| Post | Date |
| RE: What is heat? | 30-09-2016 14:38 |
| RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 30-09-2016 14:37 |
| RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 30-09-2016 12:03 |
| RE: What is heat? | 30-09-2016 11:42 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 25-09-2016 23:23 |
| RE: Is GW religious? | 23-09-2016 23:35 |
| RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 23-09-2016 23:19 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 23-09-2016 22:56 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 23-09-2016 22:50 |
| RE: the atmosphere is a blanket, traps heat | 23-09-2016 20:17 |
| RE: Is GW religious? | 23-09-2016 20:11 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 23-09-2016 18:23 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 23-09-2016 17:44 |
| RE: the atmosphere is a blanket, traps heat | 23-09-2016 17:30 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 23-09-2016 17:15 |
| RE: the atmosphere is a blanket, traps heat | 23-09-2016 13:24 |
| RE: the atmosphere is a blanket, traps heat | 23-09-2016 11:18 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 23-09-2016 11:06 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 22-09-2016 22:12 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 22-09-2016 19:07 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 22-09-2016 18:32 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 22-09-2016 18:17 |
| RE: Read this and think | 22-09-2016 18:05 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 22-09-2016 18:00 |
| RE: 33 degrees C | 22-09-2016 17:38 |
| RE: Read this and think | 22-09-2016 17:35 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 22-09-2016 17:30 |
| RE: 33 degrees C | 22-09-2016 16:20 |
| RE: Clarification | 22-09-2016 16:17 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 22-09-2016 16:05 |
| RE: Basic arithmetic | 22-09-2016 14:27 |
| RE: Read this and think | 22-09-2016 14:19 |
| RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 22-09-2016 14:12 |
| RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 22-09-2016 14:07 |
| RE: Basic arithmetic | 22-09-2016 13:58 |
| RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 22-09-2016 13:47 |
| RE: Is GW religious? | 22-09-2016 13:44 |
| RE: Clarification | 22-09-2016 13:42 |
| RE: 33 degrees C | 22-09-2016 13:13 |
| RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 22-09-2016 00:42 |
| RE: Basic arithmetic | 22-09-2016 00:35 |
| RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 22-09-2016 00:30 |
| RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 22-09-2016 00:27 |
| RE: Is GW religious? | 22-09-2016 00:26 |
| RE: Is GW religious? | 21-09-2016 23:58 |
| RE: Read this and think | 21-09-2016 23:53 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 22:42 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 21:54 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 19:12 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 19:08 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 18:40 |
| RE: Basic arithmetic | 21-09-2016 18:33 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 18:22 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 18:17 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 17:58 |
| RE: Basic arithmetic | 21-09-2016 17:56 |
| RE: Basic arithmetic | 21-09-2016 17:02 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 16:58 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 16:32 |
| RE: Let's Get Back On Track | 21-09-2016 16:09 |
| RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 21-09-2016 15:55 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 15:37 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 15:11 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 14:48 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 14:34 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 14:10 |
| RE: Is this one good enough? | 21-09-2016 10:39 |
| RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 02:16 |
| RE: Is GW religious? | 21-09-2016 01:59 |
| RE: Is this one good enough? | 21-09-2016 01:30 |
| RE: Is this one good enough? | 20-09-2016 23:51 |
| RE: Is this one good enough? | 20-09-2016 23:05 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 20-09-2016 18:18 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 20-09-2016 01:22 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 20-09-2016 00:32 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 20-09-2016 00:06 |
| RE: the atmosphere doesn't need CO2 and H2O to generate heat | 19-09-2016 22:41 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 19-09-2016 22:25 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 19-09-2016 21:59 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 19-09-2016 21:36 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 19-09-2016 02:38 |
| RE: Preferred word in lieu of "GW Denier" | 19-09-2016 02:33 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 19-09-2016 01:58 |
| RE: climate change affects crops | 18-09-2016 23:50 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 18-09-2016 14:15 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 18-09-2016 03:39 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 18-09-2016 02:44 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 17-09-2016 22:48 |
| RE: XKCD earth temperarture; | 17-09-2016 21:43 |
| RE: Why sea level rise will be a good thing. | 06-09-2016 20:46 |
| RE: Scientific Theories? | 06-09-2016 20:29 |
| RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID | 06-09-2016 04:17 |
| RE: July hottest month since records began say nasa | 06-09-2016 04:15 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 06-09-2016 04:00 |
| RE: New Posters beware! | 06-09-2016 03:55 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 06-09-2016 03:47 |
| RE: CO2 Lags About 2,000 Years Behind on Temperature Changes | 06-09-2016 03:44 |
| RE: Why doesn't Exxon sell cigarettes? | 06-09-2016 03:36 |
| RE: Climate change is unavoidable, so is a warmer or cooler climate more desireable? | 06-09-2016 03:31 |
| RE: Scientific Theories? | 06-09-2016 03:16 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 06-09-2016 01:59 |
| RE: Why sea level rise will be a good thing. | 06-09-2016 01:55 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 05-09-2016 18:54 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 05-09-2016 11:02 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 05-09-2016 00:01 |
| RE: Scientific Theories? | 04-09-2016 23:57 |
| RE: Why sea level rise will be a good thing. | 04-09-2016 23:32 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 04-09-2016 18:31 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 04-09-2016 18:18 |
| RE: Scientific Theories? | 04-09-2016 18:03 |
| RE: Why sea level rise will be a good thing. | 04-09-2016 17:28 |
| RE: Scientific Theories? | 04-09-2016 17:15 |
| RE: Why sea level rise will be a good thing. | 04-09-2016 16:42 |
| RE: New Posters beware! | 04-09-2016 16:34 |
| RE: Scientific Theories? | 04-09-2016 16:22 |
| RE: Scientific Theories? | 04-09-2016 00:57 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 04-09-2016 00:46 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 04-09-2016 00:39 |
| RE: July hottest month since records began say nasa | 04-09-2016 00:31 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 03-09-2016 22:28 |
| RE: July hottest month since records began say nasa | 03-09-2016 22:18 |
| RE: July hottest month since records began say nasa | 03-09-2016 21:44 |
| RE: July hottest month since records began say nasa | 03-09-2016 21:23 |
| RE: Scientific Theories? | 03-09-2016 20:56 |
| RE: July hottest month since records began say nasa | 03-09-2016 19:19 |
| RE: Scientific Theories? | 03-09-2016 19:00 |
| RE: July hottest month since records began say nasa | 03-09-2016 17:56 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 03-09-2016 17:21 |
| RE: Scientific Theories? | 03-09-2016 15:52 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 03-09-2016 04:03 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 03-09-2016 03:59 |
| RE: Scientific Theories? | 03-09-2016 03:19 |
| RE: July hottest month since records began say nasa | 03-09-2016 03:16 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 03-09-2016 02:54 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 03-09-2016 02:53 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 03-09-2016 02:50 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 03-09-2016 02:46 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 02-09-2016 22:06 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 02-09-2016 19:35 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 02-09-2016 17:17 |
| Sharing a flat with IBdaMann | 02-09-2016 03:49 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 02-09-2016 03:34 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 02-09-2016 03:33 |
| RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID | 02-09-2016 03:29 |
| RE: Record temperatures, AGW accelerating | 02-09-2016 03:25 |
| RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID | 02-09-2016 01:56 |
| RE: Record temperatures, AGW accelerating | 02-09-2016 01:53 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 02-09-2016 01:51 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 02-09-2016 01:17 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 02-09-2016 01:08 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 01-09-2016 20:56 |
| RE: Why sea level rise will be a good thing. | 01-09-2016 20:42 |
| RE: Why sea level rise will be a good thing. | 01-09-2016 19:37 |
| RE: Why sea level rise will be a good thing. | 01-09-2016 19:32 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 01-09-2016 19:29 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 01-09-2016 19:16 |
| RE: Record temperatures, AGW accelerating | 01-09-2016 19:15 |
| RE: Global cooling in 2030 it's true??? | 01-09-2016 16:52 |
| RE: Record temperatures, AGW accelerating | 01-09-2016 15:01 |
| RE: Why sea level rise will be a good thing. | 01-09-2016 10:55 |
| RE: Record temperatures, AGW accelerating | 01-09-2016 02:14 |
| RE: 2016 set to be hottest year on record | 01-09-2016 02:07 |
| RE: Why sea level rise will be a good thing. | 01-09-2016 02:00 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 01-09-2016 01:58 |
| RE: 2016 set to be hottest year on record | 31-08-2016 20:47 |
| RE: Is Obama's 10 bucks per barrel oil tax a good idea? | 31-08-2016 20:35 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 31-08-2016 20:16 |
| Record temperatures, AGW accelerating | 31-08-2016 20:06 |
| RE: Is Obama's 10 bucks per barrel oil tax a good idea? | 31-08-2016 17:54 |
| RE: Is Obama's 10 bucks per barrel oil tax a good idea? | 30-08-2016 23:24 |
| RE: Is Obama's 10 bucks per barrel oil tax a good idea? | 28-08-2016 01:05 |
| RE: Is Obama's 10 bucks per barrel oil tax a good idea? | 27-08-2016 23:41 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 27-08-2016 23:29 |
| RE: Is Obama's 10 bucks per barrel oil tax a good idea? | 27-08-2016 23:18 |
| RE: Is Obama's 10 bucks per barrel oil tax a good idea? | 27-08-2016 23:09 |
| RE: Is Obama's 10 bucks per barrel oil tax a good idea? | 27-08-2016 19:41 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 27-08-2016 19:34 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 27-08-2016 17:25 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 27-08-2016 15:50 |
| RE: July hottest month since records began say nasa | 26-08-2016 21:48 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 26-08-2016 21:41 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 26-08-2016 19:07 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 26-08-2016 03:47 |
| RE: July hottest month since records began say nasa | 26-08-2016 03:10 |
| RE: 2016 set to be hottest year on record | 25-08-2016 01:36 |
| RE: 2016 set to be hottest year on record | 25-08-2016 01:05 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 24-08-2016 17:02 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 24-08-2016 11:43 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 24-08-2016 03:31 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 24-08-2016 03:26 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 24-08-2016 03:06 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 23-08-2016 02:56 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 22-08-2016 03:05 |
| RE: 2016 set to be hottest year on record | 22-08-2016 02:49 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 22-08-2016 02:02 |
| RE: July hottest month since records began say nasa | 21-08-2016 20:27 |
| RE: NASA says "Global Cooling!" | 21-08-2016 04:07 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 21-08-2016 00:09 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 20-08-2016 15:52 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 19-08-2016 23:23 |
| RE: NASA says "Global Cooling!" | 19-08-2016 23:03 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 19-08-2016 22:46 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 19-08-2016 22:37 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 19-08-2016 14:42 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 18-08-2016 20:31 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 18-08-2016 14:14 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 18-08-2016 14:08 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 18-08-2016 03:30 |
| RE: Proffessor Brian Cox vs Conspiracy theorist Australian Senator | 18-08-2016 02:38 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 18-08-2016 02:11 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 17-08-2016 18:25 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 17-08-2016 03:50 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 16-08-2016 23:20 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-08-2016 01:22 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 27-02-2016 02:01 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 27-02-2016 00:12 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 27-02-2016 00:04 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 26-02-2016 22:45 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 26-02-2016 22:26 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 24-02-2016 13:27 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 24-02-2016 10:50 |
| RE: No one cares even if 97% of climate scientists think more CO2 causes warmer weather. Because of Galileo. | 24-02-2016 10:41 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 24-02-2016 10:15 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 24-02-2016 02:23 |
| RE: No one cares even if 97% of climate scientists think more CO2 causes warmer weather. Because of Galileo. | 24-02-2016 02:19 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 24-02-2016 02:04 |
| RE: What if Greenland Was on the North Pole? | 22-02-2016 15:20 |
| RE: What if Greenland Was on the North Pole? | 22-02-2016 15:13 |
| RE: What if Greenland Was on the North Pole? | 22-02-2016 15:08 |
| RE: What if Greenland Was on the North Pole? | 22-02-2016 14:54 |
| RE: What if Greenland Was on the North Pole? | 22-02-2016 14:47 |
| RE: What if Greenland Was on the North Pole? | 22-02-2016 14:30 |
| RE: ... And the heat goes on! ... | 22-02-2016 13:30 |
| RE: ... And the heat goes on! ... | 22-02-2016 01:36 |
| RE: What if Greenland Was on the North Pole? | 22-02-2016 01:31 |
| RE: ... And the heat goes on! ... | 22-02-2016 01:25 |
| RE: ... And the heat goes on! ... | 21-02-2016 23:53 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 21-02-2016 04:07 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 21-02-2016 03:54 |
| RE: climate change media stories made me so sick I never google climate change ever again | 19-02-2016 21:47 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 21:33 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 19:02 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 18:27 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 03:15 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 02:32 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 20:32 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 18:58 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 18:53 |
| RE: Teaching younger generations | 18-02-2016 16:44 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 11:32 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 03:00 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 02:52 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 02:47 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 02:25 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 02:06 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 01:55 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 00:26 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 00:08 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 17-02-2016 23:46 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 17-02-2016 21:32 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 17-02-2016 19:55 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 17-02-2016 14:37 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 17-02-2016 14:15 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 20:03 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 00:50 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 15-02-2016 23:02 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 15-02-2016 21:57 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 15-02-2016 19:50 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 14-02-2016 22:38 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 14-02-2016 18:32 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 14-02-2016 18:02 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 14-02-2016 05:00 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 14-02-2016 04:58 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 14-02-2016 04:22 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 14-02-2016 04:13 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 14-02-2016 03:47 |
| RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID | 12-02-2016 22:22 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 12-02-2016 22:06 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 12-02-2016 18:55 |
| RE: burning fossil fuels should result in a major cooling factor, here's why | 12-02-2016 10:44 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 12-02-2016 10:39 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 12-02-2016 03:15 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 11-02-2016 21:30 |
| RE: CO2 the Magic Gas! | 11-02-2016 11:00 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 11-02-2016 10:30 |
| RE: CO2 the Magic Gas! | 10-02-2016 23:04 |
| RE: CO2 the Magic Gas! | 10-02-2016 20:55 |
| RE: CO2 the Magic Gas! | 10-02-2016 19:34 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 10-02-2016 16:29 |
| RE: CO2 the Magic Gas! | 10-02-2016 16:27 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 10-02-2016 16:08 |
| RE: CO2 the Magic Gas! | 10-02-2016 15:58 |
| RE: CO2 the Magic Gas! | 10-02-2016 14:05 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 10-02-2016 13:58 |
| RE: Tipping point | 10-02-2016 00:32 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 09-02-2016 15:20 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 09-02-2016 04:54 |
| RE: CO2 makes Earth much cooler than the Moon because it blocks the Sun's IR | 09-02-2016 04:48 |
| RE: there is no evidence more CO2 traps more heat and heats the Earth | 09-02-2016 04:37 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 09-02-2016 04:33 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 09-02-2016 04:29 |
| RE: CO2 makes Earth much cooler than the Moon because it blocks the Sun's IR | 09-02-2016 00:34 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 08-02-2016 23:21 |
| RE: there is no evidence more CO2 traps more heat and heats the Earth | 08-02-2016 23:07 |
| RE: there is no evidence more CO2 traps more heat and heats the Earth | 08-02-2016 22:04 |
| RE: there is no evidence more CO2 traps more heat and heats the Earth | 08-02-2016 19:54 |
| RE: there is no evidence more CO2 traps more heat and heats the Earth | 08-02-2016 19:51 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 07-02-2016 00:26 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 07-02-2016 00:18 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 06-02-2016 23:48 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 06-02-2016 23:45 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 06-02-2016 23:39 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 06-02-2016 02:42 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 06-02-2016 02:21 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 06-02-2016 02:05 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 05-02-2016 14:53 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 05-02-2016 14:31 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 05-02-2016 13:33 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 05-02-2016 13:24 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 05-02-2016 13:22 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 04-02-2016 19:30 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 04-02-2016 19:24 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 04-02-2016 14:44 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 04-02-2016 02:31 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 04-02-2016 02:28 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 04-02-2016 01:45 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 03-02-2016 19:00 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 03-02-2016 18:05 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 03-02-2016 17:55 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 03-02-2016 17:34 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 03-02-2016 16:43 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 03-02-2016 11:50 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 02-02-2016 22:51 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 02-02-2016 22:47 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 02-02-2016 22:18 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 02-02-2016 19:34 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 02-02-2016 19:22 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 02-02-2016 14:49 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 02-02-2016 14:39 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 02-02-2016 04:25 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 01-02-2016 23:49 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 01-02-2016 23:44 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 01-02-2016 22:47 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 01-02-2016 22:45 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 01-02-2016 22:43 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 01-02-2016 22:38 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 01-02-2016 21:54 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 01-02-2016 21:50 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 01-02-2016 19:31 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 01-02-2016 16:20 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 01-02-2016 15:35 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 01-02-2016 02:47 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 01-02-2016 02:42 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 31-01-2016 04:49 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 31-01-2016 04:47 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 31-01-2016 04:42 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 31-01-2016 03:02 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 31-01-2016 02:57 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 31-01-2016 02:15 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 31-01-2016 02:02 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 30-01-2016 00:36 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 29-01-2016 22:42 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 29-01-2016 22:24 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 29-01-2016 22:19 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 29-01-2016 22:07 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 29-01-2016 21:57 |
| RE: Were Glaciations Nothing More Than Crustal Shifts? | 29-01-2016 15:11 |
| RE: Were Glaciations Nothing More Than Crustal Shifts? | 29-01-2016 15:06 |
| RE: Global Warming and the consequences - is it real? | 29-01-2016 14:57 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 29-01-2016 14:47 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 29-01-2016 14:05 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 29-01-2016 13:59 |
| RE: Were Glaciations Nothing More Than Crustal Shifts? | 29-01-2016 11:14 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 29-01-2016 10:26 |
| RE: Were Glaciations Nothing More Than Crustal Shifts? | 29-01-2016 02:45 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 29-01-2016 02:26 |
| RE: Were Glaciations Nothing More Than Crustal Shifts? | 28-01-2016 15:07 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 28-01-2016 10:28 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 27-01-2016 23:01 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 27-01-2016 16:19 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 27-01-2016 13:06 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 26-01-2016 10:46 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 25-01-2016 17:58 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 25-01-2016 17:46 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 25-01-2016 17:04 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 25-01-2016 11:53 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 25-01-2016 01:51 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 24-01-2016 23:15 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 23-01-2016 00:10 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 21-01-2016 14:10 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 21-01-2016 10:55 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 21-01-2016 10:45 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 21-01-2016 01:19 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 20-01-2016 22:47 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 20-01-2016 22:31 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 20-01-2016 20:20 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 20-01-2016 19:22 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 20-01-2016 16:34 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 17-01-2016 03:03 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 17-01-2016 02:40 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 16-01-2016 03:19 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 16-01-2016 03:16 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 16-01-2016 03:13 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 16-01-2016 03:11 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 14-01-2016 15:58 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 14-01-2016 10:19 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 23:00 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 17:24 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 16:32 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 15:01 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 14:20 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 10:24 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 04:26 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 03:59 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 00:32 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 00:28 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 12-01-2016 15:49 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 12-01-2016 11:04 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 12-01-2016 10:20 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 12-01-2016 03:16 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 12-01-2016 01:34 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 12-01-2016 01:22 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 12-01-2016 00:46 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 12-01-2016 00:25 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 12-01-2016 00:08 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 11-01-2016 23:59 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 11-01-2016 23:53 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 11-01-2016 22:34 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 11-01-2016 19:25 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 11-01-2016 17:56 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 11-01-2016 15:55 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 11-01-2016 14:10 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 11-01-2016 11:28 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 11-01-2016 01:56 |
| RE: CO2 blocks the Sun's incoming short wave and blocks Earth's outgoing long wave, so increasing it | 08-01-2016 14:58 |
| RE: CO2 blocks the Sun's incoming short wave and blocks Earth's outgoing long wave, so increasing it | 08-01-2016 14:16 |
| RE: Greenhouse effect theory violates the second law of thermodynamics | 08-01-2016 03:54 |
| RE: Greenhouse effect theory violates the second law of thermodynamics | 08-01-2016 03:37 |
| RE: Where's the infrared light that greenhouse gases shoot toward the ground? | 08-01-2016 03:25 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 08-01-2016 03:14 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 08-01-2016 03:02 |
| RE: Greenhouse effect theory violates the second law of thermodynamics | 08-01-2016 02:54 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 20:00 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 19:40 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 19:11 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 18:51 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 17:49 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 17:15 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 16:59 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 15:22 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 07-01-2016 00:39 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 07-01-2016 00:25 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 07-01-2016 00:18 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 07-01-2016 00:00 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 22:22 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 22:07 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 19:34 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 16:36 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 15:42 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 03:28 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 00:44 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 00:15 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 05-01-2016 23:14 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 05-01-2016 16:03 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 05-01-2016 10:11 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 05-01-2016 00:37 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 04-01-2016 23:21 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 04-01-2016 23:18 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 04-01-2016 22:45 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 04-01-2016 22:16 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 04-01-2016 22:14 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 04-01-2016 19:11 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 04-01-2016 18:24 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 22-12-2015 05:35 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 22-12-2015 05:27 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 22-12-2015 05:16 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 22-12-2015 05:05 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 22-12-2015 04:45 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 22-12-2015 04:28 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 22-12-2015 02:47 |
| RE: human contribution by the numbers | 20-12-2015 02:34 |
| RE: human contribution by the numbers | 18-12-2015 03:24 |
| RE: Solar Roadways. Solar panels on the roads | 17-12-2015 01:39 |
| RE: human contribution by the numbers | 17-12-2015 01:35 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 17-12-2015 00:40 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 16-12-2015 10:54 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 16-12-2015 02:55 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 16-12-2015 01:35 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 16-12-2015 00:42 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 15-12-2015 22:27 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 15-12-2015 21:37 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 15-12-2015 17:27 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 15-12-2015 00:16 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 15-12-2015 00:00 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 14-12-2015 23:49 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 14-12-2015 23:38 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 14-12-2015 23:32 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 14-12-2015 23:15 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 14-12-2015 23:11 |
| RE: 97% of Scientists Can't be Wrong, Can They? | 14-12-2015 22:48 |