guage on the top of it and draw a graph using the data untill it gets close to zero. I apparently was editing my last post while you were answering it. The internet does allow for it. Unfortunately, sometimes for me to think through what I am posting I will do several edits. I now I create a hazard in that respect but in some ways this is a sounding board. It should give us a pause to consider our thoughts.
04-04-2020 00:41
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14389)	James___ wrote: 32.18504 = 9.81 m/s or meters. Gravity accelerates at 9.81 m/s. It's 9.81 m/s^2 . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist

Page 2 of 2

2

Join the debate Climate change in green land:

Related content

Threads	Replies	Last post
Green Hydrogen	61	15-09-2023 22:36
This is How the European Commission Classifies Nuclear Energy and Gas to Be 'Green'	2	05-02-2022 04:07
The Great Economy Money Reset Will Kick Off With Various Numeral Systems Return Back To The Land	15	22-06-2021 20:06
I The Savior Messiah Buddha Reveal Two Working Solutions For Land Conflict Between Israel Palestine	20	21-02-2021 19:16
Going "Green"	166	08-02-2021 00:40

▲ Top of page

Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact