A Post On Quora Explaining What is Wrong With The 97% Consensus Studies
| A Post On Quora Explaining What is Wrong With The 97% Consensus Studies07-03-2020 12:50 | |
One Punch Man ★☆☆☆☆(142) |
Click here. Nathan-D |
| 07-03-2020 16:03 | |
HarveyH55 ★★★★★(5197) |
Consensus is subjective, an opinion, not science. It's kind of like political polling, the results are dependant on quite a few factors. The question, how you ask the question, the context of the question, who you ask, when you ask. All of those things can be used the bias the results. Climate change has always been political, more than science or environmental. When they first claimed it was 'settled', and had a 'consensus'. They really defined how they came to the consensus. Of course, those that went to college, specifically to get a 'degree' in climate science, would of course agree, they were sold before enrolling, not to mention, a successful career in their chosen field, sort of depends on a demand for their services. Is climate change actually happening, and real, or is climate change beneficial to one's career? |
| 08-03-2020 18:17 | |
IBdaMann ★★★★★(14407) |
One Punch Man wrote: How about you post some of your own original thoughts? ... unless you don't have any, of course. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
Join the debate A Post On Quora Explaining What is Wrong With The 97% Consensus Studies:
Related content
| Threads | Replies | Last post |
| Every time I say that this board is dead, someone says something to prove me wrong, but | 9 | 01-01-2024 05:08 |
| It is not if, but when will North become South and the Geese will fly the wrong way | 78 | 24-11-2023 03:35 |
| climate-debate.com awaits 100th new member since my first post | 9 | 01-11-2023 22:45 |
| A conservative website that gets it wrong about Global Warming | 3 | 20-06-2023 19:34 |
| Where the 97% consensus among scientists comes from | 38 | 16-06-2023 11:07 |
| Articles |
| Analysis - Explaining China's Climate Policy |