Remember me
▼ Content

All posts by One Punch Man



PostDate
21 Reasons To Be Skeptical of Man-Made Climate Change20-09-2019 12:34
RE: 75 papers now support a low climate sensitivity06-10-2018 02:45
75 papers now support a low climate sensitivity04-10-2018 15:15
RE: This is one of the reasons why I am skeptical of human-induced global warming04-10-2018 14:52
This is one of the reasons why I am skeptical of human-induced global warming02-10-2018 01:22
RE: 20 Reasons To Be Skeptical Of Human-Induced Global Warming23-09-2018 00:12
RE: 20 Reasons To Be Skeptical Of Human-Induced Global Warming22-09-2018 22:09
RE: 20 Reasons To Be Skeptical Of Human-Induced Global Warming22-09-2018 19:02
20 Reasons To Be Skeptical Of Human-Induced Global Warming21-09-2018 13:35
The IPCC overestimates climate sensitivity13-09-2018 13:24
RE: Is the CO2 increase natural or man-made?06-09-2018 16:05
RE: Is the CO2 increase natural or man-made?06-09-2018 14:33
RE: Is the CO2 increase natural or man-made?05-09-2018 15:06
RE: Is the CO2 increase natural or man-made?04-09-2018 16:25
RE: Is the CO2 increase natural or man-made?04-09-2018 16:07
RE: Is the CO2 increase natural or man-made?22-08-2018 01:08
RE: Is the CO2 increase natural or man-made?22-08-2018 01:05
RE: Is the CO2 increase natural or man-made?20-08-2018 15:55
RE: Is the CO2 increase natural or man-made?20-08-2018 14:58
Is the CO2 increase natural or man-made?16-08-2018 12:41
RE: Welcome to a much greener Earth!17-05-2016 20:30
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.01-03-2016 15:55
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.01-03-2016 14:06
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.01-03-2016 13:13
RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure?29-02-2016 16:48
RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure?29-02-2016 16:37
RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure?29-02-2016 16:34
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.29-02-2016 13:55
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.29-02-2016 01:35
RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure?28-02-2016 18:19
RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure?28-02-2016 17:51
RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure?28-02-2016 17:37
RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure?27-02-2016 15:29
RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure?27-02-2016 15:18
RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming26-02-2016 23:41
RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure?26-02-2016 23:28
RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming26-02-2016 21:19
RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure?26-02-2016 16:53
RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming26-02-2016 15:53
RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming24-02-2016 22:27
RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming24-02-2016 22:14
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.24-02-2016 21:41
RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming24-02-2016 14:29
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.24-02-2016 13:35
RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming24-02-2016 02:33
RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming24-02-2016 02:19
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.24-02-2016 01:13
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.23-02-2016 14:56
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.20-02-2016 17:08
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.20-02-2016 11:36
RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease.19-02-2016 19:12
RE: Why deny global warming19-02-2016 14:22
RE: Why deny global warming19-02-2016 14:04
RE: Why deny global warming19-02-2016 03:38
RE: Why deny global warming18-02-2016 20:49
RE: Why deny global warming18-02-2016 20:21
RE: Why deny global warming17-02-2016 12:59
RE: Why deny global warming16-02-2016 18:09
RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID13-02-2016 01:01
RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID12-02-2016 19:34
RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID12-02-2016 18:01
RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID12-02-2016 17:07
RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID12-02-2016 15:22
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?11-02-2016 17:40
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?11-02-2016 16:27
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?11-02-2016 16:03
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?11-02-2016 15:43
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?11-02-2016 15:15
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?11-02-2016 14:36
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?11-02-2016 14:18
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?11-02-2016 14:08
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?11-02-2016 14:03
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?10-02-2016 21:01
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?10-02-2016 16:52
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?10-02-2016 12:04
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?09-02-2016 16:54
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?09-02-2016 15:52
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?09-02-2016 15:51
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?09-02-2016 14:45
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?09-02-2016 14:37
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?09-02-2016 02:37
RE: there is no evidence more CO2 traps more heat and heats the Earth08-02-2016 21:31
RE: there is no evidence more CO2 traps more heat and heats the Earth08-02-2016 20:26
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?07-02-2016 19:26
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?07-02-2016 17:28
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?07-02-2016 14:50
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?05-02-2016 19:13
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?05-02-2016 13:24
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?05-02-2016 13:18
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?05-02-2016 13:16
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?04-02-2016 17:56
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?04-02-2016 17:51
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?04-02-2016 12:36
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?03-02-2016 20:20
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?03-02-2016 20:06
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?03-02-2016 17:50
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?03-02-2016 17:24
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?03-02-2016 17:02
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?03-02-2016 15:27
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?03-02-2016 01:08
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?02-02-2016 23:38
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?02-02-2016 23:32
RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2?02-02-2016 13:52
RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics29-01-2016 18:04
RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics29-01-2016 01:49
RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics28-01-2016 20:22
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?22-01-2016 17:46
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?22-01-2016 15:36
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?22-01-2016 13:41
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?21-01-2016 23:50
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?21-01-2016 20:41
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?21-01-2016 19:48
RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There?21-01-2016 12:47
RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics19-01-2016 21:45
RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics19-01-2016 21:10
RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics19-01-2016 17:03
RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics19-01-2016 16:18






▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact