Bird bird bird bird is the word. Happy turkey day

Swan wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Gc4QTqslN4&list=RD9Gc4QTqslN4&start_radio=1

Swan wrote:
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

You still have not discovered what a molecule is. Gold is indeed a molecule AND an element.

IBdaMann never said the ice age never happened. He said you don't know if it happened or not...which is true. You can't go back in time to see if it actually happened.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

You still have not discovered what a molecule is. Gold is indeed a molecule AND an element.

IBdaMann never said the ice age never happened. He said you don't know if it happened or not...which is true. You can't go back in time to see if it actually happened.

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

You still have not discovered what a molecule is. Gold is indeed a molecule AND an element.

IBdaMann never said the ice age never happened. He said you don't know if it happened or not...which is true. You can't go back in time to see if it actually happened.

Into the Night might be an effective criminal defense attorney, if the judge and jury are "open minded" enough to understand the evidence.

Your honor, we don't KNOW if this crime really happened or not. None of us can go back in time to see if it actually happened. You didn't see it. I didn't see it. My client assures me that HE didn't see it.

With all due respect, your honor, I am not claiming that the crime never happened. I am just saying that there is NO WAY TO KNOW if the crime happened or not, because we were not there to see it. Case closed.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

You still have not discovered what a molecule is. Gold is indeed a molecule AND an element.

IBdaMann never said the ice age never happened. He said you don't know if it happened or not...which is true. You can't go back in time to see if it actually happened.

OKEEDOKEE Fred

Seriously you can do better, try not to post under the spell of turkey l tryptophan.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

You still have not discovered what a molecule is. Gold is indeed a molecule AND an element.

IBdaMann never said the ice age never happened. He said you don't know if it happened or not...which is true. You can't go back in time to see if it actually happened.

OKEEDOKEE Fred

Seriously you can do better, try not to post under the spell of turkey l tryptophan.

Still trying to deny molecules and elements. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Still trying to put words in people's mouths. Mantra 40a.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

You still have not discovered what a molecule is. Gold is indeed a molecule AND an element.

IBdaMann never said the ice age never happened. He said you don't know if it happened or not...which is true. You can't go back in time to see if it actually happened.

OKEEDOKEE Fred

Seriously you can do better, try not to post under the spell of turkey l tryptophan.

Still trying to deny molecules and elements. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Still trying to put words in people's mouths. Mantra 40a.

Molecules are not listed on the periodic table, only elements are listed there. As such Goud, or AU is an element.



Ypu may now resume stomping your feet

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

You still have not discovered what a molecule is. Gold is indeed a molecule AND an element.

IBdaMann never said the ice age never happened. He said you don't know if it happened or not...which is true. You can't go back in time to see if it actually happened.

OKEEDOKEE Fred

Seriously you can do better, try not to post under the spell of turkey l tryptophan.

Still trying to deny molecules and elements. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Still trying to put words in people's mouths. Mantra 40a.

Molecules are not listed on the periodic table, only elements are listed there. As such Goud, or AU is an element.



Ypu may now resume stomping your feet

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

You still have not discovered what a molecule is. Gold is indeed a molecule AND an element.

IBdaMann never said the ice age never happened. He said you don't know if it happened or not...which is true. You can't go back in time to see if it actually happened.

OKEEDOKEE Fred

Seriously you can do better, try not to post under the spell of turkey l tryptophan.

Still trying to deny molecules and elements. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Still trying to put words in people's mouths. Mantra 40a.

Molecules are not listed on the periodic table, only elements are listed there. As such Goud, or AU is an element.

Ypu may now resume stomping your feet

Every single element is also a molecule, moron.

Hydrogen typically is found as H2.
Carbon can bond with itself almost endlessly.
Metals form a crystal type structure. Gold also does this. So does silver and lead. Crystals of metals are ductile because of the 'sea' of shared electrons they have.
Oxygen is typically found as O2, sometimes O3 (ozone). These are different molecules of oxygen, and oxygen alone.

The word 'molecule' first entered the English lexicon from Latin around around the 1600's. Meaning 'mass' at first, then 'tiny mass'. It's most recent refinement of this word was "smallest part into which a substance can be divided without destroying its chemical character" by Avogadro in 1811.

ALL elements form molecules.
MANY elements can bond with themselves.

Im a BM wrote:


"IBdaMann AND Into the Night BOTH claim that gold is a molecule."

But then it would be two against one, which proves they are right

Pure gold (just Au atoms, no other elements) cannot form a molecule because a molecule requires two or more atoms bonded together in a discrete unit. In solid gold, the atoms are arranged in a metallic lattice, where each atom is connected to many others in a continuous network. That's a solid, not a molecule.
In short:
Gold metal (Au) → metallic lattice, not a molecule
Gold compounds (Au + other elements) → can form molecules

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

You still have not discovered what a molecule is. Gold is indeed a molecule AND an element.

IBdaMann never said the ice age never happened. He said you don't know if it happened or not...which is true. You can't go back in time to see if it actually happened.

OKEEDOKEE Fred

Seriously you can do better, try not to post under the spell of turkey l tryptophan.

Still trying to deny molecules and elements. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Still trying to put words in people's mouths. Mantra 40a.

Molecules are not listed on the periodic table, only elements are listed there. As such Goud, or AU is an element.

Ypu may now resume stomping your feet

Every single element is also a molecule, moron.

Hydrogen typically is found as H2.
Carbon can bond with itself almost endlessly.
Metals form a crystal type structure. Gold also does this. So does silver and lead. Crystals of metals are ductile because of the 'sea' of shared electrons they have.
Oxygen is typically found as O2, sometimes O3 (ozone). These are different molecules of oxygen, and oxygen alone.

The word 'molecule' first entered the English lexicon from Latin around around the 1600's. Meaning 'mass' at first, then 'tiny mass'. It's most recent refinement of this word was "smallest part into which a substance can be divided without destroying its chemical character" by Avogadro in 1811.

ALL elements form molecules.
MANY elements can bond with themselves.

"Every single element is also a molecule, moron." - Into the Night

Like those party balloons filled with helium "molecules".

Like that 1% of the atmosphere comprised of argon "molecules".

How about those neon "molecules" in the colored lamps?

Don't forget your radon "molecules".

Krypton doesn't want to be neglected, and xenon doesn't want to be left out.

All God's atoms are MOLECULES now!

Thank you for making this Royal Decree, Into the Night.

And it was a nice touch to finish the retarded statement with the word "moron".

Knowing that EVERY element is a molecule is the kind of thing you need a federal chemist "license" to become informed about.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.

You still have not discovered what a molecule is. Gold is indeed a molecule AND an element.

IBdaMann never said the ice age never happened. He said you don't know if it happened or not...which is true. You can't go back in time to see if it actually happened.

OKEEDOKEE Fred

Seriously you can do better, try not to post under the spell of turkey l tryptophan.

Still trying to deny molecules and elements. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Still trying to put words in people's mouths. Mantra 40a.

Molecules are not listed on the periodic table, only elements are listed there. As such Goud, or AU is an element.



Ypu may now resume stomping your feet

Every single element is also a molecule, moron.

Hydrogen typically is found as H2.
Carbon can bond with itself almost endlessly.
Metals form a crystal type structure. Gold also does this. So does silver and lead. Crystals of metals are ductile because of the 'sea' of shared electrons they have.
Oxygen is typically found as O2, sometimes O3 (ozone). These are different molecules of oxygen, and oxygen alone.

The word 'molecule' first entered the English lexicon from Latin around around the 1600's. Meaning 'mass' at first, then 'tiny mass'. It's most recent refinement of this word was "smallest part into which a substance can be divided without destroying its chemical character" by Avogadro in 1811.

ALL elements form molecules.
MANY elements can bond with themselves.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:


"IBdaMann AND Into the Night BOTH claim that gold is a molecule."

But then it would be two against one, which proves they are right

Now we have chatGPT (or other chat bots) which I assume is all scientific knowledge ascertained thus far...

Spongy Iris wrote:

Pure gold (just Au atoms, no other elements) cannot form a molecule because a molecule requires two or more atoms bonded together in a discrete unit. In solid gold, the atoms are arranged in a metallic lattice, where each atom is connected to many others in a continuous network. That's a solid, not a molecule.
In short:
Gold metal (Au) → metallic lattice, not a molecule
Gold compounds (Au + other elements) → can form molecules

Spongy Iris wrote:
So I guess gold cannot form a molecule with itself?

Spongy Iris wrote:
Perhaps Into the Night or IBdaMann can bring to light any instances where gold does form a molecule with itself, and disrupt the scientific conclusions gathered thus far?

Spongy Iris wrote:
No RQAA please, I'm not going to dig up post history, explain it like I'm a 6 year old, who has just met you.

Im a BM wrote:
Question for Google (aka God)

Is a helium atom also a molecule?

Google and God say: "No, a single helium (He) atom is not a molecule, but under certain conditions, it can form a 'diatomic molecule' of two helium atoms (He2)."

But Google doesn't have a federal chemist "license", so its just buzzwords.

The dictionaries and chemistry textbooks all agree and Into the Night is the odd one out on this one.

Everyone else (and of course I DO speak for EVERYONE) knows that a molecule has to contain more than one atom, attached to each other by CHEMICAL bonds.

I would understand this stuff so much more thoroughly if I had some kind of federal chemist "license" instead of this worthless PhD, Master's, bachelor's, and widely cited published discoveries in chemistry journals. I bow before ITN.

Into the Night wrote:

A metallic lattice is bonded atoms. Further it is a crystalline structure.

Gold is BOTH an element AND a molecule..

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

A metallic lattice is bonded atoms. Further it is a crystalline structure.

Gold is BOTH an element AND a molecule..

This is a subtle but important distinction, and it comes up a lot in debates about metals. Let's break it down carefully.

1. Chemical Bonds in Molecules
A chemical bond is a specific interaction between a defined set of atoms. The key features are:
Localized: The bond connects specific atoms (e.g., H–O in water).
Discrete unit: Molecules are separate, countable units (H₂O, CO₂, AuCl₃).
Defined electron sharing or transfer: Covalent bonds share electrons; ionic bonds transfer electrons.
Example: In water (H₂O), each oxygen atom shares electrons with two hydrogen atoms. That creates a molecule with a well-defined composition and shape.

2. Metallic Lattice
A metallic lattice is not a molecule. It's a continuous network of metal atoms held together by a "sea" of delocalized electrons. Key points:
Delocalized bonding: Electrons are free to move throughout the entire lattice, not tied between two atoms.
No discrete units: You can't point to "one gold molecule" in a gold bar. The whole solid is one giant network.
Collective behavior: Properties like conductivity, malleability, and luster come from the lattice, not individual bonds.

Analogy: Think of a metallic lattice like a crowd of people all holding hands loosely with everyone around them, while a chemical bond is like two people holding hands firmly and exclusively.

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

A metallic lattice is bonded atoms. Further it is a crystalline structure.

Gold is BOTH an element AND a molecule..

This is a subtle but important distinction, and it comes up a lot in debates about metals. Let's break it down carefully.

1. Chemical Bonds in Molecules
A chemical bond is a specific interaction between a defined set of atoms. The key features are:
Localized: The bond connects specific atoms (e.g., H–O in water).
Discrete unit: Molecules are separate, countable units (H₂O, CO₂, AuCl₃).
Defined electron sharing or transfer: Covalent bonds share electrons; ionic bonds transfer electrons.
Example: In water (H₂O), each oxygen atom shares electrons with two hydrogen atoms. That creates a molecule with a well-defined composition and shape.

2. Metallic Lattice
A metallic lattice is not a molecule. It's a continuous network of metal atoms held together by a "sea" of delocalized electrons. Key points:
Delocalized bonding: Electrons are free to move throughout the entire lattice, not tied between two atoms.
No discrete units: You can't point to "one gold molecule" in a gold bar. The whole solid is one giant network.
Collective behavior: Properties like conductivity, malleability, and luster come from the lattice, not individual bonds.

Analogy: Think of a metallic lattice like a crowd of people all holding hands loosely with everyone around them, while a chemical bond is like two people holding hands firmly and exclusively.

Quite correct, Spongy Iris.

But the absurd definition for molecule went further than that.

HELIUM atoms are also molecules, says ITN. Not even a "metallic" bond between them. But metallic bonds don't make molecules either.

Avogrado did not write the dictionary used for chemistry, and the fact that the root words for mole and molecule and what not.

Into the Night and IBdaMann are the only "scientists" that I have ever been aware of making the absurd claim that gold (and helium!) are "molecules". It is very easy to find a long list of references explicitly stating that there must be more than one atom for it to count as a "molecule", held together by molecular forces and interactions between specific electron orbitals, etc.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

A metallic lattice is bonded atoms. Further it is a crystalline structure.

Gold is BOTH an element AND a molecule..

This is a subtle but important distinction, and it comes up a lot in debates about metals. Let's break it down carefully.

1. Chemical Bonds in Molecules
A chemical bond is a specific interaction between a defined set of atoms. The key features are:
Localized: The bond connects specific atoms (e.g., H–O in water).
Discrete unit: Molecules are separate, countable units (H₂O, CO₂, AuCl₃).
Defined electron sharing or transfer: Covalent bonds share electrons; ionic bonds transfer electrons.
Example: In water (H₂O), each oxygen atom shares electrons with two hydrogen atoms. That creates a molecule with a well-defined composition and shape.

2. Metallic Lattice
A metallic lattice is not a molecule. It's a continuous network of metal atoms held together by a "sea" of delocalized electrons. Key points:
Delocalized bonding: Electrons are free to move throughout the entire lattice, not tied between two atoms.
No discrete units: You can't point to "one gold molecule" in a gold bar. The whole solid is one giant network.
Collective behavior: Properties like conductivity, malleability, and luster come from the lattice, not individual bonds.

Analogy: Think of a metallic lattice like a crowd of people all holding hands loosely with everyone around them, while a chemical bond is like two people holding hands firmly and exclusively.

Quite correct, Spongy Iris.

But the absurd definition for molecule went further than that.

HELIUM atoms are also molecules, says ITN. Not even a "metallic" bond between them. But metallic bonds don't make molecules either.

Avogrado did not write the dictionary used for chemistry, and the fact that the root words for mole and molecule and what not.

Into the Night and IBdaMann are the only "scientists" that I have ever been aware of making the absurd claim that gold (and helium!) are "molecules". It is very easy to find a long list of references explicitly stating that there must be more than one atom for it to count as a "molecule", held together by molecular forces and interactions between specific electron orbitals, etc.

It seems like they will just say it's a molecule cuz they redefined the word molecule to be anything more than 1 atom forming any 1 kind of shape.

I don't see anything enlightening about arbitrarily writing new definitions, then arguing with others who are using the standard definitions. It doesn't seem like any kind of interesting disruption to me if that's all they are going to do.

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

What may be an even more relevant question is, How does intelligence create molecules?

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

What may be an even more relevant question is, How does intelligence create molecules?

Intelligence creates molecules by mixing stuff up, but since intelligence itself is always molecular, who or what did the original mixing?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

What may be an even more relevant question is, How does intelligence create molecules?

Intelligence creates molecules by mixing stuff up, but since intelligence itself is always molecular, who or what did the original mixing?

Hmm... there must be an intelligence that always was, is, and shall be...

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

What may be an even more relevant question is, How does intelligence create molecules?

Intelligence creates molecules by mixing stuff up, but since intelligence itself is always molecular, who or what did the original mixing?

Hmm... there must be an intelligence that always was, is, and shall be...

Nah, just one not exactly like us

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

What may be an even more relevant question is, How does intelligence create molecules?

Intelligence creates molecules by mixing stuff up, but since intelligence itself is always molecular, who or what did the original mixing?

Hmm... there must be an intelligence that always was, is, and shall be...

Nah, just one not exactly like us

At some point there has to be an intelligence that always was, cuz it is never reasonable molecules, or empty space, gave birth to intelligence

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

What may be an even more relevant question is, How does intelligence create molecules?

Intelligence creates molecules by mixing stuff up, but since intelligence itself is always molecular, who or what did the original mixing?

Hmm... there must be an intelligence that always was, is, and shall be...

Nah, just one not exactly like us

At some point there has to be an intelligence that always was, cuz it is never reasonable molecules, or empty space, gave birth to intelligence

The question may be answerable, when you, can define you, but not before

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

What may be an even more relevant question is, How does intelligence create molecules?

Intelligence creates molecules by mixing stuff up, but since intelligence itself is always molecular, who or what did the original mixing?

Hmm... there must be an intelligence that always was, is, and shall be...

Nah, just one not exactly like us

At some point there has to be an intelligence that always was, cuz it is never reasonable molecules, or empty space, gave birth to intelligence

The question may be answerable, when you, can define you, but not before

https://youtu.be/LFrKq89pvXc?si=mzzh6bPJZGu2yBkk

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

What may be an even more relevant question is, How does intelligence create molecules?

Intelligence creates molecules by mixing stuff up, but since intelligence itself is always molecular, who or what did the original mixing?

Hmm... there must be an intelligence that always was, is, and shall be...

Nah, just one not exactly like us

At some point there has to be an intelligence that always was, cuz it is never reasonable molecules, or empty space, gave birth to intelligence

The question may be answerable, when you, can define you, but not before

https://youtu.be/LFrKq89pvXc?si=mzzh6bPJZGu2yBkk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEOpX8tmiUI

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

What may be an even more relevant question is, How does intelligence create molecules?

Intelligence creates molecules by mixing stuff up, but since intelligence itself is always molecular, who or what did the original mixing?

Hmm... there must be an intelligence that always was, is, and shall be...

Nah, just one not exactly like us

At some point there has to be an intelligence that always was, cuz it is never reasonable molecules, or empty space, gave birth to intelligence

The question may be answerable, when you, can define you, but not before

https://youtu.be/LFrKq89pvXc?si=mzzh6bPJZGu2yBkk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEOpX8tmiUI

Ah the 10 hours of retarded running horse video. I was totally not expecting that one.

Ja ga rook, ja ga rook.

Technically, if people are capable of growing 60 feet tall, but they only grow to be 6 feet tall, that satisfies the definition of retarded.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

What may be an even more relevant question is, How does intelligence create molecules?

Intelligence creates molecules by mixing stuff up, but since intelligence itself is always molecular, who or what did the original mixing?

Hmm... there must be an intelligence that always was, is, and shall be...

Nah, just one not exactly like us

At some point there has to be an intelligence that always was, cuz it is never reasonable molecules, or empty space, gave birth to intelligence

The question may be answerable, when you, can define you, but not before

https://youtu.be/LFrKq89pvXc?si=mzzh6bPJZGu2yBkk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEOpX8tmiUI

Ah the 10 hours of retarded running horse video. I was totally not expecting that one.

Ja ga rook, ja ga rook.

Technically, if people are capable of growing 60 feet tall, but they only grow to be 6 feet tall, that satisfies the definition of retarded.

15 Mexicans are not 60 feet tall

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

But how do molecules create intelligence? that is the relevant question

What may be an even more relevant question is, How does intelligence create molecules?

Intelligence creates molecules by mixing stuff up, but since intelligence itself is always molecular, who or what did the original mixing?

Hmm... there must be an intelligence that always was, is, and shall be...

Nah, just one not exactly like us

At some point there has to be an intelligence that always was, cuz it is never reasonable molecules, or empty space, gave birth to intelligence

The question may be answerable, when you, can define you, but not before

https://youtu.be/LFrKq89pvXc?si=mzzh6bPJZGu2yBkk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEOpX8tmiUI

Ah the 10 hours of retarded running horse video. I was totally not expecting that one.

Ja ga rook, ja ga rook.

Technically, if people are capable of growing 60 feet tall, but they only grow to be 6 feet tall, that satisfies the definition of retarded.

15 Mexicans are not 60 feet tall

The sum of the heights of 15 midgets may not reach 60 feet tall, but perhaps 52'6", assuming they are all 3'6".

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

The sum of the heights of 15 midgets may not reach 60 feet tall, but perhaps 52'6", assuming they are all 3'6".

Submit that to the journal of retarded running horses

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

The sum of the heights of 15 midgets may not reach 60 feet tall, but perhaps 52'6", assuming they are all 3'6".

Submit that to the journal of retarded running horses

There are fines for whipping a horse more than 6 times in 1 race. Whipping 10 times is disqualifying.

https://youtu.be/L1EkMxFp1mI?si=TNUZSzhmTMiOcPpW

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

The sum of the heights of 15 midgets may not reach 60 feet tall, but perhaps 52'6", assuming they are all 3'6".

Submit that to the journal of retarded running horses

There are fines for whipping a horse more than 6 times in 1 race. Whipping 10 times is disqualifying.

https://youtu.be/L1EkMxFp1mI?si=TNUZSzhmTMiOcPpW

What if the horse likes it?

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

The sum of the heights of 15 midgets may not reach 60 feet tall, but perhaps 52'6", assuming they are all 3'6".

Submit that to the journal of retarded running horses

There are fines for whipping a horse more than 6 times in 1 race. Whipping 10 times is disqualifying.

https://youtu.be/L1EkMxFp1mI?si=TNUZSzhmTMiOcPpW

What if the horse likes it?

Any thoughts on why Trump is so afraid of the Jack Smith report being released?

Our "transparency" president is blocking release of Jack Smith's final report on the Maga-Lardo bathroom-stored-top-secret-documents scandal.

The report is complete and could potentially be "debunked" if Trump would let us know what it says.

That was also true of the Department of Energy and the climate reports. All complete and ready for release. Somebody doesn't want us to see them.

"What they don't know won't hurt them"

Right?

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

The sum of the heights of 15 midgets may not reach 60 feet tall, but perhaps 52'6", assuming they are all 3'6".

Submit that to the journal of retarded running horses

There are fines for whipping a horse more than 6 times in 1 race. Whipping 10 times is disqualifying.

https://youtu.be/L1EkMxFp1mI?si=TNUZSzhmTMiOcPpW

What if the horse likes it?

Any thoughts on why Trump is so afraid of the Jack Smith report being released?

Our "transparency" president is blocking release of Jack Smith's final report on the Maga-Lardo bathroom-stored-top-secret-documents scandal.

The report is complete and could potentially be "debunked" if Trump would let us know what it says.

That was also true of the Department of Energy and the climate reports. All complete and ready for release. Somebody doesn't want us to see them.

"What they don't know won't hurt them"

Right?

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

The sum of the heights of 15 midgets may not reach 60 feet tall, but perhaps 52'6", assuming they are all 3'6".

Submit that to the journal of retarded running horses

There are fines for whipping a horse more than 6 times in 1 race. Whipping 10 times is disqualifying.

https://youtu.be/L1EkMxFp1mI?si=TNUZSzhmTMiOcPpW

What if the horse likes it?