Remember me
▼ Content

Biogeochemistry Debunked



Page 2 of 2<12
24-05-2024 19:58
Im a BM
★★★☆☆
(921)
IBdaMann debunked

This thread by IBdaMann is NOT an accurate definition of "biogeochemistry".

More recent controversy is about the term "paleobiogeochemistry".

"...there is no such thing as paleobiogeochemistry." - IBdaMann

Another fake science term exposed as a fraud.

As this thread reveals, IBdaMann is an expert at digging up the dirt on fake science term frauds.

In THIS thread, the meaningless buzzword "biogeochemistry" is exposed for what it is.

"..a religious movement based on a personality."

Maybe a similar investigation can dig up the roots of this non-science "paleobiogeochemistry" hoax.


If there is anyone who knows the Gospel Truth about which terms in science have an acceptable unambiguous definition, versus those fake terms being thrown around which are just meaningless buzzwords...

A new thread could be called "Debunking paleobiogeochemistry"

Or that investigation could be piggybacked on to the investigation already revealed in THIS thread.
It seems quite plausible that "paleobiogeochemistry" grew out of the same "religious movement based on a personality" that is the true definition of "biogeochemistry".

Maybe as the fake Russian scientist got much older, he started thinking in terms of "paleo.." Geezer fake science.

Anyway, we already know that the Gospel Truth is that:

"There is no such thing as paleobiogeochemistry.", because IBdaMann says so.

That is obviously proof enough, but "skeptics" might not be convinced without something they naively refer to as "evidence".



"There is no such thing as biogeochemistry." - IBdaMann

"There is no such thing as biogeochemistry." - Into the Night


REALITY CHECK: Actually, there IS such a thing as biogeochemistry.

So easily confirmed by the simplest search. A dictionary, for example.

But if one REFUSES TO BELIEVE that there is such a thing as biogeochemistry, an extensive enough search might reveal corroborating evidence for their faith.

A TRUE SCIENTIFIC GENIUS has already done the investigation to actually "debunk" biogeochemistry.


see below

"Paleobiogeochemistry" is probably part of the same conspiracy.


IBdaMann wrote:
I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge.

Biogeochemistry is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church.

Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him.

Ergo, the Biogeochemistry faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing.

The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover]

As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere.

As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution.

Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs.

As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project.

This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere).

"The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'"
- V.I. Vernadsky


If you'd like to learn more, I recommend you read the Manifesto for the Noosphere: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Consciousness by José Argüelles, available on Amazon for only $14.95, or available to read free of charge HERE on Politiplex.



I recommend everyone read the Manifesto of the Noosphere because it is short, it should only take someone about five minutes to read, and duncan should only need about twelve minutes.

BS "debunking" of biogeochemistry with absurd conspiracy theory.

Responding directly to the thread author's topic post is NOT spamming.
24-05-2024 22:48
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(22183)
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann debunked

This thread by IBdaMann is NOT an accurate definition of "biogeochemistry".

More recent controversy is about the term "paleobiogeochemistry".

You have not debunked anything. Assumption of victory fallacy.
There is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry' or 'paleobiogeochemistry'.

Your religion is not science.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
Page 2 of 2<12





Join the debate Biogeochemistry Debunked:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Global Change Science and Applied Biogeochemistry Moderated Sub Forum622-06-2024 07:27
Tell your old college professors to check out climate-debate.com for biogeochemistry33117-06-2024 21:16
Biogeochemistry-related Thread Guide for "sealover" threads.4201-06-2024 06:13
What is Biogeochemistry?13624-05-2024 22:44
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact