2%

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > 2% > Page 3

Page 3 of 3

23-07-2020 23:29
gfm7175★★★★★ (3314)	keepit wrote: "In my world" is a figure of speech. Time and time again ITN. What's the problem? Your stupidity (due to your unwillingness to learn).
24-07-2020 00:20
Into the Night★★★★★ (21582)	keepit wrote: "In my world" is a figure of speech. Semantics fallacy. keepit wrote: Time and time again ITN. What's the problem? You're stupidity. You refuse to learn. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
24-07-2020 02:45
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14389)	keepit wrote: "In my world" is a figure of speech. Time and time again ITN. What's the problem? You need to take responsibility for saying what you mean and for meaning what you say. Until then you are just wasting bandwidth. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
24-07-2020 03:40
keepit ★★★★★ (3058)	IBD, Figures of speech are a useful way of communicating. Sort of an extra dimension from the literal. Why don't you like it?
24-07-2020 04:02
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14389)	keepit wrote: IBD, Figures of speech are a useful way of communicating. Sort of an extra dimension from the literal. Why don't you like it? I love figures of speech. They need to be correctly used however. You did not use figures of speech to aid in your expression; you misused speech resulting in confusion. The one absolute requirement is that you say what you mean and that you mean what you say, but you did not say what you meant and you did not mean what you said. You need to get that right. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist

24-07-2020 04:18
keepit ★★★★★ (3058)	IBD, I got it right. I agree that you're confused. Edited on 24-07-2020 04:37
24-07-2020 04:26
James___ ★★★★★ (5513)	IBdaMann wrote: keepit wrote: IBD, Figures of speech are a useful way of communicating. Sort of an extra dimension from the literal. Why don't you like it? I love figures of speech. They need to be correctly used however. You did not use figures of speech to aid in your expression; you misused speech resulting in confusion. The one absolute requirement is that you say what you mean and that you mean what you say, but you did not say what you meant and you did not mean what you said. You need to get that right. . Son, your mama would be disappointed in you. It's not about word games. And I expect better of you. This is about leadership. You're not a minion, right? Make your mama proud. She loves you just as I do son.
25-07-2020 00:21
Into the Night★★★★★ (21582)	keepit wrote: IBD, Figures of speech are a useful way of communicating. Sort of an extra dimension from the literal. Why don't you like it? Semantics fallacy. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
25-07-2020 00:21
Into the Night★★★★★ (21582)	keepit wrote: IBD, I got it right. I agree that you're confused. Assumption of victory fallacy. Contextomy fallacy. Semantics fallacy. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 25-07-2020 00:22
20-12-2021 09:33
Kim456 ☆☆☆☆☆ (1)	Climate debate is a very popular topic today. I am into this issue as well. I have researched this topi8c a lot. You can read more on my blog http://best-custom-writing.org/ I often post updates.
20-12-2021 17:54
Into the Night★★★★★ (21582)	Kim456 wrote: Climate debate is a very popular topic today. I am into this issue as well. I have researched this topi8c a lot. You can read more on my blog http://best-custom-writing.org/ I often post updates. The very first requirement of any paper on 'climate change' is to define what the phrase means. Any paper written about 'climate change' is just a void argument until you do. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
20-12-2021 19:01
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14389)	Kim456 wrote: Climate debate is a very popular topic today. I am into this issue as well. I have researched this topi8c a lot. You can read more on my blog http://best-custom-writing.org/ I often post updates. The first requirement is to define whatever you mean by a global climate for two main reasons: 1. There is no such thing in physics/science 2. Logically it would otherwise stand as a contradiction in terms since the standard definition of a climate is of local conditions (of some bounded geographical region) and there is no such thing as global-local, i.e. a contradiction. Without a definition, any mention of "climate change" would be met by the persistent question "Which one? The earth has millions!" The main reason for leaving the concept of a global climate undefined is to avoid dealing with the logical contradiction of a religious term that requires faith/belief in the first place. Of course, science does not work that way. No prior belief or faith or religious dogma is required to see that actual science survives the scientific method. In contrast, the concept of a global climate is religious in nature and would not be able to survive any level of scrutiny by the scientific method if it were defined unambiguously. Hence, in religious contexts, it is best to avoid all embarrassment and just leave the contradictory notion of a global climate completely undefined ... and just ignore those who ask for more specifics.

Page 3 of 3

Join the debate 2%: