Remember me
▼ Content

10 years ago, Marxist Obama declared CO2 was a poison gas in EPA to bankrupt


10 years ago, Marxist Obama declared CO2 was a poison gas in EPA to bankrupt15-02-2019 00:23
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1085)
America with Marxist polices like USSR, East Germany, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, eastern Europe.

Bloomberg: Obama to classify CO2 as toxic pollutant

https://www.texaspolicy.com/bloomberg-obama-to-classify-co2-as-toxic-pollutant/

The Problems with the 'Miracle' Cure of Sucking Carbon Out of the Air

For starters, we'd need something like 250,000 such sky vacuums to remove just 1 percent of our carbon emissions

https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/the-problems-with-the-miracle-cure-of-sucking-carbon-out-of-the-air

meanwhile

China Emits More Carbon Dioxide Than The U.S. and EU Combined

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2018/07/01/china-emits-more-carbon-dioxide-than-the-u-s-and-eu-combined/#173b7295628c
Edited on 15-02-2019 00:28
15-02-2019 02:59
Wake
★★★★★
(4034)
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
America with Marxist polices like USSR, East Germany, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, eastern Europe.

Bloomberg: Obama to classify CO2 as toxic pollutant

https://www.texaspolicy.com/bloomberg-obama-to-classify-co2-as-toxic-pollutant/

The Problems with the 'Miracle' Cure of Sucking Carbon Out of the Air

For starters, we'd need something like 250,000 such sky vacuums to remove just 1 percent of our carbon emissions

https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/the-problems-with-the-miracle-cure-of-sucking-carbon-out-of-the-air

meanwhile

China Emits More Carbon Dioxide Than The U.S. and EU Combined

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2018/07/01/china-emits-more-carbon-dioxide-than-the-u-s-and-eu-combined/#173b7295628c


Whether or not China is making more or not is rather irrelevant. All human beings wish to live in comfort. The more comfort and security a people have the less need they have to reproduce to make sure they have security in old age.

This all means that the easiest way to control power generation is to control population. So the very power that the True Believers think threaten them is the only way of finding a balance to the population problem.

Furthermore, if you try to cut the generation of power off to the world they will simply kill you. It is that plain.

There is no practical way to control the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere except to limit population. Reaching a balance in the production of CO2 would allow the oceans to get enough plankton growth to balance or even reduce the atmospheric levels.

Let's remember that the original atmosphere contained about 40% CO2 and that was brought down to the insignificant levels of what it presently is from plant growth. So plainly the oceans are entirely capable of handling large levels of atmospheric CO2.

So we should no play along with this claim that CO2 is a polutant because it is not. It is and was the building block of oxygen.
15-02-2019 04:37
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(21588)
Wake wrote:
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
America with Marxist polices like USSR, East Germany, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, eastern Europe.

Bloomberg: Obama to classify CO2 as toxic pollutant

https://www.texaspolicy.com/bloomberg-obama-to-classify-co2-as-toxic-pollutant/

The Problems with the 'Miracle' Cure of Sucking Carbon Out of the Air

For starters, we'd need something like 250,000 such sky vacuums to remove just 1 percent of our carbon emissions

https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/the-problems-with-the-miracle-cure-of-sucking-carbon-out-of-the-air

meanwhile

China Emits More Carbon Dioxide Than The U.S. and EU Combined

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2018/07/01/china-emits-more-carbon-dioxide-than-the-u-s-and-eu-combined/#173b7295628c


Whether or not China is making more or not is rather irrelevant. All human beings wish to live in comfort. The more comfort and security a people have the less need they have to reproduce to make sure they have security in old age.

This all means that the easiest way to control power generation is to control population. So the very power that the True Believers think threaten them is the only way of finding a balance to the population problem.

There is no population problem. Fascist schemes to manipulate energy markets are not going to work.
Wake wrote:
Furthermore, if you try to cut the generation of power off to the world they will simply kill you. It is that plain.
More likely the fascism attempt will simply be ignored. You can't kill the free market. It's immortal. If someone tries to enter private property without the owner's leave, they might get killed. That's called 'trespassing'.
Wake wrote:
There is no practical way to control the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere except to limit population.

There is no way to measure the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Wake wrote:
Reaching a balance in the production of CO2 would allow the oceans to get enough plankton growth to balance or even reduce the atmospheric levels.
Who says it unbalanced, other than the Church of Global Warming or the Church of Green?
Wake wrote:
Let's remember that the original atmosphere contained about 40% CO2

How do you know? Were you there, Wake? How did you measure this? It is not possible to measure the global CO2 content of the atmosphere today.
Wake wrote:
and that was brought down to the insignificant levels of what it presently is from plant growth.
How do you know? Were you there?
Wake wrote:
So plainly the oceans are entirely capable of handling large levels of atmospheric CO2.

That they are. Ocean water is nowhere near saturation levels of CO2.
Wake wrote:
So we should no play along with this claim that CO2 is a polutant because it is not.
Bad reasoning, but the right conclusion. CO2 is not a pollutant because it naturally occurs in the atmosphere and in ocean water.
Wake wrote:
It is and was the building block of oxygen.

WRONG. Oxygen is the building block of oxygen. Oxygen is an element, Wake.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan




Join the debate 10 years ago, Marxist Obama declared CO2 was a poison gas in EPA to bankrupt:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
A Gas Can Be A Barrier817-04-2024 13:39
A Gas Can Be ing A Barrier012-02-2024 04:51
Burn Gasoline and Natural Gas To Fight Against Climate Change2504-01-2024 06:33
Would You Join A New Secret Society Help Humans Live To At Least 200 Years And More ?203-01-2024 20:18
Fossil Fuel Substitution for reduced emission of CO2, mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium..39201-12-2023 21:58
Articles
Barack Obama: Securing Our Energy Future
Barack Obama: Energy Independence and the Safety of Our Planet
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact