Remember me
▼ Content

White Racism and Global Warming


White Racism and Global Warming21-12-2017 19:48
Wake
★★★★★
(3509)
At the turn of the 20th Century the white race began with the extreme racism demonstrated by the Klu Klux Klan. This eventually led to Hitler but there are more quietly carried out programs.

Margaret Sanger started Planned Parenthood. Among her other comments were:

"We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population..."
-- Letter to Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, December 10, 1939, p. 2
https://libex.smith.edu/omeka/...

(To this day almost all Planned Parenthood offices are in or adjacent to black neighborhoods and 40% of all medical murders are of black babies)

"I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's branch of the Ku Klux Klan... I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak...In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered."
-- Margaret Sanger, An Autobiography, published in 1938, p. 366

The Klu Klux Klan were active into the 1980's and burned some 3,000 blacks and 1,000 Republicans. The Republicans presented ever civil rights act except the 1984 civil rights act and the Fair Housing Act.

And Republican PASSED every civil rights act - mostly by 100% Republicans for an 100% Democrats against. Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was presented by JFK was passed with 80% Republicans for and only 60% of Democrats for. JFK's assassin was a good little Democrat.

The Fair Housing Act has nearly driven this country into bankruptcy rather than supplied fair housing. Since blacks could not generally move into white neighborhoods because of the expense of homes the government started paying their way in the misguided belief that blacks shouldn't have to pay their way like everyone else. They didn't do this for Asians and they are now the racial group with the highest income in this country. Exactly why would people believe that blacks are incapable?

In any case the global warming hysteria boils down to one thing - the white elite do not believe that there should be development in the third world. And that is ALL based in a racism that is sickening. You can see it here in the way that people who haven't the slightest qualifications to speak of science (monckton, litebrain and a few others) INSIST that "we must do something". Though they themselves still take vacations to distant destination that require flying. They own large cars that are gas hogs. They heat their homes excessively. They eat expensive food.

Climate Change believers are almost entirely whites who believe themselves brighter and whiter than anyone else.
21-12-2017 20:27
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed: Republican PASSED every civil rights act - mostly by 100% Republicans for an 100% Democrats against. Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was presented by JFK was passed with 80% Republicans for and only 60% of Democrats for.
Been around this block before. re-pubic-lick-uns voted for lesser rights acts, while dems voted against the lesser rights acts. Of course, when the stronger right acts came up for votes, re-pubic-lick-uns voted against them, while dems voted for them..... thus the 1964 Civil Rights Act came into being..... with improvements there-after, also, that re-pubic-lick-uns voted against. "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" ignores that he was taught this previously & earns its name "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up".
21-12-2017 20:33
Into the Night
★★★★★
(6074)
Wake wrote:
At the turn of the 20th Century the white race began with the extreme racism demonstrated by the Klu Klux Klan. This eventually led to Hitler but there are more quietly carried out programs.

Margaret Sanger started Planned Parenthood. Among her other comments were:

"We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population..."
-- Letter to Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, December 10, 1939, p. 2
https://libex.smith.edu/omeka/...

(To this day almost all Planned Parenthood offices are in or adjacent to black neighborhoods and 40% of all medical murders are of black babies)

"I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's branch of the Ku Klux Klan... I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak...In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered."
-- Margaret Sanger, An Autobiography, published in 1938, p. 366

The Klu Klux Klan were active into the 1980's and burned some 3,000 blacks and 1,000 Republicans. The Republicans presented ever civil rights act except the 1984 civil rights act and the Fair Housing Act.

And Republican PASSED every civil rights act - mostly by 100% Republicans for an 100% Democrats against. Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was presented by JFK was passed with 80% Republicans for and only 60% of Democrats for. JFK's assassin was a good little Democrat.

The Fair Housing Act has nearly driven this country into bankruptcy rather than supplied fair housing. Since blacks could not generally move into white neighborhoods because of the expense of homes the government started paying their way in the misguided belief that blacks shouldn't have to pay their way like everyone else. They didn't do this for Asians and they are now the racial group with the highest income in this country. Exactly why would people believe that blacks are incapable?

In any case the global warming hysteria boils down to one thing - the white elite do not believe that there should be development in the third world. And that is ALL based in a racism that is sickening. You can see it here in the way that people who haven't the slightest qualifications to speak of science (monckton, litebrain and a few others) INSIST that "we must do something". Though they themselves still take vacations to distant destination that require flying. They own large cars that are gas hogs. They heat their homes excessively. They eat expensive food.

Climate Change believers are almost entirely whites who believe themselves brighter and whiter than anyone else.


This itself is a racist post.


The Parrot Killer
21-12-2017 20:37
Wake
★★★★★
(3509)
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed: Republican PASSED every civil rights act - mostly by 100% Republicans for an 100% Democrats against. Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was presented by JFK was passed with 80% Republicans for and only 60% of Democrats for.
Been around this block before. re-pubic-lick-uns voted for lesser rights acts, while dems voted against the lesser rights acts. Of course, when the stronger right acts came up for votes, re-pubic-lick-uns voted against them, while dems voted for them..... thus the 1964 Civil Rights Act came into being..... with improvements there-after, also, that re-pubic-lick-uns voted against. "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" ignores that he was taught this previously & earns its name "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up".


You F-ing scum bag - the Emancipation Proclamation was from a Republican President. The 13th. 14th and 15th Amendments. You are so sick in the mind that you really need to be put down.
21-12-2017 21:48
Into the Night
★★★★★
(6074)
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed: Republican PASSED every civil rights act - mostly by 100% Republicans for an 100% Democrats against. Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was presented by JFK was passed with 80% Republicans for and only 60% of Democrats for.
Been around this block before. re-pubic-lick-uns voted for lesser rights acts, while dems voted against the lesser rights acts. Of course, when the stronger right acts came up for votes, re-pubic-lick-uns voted against them, while dems voted for them..... thus the 1964 Civil Rights Act came into being..... with improvements there-after, also, that re-pubic-lick-uns voted against. "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" ignores that he was taught this previously & earns its name "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up".


You F-ing scum bag - the Emancipation Proclamation was from a Republican President. The 13th. 14th and 15th Amendments. You are so sick in the mind that you really need to be put down.


...and you're going to come up to the Seattle area personally and do that, are you?


The Parrot Killer
21-12-2017 22:34
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed: Republican PASSED every civil rights act - mostly by 100% Republicans for an 100% Democrats against. Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was presented by JFK was passed with 80% Republicans for and only 60% of Democrats for.
Been around this block before. re-pubic-lick-uns voted for lesser rights acts, while dems voted against the lesser rights acts. Of course, when the stronger right acts came up for votes, re-pubic-lick-uns voted against them, while dems voted for them..... thus the 1964 Civil Rights Act came into being..... with improvements there-after, also, that re-pubic-lick-uns voted against. "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" ignores that he was taught this previously & earns its name "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up".
You F-ing scum bag - the Emancipation Proclamation was from a Republican President.
We been arount this here corna before, too. Lincoln in a letter to Horace Greeley:
"I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union....."
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" ignores that he was taught this previously & earns its name "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up".
Edited on 21-12-2017 22:36
21-12-2017 22:40
Into the Night
★★★★★
(6074)
litesong wrote:
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed: Republican PASSED every civil rights act - mostly by 100% Republicans for an 100% Democrats against. Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was presented by JFK was passed with 80% Republicans for and only 60% of Democrats for.
Been around this block before. re-pubic-lick-uns voted for lesser rights acts, while dems voted against the lesser rights acts. Of course, when the stronger right acts came up for votes, re-pubic-lick-uns voted against them, while dems voted for them..... thus the 1964 Civil Rights Act came into being..... with improvements there-after, also, that re-pubic-lick-uns voted against. "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" ignores that he was taught this previously & earns its name "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up".
You F-ing scum bag - the Emancipation Proclamation was from a Republican President.
We been arount this here corna before, too. Lincoln in a letter to Horace Greeley:
"I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union....."
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" ignores that he was taught this previously & earns its name "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up".


As is often the case...this letter is taken out of context.

People today have no appreciation for what public attitudes or what the various opinions even were then.


The Parrot Killer
Edited on 21-12-2017 22:41
21-12-2017 23:36
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" bluffed:...People today have no appreciation for what public attitudes or what the various opinions even were then.
It good to know that Lincoln couldn't express himself properly.... altho he expressed himself well in the letter.
21-12-2017 23:39
Wake
★★★★★
(3509)
Into the Night wrote:
litesong wrote:
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed: Republican PASSED every civil rights act - mostly by 100% Republicans for an 100% Democrats against. Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that was presented by JFK was passed with 80% Republicans for and only 60% of Democrats for.
Been around this block before. re-pubic-lick-uns voted for lesser rights acts, while dems voted against the lesser rights acts. Of course, when the stronger right acts came up for votes, re-pubic-lick-uns voted against them, while dems voted for them..... thus the 1964 Civil Rights Act came into being..... with improvements there-after, also, that re-pubic-lick-uns voted against. "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" ignores that he was taught this previously & earns its name "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up".
You F-ing scum bag - the Emancipation Proclamation was from a Republican President.
We been arount this here corna before, too. Lincoln in a letter to Horace Greeley:
"I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union....."
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" ignores that he was taught this previously & earns its name "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up".


As is often the case...this letter is taken out of context.

People today have no appreciation for what public attitudes or what the various opinions even were then.


Not only taken out of context but a YEAR after the civil war had already begun.

The Emancipation Proclamation was yet to come and this was an excuse for Greeley who was a major newspaper owner to publish some political excuses for the yet to come proclamation.
Edited on 21-12-2017 23:44
22-12-2017 05:20
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed: Not only taken out of context but a YEAR after the civil war had already begun. The Emancipation Proclamation was yet to come...
So Lincoln wasn't the Great Emancipator at the being of the war.... not even the 2nd year....oh, yeah.... the third year. Lincoln was the Great Emancipator for Native Tribes tho. Lincoln oversaw the largest hanging of Native Tribe human beings in U.S. history, emancipating them from life.
22-12-2017 05:27
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed:...this was an excuse for Greeley who was a major newspaper owner to publish some political excuses for the yet to come proclamation.
The "excuses" were the words of Lincoln, carefully thought out & phrased.
22-12-2017 18:31
Wake
★★★★★
(3509)
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed:...this was an excuse for Greeley who was a major newspaper owner to publish some political excuses for the yet to come proclamation.
The "excuses" were the words of Lincoln, carefully thought out & phrased.


More than anything else you've posted here this shows what an incredible and uneducated ass your are. You don't even know the history of the country you claim to live in.

The civil war was NOT about slavery from the southern prospective. The south was almost entirely rural and agricultural whereas the north was urban and industrialized. The US Government was controlled mostly by northern interests and instead of fair taxation was heavily taxing agricultural products of the south. This is what caused the secession.

The north was also heavily controlled by a anti-slavery contingent. So while the Confederacy was formed to protect the south from a military contingent from the north who were anti-slavery, the south was anti-taxation from the US Government.

The industrialization of agriculture would very soon have caused slavery to be far more expensive than it was worth and so the civil war only sped up what was coming. Moreover, since an entire generation of both north and south was killed by the civil war this animus was transferred to the blacks which would never have occurred had the taxation of the south which led to the civil war not occurred.

But as a stupid ass you know nothing of this and shoot your ignorance out for all to see. No wonder you talk to yourself.
22-12-2017 20:05
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed:....The industrialization of agriculture would very soon have caused slavery to be far more expensive than it was worth and so the civil war only sped up what was coming.
Agree. Slaves, which were cheap in the 1700 to early 1800's, were getting very expensive after 1850, plus the discovered need to maintain their health (ya lose your investment with dead slaves). With an increasingly expensive labor force harvesting ever decreasing value cotton, the South should have been allowed to secede from the Union. The South would have been clamoring to be back in the Union before the 1890's.
Still & all, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" remains an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener.
Edited on 22-12-2017 20:05
22-12-2017 21:02
Wake
★★★★★
(3509)
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed:....The industrialization of agriculture would very soon have caused slavery to be far more expensive than it was worth and so the civil war only sped up what was coming.
Agree. Slaves, which were cheap in the 1700 to early 1800's, were getting very expensive after 1850, plus the discovered need to maintain their health (ya lose your investment with dead slaves). With an increasingly expensive labor force harvesting ever decreasing value cotton, the South should have been allowed to secede from the Union. The South would have been clamoring to be back in the Union before the 1890's.
Still & all, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" remains an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time (plus 1) threatener.


There isn't anything you can understand even if it's explained to you in detail. I suggest you commit suicide and end your stupidity.
22-12-2017 21:31
Into the Night
★★★★★
(6074)
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed:...this was an excuse for Greeley who was a major newspaper owner to publish some political excuses for the yet to come proclamation.
The "excuses" were the words of Lincoln, carefully thought out & phrased.


More than anything else you've posted here this shows what an incredible and uneducated ass your are. You don't even know the history of the country you claim to live in.

The civil war was NOT about slavery from the southern prospective.

It kind of was, indirectly.
Wake wrote:
The south was almost entirely rural and agricultural whereas the north was urban and industrialized.

True.
Wake wrote:
The US Government was controlled mostly by northern interests and instead of fair taxation was heavily taxing agricultural products of the south. This is what caused the secession.

While that was a factor, the secession of the various southern States from the union was about the federal governments attempt to ignore the 4th and 10th amendments, seizing property in the southern States (the slaves and real property). Lincoln had the right idea, but he was an ass when it came to implementing it.
Wake wrote:
The north was also heavily controlled by a anti-slavery contingent. So while the Confederacy was formed to protect the south from a military contingent from the north who were anti-slavery, the south was anti-taxation from the US Government.

Not just anti-tax, but also insisted that the US government adhere to its Constitution. Slaves are property.

At the time, there were various factions forming around the slave problem. Some wanted to keep it. Some wanted to end it, but compensate the slave owners for their loss. Some wanted to end it and NOT compensate the slave owners for their loss. Some wanted to end it and seize the slave owners real property and give it to the former slaves. Lincoln was part of this last group. Naturally, the South seceded from the union, realizing that there was no other solution to this flagrant violation of the 4th and 10th amendments. Naturally, when the North kept armies in what was now a foreign country, the South fought back. The war was a result of a crisis in our Constitution.

True, it did result in emancipation of the slaves (reinforced by Republicans again in the 60's), but it came at a terrible cost to the founding documents of our nation.

The United States never has had a civil war. This was a war of secession, rather than a civil war. Most people living here have no idea what a civil war looks like. There is a very real possibility of that kind of war in our near future.
Wake wrote:
The industrialization of agriculture would very soon have caused slavery to be far more expensive than it was worth and so the civil war only sped up what was coming.

Slavery was always expensive. It cost quite a bit of money to capture people in Africa, sell them to the slave ships, sail across the Atlantic, then put these unfortunate people on sale. A slave owner had to pay for all this. Only the rich could afford it. Many at the time considered the number of slaves a sign of wealth. Some things changed very little throughout history.
Wake wrote:
Moreover, since an entire generation of both north and south was killed by the civil war this animus was transferred to the blacks which would never have occurred had the taxation of the south which led to the civil war not occurred.

Most of these freed slaves, when they voted, naturally voted Republican. They were grateful for what Lincoln had done. It was only later, when the cheap gifts and coercive techniques of the Democrats were applied, that these people began voting Democrat again.
Wake wrote:
But as a stupid ass you know nothing of this and shoot your ignorance out for all to see. No wonder you talk to yourself.

You brought up some valid points from history, but you ignored certain major factors concerning the War of Secession.


The Parrot Killer
22-12-2017 21:33
Into the Night
★★★★★
(6074)
Wake wrote:
There isn't anything you can understand even if it's explained to you in detail. I suggest you commit suicide and end your stupidity.


Why do you like to boast about killing people? Why do you like to suggest others commit suicide? Why do you like to threaten people?

You've got a problem, dude.


The Parrot Killer
30-12-2017 01:27
Wake
★★★★★
(3509)
Into the Night wrote:
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener (plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed:...this was an excuse for Greeley who was a major newspaper owner to publish some political excuses for the yet to come proclamation.
The "excuses" were the words of Lincoln, carefully thought out & phrased.


More than anything else you've posted here this shows what an incredible and uneducated ass your are. You don't even know the history of the country you claim to live in.

The civil war was NOT about slavery from the southern prospective.

It kind of was, indirectly.
Wake wrote:
The south was almost entirely rural and agricultural whereas the north was urban and industrialized.

True.
Wake wrote:
The US Government was controlled mostly by northern interests and instead of fair taxation was heavily taxing agricultural products of the south. This is what caused the secession.

While that was a factor, the secession of the various southern States from the union was about the federal governments attempt to ignore the 4th and 10th amendments, seizing property in the southern States (the slaves and real property). Lincoln had the right idea, but he was an ass when it came to implementing it.
Wake wrote:
The north was also heavily controlled by a anti-slavery contingent. So while the Confederacy was formed to protect the south from a military contingent from the north who were anti-slavery, the south was anti-taxation from the US Government.

Not just anti-tax, but also insisted that the US government adhere to its Constitution. Slaves are property.

At the time, there were various factions forming around the slave problem. Some wanted to keep it. Some wanted to end it, but compensate the slave owners for their loss. Some wanted to end it and NOT compensate the slave owners for their loss. Some wanted to end it and seize the slave owners real property and give it to the former slaves. Lincoln was part of this last group. Naturally, the South seceded from the union, realizing that there was no other solution to this flagrant violation of the 4th and 10th amendments. Naturally, when the North kept armies in what was now a foreign country, the South fought back. The war was a result of a crisis in our Constitution.

True, it did result in emancipation of the slaves (reinforced by Republicans again in the 60's), but it came at a terrible cost to the founding documents of our nation.

The United States never has had a civil war. This was a war of secession, rather than a civil war. Most people living here have no idea what a civil war looks like. There is a very real possibility of that kind of war in our near future.
Wake wrote:
The industrialization of agriculture would very soon have caused slavery to be far more expensive than it was worth and so the civil war only sped up what was coming.

Slavery was always expensive. It cost quite a bit of money to capture people in Africa, sell them to the slave ships, sail across the Atlantic, then put these unfortunate people on sale. A slave owner had to pay for all this. Only the rich could afford it. Many at the time considered the number of slaves a sign of wealth. Some things changed very little throughout history.
Wake wrote:
Moreover, since an entire generation of both north and south was killed by the civil war this animus was transferred to the blacks which would never have occurred had the taxation of the south which led to the civil war not occurred.

Most of these freed slaves, when they voted, naturally voted Republican. They were grateful for what Lincoln had done. It was only later, when the cheap gifts and coercive techniques of the Democrats were applied, that these people began voting Democrat again.
Wake wrote:
But as a stupid ass you know nothing of this and shoot your ignorance out for all to see. No wonder you talk to yourself.

You brought up some valid points from history, but you ignored certain major factors concerning the War of Secession.


As is usual you know as little about history as you do everything else.

Only 10% of the South owned slaves and of those only 10% owned more than a single slave.

Most slaves were nothing more than a field hand that slept in the same quarters and ate at the same table with his "master". Regular white field hands had exactly the same deal. A slave cost $500 and you sure as hell weren't going to throw away that fortune by treating a slave badly.

So it was crippling farm product tariffs that caused the secession and not slavery and worries about it. Most southerners could live their entire life and never even see a slave. What the hell would they care about retaining slavery?

Slavery was dead on the vine anyway. The Cotton Gin and coming advances of technology made industrialization of farming FAR cheaper than retaining slaves.

If Lincoln hadn't gone with his Christian views of abolition and simply bade his time slavery would have fallen apart of its own weight. And then instead of a nation angry from the lost of an entire generation and blaming it on the blacks. we would have had a nation suffering under knowing that they had sinned and embarrassed that they could have done that to other humans.

This nation would have been dramatically different. Or you can go with litebrain and tell us that the white man was the worst thing that ever happened to this Earth.
10-06-2018 06:01
moncktonProfile picture★★★☆☆
(436)
Wake wrote:
At the turn of the 20th Century the white race began with the extreme racism demonstrated by the Klu Klux Klan.


I struggled to put my finger on it, but this sock puppet never really did sound black. I always used to say it wrong the same way myself - but then again, I was never chased to death by the cunts.
It's a whitie thing - it's probably because of the same John Wayne movie.

Ku Klux Klan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan


"Bring us your sick and tired, your educated ..."
Edited on 10-06-2018 06:12
10-06-2018 18:41
Wake
★★★★★
(3509)
monckton wrote:
I struggled to put my finger on it, but this sock puppet never really did sound black. I always used to say it wrong the same way myself - but then again, I was never chased to death by the cunts.
It's a whitie thing - it's probably because of the same John Wayne movie.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan


Being identified for what you are seems to disturb you. I suppose it's the English in you but your intent to refuse energy to the third world is rooted in racism and not in belief in AGW.
10-06-2018 20:30
moncktonProfile picture★★★☆☆
(436)
I thought it was supposed to be the blue blood.
Come on, you've got to get the name of the Klan right or at least move with the times and call it the NRA.
Even Rachel Dolezal wouldn't make such a schoolboy error, it's blackface 101.
And this oil mans burden your selling, stop you'll make me cry.




Join the debate White Racism and Global Warming:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
White House approves report - humans are causing global warming - starkly contradicts Trump - Nov 2017419-01-2018 23:14
New Federal Report, Approved by White House, Predicts 5C Rise by 21007318-11-2017 18:25
White House Petition: The United States must stop investing in fossil fuels and lead the global efforts t602-02-2017 20:16
Gore finally got his white whale after 11yrs.107-10-2016 14:23
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2017 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact