Remember me
▼ Content

CAGW funded by big agriculture industry?


CAGW funded by big agriculture industry?29-03-2019 14:15
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1036)
Let's say they lobby government to spend quadrillions of USD building hundreds of thousands of air CO2 capture factories and hundreds of thousands of offshore wind farms to power them, and put CO2 under ground so CO2 is 100 ppm in air. No vegetation would grow on land except in industrial greenhouses where they use CO2 concentration thousands of PPM to grow food. This make the rest of society depend on them for food production. Profit?
29-03-2019 19:12
Wake
★★★★★
(4026)
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
Let's say they lobby government to spend quadrillions of USD building hundreds of thousands of air CO2 capture factories and hundreds of thousands of offshore wind farms to power them, and put CO2 under ground so CO2 is 100 ppm in air. No vegetation would grow on land except in industrial greenhouses where they use CO2 concentration thousands of PPM to grow food. This make the rest of society depend on them for food production. Profit?


Exactly who do you believe would fund this?
29-03-2019 19:14
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1036)
Wake wrote:
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
Let's say they lobby government to spend quadrillions of USD building hundreds of thousands of air CO2 capture factories and hundreds of thousands of offshore wind farms to power them, and put CO2 under ground so CO2 is 100 ppm in air. No vegetation would grow on land except in industrial greenhouses where they use CO2 concentration thousands of PPM to grow food. This make the rest of society depend on them for food production. Profit?


Exactly who do you believe would fund this?


Who else other than taxpayers can pocket quadrillions of USD?
29-03-2019 19:30
Wake
★★★★★
(4026)
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
Wake wrote:
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
Let's say they lobby government to spend quadrillions of USD building hundreds of thousands of air CO2 capture factories and hundreds of thousands of offshore wind farms to power them, and put CO2 under ground so CO2 is 100 ppm in air. No vegetation would grow on land except in industrial greenhouses where they use CO2 concentration thousands of PPM to grow food. This make the rest of society depend on them for food production. Profit?


Exactly who do you believe would fund this?


Who else other than taxpayers can pocket quadrillions of USD?


This can only occur if the Congress approves such an expenditure. With a conservative government with a proper outlook to science rather than the silliness that would never happen.
31-03-2019 18:18
HarveyH55
★★★☆☆
(717)
Wake wrote:
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
Wake wrote:
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
Let's say they lobby government to spend quadrillions of USD building hundreds of thousands of air CO2 capture factories and hundreds of thousands of offshore wind farms to power them, and put CO2 under ground so CO2 is 100 ppm in air. No vegetation would grow on land except in industrial greenhouses where they use CO2 concentration thousands of PPM to grow food. This make the rest of society depend on them for food production. Profit?


Exactly who do you believe would fund this?


Who else other than taxpayers can pocket quadrillions of USD?


This can only occur if the Congress approves such an expenditure. With a conservative government with a proper outlook to science rather than the silliness that would never happen.


Unfortunately, ours isn't so conservative anymore, and looking like acting silly is the thing these days. Only hope, is that Trump has just been giving the Green Party plenty of rope to play with, so they show their cards. Then gets down to business, and cleans up the mess, we call government these days. They are obviously a little concerned, and their priority is still investigations into Trump, trying to find some nugget that will take him out. If the Clintons couldn't find anything, Mueller could find anything, there probably isn't anything there.
01-04-2019 20:05
Wake
★★★★★
(4026)
There is nothing there concerning Trump and never was. Mueller should presently be in custody and awaiting trial with no bond possible.

The Greenies are dying on the hoof. The only reason that the rest of the world was supporting this climate change crap is because it only affected the US giving them an economic advantage. What they forgot was that the USA made these changes so rapidly that they gained little advantage and now their economies cannot move rapid enough to make the changes that they have to make because of pollution and smog.

So we are seeing many countries dropping out of the UN climate deals. This means that the UN and its dreams of world domination are disappearing faster than the politicians there can stand it. I suppose we can expect even more dire threats from the IPCC as more and more world wide scientists are proclaiming it poppycock.




Join the debate CAGW funded by big agriculture industry?:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
UK talks big on Climate Change, but will they do it?903-05-2019 11:36
Carbon tax killed auto industry in Ontario. Good thing for China. So who paid them?120-04-2019 00:00
Rising CO2 on declining nutrition in food is big issue, TED talk hears019-04-2019 15:32
Climate change: 'Magic bullet' carbon solution takes big step003-04-2019 19:39
Here's how climate change is impacting the ski industry1023-03-2019 18:36
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact