Biogeochemistry Debunked

IBdaMann wrote:
I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge.

Biogeochemistry is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church.

Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him.

Ergo, the Biogeochemistry faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing.

The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover]

As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere.

As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution.

Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs.

As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project.

This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere).

"The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'"
- V.I. Vernadsky

If you'd like to learn more, I recommend you read the Manifesto for the Noosphere: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Consciousness by José Argüelles, available on Amazon for only $14.95, or available to read free of charge HERE on Politiplex.

I recommend everyone read the Manifesto of the Noosphere because it is short, it should only take someone about five minutes to read, and duncan should only need about twelve minutes.

BS "debunking" of biogeochemistry with absurd conspiracy theory.

Responding directly to the thread author's topic post is NOT spamming.

Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann debunked

This thread by IBdaMann is NOT an accurate definition of "biogeochemistry".

More recent controversy is about the term "paleobiogeochemistry".

IBdaMann wrote:
I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge.

Biogeochemistry is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church.

Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him.

Ergo, the Biogeochemistry faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing.

The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover]

As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere.

As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution.

Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs.

As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project.

This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere).

"The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'"
- V.I. Vernadsky

If you'd like to learn more, I recommend you read the Manifesto for the Noosphere: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Consciousness by José Argüelles, available on Amazon for only $14.95, or available to read free of charge HERE on Politiplex.

I recommend everyone read the Manifesto of the Noosphere because it is short, it should only take someone about five minutes to read, and duncan should only need about twelve minutes.

IBdaMann wrote:
I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge.

Biogeochemistry is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church.

Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him.

Ergo, the Biogeochemistry faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing.

[quote]The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover]

As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere.

As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution.

Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs.

As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project.

This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere).

"The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'"
- V.I. Vernadsky

Im a BM wrote: Do I even EXIST?

Im a BM wrote: Coming to grips with the depths of my delusions...

Im a BM wrote: For decades, I believed that I was a PhD biogeochemist.

Im a BM wrote:My delusion was of a profession that doesn't even exist.

Im a BM wrote: For decades, I believed that I had many colleagues who were also biogeochemists.

Im a BM wrote: I think they were real people, but how can I be sure?

Im a BM wrote: My delusion was so intricately detailed, I believed I had published a paper in a journal called BIOGEOCHEMISTRY.

Im a BM wrote: I believed that I had published it in 1998. Biogeochemistry volume 42, pages 189-220.

Im a BM wrote: According to my delusion, 475 peer-reviewed scientific papers had CITED this paper that I believed I had authored.

Im a BM wrote:But there is NO SUCH THING as biogeochemistry.

Im a BM wrote:I have to face reality and keep remembering that.

Im a BM wrote: This is an existential crisis for me. My profession was never real.

Im a BM wrote:My colleagues, if they even really existed, weren't really scientists.

Im a BM wrote: That paper I thought I published... That degree I thought I had earned...

IBdaMann wrote:
I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge.

Biogeochemistry is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church.

Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him.

Ergo, the Biogeochemistry faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing.

[quote]The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover]

As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere.

As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution.

Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs.

As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project.

This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere).

"The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'"
- V.I. Vernadsky

Im a BM wrote: Do I even EXIST?

Im a BM wrote: Coming to grips with the depths of my delusions...

Im a BM wrote: For decades, I believed that I was a PhD biogeochemist.

Im a BM wrote:My delusion was of a profession that doesn't even exist.

Im a BM wrote: For decades, I believed that I had many colleagues who were also biogeochemists.

Im a BM wrote: I think they were real people, but how can I be sure?

Im a BM wrote: My delusion was so intricately detailed, I believed I had published a paper in a journal called BIOGEOCHEMISTRY.

Im a BM wrote: I believed that I had published it in 1998. Biogeochemistry volume 42, pages 189-220.

Im a BM wrote: According to my delusion, 475 peer-reviewed scientific papers had CITED this paper that I believed I had authored.

Im a BM wrote:But there is NO SUCH THING as biogeochemistry.

Im a BM wrote:I have to face reality and keep remembering that.

Im a BM wrote: This is an existential crisis for me. My profession was never real.

Im a BM wrote:My colleagues, if they even really existed, weren't really scientists.

Im a BM wrote: That paper I thought I published... That degree I thought I had earned...

IBdaMann wrote:
I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge.

Biogeochemistry is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church.

Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him.

Ergo, the Biogeochemistry faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing.

The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover]

As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere.

As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution.

Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs.

As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project.

This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere).

"The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'"
- V.I. Vernadsky

If you'd like to learn more, I recommend you read the Manifesto for the Noosphere: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Consciousness by José Argüelles, available on Amazon for only $14.95, or available to read free of charge HERE on Politiplex.

I recommend everyone read the Manifesto of the Noosphere because it is short, it should only take someone about five minutes to read, and duncan should only need about twelve minutes.

Im a BM wrote:Ten years into his trolling now, IBdaMann deserves much of the credit for making this website so POPULAR.

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:Ten years into his trolling now, IBdaMann deserves much of the credit for making this website so POPULAR.

... and in the short time that you've been here, you've effectively killed it. Congratulations.

Im a BM wrote:
Correlation versus causation.

When I first posted in March, 2022, there were about 132 fewer members than there are today.

132 members joined after 1 did, two and a half years ago, and NONE of them continue to participate.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Correlation versus causation.

When I first posted in March, 2022, there were about 132 fewer members than there are today.

132 members joined after 1 did, two and a half years ago, and NONE of them continue to participate.

Thanks to you and your spamming.

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:Ten years into his trolling now, IBdaMann deserves much of the credit for making this website so POPULAR.

... and in the short time that you've been here, you've effectively killed it. Congratulations.

Im a BM wrote:Certainly there is a CORRELATION between the short time I have been here, and the exit of 132 new members from the discussion.

Im a BM wrote: More than that, ALL 132 members who joined after I did decided to have nothing more to do with ...

Im a BM wrote: It is implausible that 100% loss of ALL new members from the discussion has been a consistent trend for all 14 years climate-debate.com's existence.

Im a BM wrote: Is my presence a new variable that has altered the dynamics?

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:Certainly there is a CORRELATION between the short time I have been here, and the exit of 132 new members from the discussion.

Certainly there is CAUSATION between your unmitigated spamming of every thread and the exit of 132 new members from the discussion.

Im a BM wrote: More than that, ALL 132 members who joined after I did decided to have nothing more to do with ...

... your spam. If you weren't even going to extend to them the courtesy of defining your terms or answering questions, what value would they find in simply wading through your spam?

Im a BM wrote: It is implausible that 100% loss of ALL new members from the discussion has been a consistent trend for all 14 years climate-debate.com's existence.

Correct. Your appearance does, in fact, mark the steep decline of new arrivals, as you have noted.

Im a BM wrote: Is my presence a new variable that has altered the dynamics?

Not your presence, but your spamming and dishonesty.

IBdaMann wrote:
I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge.

Biogeochemistry is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church.

Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him.

Ergo, the Biogeochemistry faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing.

The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover]

As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere.

As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution.

Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs.

As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project.

This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere).

"The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'"
- V.I. Vernadsky

If you'd like to learn more, I recommend you read the Manifesto for the Noosphere: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Consciousness by José Argüelles, available on Amazon for only $14.95, or available to read free of charge HERE on Politiplex.

I recommend everyone read the Manifesto of the Noosphere because it is short, it should only take someone about five minutes to read, and duncan should only need about twelve minutes.

IBdaMann wrote:
I have added Biogeochemistry and QAnon to the Debunking Signature. If you are already registered for the Debunking Signature at Politiplex, you will be receiving these at no additional charge.

Biogeochemistry is a religious movement based on a personality, i.e. the failed Russian chemist Vladimir Vernadsky, whose last-ditch effort for recognition spawned a bizarre metaphysical earth movement. As with most religious movements, the worshipers point to Vernadsky's having been a chemist as legitimizing the religion as science. Since Vernadsky focused on crystals and minerals, the movement's followers invented the term "geochemistry" as the branch of science under which they claim their faith should be categorized. Fast forward to modern-day, the movement felt it necessary to add the "bio" prefix, i.e. "biogeochemistry", in order to better poach members from other Church of Green, Church of Global Warming and Church of Climate Change denominations, as well as to more effectively convert fellow Marxists who might be sitting on the fence before they get snapped up by some other church.

Vladimir Vernadsky made no contributions to science, which is why you have never studied any of his work. Vernadsky tried his hand at producing some falsifiable models, but they were quickly falsified by more proficient and more knowledgeable scientists. However, as is the case in the world of academics, Vernadsky's "research" was nonetheless sufficient to earn him several academic positions that did not require any sort of accomplishments. He was appointed head of the Museum of Mineralogy and Geology in St. Petersburg and later he was made the head of the University of Simferopol in Kiev. Good for him.

Ergo, the Biogeochemistry faith (capitalized because it is the name of a religion) is not based on any science. It is based on the metaphysics of the Noosphere (capitalized because it is the name of the sacred deity). In this faith, the Noosphere is the deity and the global climate is just one of its appendages, i.e. a thing.

The Noosphere is the planetary sphere of the mind, or the thinking layer of planet Earth. To grasp the idea of the Noosphere we must elevate our consciousness and open ourselves to the most general, elemental and cosmic principles of life on Earth.[Book Cover]

As the mental sheathe of the planet, the Noosphere characterizes mind and consciousness as a unitary phenomenon. This means that the quality and nature of our individual and collective thoughts directly affects the Noosphere and creates the quality of our environment—the biosphere.

As the Earth's "mental sheathe," the Noosphere represents the breakthrough to a new consciousness, a new time and a new reality arising from the biospheric crisis. This is known as the Biosphere-Noosphere evolution.

Just as the biosphere is the unity of all of life and its support system, the Noosphere is the unity of all mind and its thinking layers. In this way the Noosphere can be understood as the sum of the mental interactions of all life. Within the Noosphere exists the evolutionary control panels, known as the psi bank, the storage and retrieval system for all the mental programs.

As the next stage of evolution of the terrestrial biosphere, the Noosphere signifies the advent of a qualitative/dimensional shift - the passage from one state to another. This is the main investigative topic of the Noosphere II project.

This perspective of the Noosphere, as an evolutionary event, has been scientifically anticipated by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the noted French paleontologist, as well as his colleague (with whom he jointly coined the word noosphere in 1926), Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky (see The Theory and History of the Noosphere).

"The historic process is changing dramatically before our eyes ... Mankind taken as a whole is becoming a powerful geological force. Humanity's mind and work face the problem of reconstructing the biosphere in the interests of freely thinking mankind as a single entity. This new state of the world we are approaching without noticing it is the 'Noosphere.'"
- V.I. Vernadsky

If you'd like to learn more, I recommend you read the Manifesto for the Noosphere: The Next Stage in the Evolution of Human Consciousness by José Argüelles, available on Amazon for only $14.95, or available to read free of charge HERE on Politiplex.

I recommend everyone read the Manifesto of the Noosphere because it is short, it should only take someone about five minutes to read, and duncan should only need about twelve minutes.

Im a BM wrote:
ANYONE can use a dictionary or search engine to learn what "biogeochemistry" is. It is highly relevant to discussion of climate change, particularly in regard to the carbon cycle.

Im a BM wrote:
It is difficult NOT to find the correct and unambiguous definition for biogeochemistry that is understood among the scientific community.

Im a BM wrote:
It takes a special talent for SCIENCE DENIAL to look for the definition of "biogeochemistry" without immediately finding the correct one that everyone uses and understands.

Im a BM wrote:
That talent is on display here. Rather than acknowledging the existence of an important field of science, it discovers a CONSPIRACY...

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
ANYONE can use a dictionary or search engine to learn what "biogeochemistry" is. It is highly relevant to discussion of climate change, particularly in regard to the carbon cycle.

No dictionary defines any word.
No search engine defines any word.
There is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry'.

Im a BM wrote:
It is difficult NOT to find the correct and unambiguous definition for biogeochemistry that is understood among the scientific community.

Science is not a community. There is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry'.

Im a BM wrote:
It takes a special talent for SCIENCE DENIAL to look for the definition of "biogeochemistry" without immediately finding the correct one that everyone uses and understands.

Inversion fallacy. You don't get to blame your problem on anybody else. Omniscience fallacy. You don't get to speak for everyone.

Im a BM wrote:
That talent is on display here. Rather than acknowledging the existence of an important field of science, it discovers a CONSPIRACY...

There is no such branch of science called 'biogeochemistry'.

The Democrat party is a conspiracy.

Im a BM wrote:
SCIENCE DENIAL on full display!

This is quite literally an example of science denial.

This is about as far as one can go with science denial.

Im a BM wrote:
Deny that a whole field of science even exists.

"You deny science." - Into the Night

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
SCIENCE DENIAL on full display!

This is quite literally an example of science denial.

This is about as far as one can go with science denial.

You are describing yourself, Robert. You cannot blame YOUR problem on anybody else. Inversion fallacy.

Im a BM wrote:
Deny that a whole field of science even exists.

"You deny science." - Into the Night

'Biogeochemistry' is not a branch of science. There is no such thing.

You have consistently denied science and chemistry.
* You think science and chemistry is a bunch of gibber-babble.
* You think science and chemistry is a paper.
* You think science and chemistry is a search engine.
* You think science and chemistry is a Holy Sanctification.

You think the Earth is warming. You think energy can be created out of nothing.

Im a BM wrote:
Are you delusional enough to believe that anyone recognizes your authority to declare what is or is not science?

Im a BM wrote:
Do you have the intellectual honesty to look up just one "buzzword" and find out why everyone ELSE understands what it means?

Im a BM wrote:
Nobody else is responsible for your deficiencies.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Are you delusional enough to believe that anyone recognizes your authority to declare what is or is not science?

Science is not owned by anyone. Meaningless buzzword and gibber-babble is not science.

Im a BM wrote:
Do you have the intellectual honesty to look up just one "buzzword" and find out why everyone ELSE understands what it means?

Buzzwords have no meaning, Robert.

Im a BM wrote:
Nobody else is responsible for your deficiencies.

You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy. You can't blame your problems on anybody else.

Im a BM wrote:You lie and claim to be a "chemist", which you obviously are NOT.

Im a BM wrote:And you drove everyone else away.

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:You lie and claim to be a "chemist", which you obviously are NOT.

He makes cool fireworks and you do not.

Im a BM wrote:And you drove everyone else away.

Your spamming of the board did that, all because you were trying to distract attention away from not understanding that water evaporates, for not knowing the difference between a chemical compound and a chemical category, and that Dominican coral reefs are just fine, that the ocean is not somehow losing its alkalinity, and that your Global Warming religion is dead.

But you do get to plausibly claim credit for having co-authored papers to which the authors allowed you to add your name. At least you get to spend your time watching for those papers to be cited. Well done.

IBdaMann wrote:

Im a BM wrote:You lie and claim to be a "chemist", which you obviously are NOT.

He makes cool fireworks and you do not.

Im a BM wrote:And you drove everyone else away.

Your spamming of the board did that, all because you were trying to distract attention away from not understanding that water evaporates, for not knowing the difference between a chemical compound and a chemical category, and that Dominican coral reefs are just fine, that the ocean is not somehow losing its alkalinity, and that your Global Warming religion is dead.

But you do get to plausibly claim credit for having co-authored papers to which the authors allowed you to add your name. At least you get to spend your time watching for those papers to be cited. Well done.

Im a BM wrote:

You did not give an honest response before to what happens when one Google's "Northup and dissolved organic nitrogen".

It is quite clear that this Northup guy is FIRST author of the papers in Nature, Biogeochemistry, Plant and Soil, etc., with over a thousand citations.

It is also quite clear that the scientific community acknowledges the existence of "organic nitrogen".

So, if you can handle the truth, I not only have the advanced degrees, I also have the widely cited original discoveries.

The "library" keeps getting visitors, even as days pass without ANY new posts.

Before long, they will all reach the maximum 65,535 "views" that the software is capable of recording with 16 bits.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

You did not give an honest response before to what happens when one Google's "Northup and dissolved organic nitrogen".

It is quite clear that this Northup guy is FIRST author of the papers in Nature, Biogeochemistry, Plant and Soil, etc., with over a thousand citations.

It is also quite clear that the scientific community acknowledges the existence of "organic nitrogen".

So, if you can handle the truth, I not only have the advanced degrees, I also have the widely cited original discoveries.

The "library" keeps getting visitors, even as days pass without ANY new posts.

Before long, they will all reach the maximum 65,535 "views" that the software is capable of recording with 16 bits.

Nitrogen is not organic. Science is not a community. You don't get to speak for everybody. Omniscience fallacy. Science is not a degree, discovery, library, views, software, or bits.

Im a BM wrote:

Something is not something else.

Something is not something else.

Something is not something else.

Science is not a chemical.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Something is not something else.

Something is not something else.

Something is not something else.

Science is not a chemical.

YARP

Im a BM wrote:
YARP is the Young Adult Reentry Partnership, which is Yet Another Reverse Proxy for the Youth Access and Resource Program.

Im a BM wrote:
If ITN could learn how to use Google, he could learn a LOT.

Im a BM wrote:
ITN, I double dog dare you to Google the term "organic carbon" and then explain how there is "no such thing" as this stuff which somehow has a million references in the scientific literature. Oh, wait. Science is not a literature.

Im a BM wrote:
I'm sure that "RQAA" is the only answer available to "what is YARP?"

Im a BM wrote:
Who gives a shit what "YARP" means anyway, if it's the only thing that a scientifically illiterate troll who LIES about being a "chemist" has to say?

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
YARP is the Young Adult Reentry Partnership, which is Yet Another Reverse Proxy for the Youth Access and Resource Program.

Redefinition fallacy. YARP.

Im a BM wrote:
If ITN could learn how to use Google, he could learn a LOT.

Google isn't God, Robert.

Im a BM wrote:
ITN, I double dog dare you to Google the term "organic carbon" and then explain how there is "no such thing" as this stuff which somehow has a million references in the scientific literature. Oh, wait. Science is not a literature.

Carbon is not organic. Google isn't science. Literature isn't science.

Im a BM wrote:
I'm sure that "RQAA" is the only answer available to "what is YARP?"

Yet Another Random Post (YARP). RQAA.

Im a BM wrote:
Who gives a shit what "YARP" means anyway, if it's the only thing that a scientifically illiterate troll who LIES about being a "chemist" has to say?

Inversion fallacy. You can't blame your problems on me or anybody else, Robert.

Im a BM wrote:

"Google isn't God, Robert." - Into the Night

Robert sounds like the kind of guy whose faith cannot be shaken by the denials of atheists who do not worship the Google God.

Im a BM wrote:
Like vampires recoiling from the sight of a crucifix, scientifically illiterate Internet trolls FEAR Google. It burns them if it touches their flesh.

Im a BM wrote:
Okay, I'll stop blaming my problems on you.

Im a BM wrote:
But I won't stop exposing your fraud, as you continue pretending that you are a "chemist". You obviously never passed a single chemistry course more advanced than high school level.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

"Google isn't God, Robert." - Into the Night

Robert sounds like the kind of guy whose faith cannot be shaken by the denials of atheists who do not worship the Google God.

You are Robert, Robert. Go learn what 'atheist' means.

Im a BM wrote:
Like vampires recoiling from the sight of a crucifix, scientifically illiterate Internet trolls FEAR Google. It burns them if it touches their flesh.

Go learn what 'atheist' means.

Im a BM wrote:
Okay, I'll stop blaming my problems on you.

Lie. Denial.

Im a BM wrote:
But I won't stop exposing your fraud, as you continue pretending that you are a "chemist". You obviously never passed a single chemistry course more advanced than high school level.

You can't blame your problems on me or anybody else, Robert. Inversion fallacy.

Im a BM wrote:
You do not deny the fact that you never passed a post-high-school level course in chemistry.

Im a BM wrote:
Are you delusional enough to think anyone ELSE respects your expertise as a "chemist"?

Im a BM wrote:
I'd be happy to comment on your famous scientific papers, if you would be willing to share a reference.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
You do not deny the fact that you never passed a post-high-school level course in chemistry.

Go learn what 'fact' means, Robert. Mantra 1c. Chemistry is not a school, course, degree, license, or any other sanctification.

Im a BM wrote:
Are you delusional enough to think anyone ELSE respects your expertise as a "chemist"?

Quite a few do, even though you don't. But then, you reject chemistry and science.

Im a BM wrote:
I'd be happy to comment on your famous scientific papers, if you would be willing to share a reference.

Science isn't a paper, Robert.

Im a BM wrote:
well, i invite you to display your knowledge of chemistry by showing what is WRONG about the chemistry I have published.

Im a BM wrote:
EASY TO FIND if you have the courage and intellectual honesty.

Im a BM wrote:
Explain what is wrong with my published scientific assertions.

Im a BM wrote:
Note that one of my papers has "organic nitrogen" in the title. You can explain the chemistry behind the non-existence of organic nitrogen, and offer your theories on why an analytical chemistry journal would publish it. Heck, you can explain why persulfate not being a "chemical" is so important to the discussion.

Im a BM wrote:
You can easily Google or go to Google Scholar scholar.google.com to get access to the chemistry research papers I've published.

Im a BM wrote:
Of course, my paper in the journal NATURE was the most famous one. Prove you are a chemist by criticizing it. If it's all just "buzzwords" that may be all you have to say. It's usually all you have to say.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
well, i invite you to display your knowledge of chemistry by showing what is WRONG about the chemistry I have published.

You haven't discussed any chemistry, Robert. Chemistry is not a 'publication'.

Im a BM wrote:
EASY TO FIND if you have the courage and intellectual honesty.

Can't find what does not exist.

Im a BM wrote:
Explain what is wrong with my published scientific assertions.

You aren't discussing science. Science is not a 'publication'.

Im a BM wrote:
Note that one of my papers has "organic nitrogen" in the title. You can explain the chemistry behind the non-existence of organic nitrogen, and offer your theories on why an analytical chemistry journal would publish it. Heck, you can explain why persulfate not being a "chemical" is so important to the discussion.

Nitrogen is not organic. Chemistry is not a journal or a publication. Persulfate is not a chemical.

Im a BM wrote:
You can easily Google or go to Google Scholar scholar.google.com to get access to the chemistry research papers I've published.

Google is not God.

Im a BM wrote:
Of course, my paper in the journal NATURE was the most famous one. Prove you are a chemist by criticizing it. If it's all just "buzzwords" that may be all you have to say. It's usually all you have to say.

Science is not a journal, magazine, book, website, search engine, pamphlet, paper, or any other publication.

I point out your buzzwords, Robert. They are YOUR problem. Only YOU can correct it.

Im a BM wrote:
The uninformed observer may not be familiar with the term "buzzword".

A "buzzword" is any scientific term that Into the Night is unable to comprehend.

Im a BM wrote:
If the uniformed observer is at all curious, it is EASY to find the actual definitions for the "buzzwords" that scientists use to communicate.

Im a BM wrote:
For example, where Into the Night insists (no less than a thousand times) that "There is no such thing as organic carbon", ANYONE can look it up and find out that whatever "organic carbon" is or is not, scientists talk about it a LOT.

Im a BM wrote:
So, Into the Night may not know how to find the definition for scientific "buzzwords" such as organic nitrogen, terminal electron acceptor, conjugate base, pH buffering, etc., but ANYONE can look up scientific terms to learn what SCIENTISTS believe those "buzzwords" mean.

Im a BM wrote:
And they can't ALL be faking it. We write these papers back and forth, all speaking the exact same language, all appearing to understand the same terms.

Im a BM wrote:
Indeed, every time Into the Night dismisses a scientific vocabulary term as a "buzzword", he confesses his IGNORANCE.

Im a BM wrote:
His ignorance can be easily confirmed by fact checking with a dictionary.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
The uninformed observer may not be familiar with the term "buzzword".

A "buzzword" is any scientific term that Into the Night is unable to comprehend.

Science is not buzzwords.

Im a BM wrote:
If the uniformed observer is at all curious, it is EASY to find the actual definitions for the "buzzwords" that scientists use to communicate.

Buzzwords have no definition. They don't mean anything. Science is not buzzwords. They cannot be used to 'communicate' anything.

Im a BM wrote:
For example, where Into the Night insists (no less than a thousand times) that "There is no such thing as organic carbon", ANYONE can look it up and find out that whatever "organic carbon" is or is not, scientists talk about it a LOT.

Carbon is not organic. You don't get to quote everyone. Omniscience fallacy.

Im a BM wrote:
So, Into the Night may not know how to find the definition for scientific "buzzwords" such as organic nitrogen, terminal electron acceptor, conjugate base, pH buffering, etc., but ANYONE can look up scientific terms to learn what SCIENTISTS believe those "buzzwords" mean.

Science isn't buzzwords. Nitrogen is not organic. There is no such thing as 'terminal electron acceptor'. You don't know what a buffer is. Science is not 'terms'. Science is not a religion. Buzzwords have no meaning.

Im a BM wrote:
And they can't ALL be faking it. We write these papers back and forth, all speaking the exact same language, all appearing to understand the same terms.

You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.
Science is not papers. Science is not 'terms'. Science is not buzzwords.

Im a BM wrote:
Indeed, every time Into the Night dismisses a scientific vocabulary term as a "buzzword", he confesses his IGNORANCE.

Buzzwords are not education. Buzzwords are not knowledge.

Im a BM wrote:
His ignorance can be easily confirmed by fact checking with a dictionary.

Buzzwords are not a dictionary. You don't get to quote every book. Omniscience fallacy. Dictionaries do not define any word. That is not their purpose.