aliens and balloons

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:I don't agree with all this author's theories surrounding the glass in the sky. But the solid observations presented, I couldn't dispute. When that happens to me, I don't refuse to learn something new

Wrong wording. You don't agree with all of the author's speculations but when presented with speculation about something "invisible" that you cannot observe, you don't refuse to believe.

There is some evidence that is just irrefutable. Some of the shattered glass can be observed in Libyan glass fields. You can even buy some on Amazon.

Your "irrefutable evidence" is easily refutable. That glass is strong evidence of lightning.

Have you, or have you not, run 40,000 amps at 100 million volts through a sample of Libyan desert sillica? Yes or no? You know this will produce glass and will refute your "irrefutable evidence" so why do you continue? ... unless it is nothing more than a strange religious belief.

GasGuzzler wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:I don't agree with all this author's theories surrounding the glass in the sky. But the solid observations presented, I couldn't dispute. When that happens to me, I don't refuse to learn something new

Wrong wording. You don't agree with all of the author's speculations but when presented with speculation about something "invisible" that you cannot observe, you don't refuse to believe.

There is some evidence that is just irrefutable. Some of the shattered glass can be observed in Libyan glass fields. You can even buy some on Amazon.

Your "irrefutable evidence" is easily refutable. That glass is strong evidence of lightning.

Have you, or have you not, run 40,000 amps at 100 million volts through a sample of Libyan desert sillica? Yes or no? You know this will produce glass and will refute your "irrefutable evidence" so why do you continue? ... unless it is nothing more than a strange religious belief.

Maybe you've already answered this Spongy. If so, I do apologize.
Why is it that it can only be observed by cameras and not the naked eye as is easily done with a reflection on a car window? Thanks.

GasGuzzler wrote:

Great question. Another is "who cleans that glass and what size squeegy is required?"

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:I don't agree with all this author's theories surrounding the glass in the sky. But the solid observations presented, I couldn't dispute. When that happens to me, I don't refuse to learn something new

Wrong wording. You don't agree with all of the author's speculations but when presented with speculation about something "invisible" that you cannot observe, you don't refuse to believe.

There is some evidence that is just irrefutable. Some of the shattered glass can be observed in Libyan glass fields. You can even buy some on Amazon.

Your "irrefutable evidence" is easily refutable. That glass is strong evidence of lightning.

Have you, or have you not, run 40,000 amps at 100 million volts through a sample of Libyan desert sillica? Yes or no? You know this will produce glass and will refute your "irrefutable evidence" so why do you continue? ... unless it is nothing more than a strange religious belief.

You think a thunderstorm created a 130 by 50 mile oval shape of more than 1000 tonnes of shattered glass? Not plausible.

Spongy Iris wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Great question. Another is "who cleans that glass and what size squeegy is required?"

Ozone cleans the inner side

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:I don't agree with all this author's theories surrounding the glass in the sky. But the solid observations presented, I couldn't dispute. When that happens to me, I don't refuse to learn something new

Wrong wording. You don't agree with all of the author's speculations but when presented with speculation about something "invisible" that you cannot observe, you don't refuse to believe.

There is some evidence that is just irrefutable. Some of the shattered glass can be observed in Libyan glass fields. You can even buy some on Amazon.

Your "irrefutable evidence" is easily refutable. That glass is strong evidence of lightning.

Have you, or have you not, run 40,000 amps at 100 million volts through a sample of Libyan desert sillica? Yes or no? You know this will produce glass and will refute your "irrefutable evidence" so why do you continue? ... unless it is nothing more than a strange religious belief.

You think a thunderstorm created a 130 by 50 mile oval shape of more than 1000 tonnes of shattered glass? Not plausible.

Not just one single, solitary thunderstorm. Many, over many, many years.

So I take it you concede what will happen when lightning strikes anywhere in the Libyan desert where said silica is abundant and is between the ground and the clouds.

.

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:I don't agree with all this author's theories surrounding the glass in the sky. But the solid observations presented, I couldn't dispute. When that happens to me, I don't refuse to learn something new

Wrong wording. You don't agree with all of the author's speculations but when presented with speculation about something "invisible" that you cannot observe, you don't refuse to believe.

There is some evidence that is just irrefutable. Some of the shattered glass can be observed in Libyan glass fields. You can even buy some on Amazon.

Your "irrefutable evidence" is easily refutable. That glass is strong evidence of lightning.

Have you, or have you not, run 40,000 amps at 100 million volts through a sample of Libyan desert sillica? Yes or no? You know this will produce glass and will refute your "irrefutable evidence" so why do you continue? ... unless it is nothing more than a strange religious belief.

You think a thunderstorm created a 130 by 50 mile oval shape of more than 1000 tonnes of shattered glass? Not plausible.

Not just one single, solitary thunderstorm. Many, over many, many years.

So I take it you concede what will happen when lightning strikes anywhere in the Libyan desert where said silica is abundant and is between the ground and the clouds.

.

Dude wtf are you sharing a mastercard number in a chat room?! Talk about irresponsible!

Your image attached should be deleted asap.

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:I don't agree with all this author's theories surrounding the glass in the sky. But the solid observations presented, I couldn't dispute. When that happens to me, I don't refuse to learn something new

Wrong wording. You don't agree with all of the author's speculations but when presented with speculation about something "invisible" that you cannot observe, you don't refuse to believe.

There is some evidence that is just irrefutable. Some of the shattered glass can be observed in Libyan glass fields. You can even buy some on Amazon.

Your "irrefutable evidence" is easily refutable. That glass is strong evidence of lightning.

Have you, or have you not, run 40,000 amps at 100 million volts through a sample of Libyan desert sillica? Yes or no? You know this will produce glass and will refute your "irrefutable evidence" so why do you continue? ... unless it is nothing more than a strange religious belief.

You think a thunderstorm created a 130 by 50 mile oval shape of more than 1000 tonnes of shattered glass? Not plausible.

Not just one single, solitary thunderstorm. Many, over many, many years.

So I take it you concede what will happen when lightning strikes anywhere in the Libyan desert where said silica is abundant and is between the ground and the clouds.

.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:I don't agree with all this author's theories surrounding the glass in the sky. But the solid observations presented, I couldn't dispute. When that happens to me, I don't refuse to learn something new

Wrong wording. You don't agree with all of the author's speculations but when presented with speculation about something "invisible" that you cannot observe, you don't refuse to believe.

There is some evidence that is just irrefutable. Some of the shattered glass can be observed in Libyan glass fields. You can even buy some on Amazon.

Your "irrefutable evidence" is easily refutable. That glass is strong evidence of lightning.

Have you, or have you not, run 40,000 amps at 100 million volts through a sample of Libyan desert sillica? Yes or no? You know this will produce glass and will refute your "irrefutable evidence" so why do you continue? ... unless it is nothing more than a strange religious belief.

You think a thunderstorm created a 130 by 50 mile oval shape of more than 1000 tonnes of shattered glass? Not plausible.

Not just one single, solitary thunderstorm. Many, over many, many years.

So I take it you concede what will happen when lightning strikes anywhere in the Libyan desert where said silica is abundant and is between the ground and the clouds.

.

Dude wtf are you sharing a mastercard number in a chat room?! Talk about irresponsible!

Your image attached should be deleted asap.

Who repairs the glass after the meteors come thru?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:I don't agree with all this author's theories surrounding the glass in the sky. But the solid observations presented, I couldn't dispute. When that happens to me, I don't refuse to learn something new

Wrong wording. You don't agree with all of the author's speculations but when presented with speculation about something "invisible" that you cannot observe, you don't refuse to believe.

There is some evidence that is just irrefutable. Some of the shattered glass can be observed in Libyan glass fields. You can even buy some on Amazon.

Your "irrefutable evidence" is easily refutable. That glass is strong evidence of lightning.

Have you, or have you not, run 40,000 amps at 100 million volts through a sample of Libyan desert sillica? Yes or no? You know this will produce glass and will refute your "irrefutable evidence" so why do you continue? ... unless it is nothing more than a strange religious belief.

You think a thunderstorm created a 130 by 50 mile oval shape of more than 1000 tonnes of shattered glass? Not plausible.

Not just one single, solitary thunderstorm. Many, over many, many years.

So I take it you concede what will happen when lightning strikes anywhere in the Libyan desert where said silica is abundant and is between the ground and the clouds.

.

Dude wtf are you sharing a mastercard number in a chat room?! Talk about irresponsible!

Your image attached should be deleted asap.

Who repairs the glass after the meteors come thru?

Meteors don't come from outer space, and thus don't break through the glass.

Swan wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Who repairs the glass after the meteors come thru?

Meteors don't come from outer space, and thus don't break through the glass.

Well you are actually half correct because meteors do not break thru the glass.

Are you a man who uses tampons?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Who repairs the glass after the meteors come thru?

Meteors don't come from outer space, and thus don't break through the glass.

Well you are actually half correct because meteors do not break thru the glass.

Are you a man who uses tampons?

I mean the trajectory of shooting meteorites doesn't start in outer space.

I don't understand why you're asking me about tampons...

Spongy Iris wrote:Dude wtf are you sharing a mastercard number in a chat room?! Talk about irresponsible!

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Dude wtf are you sharing a mastercard number in a chat room?! Talk about irresponsible!

That was a good catch on your part to notice that, not only is that a valid credit card number, but a valid MasterCard number. Serious bonus points for you.

It's a valid MasterCard number, not an active MasterCard number.

I'm just trying to be totally transparent with you (do you see what I did there?)

Making Glass - Melting Sand with High Voltage Electricity!:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXmKc6LqkTY

Swan wrote:

So what is your favorite brand of male tampon?

Swan wrote:In patients like you are not allowed to have credit cards.

Swan wrote:Are you a man who uses tampons?

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Are you a man who uses tampons?

Your son will be learning how to properly use a tampon.

All military who deploy receive pre-deployment training which includes how to properly treat wounds. In this training, your son will learn that there is nothing better for a bleeding wound than a tampon, which was made exactly for that sort of thing. Burly special forces hombres will explain the wisdom of carrying a pair of tampons into battle, or to wherever there might be wounding going on.

Imagine, your son carrying around tampons. I'm imagining it right now.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Are you a man who uses tampons?

Your son will be learning how to properly use a tampon.

All military who deploy receive pre-deployment training which includes how to properly treat wounds. In this training, your son will learn that there is nothing better for a bleeding wound than a tampon, which was made exactly for that sort of thing. Burly special forces hombres will explain the wisdom of carrying a pair of tampons into battle, or to wherever there might be wounding going on.

Imagine, your son carrying around tampons. I'm imagining it right now.

Into the Night wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Are you a man who uses tampons?

Your son will be learning how to properly use a tampon.

All military who deploy receive pre-deployment training which includes how to properly treat wounds. In this training, your son will learn that there is nothing better for a bleeding wound than a tampon, which was made exactly for that sort of thing. Burly special forces hombres will explain the wisdom of carrying a pair of tampons into battle, or to wherever there might be wounding going on.

Imagine, your son carrying around tampons. I'm imagining it right now.

They use Maxipads too. These are treated with a clotting compound. They make an excellent emergency dressing.