Biogeochemistry Debunked

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > Biogeochemistry Debunked > Page 2

Page 2 of 2

24-05-2024 19:58
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1924)	IBdaMann debunked This thread by IBdaMann is NOT an accurate definition of "biogeochemistry". More recent controversy is about the term "paleobiogeochemistry". "...there is no such thing as paleobiogeochemistry." - IBdaMann Another fake science term exposed as a fraud. As this thread reveals, IBdaMann is an expert at digging up the dirt on fake science term frauds. In THIS thread, the meaningless buzzword "biogeochemistry" is exposed for what it is. "..a religious movement based on a personality." Maybe a similar investigation can dig up the roots of this non-science "paleobiogeochemistry" hoax. If there is anyone who knows the Gospel Truth about which terms in science have an acceptable unambiguous definition, versus those fake terms being thrown around which are just meaningless buzzwords... A new thread could be called "Debunking paleobiogeochemistry" Or that investigation could be piggybacked on to the investigation already revealed in THIS thread. It seems quite plausible that "paleobiogeochemistry" grew out of the same "religious movement based on a personality" that is the true definition of "biogeochemistry". Maybe as the fake Russian scientist got much older, he started thinking in terms of "paleo.." Geezer fake science. Anyway, we already know that the Gospel Truth is that: "There is no such thing as paleobiogeochemistry.", because IBdaMann says so. That is obviously proof enough, but "skeptics" might not be convinced without something they naively refer to as "evidence". "There is no such thing as biogeochemistry." - IBdaMann "There is no such thing as biogeochemistry." - Into the Night REALITY CHECK: Actually, there IS such a thing as biogeochemistry. So easily confirmed by the simplest search. A dictionary, for example. But if one REFUSES TO BELIEVE that there is such a thing as biogeochemistry, an extensive enough search might reveal corroborating evidence for their faith. A TRUE SCIENTIFIC GENIUS has already done the investigation to actually "debunk" biogeochemistry. see below "Paleobiogeochemistry" is probably part of the same conspiracy. IBdaMann wrote: I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge. Biogeochemistry is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church. Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him. Ergo, the *Biogeochemistry* faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing. The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover] As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere. As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution. Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs. As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project. This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere). "The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'" - V.I. Vernadsky If you'd like to learn more, I recommend you read the Manifesto for the Noosphere: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Consciousness by José Argüelles, available on Amazon for only $14.95, or available to read free of charge HERE on Politiplex. I recommend everyone read the Manifesto of the Noosphere because it is short, it should only take someone about five minutes to read, and duncan should only need about twelve minutes. BS "debunking" of biogeochemistry with absurd conspiracy theory. Responding directly to the thread author's topic post is NOT spamming.
24-05-2024 22:48
Into the Night★★★★★ (22991)	Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann debunked This thread by IBdaMann is NOT an accurate definition of "biogeochemistry". More recent controversy is about the term "paleobiogeochemistry". You have not debunked anything. Assumption of victory fallacy. There is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry' or 'paleobiogeochemistry'. Your religion is not science. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
17-10-2024 03:19
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1924)	Do I even EXIST? Coming to grips with the depths of my delusions... For decades, I believed that I was a PhD biogeochemist. My delusion was of a profession that doesn't even exist. For decades, I believed that I had many colleagues who were also biogeochemists. I think they were real people, but how can I be sure? My delusion was so intricately detailed, I believed I had published a paper in a journal called BIOGEOCHEMISTRY. I believed that I had published it in 1998. Biogeochemistry volume 42, pages 189-220. According to my delusion, 475 peer-reviewed scientific papers had CITED this paper that I believed I had authored. But there is NO SUCH THING as biogeochemistry. I have to face reality and keep remembering that. As I learned from the post below, the only thing that might accurately be labeled "biogeochemistry" is really just some kind of WACKY religion. This is an existential crisis for me. My profession was never real. My colleagues, if they even really existed, weren't really scientists. That paper I thought I published... That degree I thought I had earned... Those scientific conferences where I believed I was an invited speaker. Those new papers where I still think I see my own name being cited for some kind of "biogeochemistry" research that couldn't possibly be real. Who am I? Do I even EXIST? There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as biogeeiwishiknewwhatthe**... MOMMY! HELP! IBdaMann wrote: I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge. Biogeochemistry** is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church. Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him. Ergo, the *Biogeochemistry* faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing. The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover] As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere. As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution. Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs. As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project. This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere). "The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'" - V.I. Vernadsky If you'd like to learn more, I recommend you read the Manifesto for the Noosphere: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Consciousness by José Argüelles, available on Amazon for only $14.95, or available to read free of charge HERE on Politiplex. I recommend everyone read the Manifesto of the Noosphere because it is short, it should only take someone about five minutes to read, and duncan should only need about twelve minutes.
11-11-2024 22:01
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1924)	Do I even EXIST? Coming to grips with the depths of my delusions... For decades, I believed that I was a PhD biogeochemist. My delusion was of a profession that doesn't even exist. For decades, I believed that I had many colleagues who were also biogeochemists. I think they were real people, but how can I be sure? My delusion was so intricately detailed, I believed I had published a paper in a journal called BIOGEOCHEMISTRY. I believed that I had published it in 1998. Biogeochemistry volume 42, pages 189-220. According to my delusion, 475 peer-reviewed scientific papers had CITED this paper that I believed I had authored. But there is NO SUCH THING as biogeochemistry. I have to face reality and keep remembering that. As I learned from the post below, the only thing that might accurately be labeled "biogeochemistry" is really just some kind of WACKY religion. This is an existential crisis for me. My profession was never real. My colleagues, if they even really existed, weren't really scientists. That paper I thought I published... That degree I thought I had earned... Those scientific conferences where I believed I was an invited speaker. Those new papers where I still think I see my own name being cited for some kind of "biogeochemistry" research that couldn't possibly be real. Who am I? Do I even EXIST? There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as biogeeiwishiknewwhatthe**... MOMMY! HELP! I have to keep reminding myself that none of this is real. There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. Climate cannot change. And I HAVE to try to remember that fluoride is NOT a chemical, because that makes any discussion of the meaningless term moot. LONG LIVE SCIENCE! Do I even know what "science" IS? I'm not sure now that I even EXIST. I'll read below one more time to be sure that I understand what "biogeochemistry" REALLY is, so I'll better remember that none of this is real. There is no such thing as "biogeochemistry"... At least, not the WACKY religion kind of biogeochemistry that has been at the center of my delusions. Thank God that IBdaMann knows how to do "truly scientific" research in order to uncover the ugly truth about... BIOGEOCHEMISTRY! For that, as Parrot Boy said, "Excellent work, sir. And thank you!" IBdaMann wrote: I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge. Biogeochemistry** is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church. Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him. Ergo, the *Biogeochemistry* faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing. [quote]The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover] As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere. As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution. Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs. As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project. This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere). "The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'" - V.I. Vernadsky If you'd like to learn more, I recommend you read the Manifesto for the Noosphere: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Consciousness by José Argüelles, available on Amazon for only $14.95, or available to read free of charge HERE on Politiplex. I recommend everyone read the Manifesto of the Noosphere because it is short, it should only take someone about five minutes to read, and duncan should only need about twelve minutes.
12-11-2024 01:55
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14955)	Im a BM wrote: Do I even EXIST? Of course you do, and we're all better off for it. You did your part to compel Americans to put Trump into the White House. The answer to your question is "I celebrate Trump's victory, therefore I am!" Yes, Robert, you EXIST. Im a BM wrote: Coming to grips with the depths of my delusions... I wouldn't go that far; remember, baby steps. Just focus on the celebration for the moment and later, when you are ready, we'll slowly face your delusions together, one by one. Im a BM wrote: For decades, I believed that I was a PhD biogeochemist. Your mistake was believing everything you read on the internet was absolutely true. Im a BM wrote:My delusion was of a profession that doesn't even exist. I hate to be the one to splash you with cold water, but to your credit, you are taking it quite well. Im a BM wrote: For decades, I believed that I had many colleagues who were also biogeochemists. At least now you are starting to see the negative ramifications of joining a mindless leftist thought collective that believes everything on Marxist websites is absolutely true. Eventually you all begin to HATE even those who are trying to help you. Im a BM wrote: I think they were real people, but how can I be sure? You can be sure that they were mindless commuzombies who were forced to deny chemistry, as well as all science in general, and instead believe that water ceases to evaporate once it gets into the ocean, among other physics violations. The forced science denial becomes extreme around the subject of thermodynamics. It becomes very dire, that's absolutely certain. I'm sure many people feel for you. Im a BM wrote: My delusion was so intricately detailed, I believed I had published a paper in a journal called BIOGEOCHEMISTRY. Right, and you were required to believe that the act of publishing itself established "science." Im a BM wrote: I believed that I had published it in 1998. Biogeochemistry volume 42, pages 189-220. Right, you were under the impression that this publishing data itself was your science model. Im a BM wrote: According to my delusion, 475 peer-reviewed scientific papers had CITED this paper that I believed I had authored. There is no limit to the number of others in your mindless, leftist thought collective who can share in your well-disseminated delusion. Im a BM wrote:But there is NO SUCH THING as biogeochemistry. Correct. Im a BM wrote:I have to face reality and keep remembering that. Well done. Remember, baby steps. Im a BM wrote: This is an existential crisis for me. My profession was never real. What I recommend is that you force yourself to break out of your delusion and rid yourself of your need to exaggerate your accomplishments in order to avoid an "existential crisis." Let's examine your accomplishments. You contributed your perspective on polyphenols within the context of soil and plant interactions, and you mused over issues of nutrients in such environments. Others considered your perspective while performing their own research in other areas. Although we have no way to measure whether your research was of any help to others, we can probably speculate that the net result of your perspective on the others' research was to ultimately improve the world's understanding of how polyphenols affect adaptation of plants to some degree. Good on you. Well done. And your perspective is still out there; someone may come along and achieve a major breakthrough in soil-ometry, ecology and/or biogeoenvironment management. Now, getting back to cold, hard reality; you still can't get around thermodynamics, water still evaporates, even if it is in the ocean, and the ocean's alkalinity isn't somehow being depleted. Im a BM wrote:My colleagues, if they even really existed, weren't really scientists. They sound like losers to me. Im a BM wrote: That paper I thought I published... That degree I thought I had earned... They were all willing to take your money, though, right?

25-11-2024 22:02
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1924)	Do I even EXIST? Coming to grips with the depths of my delusions... For decades, I believed that I was a PhD biogeochemist. My delusion was of a profession that doesn't even exist. For decades, I believed that I had many colleagues who were also biogeochemists. I think they were real people, but how can I be sure? My delusion was so intricately detailed, I believed I had published a paper in a journal called BIOGEOCHEMISTRY. I believed that I had published it in 1998. Biogeochemistry volume 42, pages 189-220. According to my delusion, 475 peer-reviewed scientific papers had CITED this paper that I believed I had authored. But there is NO SUCH THING as biogeochemistry. I have to face reality and keep remembering that. As I learned from the post below, the only thing that might accurately be labeled "biogeochemistry" is really just some kind of WACKY religion. This is an existential crisis for me. My profession was never real. My colleagues, if they even really existed, weren't really scientists. That paper I thought I published... That degree I thought I had earned... Those scientific conferences where I believed I was an invited speaker. Those new papers where I still think I see my own name being cited for some kind of "biogeochemistry" research that couldn't possibly be real. Who am I? Do I even EXIST? There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. There is no such thing as biogeeiwishiknewwhatthe**... MOMMY! HELP! I have to keep reminding myself that none of this is real. There is no such thing as biogeochemistry. Climate cannot change. And I HAVE to try to remember that fluoride is NOT a chemical, because that makes any discussion of the meaningless term moot. LONG LIVE SCIENCE! Do I even know what "science" IS? I'm not sure now that I even EXIST. I'll read below one more time to be sure that I understand what "biogeochemistry" REALLY is, so I'll better remember that none of this is real. There is no such thing as "biogeochemistry"... At least, not the WACKY religion kind of biogeochemistry that has been at the center of my delusions. Thank God that IBdaMann knows how to do "truly scientific" research in order to uncover the ugly truth about... BIOGEOCHEMISTRY! For that, as Parrot Boy said, "Excellent work, sir. And thank you!" IBdaMann wrote: I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge. Biogeochemistry** is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church. Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him. Ergo, the *Biogeochemistry* faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing. [quote]The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover] As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere. As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution. Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs. As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project. This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere). "The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'" - V.I. Vernadsky If you'd like to learn more, I recommend you read the Manifesto for the Noosphere: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Consciousness by José Argüelles, available on Amazon for only $14.95, or available to read free of charge HERE on Politiplex. I recommend everyone read the Manifesto of the Noosphere because it is short, it should only take someone about five minutes to read, and duncan should only need about twelve minutes.
27-11-2024 10:12
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14955)	Im a BM wrote: Do I even EXIST? Of course you do, and we're all better off for it. You did your part to compel Americans to put Trump into the White House. The answer to your question is "I celebrate Trump's victory, therefore I am!" Yes, Robert, you EXIST. Im a BM wrote: Coming to grips with the depths of my delusions... I wouldn't go that far; remember, baby steps. Just focus on the celebration for the moment and later, when you are ready, we'll slowly face your delusions together, one by one. Im a BM wrote: For decades, I believed that I was a PhD biogeochemist. Your mistake was believing everything you read on the internet was absolutely true. Im a BM wrote:My delusion was of a profession that doesn't even exist. I hate to be the one to splash you with cold water, but to your credit, you are taking it quite well. Im a BM wrote: For decades, I believed that I had many colleagues who were also biogeochemists. At least now you are starting to see the negative ramifications of joining a mindless leftist thought collective that believes everything on Marxist websites is absolutely true. Eventually you all begin to HATE even those who are trying to help you. Im a BM wrote: I think they were real people, but how can I be sure? You can be sure that they were mindless commuzombies who were forced to deny chemistry, as well as all science in general, and instead believe that water ceases to evaporate once it gets into the ocean, among other physics violations. The forced science denial becomes extreme around the subject of thermodynamics. It becomes very dire, that's absolutely certain. I'm sure many people feel for you. Im a BM wrote: My delusion was so intricately detailed, I believed I had published a paper in a journal called BIOGEOCHEMISTRY. Right, and you were required to believe that the act of publishing itself established "science." Im a BM wrote: I believed that I had published it in 1998. Biogeochemistry volume 42, pages 189-220. Right, you were under the impression that this publishing data itself was your science model. Im a BM wrote: According to my delusion, 475 peer-reviewed scientific papers had CITED this paper that I believed I had authored. There is no limit to the number of others in your mindless, leftist thought collective who can share in your well-disseminated delusion. Im a BM wrote:But there is NO SUCH THING as biogeochemistry. Correct. Im a BM wrote:I have to face reality and keep remembering that. Well done. Remember, baby steps. Im a BM wrote: This is an existential crisis for me. My profession was never real. What I recommend is that you force yourself to break out of your delusion and rid yourself of your need to exaggerate your accomplishments in order to avoid an "existential crisis." Let's examine your accomplishments. You contributed your perspective on polyphenols within the context of soil and plant interactions, and you mused over issues of nutrients in such environments. Others considered your perspective while performing their own research in other areas. Although we have no way to measure whether your research was of any help to others, we can probably speculate that the net result of your perspective on the others' research was to ultimately improve the world's understanding of how polyphenols affect adaptation of plants to some degree. Good on you. Well done. And your perspective is still out there; someone may come along and achieve a major breakthrough in soil-ometry, ecology and/or biogeoenvironment management. Now, getting back to cold, hard reality; you still can't get around thermodynamics, water still evaporates, even if it is in the ocean, and the ocean's alkalinity isn't somehow being depleted. Im a BM wrote:My colleagues, if they even really existed, weren't really scientists. They sound like losers to me. Im a BM wrote: That paper I thought I published... That degree I thought I had earned... They were all willing to take your money, though, right?
27-11-2024 20:03
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1924)	In the past five months (since late June) only ONE new member has joined climate-debate.com and posted anything. Just one post from one new member in five months. So, what makes climate-debate.com such an attractive website for so much active discussion about... Climate? Well, just look at what the two most active members have to offer! This highly enlightening post (below) by IBdaMann reveals the ugly truth about biogeochemistry. This website might be the only place where you can find "scientists" who are so well informed that they can tell you... "Biogeochemistry is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky." - IBdaMann Who knew? IBdaMann knew! Ten years into his trolling now, IBdaMann deserves much of the credit for making this website so POPULAR. Where else could you find the ugly truth about the biogeochemistry conspiracy? What other website identifies this WACKY religion that calls itself "science"? Where else can a new member join to get in on such an informative discussion? A place where they aren't afraid to tell you the truth that IBdaMann has so bravely exposed to so many new members over the past ten years... "You are a scientifically illiterate moron." - IBdaMann "You are describing yourself." - Into the Night IBdaMann wrote: I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge. Biogeochemistry is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church. Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him. Ergo, the *Biogeochemistry* faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing. The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover] As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere. As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution. Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs. As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project. This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere). "The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'" - V.I. Vernadsky If you'd like to learn more, I recommend you read the Manifesto for the Noosphere: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Consciousness by José Argüelles, available on Amazon for only $14.95, or available to read free of charge HERE on Politiplex. I recommend everyone read the Manifesto of the Noosphere because it is short, it should only take someone about five minutes to read, and duncan should only need about twelve minutes.
28-11-2024 06:43
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14955)	Im a BM wrote:Ten years into his trolling now, IBdaMann deserves much of the credit for making this website so POPULAR. ... and in the short time that you've been here, you've effectively killed it. Congratulations.
05-12-2024 21:54
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1924)	IBdaMann wrote: Im a BM wrote:Ten years into his trolling now, IBdaMann deserves much of the credit for making this website so POPULAR. ... and in the short time that you've been here, you've effectively killed it. Congratulations. Correlation versus causation. When I first posted in March, 2022, there were about 132 fewer members than there are today. 132 members joined after 1 did, two and a half years ago, and NONE of them continue to participate. Certainly there is a CORRELATION between the short time I have been here, and the exit of 132 new members from the discussion. More than that, ALL 132 members who joined after I did decided to have nothing more to do with the discussion. It is implausible that 100% loss of ALL new members from the discussion has been a consistent trend for all 14 years climate-debate.com's existence. Is my presence a new variable that has altered the dynamics? Is there a CAUSAL relationship between these CORRELATED phenomenon? Have I "effectively killed it"? Am I responsible for the death of climate-debate.com? My bad. What do you expect from a biogeochemistry WACKY religion cult member? It is impossible to tell for sure exactly how many active members were participating in the discussion NINE YEARS AGO, when the presence of IBdaMann became a new variable to potentially alter dynamics. Well, with BOTH of us here right now, you can count the active members on one hand. When I look at the nine years ago posts, such as when Branner (site administrator) admonished IBdaMann for calling other members "morons" "religious WACK-jobs" "Frauds" etc... Just on that thread alone in the week of that post, it was at least twice as many active members posting then, compared to how many posted THIS week (2024) I'm not really sure if I deserve ALL the credit for "killing" climate-debate.com Edited on 05-12-2024 22:15
06-12-2024 00:32
Into the Night★★★★★ (22991)	Im a BM wrote: Correlation versus causation. When I first posted in March, 2022, there were about 132 fewer members than there are today. 132 members joined after 1 did, two and a half years ago, and NONE of them continue to participate. Thanks to you and your spamming. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
07-12-2024 18:47
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1924)	Into the Night wrote: Im a BM wrote: Correlation versus causation. When I first posted in March, 2022, there were about 132 fewer members than there are today. 132 members joined after 1 did, two and a half years ago, and NONE of them continue to participate. Thanks to you and your spamming. This thread, "Biogeochemistry Debunked" was part of the proof that "there is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry'" "There is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry'" CONTINUES to be the mantra, after two and a half years. As this thread documents so clearly, there is no actual SCIENCE called "biogeochemistry". It's just a WACKY religion. Kind of like climate science. Be sure to read the first post of this thread to learn what biogeochemistry REALLY is. And don't let the Devil fool you with his tricks. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
08-12-2024 04:35
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1924)	Another confounding variable, and a BIG one at that. The puzzle to be solved is how to attribute responsibility for the death of climate-debate.com Two members are identified as potentially being more responsible than any other member for killing climate-debate.com However, there is a very important confounding variable that changed in only the past six or seven months. The GOOGLE EFFECT! How did I find the website? I did a Google search. With the keywords "climate change discussion website" THIS website, climate-debate.com, showed up on the first page of the Google search results, relatively near the top as I recall. Over the past two and a half years, I have OFTEN ranted about the fact that Google displays climate-debate.com as if it were a valid and popular forum. I have seen posts of members who only posted once or twice, but the explicitly identified an Internet search as the way they found climate-debate.com It was at least two years ago, the first time I whined about the fact that Google inadvertently was baiting tree huggers into a troll gang rape ambush. I have bitched about it often and consistently. I often re-tested Google search results, with multiple variations on climate related discussion website keywords They kept showing climate-debate.com as if it were a valid and popular forum. And six or seven months ago, I posted that Google stopped doing this. I can't say exactly when, I'd have to check my posts here, but I think the last time I tested it with Google still showing climate-debate.com was March or so. Some time before May of this year, Google stopped including climate-debate.com on page one results of searches for climate discussion sites. In March, 2022, new members were signing up at LEAST once or twice a week. So, that is when I began MY participation killing the website. But that pace kept up for pretty much the first two full years of my on again off again participation here - one or two new members a week. Now, how many new members since March, 2024? When the GOOGLE FACTOR kicked in as a confounding variable in the puzzle. Did GOOGLE KILL climate-debate.com? Did Google, by discontinuing its practice of displaying climate-debate.com in search results for climate discussion websites, KILL climate-debate.com? No, But for years, Google kept climate-debate.com on artificial life support. Unable to retain preexisting members, or create a growing following by word of mouth from satisfied members, climate-debate.com depended entirely on the influx of new members directed here by Google searches. It baited many innocent environmentalists into a "define your terms you moron" ambush. But now, that no longer happens. Did we have only ONE new member who posted more than once in the last six or seven months? Google didn't kill it. It just disconnected the life support. IBdaMann wrote: Im a BM wrote:Ten years into his trolling now, IBdaMann deserves much of the credit for making this website so POPULAR. ... and in the short time that you've been here, you've effectively killed it. Congratulations. Correlation versus causation. When I first posted in March, 2022, there were about 132 fewer members than there are today. 132 members joined after 1 did, two and a half years ago, and NONE of them continue to participate. Certainly there is a CORRELATION between the short time I have been here, and the exit of 132 new members from the discussion. More than that, ALL 132 members who joined after I did decided to have nothing more to do with the discussion. It is implausible that 100% loss of ALL new members from the discussion has been a consistent trend for all 14 years climate-debate.com's existence. Is my presence a new variable that has altered the dynamics? Is there a CAUSAL relationship between these CORRELATED phenomenon? Have I "effectively killed it"? Am I responsible for the death of climate-debate.com? My bad. What do you expect from a biogeochemistry WACKY religion cult member? It is impossible to tell for sure exactly how many active members were participating in the discussion NINE YEARS AGO, when the presence of IBdaMann became a new variable to potentially alter dynamics. Well, with BOTH of us here right now, you can count the active members on one hand. When I look at the nine years ago posts, such as when Branner (site administrator) admonished IBdaMann for calling other members "morons" "religious WACK-jobs" "Frauds" etc... Just on that thread alone in the week of that post, it was at least twice as many active members posting then, compared to how many posted THIS week (2024) I'm not really sure if I deserve ALL the credit for "killing" climate-debate.com
08-12-2024 10:36
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14955)	Im a BM wrote:Certainly there is a CORRELATION between the short time I have been here, and the exit of 132 new members from the discussion. Certainly there is CAUSATION between your unmitigated spamming of every thread and the exit of 132 new members from the discussion. Im a BM wrote: More than that, ALL 132 members who joined after I did decided to have nothing more to do with ... ... your spam. If you weren't even going to extend to them the courtesy of defining your terms or answering questions, what value would they find in simply wading through your spam? Im a BM wrote: It is implausible that 100% loss of ALL new members from the discussion has been a consistent trend for all 14 years climate-debate.com's existence. Correct. Your appearance does, in fact, mark the steep decline of new arrivals, as you have noted. Im a BM wrote: Is my presence a new variable that has altered the dynamics? Not your presence, but your spamming and dishonesty.
08-12-2024 20:09
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1924)	IBdaMann wrote: Im a BM wrote:Certainly there is a CORRELATION between the short time I have been here, and the exit of 132 new members from the discussion. Certainly there is CAUSATION between your unmitigated spamming of every thread and the exit of 132 new members from the discussion. Im a BM wrote: More than that, ALL 132 members who joined after I did decided to have nothing more to do with ... ... your spam. If you weren't even going to extend to them the courtesy of defining your terms or answering questions, what value would they find in simply wading through your spam? Im a BM wrote: It is implausible that 100% loss of ALL new members from the discussion has been a consistent trend for all 14 years climate-debate.com's existence. Correct. Your appearance does, in fact, mark the steep decline of new arrivals, as you have noted. Im a BM wrote: Is my presence a new variable that has altered the dynamics? Not your presence, but your spamming and dishonesty. Sorry about that. My bad. Congrats, again, on your "Is Climate a Lesbian?" thread. If climate-debate.com is finally DEAD, I can declare victory and go home!

Page 2 of 2

Join the debate Biogeochemistry Debunked:

Threads	Replies	Last post
Tell your old college professors to check out climate-debate.com for biogeochemistry	370	20-03-2025 09:45
Biogeochemistry-related Thread Guide for "sealover" threads.	70	20-03-2025 03:29
Biogeochemistry Related Thread List	50	20-03-2025 01:03
What is Biogeochemistry?	188	19-03-2025 22:55
Global Change Science and Applied Biogeochemistry Moderated Sub Forum	15	18-07-2024 21:11