China's clean coal policy does not regulate CO2, because it's not considered a pollutant like in

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > China's clean coal policy does not regulate CO2, because it's not considered a pollutant like in

China's clean coal policy does not regulate CO2, because it's not considered a pollutant like in the U25-02-2019 18:38
Tai Hai Chen ★★★★☆ (1085)	when Obama added it to the list in 2009, so why should the US waste money controlling CO2 when China won't? China is largest clean coal power producer https://www.cips.org/en/supply-management/news/2019/february/china-is-largest-clean-coal-power-producer/
25-02-2019 21:05
Wake ★★★★★ (4031)	Tai Hai Chen wrote: when Obama added it to the list in 2009, so why should the US waste money controlling CO2 when China won't? China is largest clean coal power producer https://www.cips.org/en/supply-management/news/2019/february/china-is-largest-clean-coal-power-producer/ This is much easier if you have a lot of Anthracite. This is much more clean burning than Bitumen. The US doesn't have a lot of Anthracite but stack scrubbers and the like can make coal a cheaper and more efficient and relatively clean source of power. So it is not a good idea for anyone to accept China's NEA as a source of really accurate information on coal power because that can change overnight with the closing of Anthracite mines.
25-02-2019 23:28
Into the Night★★★★★ (15455)	Tai Hai Chen wrote: when Obama added it to the list in 2009, so why should the US waste money controlling CO2 when China won't? China is largest clean coal power producer https://www.cips.org/en/supply-management/news/2019/february/china-is-largest-clean-coal-power-producer/ There is no need to control CO2. CO2 is a naturally occurring gas in the atmosphere. It is not capable of warming the Earth. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
25-02-2019 23:32
Into the Night★★★★★ (15455)	Wake wrote: Tai Hai Chen wrote: when Obama added it to the list in 2009, so why should the US waste money controlling CO2 when China won't? China is largest clean coal power producer https://www.cips.org/en/supply-management/news/2019/february/china-is-largest-clean-coal-power-producer/ This is much easier if you have a lot of Anthracite. This is much more clean burning than Bitumen. The US doesn't have a lot of Anthracite but stack scrubbers and the like can make coal a cheaper and more efficient and relatively clean source of power. Anthracite and Bitumen coal burn the same way, Wake. They are both carbon. They both burn just as cleanly in modern coal burning facilities. Wake wrote: So it is not a good idea for anyone to accept China's NEA as a source of really accurate information on coal power It's not a good idea because it's Chinese government propaganda. Wake wrote: because that can change overnight with the closing of Anthracite mines. No difference, Wake. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

Join the debate China's clean coal policy does not regulate CO2, because it's not considered a pollutant like in :

Threads	Replies	Last post
ppm CO2 in atmosphere	33	12-03-2021 02:47
could we slow co2 release in enviornment by engineering a virus to kill wood eating bacteria?	26	05-03-2021 23:24
CO2 monitors can help prevent the spread of COVID-19, experts say	15	24-02-2021 18:04
CO2 ocean uptake	306	22-02-2021 04:08
Can CO2 capture be a starter for geothermal energy?	20	17-02-2021 01:49