Remember me
▼ Content

3 phases to CC



Page 3 of 3<123
11-09-2020 02:42
James___
★★★★★
(3172)
Into the Night wrote:
James___ wrote:
Into the Night wrote:

Bitumen is coal. That is carbon, not a hydrocarbon.


At the La Brea tar pits where many fossils have been found, the bitumen came from the oil field next to it. Bitumen is also used for asphalt.


So you are saying coal comes from oil?



Coal comes from a similar process. Pressure and heat. When coal seams stretch for only a 1,000 miles at most, it suggests they are the result of a river and not a sea. A sea "seems" to create a "field" and not a "seam".

And guys, if you're not one of the major a$$hole$ in here, no worries.


And we're back to; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1NwW3GCn7k
I'd like to keep my shirt on, Thank You very much.
Edited on 11-09-2020 03:08
11-09-2020 19:20
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(7465)
James___ wrote: The oil fields are the result of the decomposition of biomass.

James___ wrote:In time, vegetation became crude oil.

Walk down the produce aisle of your local grocery store and buy an assortment of fruits and vegetables. When you arrive at home, place them in a bowl and let them decompose. Report back when you have a combustible hydrocarbon.


A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
11-09-2020 20:08
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(13295)
James___ wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
James___ wrote:
Into the Night wrote:

Bitumen is coal. That is carbon, not a hydrocarbon.


At the La Brea tar pits where many fossils have been found, the bitumen came from the oil field next to it. Bitumen is also used for asphalt.


So you are saying coal comes from oil?



Coal comes from a similar process. Pressure and heat.
How do you know? Have you made coal synthetically?
James___ wrote:
When coal seams stretch for only a 1,000 miles at most, it suggests they are the result of a river and not a sea. A sea "seems" to create a "field" and not a "seam".

Coal is found in seams and also over large areas.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
12-09-2020 02:02
HarveyH55
★★★★★
(2403)
IBdaMann wrote:
James___ wrote: The oil fields are the result of the decomposition of biomass.

James___ wrote:In time, vegetation became crude oil.

Walk down the produce aisle of your local grocery store and buy an assortment of fruits and vegetables. When you arrive at home, place them in a bowl and let them decompose. Report back when you have a combustible hydrocarbon.


So, since global warming was simulated in lab, it has to be real, and the one and only? Are you a democrat? Or is the absurd logic, just part of the debate game?

I'm going to hold to the notion that things are done differently in nature, than what can be synthesized in a lab. When it comes down to faith, I avoid churches that serve Kool-aid...
12-09-2020 05:04
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(7465)
HarveyH55 wrote:So, since global warming was simulated in lab, it has to be real, and the one and only? Are you a democrat? Or is the absurd logic, just part of the debate game?

I'm going to hold to the notion that things are done differently in nature, than what can be synthesized in a lab. When it comes down to faith, I avoid churches that serve Kool-aid...

What is clear is that something I wrote put a nasty bug up your azz and I am neither sure what it was specifically that I wrote nor why you object.

Are you saying that the Fischer-Tropsche reaction somehow does not occur in nature? Are you saying that high temperatures and pressures are not needed to produce hydrocarbons?

If you'd tell me what your objection/concern is specifically I'd stand a much better chance of properly addressing it.


.


A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
Page 3 of 3<123





Join the debate 3 phases to CC:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
CC and S1215-01-2020 04:13
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact