Remember me
▼ Content

Arctic waters not freezing



Page 12 of 20<<<1011121314>>>
07-03-2017 19:42
Wake
★★★★★
(4027)
GasGuzzler wrote:
Well then you are are certainly a racist.


You must be correct. To liberals you cannot disagree with them unless you are a racist.
07-03-2017 20:45
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
GasGuzzler wrote:
Wake wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
Wake wrote:
Do you suppose he's drooling as he raves on?

Given his belief in AGW, I wonder if he is truly saddened by any loss of ice....seems to get quite excited about it melting.

From the constant raving I have the idea that he has an orgasm when he thinks that he can misrepresent anything as unnatural climate change.

Well then you are are certainly a racist.

Glad that "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" & "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" commisserated & agree that at least one of them is racist.
Of course, they nev'r argue that the following ain't happenin':
///////
The solar TSI has been languid for many decades & low for 10 years (including a 3+year low setting a 100 year record). Yet, 385+ straight months of temperatures have past, all over the 20th century average. The last 3 years have been successively the hottest years ever recorded. Presently, Arctic sea ice extent has been below 14 million square kilometers, ~ 1.5 million square kilometers LESS than the 1980's. Presently, Arctic sea ice VOLUME is 9,600 cubic kilometers LESS than that of the 1980's. This is an equivalent cube of ice, 21.2 kilometers by 21.2 kilometers by 68,000 feet high, the energy needed to melt it being 30 times the energy consumption of the U.S. All this, while the sun's HEAT.... is low.
Yes, AGW denier liar whiners are parrots..... also..... old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiners are vociferous voices for rich men who will NOT reward underlings for being underlings.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=95V9E%2bjf&id=4FC0BEEDAF541FE3EDF1A01694FDEE4CCC8A3E34&q=Arctic+Sea+Ice+Volume+Graph+feb+2017&simid=608038143506452087&selectedIndex=9&ajaxhist=0
07-03-2017 21:11
Wake
★★★★★
(4027)
Yep, he is drooling. It's pretty hard on him to have been defeated on every front. Politically, financially, climate change and intellectually.
07-03-2017 21:42
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" puffed:... he is drooling.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" doesn't answer me, anymore.
Edited on 07-03-2017 21:42
07-03-2017 21:51
Wake
★★★★★
(4027)
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

"Sea ice extent in the Sea of Okhotsk substantially decreased mid-month before rebounding to almost typical levels at the end of the month."

More tears from Chief Dumbass.
08-03-2017 01:13
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofs: "Sea ice extent in the Sea of Okhotsk substantially decreased mid-month before rebounding to almost typical levels at the end of the month."
Chief Dumbass.

Still.....total Arctic sea ice extent is below 14 million square kilometers & ~ 1.5 million square kilometers LESS than than that of the 1980's. Presently, Arctic sea ice Volume is 9600 cubic kilometers less than that of the 1980's, the energy to melt such a ice volume being ~ 30 times the annual U.S. energy consumption.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" is an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" doesn't answer me, anymore.
Edited on 08-03-2017 01:15
08-03-2017 15:21
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
IBdaMann wrote:
litesong wrote: It is good that old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiners have been predicting a return to ice age conditions for 20 years for good reason. The solar TSI has been languid for 40 years & low for the last 10 years (including a 3+ year period setting a 100 year record low TSI)

litesong, buddy, we pukey proud pigs aren't claiming such extremes. We will have somewhat noticeably cooler weather overall in twenty years....The AGW Berserker will have a little more work to do.

You should NOT back off the long past predictions of yer ilk so readily. Today, large & very cold fronts are over northern Canada & very powerfully on Ellesmere Island with temperatures of -59 degC. (20(+?)degC. below average), along the edges of & into the High Arctic. The Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
has developed average temperatures as low as 3degC. over average temperatures with chances for lower.
However, warm fronts that have intermittently but often been in northern Siberia this winter are predicted to run well into the High Arctic & may save FAB
from extinction. FAB
, now with a life 175(+?) days long, is excess AGW energy powered, living 130(+?) days LONGER than over-temperature periods of late '50's & early '60's. & remember, if not for one questionable average cold day, FAB
would be 190days old. & remember again, I predicted months ago, that FAB
could run to 200(+?) days in length.
Edited on 08-03-2017 15:33
09-03-2017 08:56
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote: Today, large & very cold fronts are over northern Canada & very powerfully on Ellesmere Island with temperatures of -59 degC. (20(+?)degC. below average), along the edges of & into the High Arctic. The Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
has developed average temperatures as low as 3degC. over average temperatures with chances for lower.
However, warm fronts that have intermittently but often been in northern Siberia this winter are predicted to run well into the High Arctic & may save FAB
from extinction. FAB
, now with a life 175(+?) days long, is excess AGW energy powered, living 130(+?) days LONGER than over-temperature periods of late '50's & early '60's. & remember, if not for one questionable average cold day, FAB
would be 190days old. & remember again, I predicted months ago, that FAB
could run to 200(+?) days in length.

The large & very cold fronts are over northern Canada & very powerfully on Ellesmere Island with temperatures of -59 degC. (20(+?)degC. below average), continue into the High Arctic powerfully, extending solidly from western Alaska, across Canada, to the eastern shores of Greenland.
However, the Siberian warm fronts have vast supporting southern heat structures extending all the way from Bay of Bengal, warm waters surrounding Indonesia & Malaysia & western Pacific Ocean heats. Some heat is driving directly north from the Bay to China & Mongolia, into Russia & Siberia, while other heats are hitching rides on eastern flowing jet streams, which curve north as they cross large expanses of the western Pacific. Moving into northern latitudes, & pumping, now north-northwest across Kamchatka Peninsula, the support heat is predicted to join the Siberian heat..... & bust the Alaska-Canada-Greenland cold block in two.
Helping this cause is more heat fronts from the U.S., pushing north at the same time as the heat from Kamchatka pushes north. Coming from different longitudes, it is no wonder that this pincer movement would break the A-C-G cold in two.
Yeah, the FAB
may NOT die..... for a second time!!
Edited on 09-03-2017 09:11
09-03-2017 18:38
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote: Moving into northern latitudes, & pumping, now north-northwest across Kamchatka Peninsula, the support heat is predicted to join the Siberian heat..... & bust the Alaska-Canada-Greenland cold block in two.

As much or more significant than the predicted cold block bust, is the warm front is predicted to power part of the cold front to the south. In the past, due to greater density of cold fronts, cold fronts pushed warm fronts around. It appears, at least in the High Arctic, that excess AGW energy in present day warm fronts, allows them to push cold fronts around.
09-03-2017 18:44
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1382)
So thermal differential air masses can actually move freely around the planet? Amazing! We could be in for another 1 degree rise in the next 100 years! Buckle up folks. It's going to be a wild ride.
10-03-2017 04:30
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleazy slimy stupid steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" gassed: So thermal differential air masses can actually move freely around the planet?


Its nice "old sick silly sleepy sleazy slimy stupid steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" realizes that warm fronts now carry more excess AGW energy & can often bulldoze cold fronts, so they can more readily occupy the High Arctic..... one of the reasons that the High Arctic (& Arctic) is warming quicker than the rest of Earth?
Anyhow..... "old sick silly sleepy sleazy slimy stupid steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" continues to be an old sick silly sleepy sleazy slimy stupid steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner.
10-03-2017 05:38
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote: Moving into northern latitudes, & pumping, now north-northwest across Kamchatka Peninsula, the support heat is predicted to join the Siberian heat..... & bust the Alaska-Canada-Greenland cold block in two.

As much or more significant than the predicted cold block bust, is the warm front is predicted to power part of the cold front to the south. In the past, due to greater density of cold fronts, cold fronts pushed warm fronts around. It appears, at least in the High Arctic, that excess AGW energy in present day warm fronts, allows them to push cold fronts around.

Possibly, the extra ability of warm fronts to push cold fronts around, is the reason the A-C-G cold front is not only being cut in two, but is also being bulldozed back into the U.S., where snow & colder March weather is visiting populated regions.
Edited on 10-03-2017 05:39
10-03-2017 17:37
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote: Moving into northern latitudes, & pumping, now north-northwest across Kamchatka Peninsula, the support heat is predicted to join the Siberian heat..... & bust the Alaska-Canada-Greenland cold block in two.

As much or more significant than the predicted cold block bust, is the warm front is predicted to power part of the cold front to the south. In the past, due to greater density of cold fronts, cold fronts pushed warm fronts around. It appears, at least in the High Arctic, that excess AGW energy in present day warm fronts, allows them to push cold fronts around.

Possibly, the extra ability of warm fronts to push cold fronts around, is the reason the A-C-G cold front is not only being cut in two, but is also being bulldozed back into the U.S., where snow & colder March weather is visiting populated regions.

Wow! New York is -4degF. That's Arctic chill.....from sweeping High Arctic excess AGW energy warm fronts powering thru & causing cold fronts to rebound & be driven south. Meanwhile, average High Arctic temperature is fluctuating ABOVE 3degC above average.
11-03-2017 07:34
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:
[quote]litesong wrote:
Possibly, the extra ability of warm fronts to push cold fronts around, is the reason the A-C-G cold front is not only being cut in two, but is also being bulldozed back into the U.S., where snow & colder March weather is visiting populated regions.

Wow! New York is -4degF. That's Arctic chill.....from sweeping High Arctic excess AGW energy warm fronts powering thru & causing cold fronts to rebound & be driven south. Meanwhile, average High Arctic temperature is fluctuating ABOVE 3degC above average.

Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
rises 5+ degC above average, as the powerful Siberian warm front, reinforced by heat transported all the way from the Bay of Bengal & western Tropical Pacific, powers into the High Arctic, cutting the A-C-G cold front in two & shoving some of the remains back into the U.S.
Edited on 11-03-2017 07:36
11-03-2017 16:51
Wake
★★★★★
(4027)
GasGuzzler wrote:
So thermal differential air masses can actually move freely around the planet? Amazing! We could be in for another 1 degree rise in the next 100 years! Buckle up folks. It's going to be a wild ride.


The cartoon character is posting so fast we don't even have a chance to laugh at him.
11-03-2017 17:06
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofs:... we don't even have a chance to laugh at him.


Admitting it ain't smart(we knew that because of his fumbling exponents), "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" bumbles & stumbles. It is good to know, that "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" doesn't pay attention to me, anymore.
Meanwhile:
The solar TSI has been languid for many decades & low for 10 years (including a 3+year low setting a 100 year record). Yet, 385+ straight months of temperatures have past, all over the 20th century average. The last 3 years have been successively the hottest years ever recorded. Presently, Arctic sea ice extent has been below 14 million square kilometers, ~ 1.5 million square kilometers LESS than the 1980's. Presently, Arctic sea ice VOLUME is 9,600 cubic kilometers LESS than that of the 1980's. This is an equivalent cube of ice, 21.2 kilometers by 21.2 kilometers by 68,000 feet high, the energy needed to melt it being 30 times the energy consumption of the U.S. All this, while the sun's HEAT.... is low.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=95V9E%2bjf&id=4FC0BEEDAF541FE3EDF1A01694FDEE4CCC8A3E34&q=Arctic+Sea+Ice+Volume+Graph+feb+2017&simid=608038143506452087&selectedIndex=9&ajaxhist=0
Edited on 11-03-2017 17:08
11-03-2017 20:16
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote
resent High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
rises 5+ degC above average, as the powerful Siberian warm front, reinforced by heat transported all the way from the Bay of Bengal & western Tropical Pacific, powers into the High Arctic, cutting the A-C-G cold front in two & shoving some of the remains back into the U.S.

Predictions continue correctly that the reinforced Siberian warm front that invaded the High Arctic, cutting & bulldozing the A-C-G cold front to the U.S., will continue to do so for the next number of days.
Many weatherpeople mistakenly say it is the Arctic cold front dropping onto the U.S. However, the beginnings of the A-C-G cold front began with upwelling cold water in the Northeast Pacific Ocean that was transported on-shore to Canada, spreading to Alaska & Greenland. The A-C-G cold front first made a move into the High Arctic. But its motion was truncated, as the Siberian warm front pounded it out of the High Arctic.
Not only did the previous Siberian warm front (now in the High Arctic) cut the A-C-G cold front in two AND thrust the cold front into the U.S., but the Siberian warm front seems to have absorbed part of the A-C-G near Greenland, such that the A-C-G is only the A-C cold front now!!!!! Just remarkable that warm fronts in the High Arctic can pound cold fronts with impunity!!!
11-03-2017 23:15
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote: Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
rises 5+ degC above average, as the powerful Siberian warm front, reinforced by heat transported all the way from the Bay of Bengal & western Tropical Pacific, powers into the High Arctic, cutting the A-C-G cold front in two & shoving some of the remains back into the U.S.

The sun's noontime vertical position is still south of the equator. But it will shortly be north of the of the equator, & already is illuminating southern parts of the High Arctic. The average temperature line of the High Arctic is starting to rise.
Altho the Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
, has been recently as low as 3degC above the average, it has a jump on the average High Arctic temperature line & already is 7degC above the average, due to the reinforced Siberian warm front powering into the High Arctic.

The Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
has now existed for 180 straight days, ~ 30 days longer than ANY previous High Arctic over-temperature period & ~ 140 straight days longer than ANY High Arctic over-temperature period during the late 1950's & early 1960's.
Edited on 11-03-2017 23:47
12-03-2017 18:45
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:Altho the Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
, has been recently as low as 3degC above the average, it has a jump on the average High Arctic temperature line & already is 7degC above the average, due to the reinforced Siberian warm front powering into the High Arctic.
The Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
has now existed for 180 straight days, ~ 30 days longer than ANY previous High Arctic over-temperature period & ~ 140 straight days longer than ANY High Arctic over-temperature period during the late 1950's & early 1960's.

The present temperature charts (both absolute & anomalous) show that a counter-clockwise rotation is in the High Arctic warm front that proceeded north from Siberia. Of course, the circular gradiated structure also shows in the Arctic air pressure charts.
Edited on 12-03-2017 19:07
13-03-2017 00:00
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:Altho the Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
, has been recently as low as 3degC above the average, it has a jump on the average High Arctic temperature line & already is 7degC above the average, due to the reinforced Siberian warm front powering into the High Arctic.

The Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
has now existed for 180 straight days, ~ 30 days longer than ANY previous High Arctic over-temperature period & ~ 140 straight days longer than ANY High Arctic over-temperature period during the late 1950's & early 1960's.

Up to 8degC above average, now.
13-03-2017 02:15
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:
litesong wrote:Altho the Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
, has been recently as low as 3degC above the average, it has a jump on the average High Arctic temperature line & already is 7degC above the average, due to the reinforced Siberian warm front powering into the High Arctic.
The Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
has now existed for 180 straight days, ~ 30 days longer than ANY previous High Arctic over-temperature period & ~ 140 straight days longer than ANY High Arctic over-temperature period during the late 1950's & early 1960's.

Up to 8degC above average, now.

Meanwhile, the warm front continues to push the A-C-G (no...it the A-C, now) cold front onto eastern U.S. NY is cold & may get as much as 18 inches of snow.
Edited on 13-03-2017 02:16
13-03-2017 04:38
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1382)
I let your weather ignorance go unchallenged all the time...but now you're going to blame a blizzard on global warming. Ummmm no. You won't get away with blaming global warming for a snowstorm. Here's my correction to your weather ramblings.

Last week an area of low pressure moved across the upper Midwest, dragging a cold front and arctic high pressure with it. This low was also to blame for several weak tornadoes and widespread severe weather in the plains. This ridge of high pressure has remained in place as a disturbace moving out of the gulf of alaska diving southeast caused another strong low to form in the zone of baroclinicity . This low will bring moderate snow to the midwest in over running moisture and frontogenesis forcing event also aided by a favorable jet srtucture for a negative tilt low. Aforementioned low will progress to the east, dragging more arctic air down behind it's counterclockwise rotation.
As it makes it's way to the eastern seaboard, it will phase with a northbound low moving up the carolinas. This, with cold air in place, will create a classic noreaster with a tight gradient for plenty of wind. If the low remains offshore just enough....buttloads of snow for New York City. IT WILL HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH GLOBAL WARMING AND SOME SIBERIAN WARM FRONT WITH A MIND OF IT'S OWN.

Get a clue before posting any more drivel.


I think people screw me over because they don't want to see someone willing to put out the effort that they won't.~James~
Attached image:


Edited on 13-03-2017 04:57
13-03-2017 16:15
Wake
★★★★★
(4027)
GasGuzzler wrote:
I let your weather ignorance go unchallenged all the time...but now you're going to blame a blizzard on global warming. Ummmm no. You won't get away with blaming global warming for a snowstorm. Here's my correction to your weather ramblings.


Chief Limpwrist blames freeway wrecks during commute hours on global warming. It doesn't make any sense to even read his postings.
13-03-2017 17:46
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" gushed: Here's my correction to your weather ramblings.
Last week an area of low pressure moved across the upper Midwest, dragging a cold front and arctic high pressure with it.

Ya don' mention what preceded your observation, but only mention the tail-end weather. First, what you call Arctic cold, originated in the cold sub-temperature upwelling waters of the Far Northeast Pacific for the past month or 2. Westerlies have moved cold onto western Canada, spreading over most of Canada, to Alaska & to Greenland, in some places 20degC below average temperatures. This is what I've mentioned previously as the A-C-G cold front. As I've also mentioned previously, the vast cold front tried to continue into the High Arctic & did depress edges of the Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
& its temperatures somewhat.
Also as I've mentioned, a large warm front in Siberia, gained extra warmth from two northern moving warm fronts to power into the High Arctic. Simultaneously, the warm front, with a large & strong circulation pattern was able to break the A-C-G cold front in two, bulldoze part of the cold back down into the U.S. AND ABSORB part of the cold front over Greenland!!! It was a marvel to behold..... & "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" MISSED IT & DIDN'T BEHOLD IT.
Yeah, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" likes being "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter".
13-03-2017 18:25
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1382)
985 millibar low in the upper midwest...that's what pulled the arctic air south. No bulldozers or backhoes.
13-03-2017 19:41
Wake
★★★★★
(4027)
GasGuzzler wrote:
985 millibar low in the upper midwest...that's what pulled the arctic air south. No bulldozers or backhoes.


There are dozens and dozens of papers from government agencies or government funded research that tells us that climate change is making severe weather events more severe and more frequent.

And yet:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/climatic-phenomena-pages/extreme-weather-page/

Surface Detail and spot can tell us that the actual information is from a website that they don't like so it is obviously wrong.
14-03-2017 02:09
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" gushed: 985 millibar low in the upper midwest...that's what pulled the arctic air south. No bulldozers or backhoes.

Nah! A long A-C-G cold front had developed for a month & a half (longer?), was lined up & tried to move into the High Arctic. That first motion is what depressed Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
temperatures almost down to..... AVERAGE. However, the Siberian warm front reinforced by further warm fronts powered over the North Pole (as it more often does than 50 years ago), & banged the A-C-G cold front. First, it cut A-C-G in two, second it knocked A-C-G into lower Canada, which caused Hudson's Bay's nearly record winter storm, & set off straight line winds in Newfoundland & Labrador over 110mph. Third, some of the warm front absorbed some of the cold of Greenland, causing A-C-G to become just the A-C.
So finally, the powerful cold front (which was seconded by the warm front) gets to the U.S., where the general westerly winds drive it to east coast U.S.
There is no way the low in the U.S. could reverse the direction of the northern moving cold front by sucking it south to the U.S., unless the powerful warm front busted the cold front to the south.
Edited on 14-03-2017 02:45
14-03-2017 02:31
Wake
★★★★★
(4027)
GasGuzzler wrote:
985 millibar low in the upper midwest...that's what pulled the arctic air south. No bulldozers or backhoes.


I told you that arguing with a True Believer is the same as insulting Allah to a Muslim.
14-03-2017 02:55
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofs: I told you that arguing with a True Believer is the same as insulting Allah to a Muslim.

Meanwhile:
The solar TSI has been languid for many decades & low for 10 years (including a 3+year low setting a 100 year record). Yet, 385+ straight months of temperatures have past, all over the 20th century average. The last 3 years have been successively the hottest years ever recorded. Presently, Arctic sea ice extent has been below 14 million square kilometers, ~ 1.5 million square kilometers LESS than the 1980's. Presently, Arctic sea ice VOLUME is 9,600 cubic kilometers LESS than that of the 1980's. This is an equivalent cube of ice, 21.2 kilometers by 21.2 kilometers by 68,000 feet high, the energy needed to melt it being 30 times the energy consumption of the U.S. All this, while the sun's HEAT.... is low.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=95V9E%2bjf&id=4FC0BEEDAF541FE3EDF1A01694FDEE4CCC8A3E34&q=Arctic+Sea+Ice+Volume+Graph+feb+2017&simid=608038143506452087&selectedIndex=9&ajaxhist=0
14-03-2017 16:38
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1382)
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" gushed: 985 millibar low in the upper midwest...that's what pulled the arctic air south. No bulldozers or backhoes.

Nah! A long A-C-G cold front had developed for a month & a half (longer?), was lined up & tried to move into the High Arctic. That first motion is what depressed Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
temperatures almost down to..... AVERAGE. However, the Siberian warm front reinforced by further warm fronts powered over the North Pole (as it more often does than 50 years ago), & banged the A-C-G cold front. First, it cut A-C-G in two, second it knocked A-C-G into lower Canada, which caused Hudson's Bay's nearly record winter storm, & set off straight line winds in Newfoundland & Labrador over 110mph. Third, some of the warm front absorbed some of the cold of Greenland, causing A-C-G to become just the A-C.
So finally, the powerful cold front (which was seconded by the warm front) gets to the U.S., where the general westerly winds drive it to east coast U.S.
There is no way the low in the U.S. could reverse the direction of the northern moving cold front by sucking it south to the U.S., unless the powerful warm front busted the cold front to the south.


So, since you are such an arctic weather expert, please reconcile your above statements with the arctic oscillation.


I think people screw me over because they don't want to see someone willing to put out the effort that they won't.~James~
14-03-2017 16:53
Wake
★★★★★
(4027)
GasGuzzler wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" gushed: 985 millibar low in the upper midwest...that's what pulled the arctic air south. No bulldozers or backhoes.

Nah! A long A-C-G cold front had developed for a month & a half (longer?), was lined up & tried to move into the High Arctic. That first motion is what depressed Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
temperatures almost down to..... AVERAGE. However, the Siberian warm front reinforced by further warm fronts powered over the North Pole (as it more often does than 50 years ago), & banged the A-C-G cold front. First, it cut A-C-G in two, second it knocked A-C-G into lower Canada, which caused Hudson's Bay's nearly record winter storm, & set off straight line winds in Newfoundland & Labrador over 110mph. Third, some of the warm front absorbed some of the cold of Greenland, causing A-C-G to become just the A-C.
So finally, the powerful cold front (which was seconded by the warm front) gets to the U.S., where the general westerly winds drive it to east coast U.S.
There is no way the low in the U.S. could reverse the direction of the northern moving cold front by sucking it south to the U.S., unless the powerful warm front busted the cold front to the south.


So, since you are such an arctic weather expert, please reconcile your above statements with the arctic oscillation.


I have decided that the morons here whose only reason for living is supporting AGW are just too stupid to deal with. You can see people like Ceist actually ranting. It simply isn't worth trying to teach them real science. Instead I'd just get Chief Limpwrist ranting 7 postings at a time in meaningless chatter meant to do nothing but insult people, spot and Surface Detail simply asking for references again and again after you supply them and Ceist cutting and pasteing 3 pages of references to an author that doesn't even say what he believes he is saying. With a group this sick it's far better to simply let history be the judge. So far history has shown them to be completely wrong.
14-03-2017 17:28
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofs: the morons here....

It is good to see "wake-me-up" doubling down about its errors.
////////
Admitting it ain't smart(we knew that because of his fumbling exponents), "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" bumbles & stumbles. It is good to know, that "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" doesn't pay attention to me, anymore.
Meanwhile:
The solar TSI has been languid for many decades & low for 10 years (including a 3+year low setting a 100 year record). Yet, 385+ straight months of temperatures have past, all over the 20th century average. The last 3 years have been successively the hottest years ever recorded. Presently, Arctic sea ice extent has been below 14 million square kilometers, ~ 1.5 million square kilometers LESS than the 1980's. Presently, Arctic sea ice VOLUME is 9,600 cubic kilometers LESS than that of the 1980's. This is an equivalent cube of ice, 21.2 kilometers by 21.2 kilometers by 68,000 feet high, the energy needed to melt it being 30 times the energy consumption of the U.S. All this, while the sun's HEAT.... is low.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=95V9E%2bjf&id=4FC0BEEDAF541FE3EDF1A01694FDEE4CCC8A3E34&q=Arctic+Sea+Ice+Volume+Graph+feb+2017&simid=608038143506452087&selectedIndex=9&ajaxhist=0
Edited on 14-03-2017 17:34
14-03-2017 17:34
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1382)
Wake wrote:
With a group this sick it's far better to simply let history be the judge. So far history has shown them to be completely wrong.


Exactly what I'm getting to Wake. There is plenty enough history already to be the judge. Climate by definition is the average of all weather. Climate change therefore must include a discussion of weather, which there is a plethora of historical records.
AGW whackos are so eager to be spoon fed another wild claim, blaming human emissions on some extreme weather. They just eat it and regurgitate it.
You can argue your PPMs and light spectrum absorption and whatever other science you want and that's all great. But for me it comes down to this; Are the claims and effects of global warming made by the alarmists substantiated by historical record? Time and again the answer is no. Why should I ever read that 5 million people die every year because of a 1 degree rise in 100 years? It's just like in a courtroom. Once your credibility is gone, you are guilty or useless.
Chief Litehead IS trying to talk about weather and what's going on because of global warming. However, he has zero knowledge of how weather actually happens. (LOL a cold front lasting a month and a half
) I suspect his posts are copied and pasted from some nutjob site that gives warm fronts names and a mind of there own with no playbook to follow.

Because I, and 99% of us are not scientists, and scientists themselves are in disagreement, we only believe the person we trust. Usually that will faith will go right down party lines. No warming forecast model has ever been right, so for a more meaningful debate, I try to move the discussion to verifiable claims. What have the warmies claimed today? Is it true/false? Can I prove it with THEIR acceptable data?


I think people screw me over because they don't want to see someone willing to put out the effort that they won't.~James~
Edited on 14-03-2017 17:38
14-03-2017 17:41
Ceist
★★★☆☆
(592)
Wake wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" gushed: 985 millibar low in the upper midwest...that's what pulled the arctic air south. No bulldozers or backhoes.

Nah! A long A-C-G cold front had developed for a month & a half (longer?), was lined up & tried to move into the High Arctic. That first motion is what depressed Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB, or FAB
temperatures almost down to..... AVERAGE. However, the Siberian warm front reinforced by further warm fronts powered over the North Pole (as it more often does than 50 years ago), & banged the A-C-G cold front. First, it cut A-C-G in two, second it knocked A-C-G into lower Canada, which caused Hudson's Bay's nearly record winter storm, & set off straight line winds in Newfoundland & Labrador over 110mph. Third, some of the warm front absorbed some of the cold of Greenland, causing A-C-G to become just the A-C.
So finally, the powerful cold front (which was seconded by the warm front) gets to the U.S., where the general westerly winds drive it to east coast U.S.
There is no way the low in the U.S. could reverse the direction of the northern moving cold front by sucking it south to the U.S., unless the powerful warm front busted the cold front to the south.


So, since you are such an arctic weather expert, please reconcile your above statements with the arctic oscillation.


I have decided that the morons here whose only reason for living is supporting AGW are just too stupid to deal with. You can see people like Ceist actually ranting. It simply isn't worth trying to teach them real science. Instead I'd just get Chief Limpwrist ranting 7 postings at a time in meaningless chatter meant to do nothing but insult people, spot and Surface Detail simply asking for references again and again after you supply them and Ceist cutting and pasteing 3 pages of references to an author that doesn't even say what he believes he is saying. With a group this sick it's far better to simply let history be the judge. So far history has shown them to be completely wrong.

LOL! You're the 'moron' who uses posts on junkscience conspiracy blogs run by non-scientists as 'sources' and refuses to read any published papers (not that you seem to be able to tell the difference). You think the nonsense you are parroting is 'real science'? What a joke!

I'm still laughing that you didn't even realise I'd posted Prof Richard Alley's entire academic CV including all his qualifications, and the hundreds of highly cited research papers he has authored over 30 years on ice-cores/glaciology/Greenland/Antarctic etc, not "3 pages of references".

You were parroting complete rubbish about ice cores from posts on conspiracy blogs written by scientifically illiterate non-scientists as if it's 'fact', and banging on about 'scientific credentials' - and you didn't even know who Alley was or anything about his research. He's probably the most cited researcher in that field.

What a complete blithering idiot you are.

Edited on 14-03-2017 17:58
15-03-2017 03:19
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1382)
So, since you are such an arctic weather expert, please reconcile your above statements with the arctic oscillation.

OK Litehead, I threw you a hanging curve ball here for you to knock out of the park. I know you saw this posting, but instead of answering, you've been cutting and pasting on 8 more posts. This is your big opportunity to say something intelligent....It's been a while....ever? Please tell us how the Arctic Oscillation interacts with the Siberian warm front and all the bulldozers, backhoes and skid loaders. Can you give it a go?
15-03-2017 03:30
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1382)
There is no way the low in the U.S. could reverse the direction of the northern moving cold front by sucking it south to the U.S., unless the powerful warm front busted the cold front to the south.


Litehead,
Click the link and it will take you to the surface map showing the 984 mb low on March 6th. Animate each day and see the low deepens to 972 in 48 hrs and the cold Canadian high rushing in behind it's circulation. It is interesting to note that on March 8th the 972mb low is near the Hudson bay while the cold front was driven by the low, all the way to the gulf of Mexico. There is a lot for you to learn just from this little set of data, and if you do learn it, you may just be a little embarrassed of some (most?)of your previous posts.

http://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20170306.html
Edited on 15-03-2017 04:09
15-03-2017 03:35
Wake
★★★★★
(4027)
GasGuzzler wrote:
There is no way the low in the U.S. could reverse the direction of the northern moving cold front by sucking it south to the U.S., unless the powerful warm front busted the cold front to the south.


Litehead,
Click the link and it will take you to the surface map showing the 986 mb low on March 6th. Animate each day and see the low deepen to 972 in 48 hrs and the Canadian high rushing in behind it's circulation. There is a lot for you to learn just from this little set of data and if you do learn it, you may just be a little embarrassed of some of your previous posts.

http://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index_20170306.html


Talking to Chief Limpwrist is nothing but a waste of time. I stopped even reading anything he posts a month ago.
15-03-2017 04:05
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner gaslighter" gushed: ...interacts with the Siberian warm front and all the bulldozers, backhoes and skid loaders.

Ah... "gaslighter" likes skidrow "hoes",who walk on his back. More sexual AGW denier liar whiner proclivities.....
As predicted & as reported as true, the Siberian warm front, supported by at least two other north moving warm fronts, drove into the High Arctic (bulldozer blades muted by the darkness around the North Pole). Nevertheless, the Siberian warm front piled into the aligned A-C-G cold front. First, the cold front was cut in two pieces. Second, part of the cold front was knocked to the south, which initially caused a dramatic, long lasting snow storm over Hudson Bay. Later, Newfoundland & Labrador had storm winds of 110+mph. Presently, that "knocked-back cold front is dumping on the U.S. east coast.
All this has been reported in my posts above.
Now, it appears that not only has the warm front knocked part of the long wall cold front to the northern U.S., the cold is spreading over the ENTIRE eastern U.S., including down to Florida. The warm front itself, is now occupying mid-northern Canada. Because the warm front has passed the North Pole & moved into northern Canada, a swirl of a cold front from Greenland has moved directly to the North Pole, & the Present High Arctic Berserker, PHAB or FAB
has DROPPED a few degC in temperatures.
Predictions for the next few days indicate the cold front will remain over the eastern U.S. AND the warm front will remain over northern Canada, at least for a few days, altho both cold & warm fronts may "thin" in their cold & warmth.
Meanwhile, the warm front that proceeded from Siberia to the North Pole & is now residing over northern Canada, left behind warmth in Siberia. The Siberian warmth is building, again supplied from the long enduring warm front passages that originated in the Bay of Bengal & in tropical western Pacific waters.
Edited on 15-03-2017 04:29
15-03-2017 04:22
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1382)
As predicted & as reported as true, the Siberian warm front, supported by at least two other north moving warm fronts, drove into the High Arctic (bulldozer blades muted by the darkness around the North Pole). Nevertheless, the Siberian warm front piled into the aligned A-C-G cold front. First, the cold front was cut in two pieces.


OK I get it. You insist on being stupid. It's so hot it's cold out. You were right Wake. They can't accept the evidence right in front of their face because it flies in the face of their agenda.

Any 2nd grader can look at the below map and see why the US is cold but people like liteshit will say it's global warming and ask the working people of the world to pay for fixing it, along with footing the bill for their health insurance. Go save some other planet. Earths biggest threat is YOU!


I think people screw me over because they don't want to see someone willing to put out the effort that they won't.~James~
Attached image:


Edited on 15-03-2017 04:23
15-03-2017 04:33
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1382)
Second, part of the cold front was knocked to the south, which initially caused a dramatic, long lasting snow storm over Hudson Bay. Later, Newfoundland & Labrador had storm winds of 110+mph. Presently, that "knocked-back cold front is dumping on the U.S. east coast.


Could you please give me the date of this Hudson bay storm? What do you suppose caused 110mph winds? Without looking it up I would suspect a 970mb low bumping up against a 1045mb high? Just a guess. Give me a date i'll find it.

Also, the current cold over the eastern US is once again due to strong low pressure (980mb) currently over New England, not a Siberian warm front. Notice how every time you have a strong low, you get a Canadian cold front? It's not coincidence. Continue to be stupid if you wish.
Edited on 15-03-2017 04:36
Page 12 of 20<<<1011121314>>>





Join the debate Arctic waters not freezing:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Temperatures leap 40 degrees above normal as the Arctic Ocean and Greenland ice sheet see record June mel318-06-2019 06:22
Mike Pompeo: Melting Arctic Ice Presents New Trade Opportunities028-05-2019 15:33
2019 Arctic sea ice wintertime extent is seventh lowest005-05-2019 13:50
Arctic's melting permafrost will cost nearly $70 trillion, study finds101-05-2019 21:12
The mechanism of the vertical circulation of the waters of the oceans301-05-2019 20:48
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact