"... take care of it." -Genesis 2:15.

Swan wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Swan wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
How would "waters" prevailing upward only 15 cubits cause water levels to rise above all the mountains under Heaven?

The 15 cubits is probably the draft of the Ark, not height above present sea level.

Are you saying wind current is what lifted the ark 15 cubits?

I'll mention it to you as well. Any occurrences of the words "mountain" or "mount" in the Bible are likely gross mistranslations or, at the very least, poor word choices and should definitely be set aside until the rest of the account is understood without those words, and then proper meaning being assigned to those words.

It sounds like you accept that all the tallest trees were covered, correct? You acknowledge that the ark was "lifted off the earth," correct?

What is gained (storywise) by involving orders of magnitude additional water? Why is this somehow more important than understanding a proper translation?

.

If I haven't made it clear in my last 1100 posts in this forum, my position is that solar and lunar winds ("waters") came flooding through a hole in Heaven, which was shattered because too much pressure built up on Earth, because too much CO2 had been emitted, around what are today the borders of Lybia, Egypt, and Sudan. These "flood waters" incinerated all life on land, most in the sea, and covered all the hills and mountains. Whatever "gopher wood" is, it shielded what was inside the ark. The solar and lunar winds lifted the ark 15 cubits.

Genesis 8
8. Then he sent out a dove to see if the water had receded from the surface of the ground.

9. But the dove could find nowhere to perch because there was water over all the surface of the earth.

Why solar wind and not ketchup or something of that nature??

Actually dumbass a dove is not in any way capable of circumnavigating the globe, so the story is BS.

You may continue masturbating

It doesn't say the dove checked the entire earth, dumbass. It says the dove found no place to land because water was over (that means above) all the surface of the earth.

I could say you couldn't find a parking place because they were all occupied, but that doesn't mean you checked all parking spots on the entire parking lot.

You continue your 3rd grade reading lesson. You'll get there.

Retard alert.

1. There was no dove as the story is the equivalent of little red riding hood, a fable, not real.

2. If there was a dove it could not have checked any more than .000001 percent of the Earths surface, and as such could have not said that there was no land, not that doves can converse with people anyway. However refer back to #1

3. How would the dove know which way to fly to find land anyway if there was land there to be found? However refer back to #1

4. If the dove did find land, and it returned, how would it give the nautical coordinates to follow? Like would it say turn left at the next wave and then go East for 700 wing flaps? However refer back to #1

5. This concludes this test of the Emergency Retard Alert system, if this had been a real retard alert further instructions would have been given.

You belong to the Church of No God. Fine. You feel you need to ridicule any other religion except yours. That just fundamentalism and hate.

It is also obvious you have not read this passage in the Bible. The dove was sent out for several days, when it came back with an olive twig, Noah knew the Flood was nearly over.

The Ark had no engines. It probably had no motive power at all (not even a sail) and no way to steer. Why should it? Where would it go? What nautical coordinate system would it have used??? How do know the Ark even had a compass?? Why would it need it???

Sorry kid doves are not seabirds that can land in the water, they are land birds period so they do not fly over water for days. It is obvious that you are clueless.

Now on to the math of this fake flood, Mount Everest is and was at the time over 29,000 feet tall, meaning that if it was covered with water that sea level was over 29,000 feet higher than today, over the entire globe. LOL where did this water drain into?

Retard alert

Genesis 1:1
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, but later on He became too stupid to figure out where to drain a little water.

So you have no idea where 29000 feet of water drained too, and naturally you have no real need to think because you can just babble that god did it. Do you have any idea why such a great god made you an idiot with no life who babbles about noah when it has no meaning to any of your obvious issues?

What does Scully say?

Into the Night wrote:

Satan, evil as he is, provides a valuable purpose: To give Man the opportunity to choose for Himself, to follow Christ and God, which counsels choice, or choose to follow Satan and his teachings of compulsion.

If we do not know cold, how can we understand hot? If we do not know evil, how can we understand good?

GasGuzzler wrote:

Are you going to ask me how Jesus fed 5,000 on a couple fish and 5 loaves of bread?

Are you going to ask how he made blind men see? How he turned water to wine? How he was resurrected to life after being tortured and killed?

Dude, its religion. It's faith. You can't prove it true or false. Either you accept God and His words, or you reject it. It's a personal choice everyone must make.

To sqabble over if the flood actually happened because a dove cannot fly 25,000 miles is a waste of bandwidth.

Swan wrote:
Sorry kid doves are not seabirds that can land in the water,

HarveyH55 wrote:
they are land birds period so they do not fly over water for days.

HarveyH55 wrote:
It is obvious that you are clueless.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Now on to the math of this fake flood,

HarveyH55 wrote:
Mount Everest is and was at the time over 29,000 feet tall,

HarveyH55 wrote:
meaning that if it was covered with water that sea level was over 29,000 feet higher than today, over the entire globe. LOL where did this water drain into?

HarveyH55 wrote:
Retard alert

GasGuzzler wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Swan wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
How would "waters" prevailing upward only 15 cubits cause water levels to rise above all the mountains under Heaven?

The 15 cubits is probably the draft of the Ark, not height above present sea level.

Are you saying wind current is what lifted the ark 15 cubits?

I'll mention it to you as well. Any occurrences of the words "mountain" or "mount" in the Bible are likely gross mistranslations or, at the very least, poor word choices and should definitely be set aside until the rest of the account is understood without those words, and then proper meaning being assigned to those words.

It sounds like you accept that all the tallest trees were covered, correct? You acknowledge that the ark was "lifted off the earth," correct?

What is gained (storywise) by involving orders of magnitude additional water? Why is this somehow more important than understanding a proper translation?

.

If I haven't made it clear in my last 1100 posts in this forum, my position is that solar and lunar winds ("waters") came flooding through a hole in Heaven, which was shattered because too much pressure built up on Earth, because too much CO2 had been emitted, around what are today the borders of Lybia, Egypt, and Sudan. These "flood waters" incinerated all life on land, most in the sea, and covered all the hills and mountains. Whatever "gopher wood" is, it shielded what was inside the ark. The solar and lunar winds lifted the ark 15 cubits.

Genesis 8
8. Then he sent out a dove to see if the water had receded from the surface of the ground.

9. But the dove could find nowhere to perch because there was water over all the surface of the earth.

Why solar wind and not ketchup or something of that nature??

Actually dumbass a dove is not in any way capable of circumnavigating the globe, so the story is BS.

You may continue masturbating

It doesn't say the dove checked the entire earth, dumbass. It says the dove found no place to land because water was over (that means above) all the surface of the earth.

I could say you couldn't find a parking place because they were all occupied, but that doesn't mean you checked all parking spots on the entire parking lot.

You continue your 3rd grade reading lesson. You'll get there.

Retard alert.

1. There was no dove as the story is the equivalent of little red riding hood, a fable, not real.

2. If there was a dove it could not have checked any more than .000001 percent of the Earths surface, and as such could have not said that there was no land, not that doves can converse with people anyway. However refer back to #1

3. How would the dove know which way to fly to find land anyway if there was land there to be found? However refer back to #1

4. If the dove did find land, and it returned, how would it give the nautical coordinates to follow? Like would it say turn left at the next wave and then go East for 700 wing flaps? However refer back to #1

5. This concludes this test of the Emergency Retard Alert system, if this had been a real retard alert further instructions would have been given.

You belong to the Church of No God. Fine. You feel you need to ridicule any other religion except yours. That just fundamentalism and hate.

It is also obvious you have not read this passage in the Bible. The dove was sent out for several days, when it came back with an olive twig, Noah knew the Flood was nearly over.

The Ark had no engines. It probably had no motive power at all (not even a sail) and no way to steer. Why should it? Where would it go? What nautical coordinate system would it have used??? How do know the Ark even had a compass?? Why would it need it???

Sorry kid doves are not seabirds that can land in the water, they are land birds period so they do not fly over water for days. It is obvious that you are clueless.

Now on to the math of this fake flood, Mount Everest is and was at the time over 29,000 feet tall, meaning that if it was covered with water that sea level was over 29,000 feet higher than today, over the entire globe. LOL where did this water drain into?

Retard alert

Genesis 1:1
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, but later on He became too stupid to figure out where to drain a little water.

Spongy Iris wrote:The solar and lunar winds lifted the ark 15 cubits.

Into the Night wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:Showing that something is "real" is a requirement of science.

No, it is not. The ONLY requirement of any theory of science is that is must be falsifiable.

Into the Night wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So if no one knows who wrote it then no one can verify that it is real.

Irrelevant. No religion is science.

No one is claiming that it is.

Into the Night wrote:

IBdaMann wrote: No religion needs to demonstrate anything to be "real."

While true, the passage in the Bible exists. It is real.

GasGuzzler wrote:Genesis 1:1
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, but later on He became too stupid to figure out where to drain a little water.

GasGuzzler wrote:Are you going to ask me how Jesus fed 5,000 on a couple fish and 5 loaves of bread?

GasGuzzler wrote:Are you going to ask how he made blind men see?

GasGuzzler wrote:How he turned water to wine?

GasGuzzler wrote:How he was resurrected to life after being tortured and killed?

GasGuzzler wrote: Either you accept God and His words, or you reject it.

GasGuzzler wrote:To sqabble over if the flood actually happened because a dove cannot fly 25,000 miles is a waste of bandwidth.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:Showing that something is "real" is a requirement of science.

No, it is not. The ONLY requirement of any theory of science is that is must be falsifiable.

Incorrect.

To be science, it must be a falsifiable model that predicts nature. If it doesn't predict nature, it isn't science.

A video game is a falsifiable model. It isn't science.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So if no one knows who wrote it then no one can verify that it is real.

Irrelevant. No religion is science.

No one is claiming that it is.

Swan did. He was claiming that no one can verify the account in Genesis is real. He's confusing Genesis with science.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

IBdaMann wrote: No religion needs to demonstrate anything to be "real."

While true, the passage in the Bible exists. It is real.

Yet the veracity of the account cannot be verified. Nonetheless, it does not need to be verified for it to be believed. No religion is somehow required to pass the scrutiny of the scientific method.

.

Into the Night wrote:Falsifiable theory. Models aren't falsifiable.

Into the Night wrote:Video games are not falsifiable theories.

Into the Night wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So if no one knows who wrote it then no one can verify that it is real.

Irrelevant. No religion is science.

No one is claiming that it is.

Swan did. He was claiming that no one can verify the account in Genesis is real. He's confusing Genesis with science.

No, he is simply denying ?A->A.

Into the Night wrote:This has nothing to do with science.

Into the Night wrote:It has to do with logic, which he is denying.

Into the Night wrote:Science isn't a method or a procedure. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.

Into the Night wrote:The initial circular argument that is basis of all religions is not a falsifiable theory. It is a nonscientific theory.

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:The solar and lunar winds lifted the ark 15 cubits.

Your version seems consistent thus far.

In your version of the great flood, how did the "rain" persist for forty days and forty nights if it crashed through heaven all at once?

In your version, did the waters prevail for 150 days? If so, whence did they go thereafter? Did they fly back to the moon?

IBdaMann wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:Are you going to ask me how Jesus fed 5,000 on a couple fish and 5 loaves of bread?

GasGuzzler wrote:Wow. Total failure on my part to just assume the boy didn't have 5 Venezuelan monster loafs in his fannie pack and a couple of humpbacks on the stringer.

GasGuzzler wrote: Hope they had a decent macrowave.

IBdaMann wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:Wow. Total failure on my part to just assume the boy didn't have 5 Venezuelan monster loafs in his fannie pack and a couple of humpbacks on the stringer.

Back in those days, before the "European miniaturization", the culinary scale was much larger. We all know what happened to Jonah, and in the Old Testament, fathers would sometimes die from overeating manna (John 6:49).

You get a pass. You can't be expected to have this on your mind constantly.

GasGuzzler wrote: Hope they had a decent macrowave.

They only had a local wave back then, which was sometime called the stadium wave. The advent of the macrowave did not occur until the Renaissance. Some believe that the great flood gave the world its one and only global wave.

There were occasional instances of microwaves, but those occurred only when someone farted in the river.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:Falsifiable theory. Models aren't falsifiable.

You are using your own terminology, which you are of course free to do, however all science theories are models, specifically, they model nature, and they are all falsifiable.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:Video games are not falsifiable theories.

They absolutely are. I don't know how familiar you are with software but all programs are lists of statements with corresponding logic.

IBdaMann wrote:
The video game you see when you play is absolutely the conclusion/theorem of those statements.

IBdaMann wrote:
User input equates to assumptions

IBdaMann wrote:
and a CPU implements the software's logic to arrive at the proper conclusion

IBdaMann wrote:
that is displayed on the screen in the form of the correct graphics/image.

IBdaMann wrote:
There is no requirement for a model to have any connection with reality in order to be a theory.

IBdaMann wrote:
Once again, a video game is entirely a falsifiable model.

IBdaMann wrote:
The software explains exactly in what way it could be shown to be false,

IBdaMann wrote:
which would amount to a bug in the code.

IBdaMann wrote:
Naturally, you are welcome to use your own terms but please define them first.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:[quote]IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:So if no one knows who wrote it then no one can verify that it is real.

Irrelevant. No religion is science.

No one is claiming that it is.

Swan did. He was claiming that no one can verify the account in Genesis is real. He's confusing Genesis with science.

IBdaMann wrote:
No. Swan is claiming that it cannot be verified, as though that is somehow a problem.
Please check his words above.

IBdaMann wrote:
Swan would have a point if Genesis were proposed as a science model, which it is not.

IBdaMann wrote:
Genesis is an account that is believed by Christians and they do not need to explain or justify their belief to anyone.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:This has nothing to do with science.

Correct. Genesis is not science. I take it we agree on this point?

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:It has to do with logic, which he is denying.

Swan is under the impression that Christians are only allowed to believe accounts that are verifiable, and his stated position is that Genesis cannot be verified therefore it cannot be believed.

IBdaMann wrote:
I claim that no Christians who believes in the accounts of Genesis have traveled back in time and verified those accounts, yet they believe nonetheless.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:Science isn't a method or a procedure. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.

Specifically, falsifiable models that predict nature.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:The initial circular argument that is basis of all religions is not a falsifiable theory. It is a nonscientific theory.

It doesn't have to be a circular argument. It can just be an assumption, e.g. the assumption that there is a God. That is sufficient to have theology.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Sorry kid doves are not seabirds that can land in the water,

Never said doves were seabirds. The routinely fly over large stretches of water though.

HarveyH55 wrote:
they are land birds period so they do not fly over water for days.

No one said they did.

HarveyH55 wrote:
It is obvious that you are clueless.

That would be you, since you apparently have no clue what people posted.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Now on to the math of this fake flood,

What math?

HarveyH55 wrote:
Mount Everest is and was at the time over 29,000 feet tall,

How do you know? Were you there?

HarveyH55 wrote:
meaning that if it was covered with water that sea level was over 29,000 feet higher than today, over the entire globe. LOL where did this water drain into?

I already asked this question. So far no answer.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Retard alert

Not an answer. Insulting people is not an answer.

Swan wrote:

Dude you can have this argument for 1000 years or until the day you die, the argument is a complete waste of time as nothing will be verified or proved.

However those with minds know that all water drains into the ocean and that Mount Everest is 29000 feet tall over current sea level, and that this water would have covered the entire Earth and that this water could not drain into the sea because it was already there and that water never leaves the Earth when it evaporates as it just comes back down as rain in another place. So Genesis is bullshit like the babies that argue it as reality

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Dude you can have this argument for 1000 years or until the day you die, the argument is a complete waste of time as nothing will be verified or proved.

However those with minds know that all water drains into the ocean and that Mount Everest is 29000 feet tall over current sea level, and that this water would have covered the entire Earth and that this water could not drain into the sea because it was already there and that water never leaves the Earth when it evaporates as it just comes back down as rain in another place. So Genesis is bullshit like the babies that argue it as reality

The double sun image proves Heaven.

The Lybian glass fields prove the flood.

Genesis is a bullshit confession inspired by a true story.

And nobody wants to admit it, because it would reveal vast levels of fraud.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Sorry kid doves are not seabirds that can land in the water,

Never said doves were seabirds. The routinely fly over large stretches of water though.

HarveyH55 wrote:
they are land birds period so they do not fly over water for days.

No one said they did.

HarveyH55 wrote:
It is obvious that you are clueless.

That would be you, since you apparently have no clue what people posted.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Now on to the math of this fake flood,

What math?

HarveyH55 wrote:
Mount Everest is and was at the time over 29,000 feet tall,

How do you know? Were you there?

HarveyH55 wrote:
meaning that if it was covered with water that sea level was over 29,000 feet higher than today, over the entire globe. LOL where did this water drain into?

I already asked this question. So far no answer.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Retard alert

Not an answer. Insulting people is not an answer.

Dude you can have this argument for 1000 years or until the day you die, the argument is a complete waste of time as nothing will be verified or proved.

However those with minds know that all water drains into the ocean and that Mount Everest is 29000 feet tall over current sea level, and that this water would have covered the entire Earth and that this water could not drain into the sea because it was already there and that water never leaves the Earth when it evaporates as it just comes back down as rain in another place. So Genesis is bullshit like the babies that argue it as reality

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Dude you can have this argument for 1000 years or until the day you die, the argument is a complete waste of time as nothing will be verified or proved.

However those with minds know that all water drains into the ocean and that Mount Everest is 29000 feet tall over current sea level, and that this water would have covered the entire Earth and that this water could not drain into the sea because it was already there and that water never leaves the Earth when it evaporates as it just comes back down as rain in another place. So Genesis is bullshit like the babies that argue it as reality

The double sun image proves Heaven.

Spongy Iris wrote:
The Lybian glass fields prove the flood.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Genesis is a bullshit confession inspired by a true story.

Spongy Iris wrote:
And nobody wants to admit it, because it would reveal vast levels of fraud.

Into the Night wrote:

Yet you deny Heaven. You are locked in paradox.

Glass is not water.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Sorry kid doves are not seabirds that can land in the water,

Never said doves were seabirds. The routinely fly over large stretches of water though.

HarveyH55 wrote:
they are land birds period so they do not fly over water for days.

No one said they did.

HarveyH55 wrote:
It is obvious that you are clueless.

That would be you, since you apparently have no clue what people posted.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Now on to the math of this fake flood,

What math?

HarveyH55 wrote:
Mount Everest is and was at the time over 29,000 feet tall,

How do you know? Were you there?

HarveyH55 wrote:
meaning that if it was covered with water that sea level was over 29,000 feet higher than today, over the entire globe. LOL where did this water drain into?

I already asked this question. So far no answer.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Retard alert

Not an answer. Insulting people is not an answer.

Dude you can have this argument for 1000 years or until the day you die, the argument is a complete waste of time as nothing will be verified or proved.

However those with minds know that all water drains into the ocean and that Mount Everest is 29000 feet tall over current sea level, and that this water would have covered the entire Earth and that this water could not drain into the sea because it was already there and that water never leaves the Earth when it evaporates as it just comes back down as rain in another place. So Genesis is bullshit like the babies that argue it as reality

Genesis is real. It exists. I am not trying to prove Genesis True. You, however, are trying to prove Genesis False. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

Swan wrote:That said why did your fake god kill everyone except noah and his soon to become inbred family?

Swan wrote:Not to mention that two of every animal would cause the inbreeding that would cause the death of everything.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:That said why did your fake god kill everyone except noah and his soon to become inbred family?

We don't have a comprehensive manifest of the ark.

Swan wrote:Not to mention that two of every animal would cause the inbreeding that would cause the death of everything.

There were at least four of each animal. Ten of each clean animal.

They were gathered in pairs, i.e. a pair was considered the unit.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Yet you deny Heaven. You are locked in paradox.

Glass is not water.

How do I deny Heaven?

Heaven is a glass ceiling all around Earth.

When a whole broke in Heaven, the solar and lunar winds came flooding in.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Yet you deny Heaven. You are locked in paradox.

Glass is not water.

How do I deny Heaven?

Heaven is a glass ceiling all around Earth.

When a whole broke in Heaven, the solar and lunar winds came flooding in.

Still waiting on your answer Parrot Boy...

Swan wrote:

Triple lobotomy with 500 volt electroshock treatments recommended.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Triple lobotomy with 500 volt electroshock treatments recommended.

Go to hell quack doctor.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Triple lobotomy with 500 volt electroshock treatments recommended.

Go to hell quack doctor.

Actually I am really interested in your proof that the Earth is inside a glass ceiling.

How did you discover this?

Have you published your discoveries with Alfred E Newman?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Triple lobotomy with 500 volt electroshock treatments recommended.

Go to hell quack doctor.

Actually I am really interested in your proof that the Earth is inside a glass ceiling.

How did you discover this?

Have you published your discoveries with Alfred E Newman?

My signature. The double sun image. That happens because the Sun is behind double pane glass.

And where I first read about the glass in the sky? The Wild Heretic.

https://www.wildheretic.com/there-is-glass-in-the-sky/

I don't agree with all the theories on The Wild Heretic. But I credit them for publishing about glass in the sky before me.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Triple lobotomy with 500 volt electroshock treatments recommended.

Go to hell quack doctor.

Actually I am really interested in your proof that the Earth is inside a glass ceiling.

How did you discover this?

Have you published your discoveries with Alfred E Newman?

My signature. The double sun image. That happens because the Sun is behind double pane glass.

And where I first read about the glass in the sky? The Wild Heretic.

https://www.wildheretic.com/there-is-glass-in-the-sky/

I don't agree with all the theories on The Wild Heretic. But I credit them for publishing about glass in the sky before me.

Swan wrote:


Have you ever been tested for earwigs?

GasGuzzler wrote:

Well shit. Now I'm totally confused. You had me convinced the double sun was proof of too much CO2 in the atmosphere.

Now you're selling a heavenly glass ceiling? OK.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:


Have you ever been tested for earwigs?

Doctors tell me there's no cure for tinnitus, but I think mine should be going away any day now...

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:


Have you ever been tested for earwigs?

Doctors tell me there's no cure for tinnitus, but I think mine should be going away any day now...

Actually only sick people need doctors.

So enjoy being sick.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:


Have you ever been tested for earwigs?

Doctors tell me there's no cure for tinnitus, but I think mine should be going away any day now...

Actually only sick people need doctors.

So enjoy being sick.

Swan please tell us your secret for life everlasting.

Swan wrote:If I went to a doctor I would be told that I have diabetes and that I have bradycardia because my heart gets down to 47bpm at night, after a 50 mile cycle ride during the day,

Swan wrote:I actually had one doctor tell me that I had kidney failure in 2018,

Swan wrote:I walked away and never looked back.

Swan wrote: Might want to challenge him to follow me now being that I am dead according to him. LOL

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:If I went to a doctor I would be told that I have diabetes and that I have bradycardia because my heart gets down to 47bpm at night, after a 50 mile cycle ride during the day,

Have you considered that you might be undead? It would explain the lack of thought put into your posts and why you cannot be forthwith reasoned.

Have you tried arranging for a priest to try performing a resurrection on you, possibly bringing you back to life? If you do, you might finally understand why you don't really know what you merely speculate.

I recommend at least giving it a try.

Swan wrote:I actually had one doctor tell me that I had kidney failure in 2018,

That's what you should expect when you have no vital signs. I bet the doctor had an entire list of your non-functioning organs. I bet he understood the purpose of those bolts on your neck.

Swan wrote:I walked away and never looked back.

The undead normally have that kind of trouble turning their heads.

Swan wrote: Might want to challenge him to follow me now being that I am dead according to him. LOL

He probably considers you "hazardous waste" and doesn't want to get too close. There's a high likelihood that you are carrying an infectious disease that is thriving in your dead flesh.

.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:That said why did your fake god kill everyone except noah and his soon to become inbred family?

We don't have a comprehensive manifest of the ark.

Swan wrote:Not to mention that two of every animal would cause the inbreeding that would cause the death of everything.

There were at least four of each animal. Ten of each clean animal.

They were gathered in pairs, i.e. a pair was considered the unit.