|Burning fossil fuel reduce O2 and increase CO2 and CO2 is a cooling gas so why20-06-2019 02:41|
|Tai Hai Chen★★★★☆
|wouldn't that cause global cooling?|
|no it would, no it wouldnt, it would, it wouldnt, it would every third sunday in april, nah it wouldnt,would< ------ > wouldnt, ****ed<------->not ****ed, which is it? stay tuned to find out.|
|0.04% of ht 260 billion cubic miles of atmosphere is insignificant. CO2 has no global warming effect, unless it creates an incredibly large quantity of energy, couldn't get that much from the sun. If CO2 has the special property of creating so much energy (which no other molecule no to man, can do), why aren't we using CO2, instead of burning fossil fuels, or throwing away AA batteries everyday? 0.04% of the atmosphere, makes it some what rare, and it's unique energy creating property, seems like it would be the focus of free-energy and perpetual motion schemes (scams). Obviously, CO2 has no special properties, and not even enough for use to get the full potential yields from our food crops. Reducing CO2 is such a bad idea. Less CO2, means less food, less people. We can ride out a few storms, beat the heat, but man, we really need to eat.|
Tai Hai Chen wrote:wouldn't that cause global cooling?
On the one hand, we have science that tells us why no atmospheric gas can change the earth's average global temperature, but ...
... you can certainly have fun referring to CO2 as the industrial refrigerant that it is, and watch warmizombies squirm in their complete inability to reconcile the truth with their religious dogma.
Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.
Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn
You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.
The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank
:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude
IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
|money is the cause of CO2 increase||9||18-09-2019 05:16|
|There is no valid physics that can show CO2 increases temperature||29||17-09-2019 22:35|
|If CO2 have higher temperature than O2 and N2 in the air?||3||17-09-2019 00:37|
|Bill Nye greenhouse gas experiment fail.||16||16-09-2019 15:51|
|Hold on. O2 and N2 do NOT absorb IR?||9||15-09-2019 22:15|